Capital Values, Job Values, and the Joint Behavior of Hiring and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

capital values job values and the joint behavior of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Capital Values, Job Values, and the Joint Behavior of Hiring and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Capital Values, Job Values, and the Joint Behavior of Hiring and Investment Eran Yashiv Discussion by David Weiss June 22, 2014 Mazel Tov! Idea Hiring (investment) depend on value of a worker (capital). Volatile. Want to understand


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Capital Values, Job Values, and the Joint Behavior

  • f Hiring and Investment

Eran Yashiv

Discussion by David Weiss

June 22, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mazel Tov!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Idea

◮ Hiring (investment) depend on value of a worker (capital). ◮ Volatile. Want to understand them. ◮ MB (PV) = MC. Not directly observable. ◮ Infer from an estimated structural model. ◮ Eran: Maybe MC of workers & capital move together?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Idea

◮ Hiring (investment) depend on value of a worker (capital). ◮ Volatile. Want to understand them. ◮ MB (PV) = MC. Not directly observable. ◮ Infer from an estimated structural model. ◮ Eran: Maybe MC of workers & capital move together?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Idea

◮ Hiring (investment) depend on value of a worker (capital). ◮ Volatile. Want to understand them. ◮ MB (PV) = MC. Not directly observable. ◮ Infer from an estimated structural model. ◮ Eran: Maybe MC of workers & capital move together?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Idea

◮ Hiring (investment) depend on value of a worker (capital). ◮ Volatile. Want to understand them. ◮ MB (PV) = MC. Not directly observable. ◮ Infer from an estimated structural model. ◮ Eran: Maybe MC of workers & capital move together?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Idea

◮ Hiring (investment) depend on value of a worker (capital). ◮ Volatile. Want to understand them. ◮ MB (PV) = MC. Not directly observable. ◮ Infer from an estimated structural model. ◮ Eran: Maybe MC of workers & capital move together?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What to do?

◮ Partial equilibrium RBC model. KISS Principle. ◮ Key: Use ’g’ function- interaction of investment and hiring in

marginal costs. Shocks to demand (PV).

◮ Adjustment costs => rents. ◮ Data on GDP, capital, investment, hiring, prices of investment ◮ See what estimates give. Gets reasonable costs. Pro cyclical

investment, countercyclical hiring. Best to coordinate hiring/investing.

◮ Compare with search literature/finance literature.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What to do?

◮ Partial equilibrium RBC model. KISS Principle. ◮ Key: Use ’g’ function- interaction of investment and hiring in

marginal costs. Shocks to demand (PV).

◮ Adjustment costs => rents. ◮ Data on GDP, capital, investment, hiring, prices of investment ◮ See what estimates give. Gets reasonable costs. Pro cyclical

investment, countercyclical hiring. Best to coordinate hiring/investing.

◮ Compare with search literature/finance literature.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

What to do?

◮ Partial equilibrium RBC model. KISS Principle. ◮ Key: Use ’g’ function- interaction of investment and hiring in

marginal costs. Shocks to demand (PV).

◮ Adjustment costs => rents. ◮ Data on GDP, capital, investment, hiring, prices of investment ◮ See what estimates give. Gets reasonable costs. Pro cyclical

investment, countercyclical hiring. Best to coordinate hiring/investing.

◮ Compare with search literature/finance literature.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What to do?

◮ Partial equilibrium RBC model. KISS Principle. ◮ Key: Use ’g’ function- interaction of investment and hiring in

marginal costs. Shocks to demand (PV).

◮ Adjustment costs => rents. ◮ Data on GDP, capital, investment, hiring, prices of investment ◮ See what estimates give. Gets reasonable costs. Pro cyclical

investment, countercyclical hiring. Best to coordinate hiring/investing.

◮ Compare with search literature/finance literature.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What to do?

◮ Partial equilibrium RBC model. KISS Principle. ◮ Key: Use ’g’ function- interaction of investment and hiring in

marginal costs. Shocks to demand (PV).

◮ Adjustment costs => rents. ◮ Data on GDP, capital, investment, hiring, prices of investment ◮ See what estimates give. Gets reasonable costs. Pro cyclical

investment, countercyclical hiring. Best to coordinate hiring/investing.

◮ Compare with search literature/finance literature.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What to do?

◮ Partial equilibrium RBC model. KISS Principle. ◮ Key: Use ’g’ function- interaction of investment and hiring in

marginal costs. Shocks to demand (PV).

◮ Adjustment costs => rents. ◮ Data on GDP, capital, investment, hiring, prices of investment ◮ See what estimates give. Gets reasonable costs. Pro cyclical

investment, countercyclical hiring. Best to coordinate hiring/investing.

◮ Compare with search literature/finance literature.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The ’g’ Function Agenda

◮ Yashiv and Merz (2007)- Helps understand firm market

valuations.

◮ Yashiv and Faccini (2014 wp)-Important for understanding

inflation.

◮ Yashiv (2014)- Important for understanding hiring/investment

rates

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The ’g’ Function Agenda

◮ Yashiv and Merz (2007)- Helps understand firm market

valuations.

◮ Yashiv and Faccini (2014 wp)-Important for understanding

inflation.

◮ Yashiv (2014)- Important for understanding hiring/investment

rates

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The ’g’ Function Agenda

◮ Yashiv and Merz (2007)- Helps understand firm market

valuations.

◮ Yashiv and Faccini (2014 wp)-Important for understanding

inflation.

◮ Yashiv (2014)- Important for understanding hiring/investment

rates

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Where to go from here?

More micro model

◮ Firm entry/growth & the relationship between hiring &

investment

◮ Take view that shock to demand (PV) => marginal costs

  • change. Shocks to costs, not demand?

Look at more stuff based on this notion

◮ Implications of taxes not well studied

◮ I bring this up because: V/N U/N Time Series

◮ Dramatic cut of corporate/dividend taxes in 1980s. Rise in

borrowing.

◮ Argument that this led to great moderation. ◮ Maybe jobless recoveries? Erem Atesagaoglu

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Where to go from here?

More micro model

◮ Firm entry/growth & the relationship between hiring &

investment

◮ Take view that shock to demand (PV) => marginal costs

  • change. Shocks to costs, not demand?

Look at more stuff based on this notion

◮ Implications of taxes not well studied

◮ I bring this up because: V/N U/N Time Series

◮ Dramatic cut of corporate/dividend taxes in 1980s. Rise in

borrowing.

◮ Argument that this led to great moderation. ◮ Maybe jobless recoveries? Erem Atesagaoglu

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Where to go from here?

More micro model

◮ Firm entry/growth & the relationship between hiring &

investment

◮ Take view that shock to demand (PV) => marginal costs

  • change. Shocks to costs, not demand?

Look at more stuff based on this notion

◮ Implications of taxes not well studied

◮ I bring this up because: V/N U/N Time Series

◮ Dramatic cut of corporate/dividend taxes in 1980s. Rise in

borrowing.

◮ Argument that this led to great moderation. ◮ Maybe jobless recoveries? Erem Atesagaoglu

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Where to go from here?

More micro model

◮ Firm entry/growth & the relationship between hiring &

investment

◮ Take view that shock to demand (PV) => marginal costs

  • change. Shocks to costs, not demand?

Look at more stuff based on this notion

◮ Implications of taxes not well studied

◮ I bring this up because: V/N U/N Time Series

◮ Dramatic cut of corporate/dividend taxes in 1980s. Rise in

borrowing.

◮ Argument that this led to great moderation. ◮ Maybe jobless recoveries? Erem Atesagaoglu

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Where to go from here?

More micro model

◮ Firm entry/growth & the relationship between hiring &

investment

◮ Take view that shock to demand (PV) => marginal costs

  • change. Shocks to costs, not demand?

Look at more stuff based on this notion

◮ Implications of taxes not well studied

◮ I bring this up because: V/N U/N Time Series

◮ Dramatic cut of corporate/dividend taxes in 1980s. Rise in

borrowing.

◮ Argument that this led to great moderation. ◮ Maybe jobless recoveries? Erem Atesagaoglu

slide-22
SLIDE 22

A Few Minor Comments

◮ Separation rates perhaps should be gross as well. Currently

uses ψ = EN+EU

E

. Why not ψ = EN+EU+EE

E

?

◮ Finds that Qn is countercyclical, as hiring rates countercyclical.

◮ We have data that perhaps can relate to this- Haefke et al

(2010) finds that elasticity of wages wrt productivity > 1

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A Few Minor Comments

◮ Separation rates perhaps should be gross as well. Currently

uses ψ = EN+EU

E

. Why not ψ = EN+EU+EE

E

?

◮ Finds that Qn is countercyclical, as hiring rates countercyclical.

◮ We have data that perhaps can relate to this- Haefke et al

(2010) finds that elasticity of wages wrt productivity > 1

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Cool!

◮ Nice paper. I learned a lot! Thanks for having me discuss. ◮ Some interesting avenues for future work.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Erem Atesagaoglu

Figure:

Back .

slide-26
SLIDE 26

More Erem Atesagaoglu

Figure:

Back .

slide-27
SLIDE 27

UV Rates

Figure:

Back .

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Time Series

Figure:

Back .