Black Hole Candidates in Gamma-Ray Bursts Xuefeng Wu Purple - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

black hole candidates in gamma ray bursts
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Black Hole Candidates in Gamma-Ray Bursts Xuefeng Wu Purple - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Black Holes and Friends Fudan University,2015.3.30-4.1 Black Hole Candidates in Gamma-Ray Bursts Xuefeng Wu Purple Mountain Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators Collaborators Liang Li, Weihua Weihua Lei, Lei, Zigao


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Black Hole Candidates in Gamma-Ray Bursts

Xuefeng Wu

Purple Mountain Observatory Chinese Academy of Sciences Collaborators Collaborators:Liang Li, Weihua Weihua Lei, Lei, Zigao Zigao Dai, Dai, Enwei Enwei Liang, and Bing Zhang

Black Holes and Friends

Fudan University,2015.3.30-4.1

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Basic Features of GRBs

  • - spatial features
  • - detection rate:
  • - temporal features
  • - spectral features
  • Profiles

Complicated

  • Durations

5 ms ─ 10 s ─ 5×103 s

  • Variability

0.1ms ─1ms ,

  • No repetition

1-2 events per day by CGRO/BATSE

  • Photon Energy

1 eV ─ 1 MeV ─ 30 GeV

  • Non-thermal:

N(E) ∝ E-α

  • High Energy Tail:

no cutoff above 1 MeV

  • Fluence:

10-10 ─ 10-8 J /m2

log

Isotropic

Lack of weak GRBs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Short vs. Long GRBs

Long Bursts: collapsars Young (few million yrs) Star-forming regions Short Bursts: mergers Old (few billion yrs) Outside galaxies Short Bursts: mergers Old (few billion yrs) Outside galaxies Long Bursts: collapsars Young (few million yrs) Star-forming regions

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Gehrels, Piro & Leonard 2002, Scientific American

How to identify black holes in GRBs?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Outline

  • 1. GRB X-ray shallow-decays/plateaus and the

magnetar model

  • 2. GRB X-ray shallow-decays/plateaus and the black

hole candidates

  • 3. Summary

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

X-ray shallow-decay/plateaus

  • Swift/XRT discovery in 2005 and hydrodynamic origin

t -5.5ν-1.60.22

GRB050319

t -0.54ν-0.690.06 t -1.14ν-0.800.08

Cusumano et al., 2006, ApJ, 639, 316

slide-7
SLIDE 7

a large sample

~ about 50% GRBs have X-ray shallow decay/plateaus for more details of data analysis on X-ray plateaus

  • f Swift GRBs, see

Liang et al., 2007, ApJ, 670, 565,

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2 classes of X-ray plateaus

external origin

  • vs. internal origin

Cusumano et al., 2006, ApJ, 639, 316 Troja et al., 2007, ApJ, 665, 599 Energy injection: Matter-dominated? Poynting dominated?

GRB050319

Magnetic dissipation?

GRB070110

1、most plateaus are of external origin 2、no quantitative internal plateau model

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Matter-dominated energy injection model

Forward Shock

end of injection

Lorentz factor distribution (Rees & Meszaros 1998):

s

M

 

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Poynting-flux dominated energy injection model

millisecond magnetar

  • r

fast-rotating black hole B-field Forward Shock

Injected luminosity (Dai & Lu 1998):

2

( / ) , ( / ) ,

q

L t T t T L L t T t T

    

       

end of injection

Forward shock energy: Ek,iso ∝ t1-q,

Poynting flux Poynting flux see Zhang et al., 2006, ApJ Nousek et al., 2006, ApJ

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Dai & Lu 1998; Zhang & Meszaros 2001; Fan & Xu 2006; Dall’Osso et al. 2011, etc.

Poynting-flux dominated injection by millisecond magnetar

numerical calculations and fittings to the observations

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Termination Shock External Shock Contact Discontinuity Shocked ambient medium

Relativistic e-e+ wind

Shocked e-e+ wind

Relativistic wind bubble (RWB) model

Black hole

Dai (2004, ApJ)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Yu & Dai (2007) numerical light curves Dai (2004) analytical light curves

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Dai (2004):X-ray plateaus may be highly polarized detectable by future X-ray polarimeter (such as XTP)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Lv & Zhang Sample for GRB Magnetars

Gold: internal plateaus, (3 known z & 6 unknown z) Silver: external plateaus, (33 known z)

15

Short GRBs

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Magnetars in short GRBs

X-ray plateau traces the spin-down of the magnetar? Collapse of the magnetar?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Magnetars in short GRBs

Rowlinson et al. (2013)

X-ray plateaus

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Magnetars in short GRBs

Rowlinson et al. (2013)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Gehrels, Piro & Leonard 2002, Scientific American

Where are black holes in GRBs?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Outline

  • 1. GRB X-ray shallow-decays/plateaus and the

magnetar model

  • 2. GRB X-ray shallow-decays/plateaus and the black

hole candidates

  • 3. Summary

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Plateau Model Comparison:Magnetar vs. BH

GRB afterglow jet GRB afterglow jet isotropic injection low efficiency collimated injection high efficiency

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Magnetar parameters

2 observables,2 variables: (1)dipole magnetic B-field; (2)initial rotational Period。

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Lv & Zhang Sample for GRB Magnetars

Magnetar isotropic injection

Gold: internal plateaus, 3 known z & 6 unknown z Silver: external plateaus, 33 known z Aluminum: other plateaus

23

Magnetar collimated injection

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Collimated wind from magnetar

Bucciantini et al., 2008, MNRAS, 383, L25 Bucciantini et al., 2009, MNRAS, 396, 2038 After plateau

/ >>

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Lv & Zhang Sample for GRB Magnetars

Gold: internal plateaus, 3 known z & 6 unknown z Silver: external plateaus, 33 known z Aluminum: other plateaus

25

Magnetar isotropic injection Magnetar collimated injection

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Bucciantini et al., 2008, MNRAS, 383, L25 Bucciantini et al., 2009, MNRAS, 396, 2038 平台相结束后

/ >>

Assumptions of Bucciantini et al. simulations (1)GRB prompt phase,progenitor envelope exist X-ray plateaus,1 – 10 ks after the prompt phase (2)B >=10^15 G,magnetar luminosity about 10^51 erg/s,at least 10^50 erg/s。 X-ray plateaus, much lower B and luminosity (10^47 – 10^49 erg/s) (3)highly magnetization, Lorentz factor about 10 X-ray plateaus, unknown magnetization, higher Lorentz factor (4)toroidal magnetic field outside the magnetar, toothpase effect (kink instability?) X-ray plateaus, still toroidal magnetic field? No conclusive words about isotropic or collimated magnetar wind during the plateau phase

26

Collimated wind from magnetar

slide-27
SLIDE 27

More reasonable criteria for magnetar/BH

GRB afterglow model has a lot of parameters Lower limit on E_k,iso (unknown radiation efficiency) Gold: Ex,iso > 2x10^52 erg, Ek,iso > 2x10^52 erg Black holes ?! (4 GRBs) Silver: Ex,iso < 2x10^52 erg, Ek,iso > 2x10^52 erg Black holes ? (62 GRBs) Bronze: Ex,iso < 2x10^52 erg, Ek,iso < 2x10^52 erg Magnetar ? (13 GRBs)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

BH candidates in GRB X-ray plateaus

(4 GRBs) (62 GRBs) (13 GRBs)

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Spin parameter of GRB BH candidates

a<0.1

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

GRB afterglow jet

Blandford-Znajek mechanism

2、BZ power: Ratio of B-field angular velocity to BH spin 1、BH rotational energy:

其中黑洞自转参数: 其中: Lei, W. H., Zhang, B., & Liang, E. W., 2013, ApJ

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Wang, D. X., Lei, W. H., Xiao, K., & Ma, R. Y., 2002, ApJ

BH spin evolution in Blandford-Znajek process (1) k=0.5, maximum BZ power (2) Region I(IA, IB), spin down LBZ,iso ∝ t -q q>0 (3) Region II , spin up LBZ,iso ∝ t -q q<0

BH spin evolution: spin up spin down

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Wang, D. X., Lei, W. H., Xiao, K., & Ma, R. Y., 2002, ApJ solid line: k=0.6 dashed line: k=0.5 (upper and lower limits depends on k value as well as the inner radius of the accretion disk)

initial condition: BH spin evolution (BZ):

(1) initial spin of X-ray plateau

  • after the prompt GRB;

(2) When k=0.6, and BH spin up, and X-ray plateau with q<0; (3) Otherwise,X-ray plateau with q>0

LBZ,iso ∝ t -q 32 BH spin evolution in Blandford-Znajek process

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Outline

  • 1. GRB X-ray shallow-decays/plateaus and the

magnetar model

  • 2. GRB X-ray shallow-decays/plateaus and the black

hole candidates

  • 3. Summary

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

  • Both magnetar and BH models can explain the X-ray

shallow-decay/plateaus of GRBs well;

  • Less energetic (smaller than the NS maximum rotational

energy, 2e52 erg) X-ray plateaus may originate from magnetars

  • More energetic (larger than the NS maximum rotational

energy, 2e52 erg) X-ray plateaus may originate from black holes

  • We plan to apply detailed BZ mechanism to constrain BH

parameters with X-ray plateaus

Summary