Brad Pinno, Fran Leishman, Ruth Errington, Morgane Merlin and Simon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

brad pinno fran leishman ruth errington morgane merlin
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Brad Pinno, Fran Leishman, Ruth Errington, Morgane Merlin and Simon - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Upland forest development in a reconstructed watershed after oil sands mining in northern Alberta, Canada Brad Pinno, Fran Leishman, Ruth Errington, Morgane Merlin and Simon Landhusser Canadian Forest Service brad.pinno@canada.ca April 10,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Upland forest development in a reconstructed watershed after oil sands mining in northern Alberta, Canada

Brad Pinno, Fran Leishman, Ruth Errington, Morgane Merlin and Simon Landhäusser Canadian Forest Service brad.pinno@canada.ca April 10, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Oil Sands in Alberta

  • Oil sands are in 3 main deposits in

Alberta

  • Mining used north of Fort

McMurray, in-situ extraction used everywhere else

  • Mining occurs where the oil deposit

is thick and close to the surface, i.e. near the Athabasca River north

  • f Fort McMurray
  • Most of the rest of Alberta is

underlain by conventional oil and gas deposits

  • The cumulative impacts of oil &

gas development, forestry, agriculture, recreation, other human uses and natural disturbances are very significant in Alberta

Mines are where

  • verburden is

shallow.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Alberta’s regulatory context

  • Public land
  • Requirements to reclaim

wetlands and uplands but the landscape will be different

  • Equivalent land capability
  • Focus on ecosystem

function rather than productivity

  • Locally common species
  • Novel ecosystems
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Natural landscape

  • Boreal forest on the

interior plains

  • Half uplands, half

wetland bogs and fens

  • Borderline sub-arctic

climate

  • Moisture limited

environment (455 mm)

  • Soil storage dominates

the water cycle

Sedge dominated fen Tamarack and black spruce bog Aspen-spruce mixedwood

  • n mesic sites

Jack pine on xeric sites

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Reclaimed watersheds

  • Priority for future reclamation is

integrated upland – wetland watersheds

  • Research in natural forests has

highlighted the importance of wetlands for upland forest growth

  • Reclaimed landscape will have more

uplands and ponds but fewer bogs/fens than original landscape

  • How is water partitioned between

uplands and wetlands in this dry environment?

The same volunteer wetland 1 and 4 growing seasons after reclamation. These micro-wetlands form due to reclamation material subsidence and may be critical landscape features for keeping water

  • n reclaimed areas.

Natural lake surrounded by reclaimed forest Wetland establishment research project

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Sandhill Fen Watershed

  • Reconstructed wetland – upland

watershed

  • 50 ha in total size
  • Old mine pit filled with tailings sand
  • Hummocks to create uplands,

wetland in lower areas

  • Hummocks capped with salvaged

forest soils

  • Goal is to create a functioning

upland-wetland ecosystem

  • Linkages between the uplands and

wetland portions

  • Integrated research project but

focus here on the upland forest

Hummock Wetland

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2011 - construction

2011 - Construction

Photo from Syncrude

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2013

Photo from Syncrude

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2014

2014

Photo from Syncrude

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Upland vegetation study

  • 2 soil types
  • coarse and fine textured
  • 2 main tree species
  • Trembling aspen and jack

pine

  • 3 planting densities
  • 0, 5,000, and 10,000 sph
  • Environmental variables
  • Tree growth
  • Understory development
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Soil water potential

  • No difference between

soils early on

  • Soil moisture closely

follows precipitation

  • As vegetation develops

the fine textured soil becomes progressively drier

Coarse textured Fine textured Reconstructed soil profile with water potential sensors

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Tree density and water

  • High tree density results

in lower water potential

  • Longer term

implications of how much leaf area these sites can support

Coarse textured Fine textured Medium density pine in the foreground, high density in the back

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Soil nutrient supply

  • Lower availability of P and K in the fine textured soils
  • Inorganic nitrogen did not vary over time or by soil

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2012 2013 2016 ns ns ns ug/10cm²/burial time Total Nitrogen

Coarse Fine

* * *

10 20 30 2012 2013 2016 Phosphorous 100 200 300 400 500 600 2012 2013 2016 Potassium

* * *

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Trees

  • Trembling aspen and jack pine
  • 0, 5,000, and 10,000 sph

planting densities

  • Growth and water use

Trembling aspen Jack pine High density jack pine planting after year 1 and year 5

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tree growth

  • Greater growth on fine textured soils, difference becoming

greater over time

  • Trembling aspen has more variable growth
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Aspect Height Growth (c 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Flat North South

A B A

Pine growth varies with aspect

  • Pine larger on north

facing plots

  • Cooler and wetter sites
  • Aspen growth not

influenced by aspect or planting density at this time

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tree water use (Stomatal conductance)

  • Aspen has high water use and does not respond to soil
  • Jack pine is more responsive to soil conditions
  • Link to the long term water balance of the site
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Axis 1 Axis 2

forbs bryophytes trees shrubs graminoids

Plant community composition

Coarse textured Fine textured

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Fine - mesic Coarse - xeric

Native Introduced Native Introduced

Species Richness per Subplot 2 4 6 8 10

Understory species richness

  • Similar species richness

between soil types

  • Coarse soil → grasses
  • Fine soil → forbs
  • More introduced species
  • n fine textured soil
  • Higher diversity with

higher density planting treatments and with north facing aspects

Total number of species

  • 2012 – 113
  • 2013 – 180
  • 2015 – 140

Shrub Graminoid Forb

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Shrub Graminoid Forb

Native Introduced Native Introduced

Vegetation Cover (%) 5 10 15 20 25 30

Fine textured Coarse textured

Understory vegetation cover

  • Higher vegetation

cover on fine textured soil, particularly native forbs

  • Higher shrub cover on

coarse textured soil

Pin cherry

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Capping significant

2 4 6 8 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Leaf Area Index (cm²/cm²)

PX RM

Vegetation development (LAI)

  • Higher overall leaf area
  • n fine textured soil
  • Difference is increasing
  • ver time
  • Tree leaf area

becoming a more important component, particularly in high density plantings

Coarse textured Fine textured

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Next steps

  • How are soils, water, plants

and trees interacting?

  • How are the uplands and

wetlands interacting?

  • How are reclaimed

ecosystems developing?

Structural equation modelling

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Operational implications

Kingfisher Watershed

  • Currently in construction

East In Pit

  • 100s of ha of

tailings to be reclaimed in the coming decades Sandhill Fen 1,000s more ha of tailings to be reclaimed across the mine lease and the mineable oil sands region

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thanks!