blueprint for quality schools crocker highlands
play

Blueprint for Quality Schools Crocker Highlands Presentation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Blueprint for Quality Schools Crocker Highlands Presentation Oakland Unified School District October 10 & 11, 2017 1 Agenda Welcome and Introductions The Process: Blueprint for Quality Schools The Data: Condition, Capacity,


  1. Blueprint for Quality Schools Crocker Highlands Presentation Oakland Unified School District October 10 & 11, 2017 1

  2. Agenda • Welcome and Introductions • The Process: Blueprint for Quality Schools • The Data: Condition, Capacity, Adequacy • Your Feedback: Questionnaire • Closing 2

  3. Blueprint: A plan focused on education Challenge: OUSD needs to significantly improve student outcomes. Strategic Goal: We must better use our limited resources to equitably improve student outcomes across OUSD. How Do We Achieve This Goal?

  4. More Than a Plan, a Vehicle for Change Community input through the Blueprint Advisory Group and Community Dialogues will help The OUSD Blueprint for Quality Schools is a planning inform options. process that will help OUSD students to have more equitable access to schools and programs they need to thrive. Some options that may be considered Keeping in Mind Our Constraints: include: ● California is 47th in per pupil ● Prioritizing upgrades to buildings and programs funding in the nation ● Expanding, merging, or closing schools ● Budget still recovering from ● Changing configurations of schools and central funding cuts office ● Declining enrollment in OUSD

  5. Blueprint for Quality Schools Overview April 24 Board Launches Shared Understanding Blueprint for Quality Schools May 25 Community Kickoff Meetings Summer Community A Engagement u g B l 1 u 7 e Retreats , p A r i u G n t g r A o 3 u d 1 v p i s M o e r e y t i n g s 1 & 2 Wk of Sept 11 Community Study Data Dialog 1 Oct 3-5 Options O c t B 2 6 l u Planning , e N p o r i v G n t 1 r Workshop o A 5 u d p v i s M o e r e y t i n g s 3 & 4 Wk of Dec 4 Community Options & Recommendations Dialog 2 Board Executive Planning Committee Blueprint Advisory Group Community Participants: Dec 12-14 Recommendations B J a l u n e Workshop 1 p 7 r i , G n 2 r t o 0 A u 1 d p 8 v M i s o e r e y t i n g 5 Jan/Feb 2018 Board Receives Blueprint

  6. OUSD Facility Needs – Current & Life Cycle Needs Life cycle costs = building systems and components that will likely exceed their useful life in 2+ years Deficiency costs = building systems and components that are already past their useful life, are broken, or not code-compliant 6

  7. OUSD Facility Needs – Current & Life Cycle Needs High seismic costs are due to aging buildings + new building codes. $4.2 in Priority 1 condition deficiencies is low for a large district such as OUSD. Mission Critical, Code Priority 1 Compliance May become Priority 1 Priority 2 issues in the near term Priority 3 Short-term Requirements Priority 4 Long-term Requirements Priority 5 Enhancements 7

  8. Educational Adequacy • Results show OUSD has prioritized healthy, safe environments with a limited budget. • Lowest scores pertain to 21 st Century learning spaces and design. • The challenge and opportunity is to determine a pathway forward that brings as many students as possible into modern learning environments with fixed resources. 8

  9. School Capacity for use in Facilities Master Planning Student-to- Classroom Utilzation Planning Classroom Type Factor Capacity Ratio • Lower utilization scores show how a Utilization = Enrollment / Capacity building is currently operating and provides a minimum utilization score. < 80% = underutilized • Higher utilization scores show how a 80-120% = acceptable range building could operate (e.g., if state funding changed to allow it) and >120% = over-utilized provides a maximum utilization score . We Seek to Balance Utilization within an sustainable planning range 9

  10. Capacity & Enrollment by SRA Current Projected Enrollment Current Utilization Projected Utilization SRA Region Enrollment (5 yrs) Range Range Central 6,691 6,620 87% -- 122% 86% -- 121% East 14,671 14,325 75% -- 106% 74% -- 103% Northeast 5,458 5,207 71% -- 97% 68% -- 92% Northwest 8,173 7,951 94% -- 129% 92% -- 125% West 3,210 3,124 52% -- 72% 51% -- 70% Total 38,203 37,227 77% -- 107% 75% -- 104% The Central and Northwest SRA regions Total area utilization often does not are full-to-over-utilized. The East and tell the whole story; you need to drill Northeast have a reasonable balance of down to grade level utilizations to utilization with pockets of extra capacity. understand implications for planning. The West is under-utilized. ** Current enrollment shown above includes charter students where they are co-located inside a building with an OUSD District School (1,655 students) 10

  11. Data Summaries by SRA | What to look for Cost of priority Degree to 1 & 2 which the deficiencies Change in building is enrollment utilized Total costs of Level of Utilization over 5 years within an repair repairs for 5 range: acceptable suggested years Projected from Min – planning based on enrollment in 5 Max range the Facility Cost of years Condition repairing / cost % total school Index of replacing capacity in 2016-17 the building as portables enrollment is 11

  12. Data Summaries by SRA | Northwest Facility Building Condition Current & Projected Enrollment School Utilization Analysis 5-year Range Facility Projected Percent of Total 5 yr Facility Seismeic, Saftey, & Current Enrollment Between the Lowest School Name Grades Served Condition Enrollment (5 Capcity in Condition Utilization Condition Costs Critical Repairs Enrollment Change (5 yrs) -to- Current Student: Index yrs) Portables Teacher Ratios Elementary K-5 16% 562 543 -19 29% 91% -- 137% Good Over-utilized Anthony Chabot Elementary School $3,926,149 $528,998 K-5 65% 459 445 -14 7% 133% -- 198% Moderate Renovations Over-utilized Crocker Highlands Elementary School $13,606,914 $7,744,926 TK-5 24% 321 324 3 37% 68% -- 98% Minor Renovations Moderate-low Emerson Elementary School $5,134,946 $2,107,089 K-5 43% 269 253 -16 38% 89% -- 135% Moderate Renovations Over-utilized Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. Elementary School $5,563,806 $787,772 K-5 31% 434 411 -23 21% 87% -- 131% Minor Renovations Over-utilized Joaquin Miller Elementary School $7,004,636 $629,164 TK-5 25% 643 700 57 17% 114% -- 169% Minor Renovations Over-utilized Montclair Elementary School $9,136,007 $77,674 K-5 10% 319 302 -17 37% 85% -- 127% Good Over-utilized Peralta Elementary School $1,223,068 $55,938 TK-5 39% 329 322 -7 6% 73% -- 107% Minor Renovations Target range Piedmont Avenue Elementary School $9,437,607 $4,310,460 TK-5 30% 392 387 -5 34% 81% -- 122% Minor Renovations Moderate-high Thornhill Elementary School $5,668,099 $809,543 Elementary Total $60,701,231 $17,051,564 3,728 3,687 -41 25% 91% -- 135% - - Middle 6-8 22% 446 441 -5 8% 90% -- 114% Minor Renovations Moderate-high Claremont Middle School $7,468,859 $1,060,589 Edna Brewer Middle School 6-8 69% $34,427,901 $17,131,320 809 786 -23 0% 101% -- 128% Major Renovation Over-utilized 6-8 44% 780 770 -10 38% 75% -- 96% Moderate Renovations Target range Montera Middle School $23,876,827 $10,035,655 Middle Total $65,773,587 $28,227,564 2,035 1,997 -38 15% 87% -- 111% - - High School 9-12 65% 2,033 1,889 -144 13% 106% -- 135% Moderate Renovations Over-utilized Oakland Technical High School $102,904,313 $23,275,167 Oakland Tech HS- Upper Campus (Far West HS) 9-12 47% $5,554,498 $272,469 0 0 0 93% % -- % Moderate Renovations 2,033 1,889 -144 53% 95% -- 120% - - High Total $108,458,811 $23,547,636 Other Hillcrest Elementary School K-8 71% $9,581,062 $1,105,248 377 378 1 6% 107% -- 155% Major Renovation Over-utilized 377 378 1 6% 107% -- 155% - - Other Total $9,581,062 $1,105,248 Northwest Area Total $244,514,692 $69,932,011 8,173 7,951 -222 26% 92% -- 125% - - 12

  13. Data Summaries by SRA | Northwest Findings Condition 29% of 5-year condition costs are associated with Seismic, Safety and Critical Repairs (Priority 1 & 2 Deficiencies). Utilization Elementary Schools – Elementary Schools are over-utilized in the Northwest SRA region. All ES are at or over-capacity and 7/9 are projected to be 122%-198% utilized in five years. Middle Schools – Middle Schools are full and Edna Brewer MS is over-utilized. High Schools – Oakland Technical HS is over-utilized. Other Schools –Hillcrest K-8 is over-utilized. 13

  14. Your Input | Questionnaire Tell your friends and neighbors to complete this questionnaire online. It will be available on the Take the Blueprint Survey at OUSD website www.ousd.org/blueprintforquality until Friday, October 13. 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend