Gianna Camiciottoli
- Dip. Di Scienze Biomediche, Sperimentali e Cliniche “Mario
Serio” Università degli Studi di Firenze
BPCO: dalle novità patogenetiche alla terapia
Firenze, 11 novembre 2016
BPCO: dalle novit patogenetiche alla terapia Gianna Camiciottoli - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
BPCO: dalle novit patogenetiche alla terapia Gianna Camiciottoli Dip. Di Scienze Biomediche, Sperimentali e Cliniche Mario Serio Universit degli Studi di Firenze Firenze, 11 novembre 2016 Conflict of interest disclosure X I have no
Serio” Università degli Studi di Firenze
Firenze, 11 novembre 2016
X I have no, real or perceived, direct or indirect conflicts of interest that relate to this presentation. I have the following, real or perceived direct or indirect conflicts of interest that relate to this presentation:
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD
Treatment according to severity Treatment according to severity
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD
Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
Vida Diagnostics, Coralville, Iowa, http://www.vidadiagnostics.com/ Vida Diagnostics, Coralville, Iowa, http://www.vidadiagnostics.com/
Phenotypes Phenotypes COPD COPD
learning set
(mm) COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
Camiciottoli G, et al European Respiratory Journal Sep 2013, 42 (3) 626-635
CT1 is proportional to the difgerence of the
and refmects then the prevalent mechanism of airfmow obstruction (airways or emphysema CT phenotype) CT2 is proportional to the sum of the
variables (%LAA-950 plus AWT-Pi10) and refmects then the
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
phenotyp e
severity
The models derived from the learning set of 100 patients were ten fold cross-validated and trained to estimate CT1 and CT2 in the prospective set
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
Prospective validation Prospective validation
testing set (patients who did not undergo CT)
testing set (patients who did not undergo CT) COPD severity and phenotype COPD severity and phenotype
CT1= (-0.018 x DLCO% ) + (-0.580 x purulent sputum*) + (0.011 x TLC%) + 0.324 CT2= (-0.030 x FEV1/VC) + (0.775 x purulent sputum*) + (0.013 x FRC%) - 0.575
purulence
Prospective validation Prospective validation COPD severity and phenotype COPD severity and phenotype
testing set
testing set
n=80 FEV1/VC: 45% FRC: 132% DLCO: 78% n=73 FEV1/VC: 36% FRC: 162% DLCO: 49% n=143 FEV1/VC: 60% FRC: 100% DLCO: 88% n=77 FEV1/VC: 52% FRC: 118% DLCO: 61%
absent/
0.30 chronic/ purulen t
chronic/non purulent 0.07
mild severe moderate very severe
(GOLD Classification of Airflow Limitation)
R i s k ( E x a c e r b a t i
h i s t
y ) H
p i t a l i z a t i
> 2 1
mMRC 0-1 CAT < 10
4 3 2 1
mMRC > 2 CAT > 10
Symptoms
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
(GOLD Classification of Airflow Limitation)
( E x a c e r b a t i
h i s t
y )
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention
H
p i t a l i z a t i
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD
(Medications in each box are mentioned in alphabetical order, and therefore not
necessarily in order of preference.)
Patient First choice Second choice Alternative Choices A SAMA prn
SABA prn LAMA
LABA
SABA and SAMA Theophylline B LAMA
LABA LAMA and LABA SABA and/or SAMA Theophylline C ICS + LABA
LAMA LAMA and LABA PDE4-inh. SABA and/or SAMA Theophylline D ICS + LABA and/or LAMA ICS and LAMA or ICS + LABA and LAMA or ICS+LABA and PDE4-inh. or LAMA and LABA or LAMA and PDE4-inh. Carbocysteine SABA and/or SAMA Theophylline
(GOLD Classification of Airflow Limitation)
( E x a c e r b a t i
h i s t
y )
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention
H
p i t a l i z a t i
Price BD et al. Inter J COPD 2014
(GOLD Classification of Airflow Limitation)
( E x a c e r b a t i
h i s t
y )
Global Strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention
H
p i t a l i z a t i
Exacerbations and phenotypes Exacerbations and phenotypes COPD COPD COPDGene study. Han MK et al. Radiology 201
Nishimura M et al. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2012 COPD COPD Exacerbations and phenotypes Exacerbations and phenotypes
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes Exacerbation severity
Mild: treated at home Severe: emergency room or hosptalized
23 %
Clinical manifestation
+ sputum (D+S) 58% 18% 24% 77%
Exacerbations Frequency
Not frequent: <2 /year Frequent: ≥2 /year
68% 32%
Bigazzi F et al,European Respiratory Journal Sep 2014, 44 (Suppl 58) P571
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
<2 ≥2 mild severe D+S D S
COPD COPD
ns ns ns ns ns p<0.01 p<0.01 p<0.01 p<0.05 ns
Exacerbation severity
Mild: treated at home Severe: emergency room or hosptalized
23 %
Clinical manifestation
+ sputum (D+S) 58% 18% 24% 77%
Exacerbations Frequency
Not frequent: <2 /year Frequent: ≥2 /year
68% 32%
Bigazzi F et al,European Respiratory Journal (Suppl),on line first October 2016,
1/3 are frequent exacerbators at 3-year follow-up 1/16 have severe exacerbations at 3-year follow-up
Nishimura M et al. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2012 COPD COPD FEV1 decline FEV1 decline
COPD COPD Nishimura M et al. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2012 FEV1 decline FEV1 decline
Prevalence of comorbidities according to predominant Phenotype and Severity of COPD
Camiciottoli G et al, Intern. J. COPD 2016; 11: 2229-2236
Prevalence of comorbidities according to predominant Phenotype and Severity of COPD
Camiciottoli G et al, Intern. J. COPD 2016; 11: 2229-2236
Prevalence of comorbidities according to predominant Phenotype and Severity of COPD
Camiciottoli G et al, Intern. J. COPD 2016; 11: 2229-2236
Prevalence of comorbidities according to predominant Phenotype and Severity of COPD
Camiciottoli G et al, Intern. J. COPD 2016; 11: 2229-2236
A B C D
B+D A+C
Prevalence of comorbidities according to predominant Phenotype and Severity of COPD
Camiciottoli G et al, Intern. J. COPD 2016; 11: 2229-2236
A B C D
C+D A+B C+D
Prevalence of comorbidities according to predominant Phenotype and Severity of COPD
Camiciottoli G et al, Intern. J. COPD 2016; 11: 2229-2236
Prevalence of comorbidities according to predominant Phenotype and Severity of COPD
Camiciottoli G et al, Intern. J. COPD 2016; 11: 2229-2236
(GOLD Classification of Airflow Limitation)
R i s k ( E x a c e r b a t i
h i s t
y ) H
p i t a l i z a t i
> 2 1
mMRC 0-1 CAT < 10
4 3 2 1
mMRC > 2 CAT > 10
Symptoms
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
FEV1 19%, FEV1/VC 26, TLC 151%, RV 312%, RV/TLC 79% FRC 132%, DLCO 19% Absent sputum FEV1 50%, FEV1/VC 63, TLC 83%, RV 102%, RV/TLC 43% FRC 90%, DLCO 77% Purulent sputum Pheripheral oedema mMRC 2 CAT20 Hospitalized mMRC 4 CAT20 Hospitalized
COPD COPD Phenotypes Phenotypes
CT1= (-0.018 x DLCO% ) + (-0.580 x purulent sputum*) + (0.011 x TLC%) + 0.324 CT2= (-0.030 x FEV1/VC) + (0.775 x purulent sputum*) + (0.013 x FRC%) - 0.5
ICS + LABA+ LAMA+ PDE4Inh ICS + LAMA and/or LABA
LAMA and/or LABA LABA + LAMA
Personalized therapy Personalized therapy COPD COPD
COPD COPD Personalized medicine Personalized medicine