Brabant Silvia Naldini Herdis Heinemann 1 Regular monitoring Van - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
brabant
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Brabant Silvia Naldini Herdis Heinemann 1 Regular monitoring Van - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 01, 2023 511 likes •788 views

UPDATE WP 4 Monumentenwacht North Brabant Silvia Naldini Herdis Heinemann 1 Regular monitoring Van iconische gewone panden Vermeiden escalatie van schade Inspecteurs monitoren en verrichten kleine werkzaamheden Eigenaar bepalend

slide-1
SLIDE 1

UPDATE WP 4 Monumentenwacht North Brabant Silvia Naldini Herdis Heinemann

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Regular monitoring Van iconische gewone panden Vermeiden escalatie van schade Inspecteurs monitoren en verrichten kleine werkzaamheden Eigenaar bepalend (betrokkenheid, geld

slide-3
SLIDE 3

40 years of MW North Brabant A successful concept

  • Good maintenance of

monuments

  • Independent from the

market

  • Continous work
  • Controle of

workmanship

  • Less costs for repairs
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Diagnosis Strategy Intervention Documentation Signalling

In theory…

External control

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

In practice: case studies

01 02 04 05 08 15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Diagnosis Strategy Intervention Documentation Signalling

Hypothesis based on cases…

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Survey Members MW Quantative data Inspection and MW reports

  • How are reports used?
  • What is seen as the task of

MW?

Reasons (not) to follow recommendations Who’s doing what?

  • Works
  • Additional investigations

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Survey General aspects

192 participants 122 Private owners (64%) 36 Religious institutions 15 Municipalities 18 Others 77% (147) National monument 87 privately owned 21% (39) Municipal monument 2% (4) not listed

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Use of MW reports (n=191) 2 7 27 25 73 80 5 No further use Document for insurance comapny Apply for subsidies Negotiations with contractor Long range maintenance planning Guide for maintenance measures Other

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Perceived tasks ≠ theoretical

tasks

  • MW inspection = complete

survey and advice

Main task MW (view of members)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Municipality Religious institution Private owner Diverse totaal

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Carried out by

  • Contractor
  • Understanding material specialist
  • incl. painters etc.

Further Investigation

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Municipality Religious institution Private owner Diverse totaal

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Main influence

  • Owner
  • Monumentenwacht
  • Contractor

“Traditional” keyplayers’ role decreased

  • Heritage care agency
  • Conservation specialists

Choice of intervention

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 Degree of influence ∅ Municipality Religious inst. Private owner Diverse

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Diagnosis Strategy Intervention Documentation

Signalering Interventie

Two cycles in the process

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conscious choice (i.e. Subcycle)?

Why

  • MW report is considered sufficient
  • Approach seems obvious (in their

eyes)

Limited awareness of risks:

  • Cause of damage / progression of

damage

  • Benefits of further investigations?

“Risk groups”

  • Typology ?
  • Material and construction technique
  • Category of owner

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Example: KVL factory Oisterwijk Cause obvious yet consequential damage complex

  • !

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Example : Boterkerkje, Oirschot

  • Postponing intervention

(owner)

  • Complexity natural stone (MW)
  • Culture historical values

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Effectiveness subcycle Evident situations

  • Cause obvious (e.g. clogged

gutter)

  • Poor workmanship (e.g. lead

connections)

  • Expectable signs of ageing

Grey zone

  • Ambiguous symptoms /

correlation of symptoms

  • Complex materials (e.g. natural

stone)

  • Seldom / modern materials
  • Effect on culture historical

values

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Effectiveness subcycle Conditions

  • MW inspections <1-2 years
  • Quick implementation works
  • Trust
  • Unified terminology

Awareness of

  • Limitations MW
  • Risks
  • ‘full cycle’

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

CHANGES within the MW system and in the Netherlands

  • Decentralisation Heritage

Care (RCE - Cultural Heritage Agency)

→ Less technical advice

  • Anamnesis & diagnosis

(expert involved and laboratory)not self-evident

  • MW does have regular

context with owner / building → Opportunity

  • GP also changes!

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

MoWa Flanders

  • cf. Reporting
  • Presenting MDCS system

2 Reports

  • One for Owners

Planning activities

  • In Nl 6 yrs plan subsidies

Further investigations/advice

  • Institutes like

KIK/Laboratories

  • Owner decides

Controls

  • Immediate - after 4 yrs

Interest for MDCS Question: consequences of changing (political) context ?

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Workshop MW / MDCS

  • Terminology damage

& diagnosis

  • Reference work
  • Documentation
  • Monitoring
  • Bridge TU-practice

 Further collaboration, involvement of

  • wners

 INFO

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Information from research: evenings for inspectors and

  • wners

Relevant items like: Humidity/Rising damp or Salt damage Aim: awareness of necessity

  • f research

Encourage network owners

22

MDCS – Profiles

slide-23
SLIDE 23

MW Gelderland

Interest for co-operation

  • Information on research
  • MDCS
  • Partcipation in MW’s

‘clinics’ for owners Issue for Province: more specialized craftsmen needed! Involve young people

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Owners

  • Empowerment
  • Awareness

Donatus insurance company

  • Risk awareness
  • Reconstruction costs

Brabant Culture chair, Tilburg University Article ‘In Brabant’ Documentation on interventions

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Co-operation with MW and Governement / Provinces Maintenance of empty churches etc.: MW and volunteers - schooling Groningen: gas extraction induced earthquakes Province:

  • Re-use: inspections MW

in contract

  • Controls funded activities
  • Subsidies investigations
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Possibility and changes GP as part of a good quality health system Owners: awareness and partcipation Infomation sessions Documentation Laboratories Permanent co-operation & exchange of info TU-MW: Practice  theory

26