C The TIDE Project www.mbl.edu/tide Whole-ecosystem manipulations - - PDF document
C The TIDE Project www.mbl.edu/tide Whole-ecosystem manipulations - - PDF document
Ecosystem Services C The TIDE Project www.mbl.edu/tide Whole-ecosystem manipulations in Plum Island Estuary, MA Target conc. NO 3 - : (70 uM; 1 mg/L) 15x reference creeks May September, Since 2004 Reference Creek System 8 Years after
Whole-ecosystem manipulations in Plum Island Estuary, MA Target conc. NO3
- : (70 uM; 1 mg/L)
15x reference creeks May – September, Since 2004
The TIDE Project
www.mbl.edu/tide
Reference Creek System – 8 Years after experiment began
Peat Fractures P <0.01 Green = Enriched
Deegan et al. 2012 Nature
Fertilized Creek System – 7 Years after experiment began P = 0.07 E n r i c h e d
Deegan et al. 2012 Nature
Top 20 cm P = 0.08 Spartina alterniflora Reference
Deegan et al. 2012 Nature
Enriched P = 0.02 Reference Enriched
Deegan et al. 2012 Nature
Source: Pennings 2012 Nature Toupee Fewer Roots
Reference Fertilized
Low marsh intact
>90% retention
3000 mol NO3
- Low marsh intact
55% retention
23,000 mol NO3
- Whole marsh nutrient retention
Year 2 of Enrichment >Year 10 of Enrichment Reference Fertilized
Low marsh LOSS
< 55% retention
Low marsh intact
>90% retention
HYPOTHESES Drake et al. 2009 - Ecology
Nelson and Deegan, in review
(Fert/ref)
Thank you
Collaborators Linda Deegan, Ph.D. John Fleeger, Ph.D. Scott Warren, Ph.D. Bruce Peterson, Ph.D. Sergio Fagherrazi, Ph.D. 15 others http://www.mbl.edu/tide/ For more information including publications and complete personnel list