Business Trends for the U.S. Defense Enterprise $700 Declining - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

business trends for the u s defense enterprise
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Business Trends for the U.S. Defense Enterprise $700 Declining - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Business Trends for the U.S. Defense Enterprise $700 Declining Revenue Trends $600 PB 2012 PB 2013 PB 2016 PB 2014 $500 PB 2015 Actuals $Billion, TY $400 Ten-Year s (FY12-23) PB12 to PB13: - $500B $300 PB13 to PB14: - $80B


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Business Trends for the U.S. Defense Enterprise

slide-2
SLIDE 2

$0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $Billion, TY

PB 2012 PB 2013 PB 2014 PB 2015 Actuals

Analysis does not include funding for Overseas Contingency Operations.

Ten-Year ∆’s (FY12-23)

PB12 to PB13:

  • $500B

PB13 to PB14:

  • $80B

PB14 to PB15:

  • $190B

PB15 to PB16:

  • $30B

PB16 BCA caps:

  • $170B

Total under BCA Sequester: -$970B

Declining Revenue Trends

PB 2016

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Potential Unfunded Liabilities (Average Per Year)

  • Board of Directors Disapproved Efficiencies (so far)

– BRAC ~$2B – Compensation reform ~$4B – Equipment retirement ~$6B – Cruisers ~$1B – Efficiencies denied ~$3B

  • Sequestration

~$24B

  • OCO to Base

$TBD Total ~$40B

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Shrinking New Product Pipeline

R&D Investments FY1998-2015 Appropriated & FY2016-2020 PBR

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 PB16 FY16 PB16 FY17 PB16 FY18 PB16 FY19 PB16 FY20

DOD RDT&E (FY 15 Constant Year Dollars in Billions)

DOD BA 1 DOD BA 2 DOD BA 3 DOD BA 4 BA 4 Sequester DOD BA 5 BA 5 Sequester DOD BA 7 BA 7 Sequester

Today’s Force Next Force Force After Next

Declining Next Force 5-15 years Largely Flat 8-20 years

Today

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Competitive Landscape

  • Potential peer competitor revenues growing ~10% per year
  • Competitor’s New Product Pipeline is Robust
  • 5th Generation Fighters
  • Advanced air-to-air missiles
  • Radars operating in non-conventional bandwidths
  • Longer range and precise ballistic and cruise missiles –

land and ship attack

  • Improved undersea warfare systems
  • Cyber and information operations capabilities
  • Extensive Electronic Warfare Systems
  • Advanced Air Defense Systems
  • Competitor cycle times and costs benefiting from industrial

espionage

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Technological Superiority Trends Relative to Competitors

Near Term (2020) Mid Term (2025)

Air Domain Maritime Domain Undersea Domain Electromagnetic Spectrum Space Domain Resilient Comm, ISR, PNT Resilient Basing

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What We’re Doing

  • Secretary Carter: Building the force of the future
  • Defense Innovative Initiative (DII)
  • Advanced Capabilities Deterrence Panel (ACDP)
  • The Third Offset Strategy
  • Long Range R&D Planning Program (LRRDPP)
  • Aerospace Innovation Initiative (AII)
  • Acquisition Reform / Improvement – Better Buying Power 3.0
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Better Buying Power 3.0 DRAFT

Achieve Affordable Programs

  • Continue to set and enforce affordability caps

Achieve Dominant Capabilities While Controlling Lifecycle Costs

  • Strengthen and expand “should cost” based cost management
  • Build stronger partnerships between the acquisition, requirements,

and intelligence communities

  • Anticipate and plan for responsive and emerging threats
  • Institutionalize stronger DoD level Long Range R&D Planning

Incentivize Productivity in Industry and Government

  • Align profitability more tightly with Department goals
  • Employ appropriate contract types, but increase the use of

incentive type contracts

  • Expand the superior supplier incentive program across DoD
  • Increase effective use of Performance-Based Logistics
  • Remove barriers to commercial technology utilization
  • Improve the return on investment in DoD laboratories
  • Increase the productivity of IRAD and CR&D

Incentivize Innovation in Industry and Government

  • Increase the use of prototyping and experimentation
  • Emphasize technology insertion and refresh in program planning
  • Use Modular Open Systems Architecture to stimulate innovation
  • Increase the return on Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
  • Provide draft technical requirements to industry early and involve

industry in funded concept definition to support requirements definition

  • Provide clear “best value” definitions so industry can propose and

DoD can choose wisely Eliminate Unproductive Processes and Bureaucracy

  • Emphasize Acquisition Executive, Program Executive

Officer and Program Manager responsibility, authority, and accountability

  • Reduce cycle times while ensuring sound investments
  • Streamline documentation requirements and staff reviews

Promote Effective Competition

  • Create and maintain competitive environments
  • Improve technology search and outreach in global

markets Improve Tradecraft in Acquisition of Services

  • Increase small business participation, including more

effective use of market research

  • Strengthen contract management outside the normal

acquisition chain

  • Improve requirements definition
  • Improve the effectiveness and productivity of contracted

engineering and technical services Improve the Professionalism of the Total Acquisition Workforce

  • Establish higher standards for key leadership positions
  • Establish stronger professional qualification requirements

for all acquisition specialties

  • Strengthen organic engineering capabilities
  • Ensure the DOD leadership for development programs is

technically qualified to manage R&D activities

  • Improve our leaders’ ability to understand and mitigate

technical risk

  • Increase DoD support for Science, Technology,

Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education

Achieving Dominant Capabilities through Technical Excellence and Innovation

Continue Strengthening Our Culture of: Cost Consciousness, Professionalism, and Technical Excellence