Boundary Review Task Force Recommendations January 15, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Boundary Review Task Force Recommendations January 15, 2019 Overview and Outcomes q Outcomes: January 15 Clarifying Questions January 22 Work Session w/Board Engagement and First Reading February 12 Board Decision
q Outcomes: § January 15 – Clarifying Questions § January 22 – Work Session w/Board Engagement and First Reading § February 12 – Board Decision § September 2019 Implementation q 2018 General Obligation Bond q Boundary Review Process q Boundary Review Task Force Recommendations
§ Over 70% to support current and future enrollment
§ PSU student projections § Educational Specifications
§ Number of classrooms required to meet projected enrollment growth
q Using the district’s boundary adjustment guiding principles and equity focus, review the springboard proposal to develop a consensus set of recommendations that:
§ Creates a balance between high school attendance feeder systems § Aligns future student populations with future school capacities § Identifies implications for the 2018 Bond Program
q Intentionally engage community members of underserved, diverse or marginalized individuals and groups q Presentation at January 15, 2019 Board meeting
q Allow adequate room for required programs and anticipated growth within each school’s capacity and throughout the district q Ensure access to equitable educational opportunities q Ensure safety to and from school q Provide continuity in school assignments for students, families, and schools q Ensure affected/impacted community members are involved in the process and represent ethnic and socioeconomic diversity q Consider the impact to established neighborhoods
q Process and Outcome
§ Intentionally ask ourselves throughout the work of the task force whether we are making decisions in the best interest of underserved, diverse or marginalized students and families:
they be mitigated?
q Members collaboratively develop and support recommendations that are in the best long term interest of the students, families and the broader community q Not 100% agreement q Allows for diverse perspectives q Each individual has the opportunity to voice their perspectives, thoughts and values in the development of recommendations that can be supported, even if the individual may have made a different decision on their own
q Co-Chairs provide leadership and planning with staff q Task Force Members provide school, community and equity perspective q Staff/FLO team provide facilitation, guidance and resources
q Internal Staff Team and FLO Analytics q Springboard Proposal
q Task Force Work Groups q Community Engagement
q Co-Chairs Present to Superintendent
q Board Approval for Fall 2019 Implementation
§ Overcrowding/class size § Maintaining neighborhood schools § Transportation § Fear of change and disruption § Program support § Equity v. Equality
Stephens, Parrish* & Waldo
McKay
Cesar Chavez*, Hallman, Hammond, Hayesville, Hoover*, Lamb, Scott*, Swegle, Washington, & Yoshikai
North Salem
Houck & Parrish*
Auburn, Englewood, Eyre, Four Corners, Grant, Highland, & Miller
South Salem
Judson*, Leslie, & Parrish*
Bush, Candalaria, Hoover*, Lee, McKinley, Morningside, Pringle, & Richmond
McNary
Claggett Creek & Whiteaker
Clear Lake, Cummings, Forest Ridge, Gubser, Keizer, Kennedy*, & Weddle Battle Creek*, Liberty, Salem Heights, Schirle, Sumpter*, & Wright
Sprague
Crossler & Judson* Straub & Walker
West Salem
Brush College, Chapman Hill, Harritt, Kalapuya*, & Myers
*These ES or MS attendance areas assign students to two different middle or high schools by residence address.