Bridging Eurasia Rasmus Gudmundsen Bjrn (MA) Foreign Elements in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bridging eurasia
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bridging Eurasia Rasmus Gudmundsen Bjrn (MA) Foreign Elements in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bridging Eurasia Rasmus Gudmundsen Bjrn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary Eurasia connected The opening of the Steppe - The rise of agriculture, east and west - The Indo-European expansion (West) - Transeurasian


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bridging Eurasia

Rasmus Gudmundsen Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Eurasia connected

The opening of the Steppe

  • The rise of agriculture, east and west
  • The Indo-European expansion (West)
  • Transeurasian expansion (East)
  • A bridge of languages
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Bridging a continent

  • There is more than 4000 km from their posited homelands.
  • Within 2000 years they had split the steppe
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

The Steppe – from wasteland to highway

  • The linguistic void – and how horses changed that
  • Inhospitable to permanent settlement, requires movement
  • The Botai culture, Kazakhstan, early horsebreeders (Anthony 2007)
  • Unknown substrate common to Tocharian and Indo-Iranian (Carling 2005)
  • Indo-Europeans east of the Urals
  • First traversed by the Tocharians (ca. 3000 BC)
  • Conquered by Indo-Iranians (ca. 2100 BC)
  • Turks and Mongols West of the Altai
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Becoming Transeurasian

  • Transeurasian ousted Iranian from the Steppe
  • Connected to Neolithic Boisman culture in the Southern Primorye

(4825‒2470 BC)

  • Mongolic and Turkic receive western admixture with the Bronze age (cf.

Robbeets et al. forthc.)

  • The dispersal of Boisman coincides with the Indo-European eastern

traversing of the Steppe, essentially founding the northern Silk Road.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

New methods, new knowledge

  • Comparative linguistics
  • Relative chronologies
  • Potential to preserve cultural aspects
  • Lot of data, but very few fixed points
  • Archaeobotanic and isotope analyses
  • Spread of plants
  • Change in sustenance strategies
  • Can date and locate fixed points

Miller et al. 2016

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Agriculture as a vocabulary event

  • A demonstrable revolution human prehistory
  • Different crops in different places
  • Comes with rich terminologies
  • Many different strains (e.g. types of grain, regional innovations)
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Methodology

1. Build a database of linguistic data

  • Semantic spheres: agriculture, horticulture
  • Languages:
  • Indo-European, primarily the eastern branches, i.e. Indo-Iranian & Tocharian
  • Transeurasian
  • Sino-Tibetan

2. Add archaeobotanical and isotope data

  • Dating, location, strain

3. Describe the spread and posit hypotheses

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Different crops, different data

  • Innovations spread at different rates
  • On the following slides we will look at two early crops
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Case 1: ‘Barley’

  • Different types
  • Early western Eurasian crop (Badr et al. 2000)

Indo-European Turkic Tungusic Sino-Tibetan W-PIE *bhar- P-Iran. *arbusa- >> PTurk. *arba P-Iran. *karšaka >> OChin. *klas ‘grain, sow’ *murgi Mallory & Adams (1997) & Robbeets et al. (forthc.)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Case 2: Millet

  • First domesticated in NE China 6th mil. BC (Miller et al. 2016)
  • Central crop for the Transeurasian family
  • Different species, broomcorn (BC), barnyard (BY), and foxtail (F)

Indo-European Turkic Mongolic Tungusic Koreanic Japonic *konak (F) <- *ko- ‘to put’ >> *konag (F) *ügür (BC) *amun (BC) *pisi-ke (BC) ~ *pihi (BY) *jiya- (F) *ip-i <- *pi- ‘to eat’ P-Iran. *pan- Mallory & Adams (1997) & Robbeets et al. (forthc.)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Exchanging barley and millet

  • Internal transfers of millet between dispersing Transeurasian phylae.
  • Millet late in Indo-European, but not from Transeurasian languages.
  • Barley, on the other hand, shows clear influences west to east.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Resources

  • Indo-European:
  • DIEAT (Guus Kroonen, CPH & Leiden)
  • Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture (Mallory & Adams)
  • Transeurasian:
  • Robbeets et al. (forthc.)
  • Tenishev (2001)
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Bibliography

Anthony (2007) The Horse, the Wheel and Language. Princeton. Bjørn (2017) Foreign elements in the PIE vocabulary [MA thesis/prize paper]. Copenhagen Badr et al. (2000) ”On the Origin and Domestication History of Barley (Hordeum vulgare)”. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(4). Carling (2005) ”Proto-Tocharian, Common Tocharian, and Tocharian”. 16th UCLA IE Conf., 47-70. Mallory & Adams (1997) Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Chicago & London. Miller et al. (2016) “Millet Cultivation across Eurasia”. The Holocene 26: 1566-1575. Robbeets et al. (forthc.) Oxford Guide to the Traneurasian Languages. Oxford. Tenishev (2001) Sravnitelno-istoricheskaya Grammatika Turskix Yazykov, Leksika. Moscow.

Thank you for your attention ! www.loanwords.prehistoricmap.com