SLIDE 1 SINGLE-FIELD INFLATION MODELS IN SUPERGRAVITY
- GRAVITY AS GRAVITY + SCALAR
- THE “STAROBINSKY” CASE
- CORRECTIONS
- SUPERGRAVITY AT LINEAR ORDER
- THE NEW MINIMAL SUPERGRAVITY
- NEW MINIMAL COMPLETION OF
GRAVITY
- HIGHER-CURVATURE CORRECTIONS
- NEW MINIMAL CHAOTIC INFLATION AND F
TERMS f(R) f = R + αR2 Rn R + αR2 R + αR2
SLIDE 2
BOSONIC HIGHER-CURVATURE GRAVITY
SET 8πG = 1 EINSTEIN ACTION PLUS HIGHER-CURVATURE CORRECTIONS L = 1 2R + f(R) = 1 2R + f(X) + 1 2Y (R − X)
SLIDE 3
BOSONIC HIGHER-CURVATURE GRAVITY
SET 8πG = 1 EINSTEIN ACTION PLUS HIGHER-CURVATURE CORRECTIONS RESCALE TO EINSTEIN FRAME L = 1 2R + f(R) = 1 2R + f(X) + 1 2Y (R − X) gmn → (1 + Y )−1gmn (1 + Y )√−gR → √−gR − 3 2 √−g[∂m log(1 + Y )]2
SLIDE 4
THE LAGRANGIAN DENSITY BECOMES LEGENDRE TRANSFORM L = 1 2R − 1 2(∂mφ)2 − (1 + Y )−2 ˜ f[Y (φ)] φ = p 3/2 log(1 + Y ) ˜ f(Y ) = Y X − f(X)|f 0(X)=Y
SLIDE 5 THE LAGRANGIAN DENSITY BECOMES LEGENDRE TRANSFORM IN PARTICULAR, WHEN f(X) = 1 2g2 X2 THE POTENTIAL IS L = 1 2R − 1 2(∂mφ)2 − (1 + Y )−2 ˜ f[Y (φ)] φ = p 3/2 log(1 + Y ) ˜ f(Y ) = Y X − f(X)|f 0(X)=Y (1 + Y )−2 ˜ f(Y ) = g2 2 ⇣ 1 − e−√
2/3φ⌘2
SLIDE 6 THE “STAROBINSKY” POTENTIAL (VERTICAL AXIS SCALE MULTIPLIED BY )
2 4 6 8 10
1 2 3 4 5 2 4 6 8 10
1 2 3 4 5
8/g2
SLIDE 7
HIGHER ORDER CORRECTIONS: WHICH SCALE?
R + 1 2g2 R2 → Rf(R/g2), f(x) = 1 + 1 2x + O(1)x4 + ... WHEN CURVATURE IS ALL TERMS ARE EQUAL O(g2) IS IT POSSIBLE TO GET ANOTHER FACTOR O(g2) IN FRONT OF THE HIGHER CURVATURE CORRECTIONS? WHAT ABOUT CHAOTIC INFLATION? T.B.C.........
SLIDE 8 SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF f(R) GRAVITY
- GRAVITON (OFF SHELL) DEGREES OF
FREEDOM: 10-4=6
- GRAVITINO DEGREES OF FREEDOM 16-4=12
- WE NEED AT LEAST 6 BOSONIC DEGREES OF
FREEDOM (AUXILIARY FIELDS)
SLIDE 9 SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF f(R) GRAVITY
- GRAVITON (OFF SHELL) DEGREES OF
FREEDOM: 10-4=6
- GRAVITINO DEGREES OF FREEDOM 16-4=12
- WE NEED AT LEAST 6 BOSONIC DEGREES OF
FREEDOM (AUXILIARY FIELDS)
- TWO CONVENIENT CHOICES:
- OLD MINIMAL: 4+2 DOF
- NEW MINIMAL: 3+3 DOF
Aµ, S + iP Bµν, Aµ
SLIDE 10 SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF f(R) GRAVITY
- GRAVITON (OFF SHELL) DEGREES OF
FREEDOM: 10-4=6
- GRAVITINO DEGREES OF FREEDOM 16-4=12
- WE NEED AT LEAST 6 BOSONIC DEGREES OF
FREEDOM (AUXILIARY FIELDS)
- TWO CONVENIENT CHOICES:
- OLD MINIMAL: 4+2 DOF
- NEW MINIMAL: 3+3 DOF
Aµ, S + iP Bµν, Aµ NO GAUGE INVARIANCE
SLIDE 11 SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF f(R) GRAVITY
- GRAVITON (OFF SHELL) DEGREES OF
FREEDOM: 10-4=6
- GRAVITINO DEGREES OF FREEDOM 16-4=12
- WE NEED AT LEAST 6 BOSONIC DEGREES OF
FREEDOM (AUXILIARY FIELDS)
- TWO CONVENIENT CHOICES:
- OLD MINIMAL: 4+2 DOF
- NEW MINIMAL: 3+3 DOF
Aµ, S + iP Bµν, Aµ NO GAUGE INVARIANCE GAUGE INVARIANCE Bµν → Bµν + ∂[µξν], Aµ → Aµ + ∂µξ
SLIDE 12
OLD MINIMAL AND NEW MINMAL DIFFER BY NON PROPAGATING DEGREES OF FREEDOM IN STANDARD “EINSTEIN” SUPERGRAVITY; WHEN HIGHER CURVATURE TERMS ARE INTRODUCED THEY AUXILIARY FIELDS PROPAGATE AND THE TWO FORMALISMS ARE NO LONGER EQUIVALENT
SLIDE 13
CONSIDER FIRST THE SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF THE ACTION
R + αR2
SLIDE 14
CONSIDER FIRST THE SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF THE ACTION
R + αR2
THE ANALYSIS OF THIS ACTION WAS DONE IN THE OLD MINIMAL FORMALISM AT QUADRATIC LEVEL BY FERRARA, GRISARU AND VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN IN 1978 AND AT NON-LINEAR LEVEL BY CECOTTI IN 1987
SLIDE 15
CONSIDER FIRST THE SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF THE ACTION
R + αR2
THE ANALYSIS OF THIS ACTION WAS DONE IN THE OLD MINIMAL FORMALISM AT QUADRATIC LEVEL BY FERRARA, GRISARU AND VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN IN 1978 AND AT NON-LINEAR LEVEL BY CECOTTI IN 1987 ANALYSIS IN THE NEW MINIMAL FORMALISM: 1988, CECOTTI, FERRARA, M.P . AND SABHARWAL
SLIDE 16
- EXTRA PROPAGATING DEGREES OF FREEDOM
IN BOTH OLD AND NEW MINIMAL: (4B,4F)
SLIDE 17
- EXTRA PROPAGATING DEGREES OF FREEDOM
IN BOTH OLD AND NEW MINIMAL: (4B,4F)
- IN OLD MINIMAL THEY FORM TWO CHIRAL
MULTIPLETS [1/2,(2)0], [1/2,(2)0]
SLIDE 18
- EXTRA PROPAGATING DEGREES OF FREEDOM
IN BOTH OLD AND NEW MINIMAL: (4B,4F)
- IN OLD MINIMAL THEY FORM TWO CHIRAL
MULTIPLETS [1/2,(2)0], [1/2,(2)0]
- IN NEW MINIMAL THEY FORM ONE
VECTOR MULTIPLET [1,(2)1/2,0]
SLIDE 19
- EXTRA PROPAGATING DEGREES OF FREEDOM
IN BOTH OLD AND NEW MINIMAL: (4B,4F)
- IN OLD MINIMAL THEY FORM TWO CHIRAL
MULTIPLETS [1/2,(2)0], [1/2,(2)0]
- IN NEW MINIMAL THEY FORM ONE
VECTOR MULTIPLET [1,(2)1/2,0] IN OLD-MINIMAL, THE BOSONIC PART OF THE ACTION IS R + S2 + P 2 + A2
µ + α[(∂µS)2 + (∂µP)2 + (∂µAµ)2 + R2]
SLIDE 20
- EXTRA PROPAGATING DEGREES OF FREEDOM
IN BOTH OLD AND NEW MINIMAL: (4B,4F)
- IN OLD MINIMAL THEY FORM TWO CHIRAL
MULTIPLETS [1/2,(2)0], [1/2,(2)0]
- IN NEW MINIMAL THEY FORM ONE
VECTOR MULTIPLET [1,(2)1/2,0] IN OLD-MINIMAL, THE BOSONIC PART OF THE ACTION IS R + S2 + P 2 + A2
µ + α[(∂µS)2 + (∂µP)2 + (∂µAµ)2 + R2]
GRAVITON PLUS ONE SCALAR ONE SCALAR
SLIDE 21
THE OLD MINIMAL SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF ACTIONS WITH HIGHER POWERS OF THE SCALAR CURVATURE CONTAINS FOUR SCALARS. IN THE SIMPLEST REALIZATIONS OF INFLATIONARY POTENTIALS THESE SCALARS MAY BECOME UNSTABLE DURING SLOW ROLL. THE NEW MINIMAL FORMALISM HAS ONLY ONE (STABLE) SCALAR.
SLIDE 22
THE OLD MINIMAL SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF ACTIONS WITH HIGHER POWERS OF THE SCALAR CURVATURE CONTAINS FOUR SCALARS. IN THE SIMPLEST REALIZATIONS OF INFLATIONARY POTENTIALS THESE SCALARS MAY BECOME UNSTABLE DURING SLOW ROLL. THE NEW MINIMAL FORMALISM HAS ONLY ONE (STABLE) SCALAR. THE SUPERMULTIPLET CONTAINING THE DEGREES OF FREEDOM RELEVANT TO A NEW MINIMAL SUPERSYMMETRIZATION OF ACTIONS WITH HIGHER POWERS OF THE SCALAR CURVATURE CAN BE WRITTEN AT THE FULL NON-LINEAR LEVEL USING SUPECONFORMAL CALCULUS
SLIDE 23
CONFORMAL CALCULUS: (ADD DILATON DOF AND WEYL INVARIANCE TO REMOVE IT) gµν → ˆ gµν ≡ φ2gµν s.t. gµν → Ω2gµν, φ → Ω−1φ
SLIDE 24
CONFORMAL CALCULUS: (ADD DILATON DOF AND WEYL INVARIANCE TO REMOVE IT) SUPERCONFORMAL CALCULUS: (ADD DILATON CHIRAL MULTIPLET AND SUPER-WEYL INVARIANCE TO REMOVE IT) THE BOSONIC PART OF SUPER-WEYL CONTAINS SCALE PLUS CHIRAL TRANSFORMATION: SUPER- WEYL MULTIPLETS ARE CLASSIFIED BY CHARGE AND SCALING DIMENSION gµν → ˆ gµν ≡ φ2gµν s.t. gµν → Ω2gµν, φ → Ω−1φ
SLIDE 25
THE NEW MINIMAL EINSTEIN ACTION DEPENDS ON A CHIRAL COMPENSATOR WITH (SCALING DIMENSION,CHIRAL WEIGHT)=(1,1) AND A LINEAR MULTIPLET WITH WEIGHTS (2,0) LE = [LVR]D, VR = log(L/S ¯ S) θ2¯ θ2 TERM
SLIDE 26
THE NEW MINIMAL EINSTEIN ACTION DEPENDS ON A CHIRAL COMPENSATOR WITH (SCALING DIMENSION,CHIRAL WEIGHT)=(1,1) AND A LINEAR MULTIPLET WITH WEIGHTS (2,0) LE = [LVR]D, VR = log(L/S ¯ S) θ2¯ θ2 TERM ¯ DαS = 0 CHIRAL MULTIPLET
SLIDE 27
THE NEW MINIMAL EINSTEIN ACTION DEPENDS ON A CHIRAL COMPENSATOR WITH (SCALING DIMENSION,CHIRAL WEIGHT)=(1,1) AND A LINEAR MULTIPLET WITH WEIGHTS (2,0) LE = [LVR]D, VR = log(L/S ¯ S) θ2¯ θ2 TERM D2L = ¯ D2L = 0 → L = ... + ¯ θσµθAµ + .., ∂µAµ = 0 ¯ DαS = 0 CHIRAL MULTIPLET LINEAR MULTIPLET
SLIDE 28
THE ACTION IS INDEPENDENT OF THE CHIRAL COMPENSATOR BECAUSE IT CAN BE SCALED TO A CONSTANT WITH A GAUGE TRANSFORMATION PARAMETRIZED BY A CHIRAL SUPERFIELD [L(Ω + ¯ Ω)]D = 0 S → S0 = eΩS, S0 = 1, VR → VR + Ω + ¯ Ω THE EINSTEIN TERM IS INVARIANT BECAUSE
SLIDE 29
THE ACTION IS INDEPENDENT OF THE CHIRAL COMPENSATOR BECAUSE IT CAN BE SCALED TO A CONSTANT WITH A GAUGE TRANSFORMATION PARAMETRIZED BY A CHIRAL SUPERFIELD [L(Ω + ¯ Ω)]D = 0 S → S0 = eΩS, S0 = 1, VR → VR + Ω + ¯ Ω THE EINSTEIN TERM IS INVARIANT BECAUSE HIGHER ORDER TERMS ARE WRITTEN IN TERMS OF THE GAUGE-INVARIANT FIELD STRENGTH Wα(VR) = ¯ D2DαVR = θαR + ...
SLIDE 30 THE NEW MINIMAL ACTION
R + αR2
θ2 TERM L = [LVR]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(VR)]F + c.c.
THE ACTION IS DUAL TO A STANDARD SUPERGRAVITY ACTION DESCRIBING GRAVITON+GRAVITINO PLUS A MASSIVE VECTOR MULTIPLET [1,(2)1/2, 0] (CECOTTI, FERRARA, M.P ., SABHARWAL, 1988; RIOTTO, KEHAGIAS, 2013)
SLIDE 31 THE NEW MINIMAL ACTION
R + αR2
θ2 TERM L = [LVR]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(VR)]F + c.c.
THE ACTION IS DUAL TO A STANDARD SUPERGRAVITY ACTION DESCRIBING GRAVITON+GRAVITINO PLUS A MASSIVE VECTOR MULTIPLET [1,(2)1/2, 0] (CECOTTI, FERRARA, M.P ., SABHARWAL, 1988; RIOTTO, KEHAGIAS, 2013) TRICK: INTRODUCE AN UNCONSTRAINED REAL MULTIPLET AS LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER: R
SLIDE 32 ACTION DOES NOT DEPEND ON BECAUSE OF GAUGE INVARIANCE L = −[S ¯ SeUU]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + c.c.
S S → SeY , U → U − Y − ¯ Y , R → R − Y − ¯ Y
SLIDE 33 SOLVE E.O.M. OF REAL MULTIPLET TO GET NEW MINIMAL ACTION ACTION DOES NOT DEPEND ON BECAUSE OF GAUGE INVARIANCE R L = −[S ¯ SeUU]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + c.c.
S S → SeY , U → U − Y − ¯ Y , R → R − Y − ¯ Y
SLIDE 34 SOLVE E.O.M. OF REAL MULTIPLET TO GET NEW MINIMAL ACTION ACTION DOES NOT DEPEND ON BECAUSE OF GAUGE INVARIANCE R L = −[S ¯ SeUU]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + c.c.
SOLVE E.O.M. OF LINEAR MULTIPLET TO GET L S REDEFINE S → Se−T S → SeY , U → U − Y − ¯ Y , R → R − Y − ¯ Y R = T + ¯ T
SLIDE 35 SOLVE E.O.M. OF REAL MULTIPLET TO GET NEW MINIMAL ACTION ACTION DOES NOT DEPEND ON BECAUSE OF GAUGE INVARIANCE R L = −[S ¯ SeUU]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + c.c.
SOLVE E.O.M. OF LINEAR MULTIPLET TO GET L S ACTION DESCRIBES A MASSIVE VECTOR MULTIPLET REDEFINE S → Se−T L = −[S ¯ S(U − T − ¯ T)e(U−T − ¯
T )]D +
1 2g2 [W 2(U)]F + c.c. S → SeY , U → U − Y − ¯ Y , R → R − Y − ¯ Y R = T + ¯ T
SLIDE 36 THIS IS A PARTICULAR CASE OF THE GENERAL N=1 ACTION WHERE THE U(1) GAUGED BY THE VECTOR FIELD IS IN THE BROKEN PHASE STUCKELBERG FIELD KAEHLER POTENTIAL T → T + Ω, U → U + Ω + ¯ Ω UeU → e(2/3)J(U−T − ¯
T ),
J(C) = 3 2(C − log C)
SLIDE 37 THE BOSONIC ACTION CAN BE COMPUTED USING THE GENERAL FORMULAS OF N=1 SUPERGRAVITY DEGREES OF FREEDOM: ONE SCALAR AND ONE MASSIVE VECTOR
L = 1 2R − 1 2J00(C)∂µC∂µC − 1 4g2 Fµν(B)F µν(B) − 1 2J00(C)BµBµ − g2 2 J02(C)
SLIDE 38 THE BOSONIC ACTION CAN BE COMPUTED USING THE GENERAL FORMULAS OF N=1 SUPERGRAVITY DEGREES OF FREEDOM: ONE SCALAR AND ONE MASSIVE VECTOR FOR THE KAEHLER FUNCTION REDEFINE
C = exp( p 2/3φ)
THE POTENTIAL IS V = 9 8g2(1 − e−√
2/3φ)2
J(C) = 3 2(C − log C)
L = 1 2R − 1 2J00(C)∂µC∂µC − 1 4g2 Fµν(B)F µν(B) − 1 2J00(C)BµBµ − g2 2 J02(C)
SLIDE 39
HIGHER CURVATURE CORRECTIONS
WE WANT TO FIND THE SUPERSYMMETRIC COMPLETION OF TERMS Rn
SLIDE 40 HIGHER CURVATURE CORRECTIONS
WE WANT TO FIND THE SUPERSYMMETRIC COMPLETION OF TERMS Rn CHIRAL PROJECTOR
(w, w − 2)
Σ
→ (w + 1, w + 1)
L = [LVR]D + 1 2g2 [W 2]F + X
klp
aklp " W 2 ¯ W 2 L2 ✓ ¯ ΣW 2 L2 ◆k ✓ Σ ¯ W 2 L2 ◆l ✓DαWα L ◆p#
D
SLIDE 41 THE BOSONIC ACTION CONTAINS THE TERMS L = 1 2R + 1 18g2 R2 + X
klp
aklpR4+p+2k+2l
SLIDE 42 THE BOSONIC ACTION CONTAINS THE TERMS L = 1 2R + 1 18g2 R2 + X
klp
aklpR4+p+2k+2l BUT ALSO THE TERMS X
klp
aklp(F +2 − D2)1+k(F −2 − D2)1+lC2+2k+2l(DC)p
SLIDE 43 THE BOSONIC ACTION CONTAINS THE TERMS L = 1 2R + 1 18g2 R2 + X
klp
aklpR4+p+2k+2l BUT ALSO THE TERMS X
klp
aklp(F +2 − D2)1+k(F −2 − D2)1+lC2+2k+2l(DC)p (ANTI) SELF-DUAL FIELD STRENGHT AUXILIARY FIELD
SLIDE 44
DANGEROUS CORRECTIONS: BECAUSE THE HIGHER-ORDER TERMS BECOME O(1) AT THE INFLATION SCALE aklp ∼ g−(6+4k+4l+2p) R ∼ g2
SLIDE 45
DANGEROUS CORRECTIONS: BUT BEHAVIOR IS TOO SINGULAR IN THE “UNHIGGSED” LIMIT BECAUSE THE HIGHER-ORDER TERMS BECOME O(1) AT THE INFLATION SCALE aklp ∼ g−(6+4k+4l+2p) R ∼ g2 g → 0
SLIDE 46
NORMALIZE VECTOR FIELD Bµ → gBµ O
SLIDE 47
NORMALIZE VECTOR FIELD Bµ → gBµ REGULARITY OF BORN-INFELD TERMS aklpg4+2k+2l(F +2)1+k(F −2)1+lC2+2k+2l(DC)p IMPLIES aklp ∼ g−(4+2k+2l) OR MORE REGULAR O
SLIDE 48
NORMALIZE VECTOR FIELD Bµ → gBµ REGULARITY OF BORN-INFELD TERMS aklpg4+2k+2l(F +2)1+k(F −2)1+lC2+2k+2l(DC)p IMPLIES aklp ∼ g−(4+2k+2l) OR MORE REGULAR O E.G. DURING SLOW ROLL THE FIRST CORRECTION ( ) IS AT MOST R4 g−4R4 ⇠ R2 ⌧ 1 18g2 R2, g ⇠ 10−4 10−5
SLIDE 49
WHAT ABOUT CHAOTIC INFLATION?
SLIDE 50 WHAT ABOUT CHAOTIC INFLATION?
- IN SUPERGRAVITY IT IS HARD TO PRODUCE A
PURE QUADRATIC SCALAR POTENTIAL.
SLIDE 51 WHAT ABOUT CHAOTIC INFLATION?
- IN SUPERGRAVITY IT IS HARD TO PRODUCE A
PURE QUADRATIC SCALAR POTENTIAL.
- EVEN HARDER TO PRODUCE A POTENTIAL
FOR A SINGLE, REAL SCALAR FIELD ABOVE THE SUSY BREAKING SCALE (SCALARS LOVE TO COME IN EQUAL-MASS PAIRS).
SLIDE 52 WHAT ABOUT CHAOTIC INFLATION?
- IN SUPERGRAVITY IT IS HARD TO PRODUCE A
PURE QUADRATIC SCALAR POTENTIAL.
- EVEN HARDER TO PRODUCE A POTENTIAL
FOR A SINGLE, REAL SCALAR FIELD ABOVE THE SUSY BREAKING SCALE (SCALARS LOVE TO COME IN EQUAL-MASS PAIRS).
- WE HAVE HERE A NEW SETTING FOR
FINDING SUCH A POTENTIAL J = C2/2, V = g2 2 C2
SLIDE 53 RATHER GENERAL COUPLING TO MATTER
L = −[S ¯ SeU(U + Φ(U, Z, ¯ Z))]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + [S3W(Z)]F + c.c.
GAUGE INVARIANT UNDER ZI → eqIΩZI, S → Se−Ω, U → U + Ω + ¯ Ω
SLIDE 54 RATHER GENERAL COUPLING TO MATTER
L = −[S ¯ SeU(U + Φ(U, Z, ¯ Z))]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + [S3W(Z)]F + c.c.
GAUGE INVARIANT UNDER ZI → eqIΩZI, S → Se−Ω, U → U + Ω + ¯ Ω CONSTRAINT SAYS THAT COMPOSITE MULTIPLET GAUGES THE R-SYMMETRY
VR
R
SLIDE 55 RATHER GENERAL COUPLING TO MATTER
L = −[S ¯ SeU(U + Φ(U, Z, ¯ Z))]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + [S3W(Z)]F + c.c.
GAUGE INVARIANT UNDER ZI → eqIΩZI, S → Se−Ω, U → U + Ω + ¯ Ω CONSTRAINT SAYS THAT COMPOSITE MULTIPLET GAUGES THE R-SYMMETRY
VR
R SOLVE E.O.M. GET STANDARD SUGRA LAGRANGIAN WITH (BROKEN) GAUGED R-SYMMETRY L
SLIDE 56 RATHER GENERAL COUPLING TO MATTER
L = −[S ¯ SeU(U + Φ(U, Z, ¯ Z))]D + [R(S ¯ SeU − L)]D + 1 2g2 [W 2
α(U)]F + [S3W(Z)]F + c.c.
GAUGE INVARIANT UNDER ZI → eqIΩZI, S → Se−Ω, U → U + Ω + ¯ Ω CONSTRAINT SAYS THAT COMPOSITE MULTIPLET GAUGES THE R-SYMMETRY
VR
R SOLVE E.O.M. GET STANDARD SUGRA LAGRANGIAN WITH (BROKEN) GAUGED R-SYMMETRY L
- CFR. LUST
- KOUNNAS-TOUMBAS arXiv: 1409.7076
FERRARA-PORRATI arXiv: 1506.01566
SLIDE 57 SCALAR POTENTIAL
A LOT OF CANCELATIONS LEAD TO V = WIΦI ¯
J ¯
W ¯
J + g2
2 D2 D = −6e−√
2/3φ + 6 + terms quadratic in matter fields z
SLIDE 58 SCALAR POTENTIAL
A LOT OF CANCELATIONS LEAD TO V = WIΦI ¯
J ¯
W ¯
J + g2
2 D2 D = −6e−√
2/3φ + 6 + terms quadratic in matter fields z
SO POTENTIAL REDUCES TO PURE STAROBINSKY AT STATIONARY POINT FOR MATTER FIELDS WHEN WI = 0 at z = 0
SLIDE 59 SCALAR POTENTIAL
A LOT OF CANCELATIONS LEAD TO V = WIΦI ¯
J ¯
W ¯
J + g2
2 D2 D = −6e−√
2/3φ + 6 + terms quadratic in matter fields z
SO POTENTIAL REDUCES TO PURE STAROBINSKY AT STATIONARY POINT FOR MATTER FIELDS WHEN WI = 0 at z = 0 PREVIOUS USE OF D TERMS FOR INFLATION: BINETRUY-DVALI hep-ph/9606342
SLIDE 60 SCALAR POTENTIAL
A LOT OF CANCELATIONS LEAD TO V = WIΦI ¯
J ¯
W ¯
J + g2
2 D2 D = −6e−√
2/3φ + 6 + terms quadratic in matter fields z
SO POTENTIAL REDUCES TO PURE STAROBINSKY AT STATIONARY POINT FOR MATTER FIELDS WHEN WI = 0 at z = 0 PREVIOUS USE OF D TERMS FOR INFLATION: BINETRUY-DVALI-KALLOSH-VAN PROEYEN hep-ph/9606342 hep-th/0402046
SLIDE 61 CONCLUSIONS
- INFLATIONARY f(R) SCENARIOS CAN BE
EMBEDDED IN SUPERGRAVITY
- THE NEW MINIMAL FORMALISM IS
PARTICULARLY SUITED TO STUDY f(R) THEORIES BECAUSE IT ADDS ONE SINGLE SCALAR TO THE GRAVITATIONAL SUPERMULTIPLET, WHICH IS UNEQUIVOCALLY IDENTIFIED WITH THE INFLATON
- POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS HIGHER-
CURVATURE CORRECTIONS ARE FORBIDDEN BY A DECOUPLING ARGUMENT
- THE D-TERM POTENTIAL CAN BE EMBEDDED
INTO A POTENTIAL CONTAINING D AND F TERMS
SLIDE 62
- LAST BUT NOT LEAST: THE LAGRANGIAN
DUAL TO NEW-MINIMAL HIGH CURVATURE POTENTIALS GIVES THE SIMPLEST AND MOST NATURAL REALIZATION IN SUPERGRAVITY OF QUADRATIC-POTENTIAL CHAOTIC INFLATION