CAADP AADP IMP MPLEM EMEN ENTATIO TION N IN N COM OMESA ESA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

caadp aadp imp mplem emen entatio tion n in n com omesa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CAADP AADP IMP MPLEM EMEN ENTATIO TION N IN N COM OMESA ESA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CAADP AADP IMP MPLEM EMEN ENTATIO TION N IN N COM OMESA ESA The CAADP Investment Programmes Design and Implementation Workshop 20-22 October 2010 Intercontinental Hotel Nairobi, Kenya Presented by: Dr Sam G. Kanyarukiga CAADP


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presented by: Dr Sam G. Kanyarukiga CAADP Coordinator -COMESA skanyarukiga@comesa.int

The CAADP Investment Programmes Design and Implementation Workshop 20-22 October 2010 Intercontinental Hotel Nairobi, Kenya

CAADP AADP IMP MPLEM EMEN ENTATIO TION N IN N COM OMESA ESA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

1.

THE COMESA REGION

2.

THE CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

MANAGEMENT LEVELS

CAADP PROCESS BENCHMARKS 3.

CURRENT STATUS IN COMESA

COMPACT SIGNATURES

POST-COMPACT STATUS

QUALITY OF INVESTMENT PLANS 4.

COMESA REGIONAL COMPACT

OBJECTIVES OF REGIONAL COMPACT

CURRENT STATUS

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • I. THE COMESA REGION

19 Countries 400 Million people

slide-4
SLIDE 4

II

CAADP IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

II.1 Management Levels

AUC NPCA RECs

Country-Led and Owned

In –Country Stakeholders

(Country Teams, Private Sector, CSOs, Farmers Organizations), DPs etc.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks

COMPACT SIGNATURES

Launch Consultative Process Stocktaking and Growth

Options Analysis

slide-7
SLIDE 7

II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks

POST COMPACT PROCESS

a.

Investment Programmes

Quality (Alignment, Consistency, Coherence, Pillars)

Expert Inputs

Costing

Best Practices

slide-8
SLIDE 8

II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks

POST COMPACT PROCESS

  • b. Technical Reviews

Led by AUC, NPCA, RECs

Independent Experts

In-Country Consultations and Document Review

Technical Review Report

slide-9
SLIDE 9

II.2 CAADP Process Benchmarks

POST COMPACT PROCESS

  • c. Post-Compact High-Level Business

Meeting

Presentation of:

  • Investment Plans and Budget by Govt
  • Technical Review Report
  • Recommendations for improvement
  • Roadmap for Improvement
  • Formulation of Gap Financing Proposals
slide-10
SLIDE 10

III

CURRENT STATUS IN COMESA

slide-11
SLIDE 11

III.1 Compact Signatures

COMESA

Rwanda – March 2006

Burundi –August 2009

Ethiopia – August 2008

Swaziland March 2010

Uganda – March 2010

Malawi – April 2010

Kenya – July 2010

Tanzania - July 2010 (EAC)

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • III. 1 Compact Signatures

Advanced Countries

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Seychelles

Djibouti

Sudan

Zimbabwe 

Launches

DRC

Egypt

Eritrea

slide-13
SLIDE 13

III.2 Post Compact Status

Technical Reviews

Rwanda: December 2009 Uganda: September 2010 Kenya: September 2010 Malawi: September 2010 Ethiopia: October 2010

slide-14
SLIDE 14

III.2 Post Compact Status

Business Meetings

Rwanda: December 2009; gap funding accessed

at 80%; USD 50m (GAFSP June 2010)

Uganda: September 2010 Kenya: September 2010

Next

Malawi: Planned for 13-14 October 2010 Ethiopia: Nov/December Tanzania: TR and BM – Nov/Dec 2010

slide-15
SLIDE 15

III.3 Quality of Investment Plans

At Compact Signature

Not refined

Not well costed

Not fully aligned

At Business Meetings

Significant Improvement

Experts Inputs

Technical Assistance

Specialized Agencies

slide-16
SLIDE 16

III.3 Quality of Investment Plans

General Issues of Investment Plans

Low capacity of In-Country Teams

Insufficient Technical Assistance

Inadequate Programme Coherence

Imbalances between investment areas and 4 pillars

Insufficient consideration of value chain development

Coherence between expenditure and economic impact and poverty reduction

M&E Framework and implementation modalities

slide-17
SLIDE 17

III.3 Quality of Investment Plans

Way forward for improved Investment Programmes:

1.

Improvement of Quality since development of Post-Compact Roadmap

2.

Room for further improvement

3.

Focus on Post-Compact resulting in slow down of progress in countries at Pre- Compact Stage

slide-18
SLIDE 18

IV

COMESA REGIONAL COMPACT

slide-19
SLIDE 19

IV IV.1 1 Ob Obje ject ctiv ive e of

  • f Reg

egio ional nal Com

  • mpact

act

 AUC/NEPAD Recommendation  Add value to National CAADP Compact  Facilitate investments in areas where individual countries

cannot effectively invest e.g. Trans-boundary and multi – country areas

 Increased involvement of private sector, PPPs and

development partners

 To forge regional cooperation and integration

slide-20
SLIDE 20

IV IV.2 .2 Cur urren ent t Sta tatus tus

 Draft Regional Compact Document is ready since

early September

 Major Areas:

 Agriculture Commodities along the Value Chains  Productive Infrastructure for increased productivity, value

addition and trade

 Institutional and Human Resource Development at all levels

(Farmers, Trader, processors etc. )

 Next Steps

 Extension into Tripartite Framework – COMESA, EAC, SADC

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Than ank k you

  • u!