C The TIDE Project www.mbl.edu/tide Whole-ecosystem manipulations - - PDF document

c the tide project
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

C The TIDE Project www.mbl.edu/tide Whole-ecosystem manipulations - - PDF document

Ecosystem Services C The TIDE Project www.mbl.edu/tide Whole-ecosystem manipulations in Plum Island Estuary, MA Target conc. NO 3 - : (70 uM; 1 mg/L) 15x reference creeks May September, Since 2004 Reference Creek System 8 Years after


slide-1
SLIDE 1

C

Ecosystem Services

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Whole-ecosystem manipulations in Plum Island Estuary, MA Target conc. NO3

  • : (70 uM; 1 mg/L)

15x reference creeks May – September, Since 2004

The TIDE Project

www.mbl.edu/tide

Reference Creek System – 8 Years after experiment began

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Peat Fractures P <0.01 Green = Enriched

Deegan et al. 2012 Nature

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Fertilized Creek System – 7 Years after experiment began P = 0.07 E n r i c h e d

Deegan et al. 2012 Nature

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Top 20 cm P = 0.08 Spartina alterniflora Reference

Deegan et al. 2012 Nature

Enriched P = 0.02 Reference Enriched

Deegan et al. 2012 Nature

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Source: Pennings 2012 Nature Toupee Fewer Roots

Reference Fertilized

Low marsh intact

>90% retention

3000 mol NO3

  • Low marsh intact

55% retention

23,000 mol NO3

  • Whole marsh nutrient retention

Year 2 of Enrichment >Year 10 of Enrichment Reference Fertilized

Low marsh LOSS

< 55% retention

Low marsh intact

>90% retention

HYPOTHESES Drake et al. 2009 - Ecology

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nelson and Deegan, in review

(Fert/ref)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Thank you

Collaborators Linda Deegan, Ph.D. John Fleeger, Ph.D. Scott Warren, Ph.D. Bruce Peterson, Ph.D. Sergio Fagherrazi, Ph.D. 15 others http://www.mbl.edu/tide/ For more information including publications and complete personnel list