bridging eurasia
play

Bridging Eurasia Rasmus Gudmundsen Bjrn (MA) Foreign Elements in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bridging Eurasia Rasmus Gudmundsen Bjrn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary Eurasia connected The opening of the Steppe - The rise of agriculture, east and west - The Indo-European expansion (West) - Transeurasian


  1. Bridging Eurasia Rasmus Gudmundsen Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  2. Eurasia connected The opening of the Steppe - The rise of agriculture, east and west - The Indo-European expansion (West) - Transeurasian expansion (East) - A bridge of languages Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  3. Bridging a continent • There is more than 4000 km from their posited homelands. • Within 2000 years they had split the steppe Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  4. The Steppe – from wasteland to highway • The linguistic void – and how horses changed that • Inhospitable to permanent settlement, requires movement • The Botai culture, Kazakhstan, early horsebreeders (Anthony 2007) • Unknown substrate common to Tocharian and Indo-Iranian (Carling 2005) • Indo-Europeans east of the Urals • First traversed by the Tocharians (ca. 3000 BC) • Conquered by Indo-Iranians (ca. 2100 BC) • Turks and Mongols West of the Altai Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  5. Becoming Transeurasian • Transeurasian ousted Iranian from the Steppe • Connected to Neolithic Boisman culture in the Southern Primorye (4825‒2470 BC) • Mongolic and Turkic receive western admixture with the Bronze age (cf. Robbeets et al. forthc.) • The dispersal of Boisman coincides with the Indo-European eastern traversing of the Steppe, essentially founding the northern Silk Road. Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  6. New methods, new knowledge • Comparative linguistics • Relative chronologies • Potential to preserve cultural aspects • Lot of data, but very few fixed points • Archaeobotanic and isotope analyses • Spread of plants • Change in sustenance strategies • Can date and locate fixed points Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Miller et al. 2016 Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  7. Agriculture as a vocabulary event • A demonstrable revolution human prehistory • Different crops in different places • Comes with rich terminologies • Many different strains (e.g. types of grain, regional innovations) Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  8. Methodology 1. Build a database of linguistic data • Semantic spheres: agriculture, horticulture • Languages: • Indo-European, primarily the eastern branches, i.e. Indo-Iranian & Tocharian • Transeurasian • Sino-Tibetan 2. Add archaeobotanical and isotope data • Dating, location, strain 3. Describe the spread and posit hypotheses Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  9. Different crops, different data • Innovations spread at different rates • On the following slides we will look at two early crops Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  10. Case 1: ‘ Barley ’ • Different types • Early western Eurasian crop (Badr et al. 2000) Indo-European Turkic Tungusic Sino-Tibetan W-PIE * b h ar- P-Iran. * arbusa- >> PTurk. * arba P-Iran. * karšaka >> OChin. * klas ‘ grain, sow ’ *murgi Mallory & Adams (1997) & Robbeets et al. (forthc.) Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  11. Case 2: Millet • First domesticated in NE China 6 th mil. BC (Miller et al. 2016) • Central crop for the Transeurasian family • Different species, broomcorn (BC), barnyard (BY), and foxtail (F) Indo-European Turkic Mongolic Tungusic Koreanic Japonic * konak (F) <- * ko- ‘to put’ >> * konag (F) * ügür (BC) * amun (BC) * pisi-ke (BC) ~ * pihi (BY) * jiya- (F) * ip-i <- *pi- ‘ to eat ’ P-Iran. * pan- Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Mallory & Adams (1997) & Robbeets et al. (forthc.) Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  12. Exchanging barley and millet • Internal transfers of millet between dispersing Transeurasian phylae. • Millet late in Indo-European, but not from Transeurasian languages. • Barley, on the other hand, shows clear influences west to east. Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  13. Resources • Indo-European: • DIEAT (Guus Kroonen, CPH & Leiden) • Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture (Mallory & Adams) • Transeurasian: • Robbeets et al. (forthc.) • Tenishev (2001) Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

  14. Thank you for your attention ! www.loanwords.prehistoricmap.com Bibliography Anthony (2007) The Horse, the Wheel and Language. Princeton. Bjørn (2017) Foreign elements in the PIE vocabulary [ MA thesis/prize paper ]. Copenhagen Badr et al. (2000) ” On the Origin and Domestication History of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) ”. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(4). Carling (2005) ” Proto- Tocharian, Common Tocharian, and Tocharian”. 16 th UCLA IE Conf. , 47-70. Mallory & Adams (1997) Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. Chicago & London. Miller et al. (2016) “Millet Cultivation across Eurasia”. The Holocene 26: 1566-1575. Robbeets et al. (forthc.) Oxford Guide to the Traneurasian Languages. Oxford. Tenishev (2001) Sravnitelno-istoricheskaya Grammatika Turskix Yazykov, Leksika. Moscow. Rasmus G. Bjørn (MA) Foreign Elements in the Proto-Indo-European Vocabulary

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend