Blueprint for Quality Schools Crocker Highlands Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

blueprint for quality schools crocker highlands
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Blueprint for Quality Schools Crocker Highlands Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Blueprint for Quality Schools Crocker Highlands Presentation Oakland Unified School District October 10 & 11, 2017 1 Agenda Welcome and Introductions The Process: Blueprint for Quality Schools The Data: Condition, Capacity,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Oakland Unified School District

October 10 & 11, 2017

1

Blueprint for Quality Schools Crocker Highlands Presentation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

2

  • Welcome and Introductions
  • The Process: Blueprint for Quality

Schools

  • The Data: Condition, Capacity, Adequacy
  • Your Feedback: Questionnaire
  • Closing
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Strategic Goal: We must better use our limited resources to equitably improve student outcomes across OUSD.

How Do We Achieve This Goal?

Blueprint: A plan focused on education

Challenge: OUSD needs to significantly improve student outcomes.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

More Than a Plan, a Vehicle for Change

The OUSD Blueprint for Quality Schools is a planning process that will help OUSD students to have more equitable access to schools and programs they need to thrive. Some options that may be considered include:

  • Prioritizing upgrades to buildings and programs
  • Expanding, merging, or closing schools
  • Changing configurations of schools and central
  • ffice

Community input through the Blueprint Advisory Group and Community Dialogues will help inform options. Keeping in Mind Our Constraints:

  • California is 47th in per pupil

funding in the nation

  • Budget still recovering from

funding cuts

  • Declining enrollment in OUSD
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Blueprint for Quality Schools Overview

Participants:

Community Blueprint Advisory Group Executive Planning Committee Board

Shared Understanding Study Data Options & Recommendations

April 24 Board Launches Blueprint for Quality Schools May 25 Community Kickoff Meetings Summer Community Engagement Retreats

A u g 1 7 , A u g 3 1 B l u e p r i n t A d v i s

  • r

y G r

  • u

p M e e t i n g s 1 & 2

Wk of Sept 11 Community Dialog 1 Oct 3-5 Options Planning Workshop

O c t 2 6 , N

  • v

1 5 B l u e p r i n t A d v i s

  • r

y G r

  • u

p M e e t i n g s 3 & 4

Wk of Dec 4 Community Dialog 2 Dec 12-14

Recommendations Workshop

J a n 1 7 , 2 1 8 B l u e p r i n t A d v i s

  • r

y G r

  • u

p M e e t i n g 5

Jan/Feb 2018 Board Receives Blueprint

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OUSD Facility Needs – Current & Life Cycle Needs

6

Life cycle costs = building systems and components that will likely exceed their useful life in 2+ years

Deficiency costs = building systems and components that are already past their useful life, are broken, or not code-compliant

slide-7
SLIDE 7

High seismic costs are due to aging buildings + new building codes.

OUSD Facility Needs – Current & Life Cycle Needs

7

Mission Critical, Code Compliance Priority 1 May become Priority 1 issues in the near term Priority 2 Short-term Requirements Priority 3 Long-term Requirements Priority 4 Enhancements Priority 5

$4.2 in Priority 1 condition deficiencies is low for a large district such as OUSD.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Educational Adequacy

8

  • Results show OUSD has prioritized

healthy, safe environments with a limited budget.

  • Lowest scores pertain to 21st

Century learning spaces and design.

  • The challenge and opportunity is to

determine a pathway forward that brings as many students as possible into modern learning environments with fixed resources.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

School Capacity for use in Facilities Master Planning

9

Student-to- Classroom Ratio Classroom Type Utilzation Factor Planning Capacity

< 80% = underutilized 80-120% = acceptable range >120% = over-utilized Utilization = Enrollment / Capacity

  • Lower utilization scores show how a

building is currently operating and provides a minimum utilization score.

  • Higher utilization scores show how a

building could operate (e.g., if state funding changed to allow it) and provides a maximum utilization score. We Seek to Balance Utilization within an sustainable planning range

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Capacity & Enrollment by SRA

10

The Central and Northwest SRA regions are full-to-over-utilized. The East and Northeast have a reasonable balance of utilization with pockets of extra capacity. The West is under-utilized. Total area utilization often does not tell the whole story; you need to drill down to grade level utilizations to understand implications for planning.

** Current enrollment shown above includes charter students where they are co-located inside a building with an OUSD District School (1,655 students)

SRA Region Current Enrollment Projected Enrollment (5 yrs) Current Utilization Range Projected Utilization Range Central 6,691 6,620 87% -- 122% 86% -- 121% East 14,671 14,325 75% -- 106% 74% -- 103% Northeast 5,458 5,207 71% -- 97% 68% -- 92% Northwest 8,173 7,951 94% -- 129% 92% -- 125% West 3,210 3,124 52% -- 72% 51% -- 70% Total 38,203 37,227 77% -- 107% 75% -- 104%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

% total school capacity in portables 2016-17 enrollment

Data Summaries by SRA | What to look for

11

Cost of repairing / cost

  • f replacing

the building as is Total costs of repairs for 5 years Cost of priority 1 & 2 deficiencies Projected enrollment in 5 years Change in enrollment

  • ver 5 years

Utilization range: from Min – Max Level of repair suggested based on the Facility Condition Index Degree to which the building is utilized within an acceptable planning range

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Data Summaries by SRA | Northwest

12

Facility Building Condition Current & Projected Enrollment School Utilization Analysis

School Name Grades Served Facility Condition Index Total 5 yr Facility Condition Costs Seismeic, Saftey, & Critical Repairs Current Enrollment Projected Enrollment (5 yrs) Enrollment Change (5 yrs) Percent of Capcity in Portables 5-year Range Between the Lowest

  • to- Current Student:

Teacher Ratios Condition Utilization

Elementary Anthony Chabot Elementary School K-5 16% $3,926,149 $528,998 562 543

  • 19

29% 91% -- 137% Good Over-utilized Crocker Highlands Elementary School K-5 65% $13,606,914 $7,744,926 459 445

  • 14

7% 133% -- 198% Moderate Renovations Over-utilized Emerson Elementary School TK-5 24% $5,134,946 $2,107,089 321 324 3 37% 68% -- 98% Minor Renovations Moderate-low Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. Elementary School K-5 43% $5,563,806 $787,772 269 253

  • 16

38% 89% -- 135% Moderate Renovations Over-utilized Joaquin Miller Elementary School K-5 31% $7,004,636 $629,164 434 411

  • 23

21% 87% -- 131% Minor Renovations Over-utilized Montclair Elementary School TK-5 25% $9,136,007 $77,674 643 700 57 17% 114% -- 169% Minor Renovations Over-utilized Peralta Elementary School K-5 10% $1,223,068 $55,938 319 302

  • 17

37% 85% -- 127% Good Over-utilized Piedmont Avenue Elementary School TK-5 39% $9,437,607 $4,310,460 329 322

  • 7

6% 73% -- 107% Minor Renovations Target range Thornhill Elementary School TK-5 30% $5,668,099 $809,543 392 387

  • 5

34% 81% -- 122% Minor Renovations Moderate-high

Elementary Total $60,701,231 $17,051,564 3,728 3,687

  • 41

25% 91% -- 135%

  • Middle

Claremont Middle School 6-8 22% $7,468,859 $1,060,589 446 441

  • 5

8% 90% -- 114% Minor Renovations Moderate-high Edna Brewer Middle School 6-8 69% $34,427,901 $17,131,320 809 786

  • 23

0% 101% -- 128% Major Renovation Over-utilized Montera Middle School 6-8 44% $23,876,827 $10,035,655 780 770

  • 10

38% 75% -- 96% Moderate Renovations Target range

Middle Total $65,773,587 $28,227,564 2,035 1,997

  • 38

15% 87% -- 111%

  • High School

Oakland Technical High School 9-12 65% $102,904,313 $23,275,167 2,033 1,889

  • 144

13% 106% -- 135% Moderate Renovations Over-utilized Oakland Tech HS- Upper Campus (Far West HS) 9-12 47% $5,554,498 $272,469 93% % -- % Moderate Renovations

High Total $108,458,811 $23,547,636 2,033 1,889

  • 144

53% 95% -- 120%

  • Other

Hillcrest Elementary School K-8 71% $9,581,062 $1,105,248 377 378 1 6% 107% -- 155% Major Renovation Over-utilized

Other Total $9,581,062 $1,105,248 377 378 1 6% 107% -- 155%

  • Northwest Area Total

$244,514,692 $69,932,011 8,173 7,951

  • 222

26% 92% -- 125%

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Data Summaries by SRA | Northwest Findings

13 Condition

29% of 5-year condition costs are associated with Seismic, Safety and Critical Repairs (Priority 1 & 2 Deficiencies).

Utilization

Elementary Schools – Elementary Schools are over-utilized in the Northwest SRA region. All ES are at or over-capacity and 7/9 are projected to be 122%-198% utilized in five years. Middle Schools – Middle Schools are full and Edna Brewer MS is over-utilized. High Schools – Oakland Technical HS is over-utilized. Other Schools –Hillcrest K-8 is over-utilized.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Your Input | Questionnaire

14

Take the Blueprint Survey at www.ousd.org/blueprintforquality

Tell your friends and neighbors to complete this questionnaire

  • nline. It will be

available on the OUSD website until Friday, October 13.