california assessment of student
play

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Accountability and Reporting Ekaterina P. Forrester Sara Shore Final Scoring For each student, the responses from the PT and CAT portions are merged for final scoring.


  1. California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Accountability and Reporting Ekaterina P. Forrester Sara Shore

  2. Final Scoring • For each student, the responses from the PT and CAT portions are merged for final scoring. • Resulting ability estimates are based on the specific test questions that a student answered, not the total number of items answered correctly. • Higher ability estimates are associated with test takers who correctly answer difficult and more discriminating items. • Lower ability estimates are associated with test takers who correctly answer easier and less discriminating items. • Two students will have the same ability estimate if they have the same set of test questions with the same responses. • It is possible for students to have the same ability estimate through different response patterns

  3. Final Scoring: Contribution of CAT and PT Sections Number of Items defined by Test Blueprints ELA/Literacy Mathematics Grade CAT PT CAT PT 3 – 5 38 – 41 5 – 6 31 – 34 2 – 6 6 – 8 37 – 42 5 – 6 30 – 34 2 – 6 39 – 41 5 – 6 33 – 36 2 – 6 11

  4. Final Scoring: Contribution of CAT and PT Sections (cont.) • Based on the test blueprint, the CAT section is emphasized because there are more CAT items/points than PT items/points. • Claims with more items/points are emphasized. • Mathematics: Concepts and Procedures  Problem Solving/Modeling and Data Analysis  Communicating Reasoning • ELA: Reading  Writing  Speaking/Listening  Research • Groups of items that are more difficult and discriminating will have a larger contribution on final scores. • Therefore there is no specific weight associated with either PT or CAT Sections CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  5. Smarter Balanced Scale Score Ranges by Grade Level Grade Subject Min Max Subject Min Max 3 ELA 2114 2623 Mathematics 2189 2621 4 ELA 2131 2663 Mathematics 2204 2659 5 ELA 2201 2701 Mathematics 2219 2700 6 ELA 2210 2724 Mathematics 2235 2748 7 ELA 2258 2745 Mathematics 2250 2778 8 ELA 2288 2769 Mathematics 2265 2802 11 ELA 2299 2795 Mathematics 2280 2862 CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  6. Achievement Levels • Achievement level classifications based on overall scores • Level 1 — Standard Not Met • Level 2 — Standard Nearly Met • Level 3 — Standard Met (College and Career Readiness) • Level 4 — Standard Exceeded CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  7. Overall Scores – 2 Areas, 4 Levels English Language Arts and Mathematics Exceeded the Standard Met the Standard Nearly Met the Standard Has Not Met the Standard CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  8. Achievement Levels by Grade CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  9. Smarter Balanced Scale Score Ranges for ELA/Literacy Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Standard Standard Standard Standard Grade NOT Met Nearly Met Met Exceeded 2114 – 2366 2367 – 2431 2432 – 2489 2490 – 2623 3 2131 – 2415 2416 – 2472 2473 – 2532 2533 – 2663 4 2201 – 2441 2442 – 2501 2502 – 2581 2582 – 2701 5 2210 – 2456 2457 – 2530 2531 – 2617 2618 – 2724 6 2258 – 2478 2479 – 2551 2552 – 2648 2649 – 2745 7 2288 – 2486 2487 – 2566 2567 – 2667 2668 – 2769 8 2299 – 2492 2493 – 2582 2583 – 2681 2682 – 2795 11 CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  10. Achievement Levels by Grade CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  11. Smarter Balanced Scale Score Ranges for Mathematics Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Standard Standard Standard Standard Grade NOT Met Nearly Met Met Exceeded 2189 – 2380 2381 – 2435 2436 – 2500 2501 – 2621 3 2204 – 2410 2411 – 2484 2485 – 2548 2549 – 2659 4 2219 – 2454 2455 – 2527 2528 – 2578 2579 – 2700 5 2235 – 2472 2473 – 2551 2552 – 2609 2610 – 2748 6 2250 – 2483 2484 – 2566 2567 – 2634 2635 – 2778 7 2265 – 2503 2504 – 2585 2586 – 2652 2653 – 2802 8 2280 – 2542 2543 – 2627 2628 – 2717 2718 – 2862 11 CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  12. Measurement Precision: Error Bands • For each scale score estimated for a student, there is measurement error associated with each score. • An error band is a useful tool that describes the measurement error associated with a reported scale score. • The error bands used to construct interval estimates were based on one standard error of measurement. • If the same test is given to student multiple times, about 68 percent of the time, the student will score within this band. CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  13. Elements of the Student Score Report Back Page Front Page 5 1 2 3 6 7 4 8

  14. Elements of the Student Score Report Front Page 3

  15. Elements of the Student Score Report Front Page 4

  16. Achievement Levels for Claims • Achievement Levels for claims are very similar to subscores. They provide supplemental information regarding a student’s strengths or weaknesses. • No achievement level setting occurred for claims. • Only three achievement levels for claims were developed since there are fewer items within each claim. • Achievement levels for claims are based on the distance a student’s performance on the claim is from the Level 3 proficiency cut. • A student must complete all items within a claim to receive an estimate of his or performance on a claim. CDE/ETS 2015 Post-Test Workshop: Reporting Summative Assessment Results

  17. Additional Scores – 3 levels • English Language Arts Above Standard 1.Reading Above Standard 2.Writing 3.Speaking & Listening 4.Research/Inquiry At/Near Standard At/Near Standard • Mathematics 1.Concepts & Procedures 2.Problem Solving & 4. Modeling & Data Below Standard Analysis Below Standard 3.Communicating Reasoning

  18. Elements of the Student Score Report Back Page 5

  19. Elements of the Student Score Report Back Page 6

  20. Elements of the Student Score Report Back Page 7

  21. Elements of the Student Score Report: Science Grades 5, 8, & 10 only Back Page 8

  22. Elements of the Student Score Report: Early Assessment Program Grade 11 only Back Page 8

  23. ELA Percent of Students in Each Achivement Level SBAC 2015, CST 2003, 2013 100 4 6 8 7 9 11 12 12 13 18 90 22 19 30 17 17 19 80 19 25 20 26 25 70 33 31 32 60 34 42 28 30 27 40 22 30 50 35 40 33 30 34 26 45 42 42 20 41 40 36 36 34 27 10 16 15 13 0 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced 23

  24. ELA Percent of Students in Each Achivement Level SBAC 2015, CST 2003, 2013 100 3 4 5 6 8 13 12 18 90 16 23 18 20 28 80 30 29 30 70 34 36 60 35 33 29 50 34 25 30 34 40 31 30 33 45 45 43 20 37 33 28 25 10 17 11 0 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced 24

  25. Mathematics Percent of Students in Each Achivement Level SBAC 2015, CST 2003, 2013 100 5 6 8 8 10 11 12 14 20 90 19 28 31 20 19 15 38 13 80 23 24 25 70 30 27 25 60 32 33 31 28 29 39 50 30 26 30 40 29 20 30 23 50 50 20 43 41 20 40 35 35 34 22 10 21 18 13 0 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced 25

  26. Mathematics Percent of Students in Each Achivement Level SBAC 2015, CST 2003, 2013 100 1 1 3 3 3 10 9 8 8 12 17 90 17 17 14 26 16 80 27 31 29 70 27 35 34 29 60 30 33 50 30 40 28 64 30 58 53 48 46 45 20 38 30 10 20 0 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 SBAC 2015 CST 2003 CST 2013 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced 26

  27. SBAC Claims and Sample Items New Ways of Assessing Learning 27

  28. 28

  29. KDS’ SBAC Claims, Targets, Standards Alignment http://www.keydatasys.com/ 29

  30. Finding Claim, Target, DOK, Standards Tables Google: Claims Targets Standards Riverside or go to KeyDataSys.com under Educational Resources

  31. Assessment Claims for ELA • Overall ELA Claim (Grades 3-8) • “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” • Overall ELA Claim (High School) • “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in English language arts and literacy.” http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Smarter-Balanced-ELA-Literacy- Claims.pdf 31

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend