brent doberstein
play

Brent Doberstein Banda Aceh, Indonesia Dec 26 2004 University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Brent Doberstein Banda Aceh, Indonesia Dec 26 2004 University of Waterloo 1 bdoberst@uwaterloo.ca What is failure knowledge? Disciplines using failure knowledge Use in disaster recovery Theory Practice: 2 Cases 2


  1. Brent Doberstein Banda Aceh, Indonesia Dec 26 2004 University of Waterloo 1 bdoberst@uwaterloo.ca

  2. • What is failure knowledge? • Disciplines using failure knowledge • Use in disaster recovery • Theory • Practice: 2 Cases 2

  3. • “…knowledge or understanding emerging from a systematic analysis of failure” • Ex-ante failure knowledge • Testing an experimental design or system until it fails, then improving design/system to avoid future failure • Ex-post failure knowledge • Investigating accidental failure, then improving design or system 3

  4. • Aviation industry (ex-post) • steady and consistent advances based on the “ meticulous and painstaking analysis that goes into understanding the crash of an airliner” (Cannon and Edmondson 2005, 306). 4

  5. • Aviation industry • steady and consistent advances based on the “ meticulous and painstaking analysis that goes into understanding the crash of an airliner” (Cannon and Edmondson 2005, 306). • Civil, Mechanical & Aeronautical Engineering (ex-ante & ex-post) 5

  6. Tacoma Narrows bridge, USA 6

  7. • Aviation industry • steady and consistent advances based on the “ meticulous and painstaking analysis that goes into understanding the crash of an airliner” (Cannon and Edmondson 2005, 306). • Civil & Mechanical Engineering • Resource & Environmental Management (largely ex-post) 7

  8. 8

  9. Failure knowledge Failure Knowledge (ex-post) 9

  10. • “…knowledge or understanding emerging from a systematic analysis of failure” • Ex-ante failure knowledge • Testing an experimental design or system until it fails, then improving design/system to avoid future failure • Ex-post failure knowledge • Investigating accidental failure, then improving design or system PROBLEM: Generally unadvisable to stage an intentional social failure… Failure knowledge in social sciences usually learning after unintentional failure ( ex-post ) 10

  11. • Disasters: confluence of hazardous potential (e.g. flooding ) & human vulnerability (e.g. living in a floodplain ) • Failure knowledge: • reduce hazard potential • reduce human vulnerability • increase resilience in the face of disaster 11

  12. Does failure Challenges & knowledge opportunities? inform recovery? Hazard mapping Regional planning Pre- Land use planning & zoning Disaster: Risk assessment Emergency Vulnerability assessment preparedness Mitigation & Insurance plan planning Incentives & penalties Protection structures Public education Rehabilitation Recovery : Relief: Post- • Debris removal • Search/Rescue • Decrease vuln. • Public services Disaster: • Medical • Re-plan Disaster (water, elect) • Psychological • & DRR • Housing • Food aid • Rebuild Recovery • Reconnect families • Shelter • Relocate 12

  13. • Challenges: Chaotic environment • Time pressure • Simultaneous relief/rehabilitation/reconstruction • Multiple institutions & multiple agendas • Disaster profiteering • Resistance: “slow down & plan properly” • Opportunities • Aid $ • Coordinating body(ies) • New disaster recovery paradigm (2005  ) 13

  14. 1. 1999 North Vargas State, Venezuela debris flows (30-50,000 people est. killed); 2. 2004 Banda Aceh, Indonesia tsunami (80,000 est. killed) 14

  15. o 900mm of rain in 24 hrs o Simultaneous debris flows in 26 watersheds o 30-50,000 killed o Largest debris flow disaster in recent global history 15

  16. Case #1: Failure Knowledge, Disaster Causes • Rainfall • Settlement(s) location: • Alluvial fans • No watershed monitoring • Lack of hazard-oriented zoning • No warning/evacuation system • Lack of public awareness of risk • “No history of recent debris flows” • Ineffective physical protection structures 16

  17. Case #1: Disaster Recovery Little to no evidence failure knowledge influenced recovery • Recovery Philosophy: “Rebuild largely as before (1999)” • Physical protection structures • Far too small • Monitoring/warning/evacuation system • Largely absent 9 years after disaster (one siren, one community) • Public awareness • Initially high, but fading…no evidence of community awareness or preparedness exercises • Zoning: unchanged post-disaster 17

  18. Evidence: massive flow volumes High water mark 18

  19. Small-scale Engineered Solutions 19

  20. Old flood deposits 2005 „mini - flood‟ 2008 20

  21. New Destroyed in 1999 21

  22. Clock stopped when tsunami struck: 9:00am • Earthquake >9.0 strongest in >40 years • Banda Aceh “shook for over 8 minutes” • Tsunami: 20 minutes after earthquake stopped • >20% of city’s Pop’n killed 22

  23. • aftershocks Seismic energy radiated over the 1500 kms rupture zone Banda Aceh Epicentre 23

  24. Roof repair showing evidence of tsunami’s height Former hospital 24

  25. Case #2: Failure Knowledge, Disaster Causes • City location (coastal, near known fault line) • Lack of tsunami awareness • Lack of monitoring/warning/evacuation system • Housing design (single story) 25

  26. March 2009

  27. Case #1: Disaster Recovery Significant evidence failure knowledge  recovery • Recovery Philosophy: “Build Back Better” • Tsunami-resistant housing + relocation villages • Comprehensive monitoring, warning & evacuation system • Commitment to learning/failure knowledge • Public awareness & Evacuation preparedness 27

  28. Banda Aceh Relocation Village Different styles: Many tsunami resistant 28

  29. Escape building 29

  30. 30

  31. 31

  32. Tsunami research & training

  33. Networking: South-south-north cooperation

  34. Tsunami warning drill: November 2008 34

  35. Community-Based Disaster Recovery ( CBDR ) Failure knowledge Social learning Assess & mitigate all disaster Failure knowledge causes “Platforms” (collective learning/decision- making bodies) 35

  36. “The only good thing about the bad things are the lessons learned…” (Disaster survivor, 2005) 36

  37. 37

  38. Brent Doberstein University of Waterloo 38 bdoberst@uwaterloo.ca

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend