Calf Rearing and Calf Health Emer Kennedy Animal & Grassland - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

calf rearing and calf health
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Calf Rearing and Calf Health Emer Kennedy Animal & Grassland - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Calf Rearing and Calf Health Emer Kennedy Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork emer.kennedy@teagasc.ie Calf Welfare is there an issue? Calf mortality 7 6 No calves dying in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Calf Rearing and Calf Health

Emer Kennedy

Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork emer.kennedy@teagasc.ie

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Calf mortality

Calf Welfare – is there an issue?

IgG mg/ml Visit 1 31 Visit 2 28 Bulls 29 Heifers 30

  • No calves dying in first 6

week reducing

  • Low by international

standards On-farm survey

Of samples tested:

  • 9.6 % had FPT of

immunity

  • Mortality rate twice as

high among FPT calves

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Dead at birth, % Dead at 28 days, %

slide-3
SLIDE 3

On-farm survey: Volume fed to Calves

3

No difference in

colostrum volume fed

between bulls/heifer Volume Percentage < 2L 3 2-3 L 59 3-4 L 17 Unknown 21

Bulls receiving 6 L/day Heifers 6.25 L/day OAD feeding on 38 % farms.. from 23 days.. 5 L/day

Bulls Heifers Waste Milk 34.04 17.02 Whole milk + Waste Milk 42.55 23.40 Milk Replacer 8.51 42.55 Whole milk 12.77 14.89 Yoghurt milk 2.13 2.13

Post Colostrum Milk feeding

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Environmental assessment

  • Hygiene of feeding equipment
  • Influences transmission of disease
  • ‘3M™ Surface Hygiene Test Kit’
  • Bacteria / Milk protein residue
  • Four point scale
  • 1= Clean , 4 = High level of residue

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Survey: Environmental assessment

  • First visit: 2.29

5

Feeding implement Avg Hygiene score (1-4) Group feeders 2.28 Automatic feeders 1.00 Bottle & teat 4.00 Individual feeder 2.46 Stomach tube 4.00

Young calves exposed to unhygienic equipment …

Feeding implement Avg Hygiene score Group feeders 2.97 Automatic feeders 1.00 Bottle & teat 2.42 Individual feeder 1.89 Stomach tube 4.00

  • Second visit: 2.76
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Achieving adequate passive transfer (APT)

3 key factors for APT 1) Quality of colostrum 2) Timing of feeding 3) Volume of colostrum

When a neonatal calf absorbs an adequate quantity of immunoglobulins

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The risks associated with poor colostrum management

7

There are many negative consequences of failure of passive transfer (FPT) :

  • increased risk of disease and death,
  • slower growth rates
  • reduction in long-term productivity
  • decreased milk production in later life
  • increased culling rate during the first lactation
  • delayed time to first insemination
slide-8
SLIDE 8

New Calf Born …… 1 am

Go back to bed??? Feed Colostrum

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Why is colostrum important?

  • No transfer of immunoglobulins

between cow and calf

  • Placenta separates maternal

and foetal blood supplies

  • Calf is almost entirely

dependent on absorption of maternal immunoglobulins from colostrum

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Factors affecting colostrum quality

(4) Weight of colostrum

IgG concentration decreased by 1.7 g/L per kg increase in the colostrum weight

(2) Time interval (1) Parity (3) Month of calving

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Other Factors Affecting Colostrum Quality

  • Lactation number
  • Length of the non-lactating period (if less than 3 weeks)
  • High ambient temperature pre-calving
  • Breed of cow
  • Quality of colostrum in beef breeds is generally better than in

dairy breeds

  • Average values in most studies well above 100 g/L - good

enough to provide adequate passive transfer, as long as supervision is provided to ensure colostral intake

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Changes in IgG content between milkings

Milking number IgG g/L Transition milk Colostrum

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Testing colostrum quality

Refractometer

Place few drops of colostrum here Look through eye piece What you see through the eye piece Values greater than 22% represent high quality colostrum suitable for calves 1st feed

slide-14
SLIDE 14

When should colostrum be fed?

Within hours of birth

slide-15
SLIDE 15

10 20 30 40 50 6 12 18 24

Hours after birth

Efficiency of IgG absorption (%)

Maximum absorption within 2 hours

How soon should colostrum be fed?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

How much colostrum to feed?

Feed at least litres

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pooling of colostrum

  • Pooling is not recommended
  • Pooling Risks

– Dilution – Disease spread (Johne’s Disease)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Treatment

Own dam Other dam Pooled SEM P-value

Colostrum IgG (mg/ml)

88.55a 94.18b 87.41a 1.66 <0.01

24 h serum IgG (mg/ml)

44.53a 43.84a 40.50b 0.64 <0.01

AEA* (%)

55.39a 54.07a 51.52b 0.76 <0.01

Effect of colostrum origin on antibody absorption

*AEA is apparent efficiency of absorption

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Colostrum storage

  • Colostrum should be collected & stored in clean containers
  • Refrigerate within 6 hours of collection
  • Bacterial growth highest in first 6 hours
  • Will last for 48 hours when refrigerated
  • Colostrum can be frozen for up to a year

10 20 30 40 50 Past Fresh 4 deg 13 deg 22 deg

Serum IgG Treatment Comparison of serum IgG concentrations between colostrum with varying bacteria levels