bituminous pwt percent within tolerance
play

Bituminous PWT (Percent Within Tolerance) Steven L. Koser, P.E. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bituminous PWT (Percent Within Tolerance) Steven L. Koser, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation www.dot.state.pa.us 1 Spec Limits and Goal Posts are Similar www.dot.state.pa.us 2 Quality Measure: Percent Within Tolerance (PWT)


  1. Bituminous PWT (Percent Within Tolerance) Steven L. Koser, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation www.dot.state.pa.us 1

  2. Spec Limits and Goal Posts are Similar www.dot.state.pa.us 2

  3. Quality Measure: Percent Within Tolerance (PWT) • Estimates the percentage of material within specification limits – Assumes normal distribution – Area equals 1.0 or 100% 1.0 or 100% www.dot.state.pa.us 3

  4. Standard Deviation • A measure of the variability (i.e. spread) of data Spread www.dot.state.pa.us 4

  5. PWT • Efficiently captures mean and standard deviation in one quality measure X - mean s - standard deviation -3s -2s -1s 1s 2s 3s X www.dot.state.pa.us 5

  6. Number of States using PWT for Hot Mix Asphalt Number of Agencies 30 25 Source 20 FHWA QA 15 Assessment 10 5 0 2014 2010 2008 www.dot.state.pa.us 6

  7. What Does PWT Drive? • Tighter adherence to producing job mix formula • Tighter adherence to field density spec. requirements www.dot.state.pa.us 7

  8. Advantages of PWT • Well suited for low bids to achieve quality • Contractors = bonuses for tighter adherence to targets • Contractors = reduced paym ents for loose adherence to targets • Moves focus to targets (NOT minimums) www.dot.state.pa.us 8

  9. What’s different with PWT spec? • Adds bonus structure (maximum 4% ) • Adds m ix gradation (PCS) as part of payment • Modifies current “goal posts” approach for 100% payment (good or no good) • Results in many fewer 100% payments and spreads these out (bonus and penalty) www.dot.state.pa.us 9

  10. Payment Equation Changes • Current specification (50% mix, 50% density) • 25% asphalt content • 25% # 200 sieve • 50% field density • PW T specification (50% mix, 50% density) • 30% asphalt content • 10% # 200 sieve • 1 0 % prim ary control sieve ( new ) • 50% field density www.dot.state.pa.us 10

  11. Common to All PWT Specs • Defective lots can be left in place at 70% pay by DE (previously 50% pay) • Allow s contractor to term inate lot  Allows contractor to limit risk when early QC results indicate an issue  Must stop paving  90% maximum pay  Must R&R if defective by test results www.dot.state.pa.us 11

  12. Current Status • Three ( 3 ) m ethods thru CT process: 1. PWT-LTS (Laboratory Testing Section) • Fully approved (includes FHWA) • Acceptance at LTS • PWT-LTS Use Guidelines/ District Memo 2. PWT-HOLA (Hands On Local Acceptance) • Fully approved (includes FHWA) • Department Acceptance, Contractor Lab 3. PWT-LA (Local Acceptance) • Contractor Results, Department Verification, F-test and t-test (Not Practical) www.dot.state.pa.us 12

  13. PWT-LTS • Very sim ilar to current process • Allows a contractor option to expedite sam ple delivery to Harrisburg  Inspection staff secures samples  Secure samples given to contractor  Contractor delivers to LTS at his cost  LTS verifies security prior to testing  Priority given to expedited samples  2 Standard Work Day Turnaround Goal at LTS www.dot.state.pa.us 13

  14. PWT-HOLA • HMA/ WMA Material sam ples collected as usual • Acceptance testing performed at: • Proficient producers lab • or another mutually acceptable lab • No LTS acceptance testing (except for dispute resolution situation) www.dot.state.pa.us 14

  15. Mixture Sample Collection Contractor Pulls Sample Representative Secures Sample Contractor Transports Sample Representative Representative Tests Sample Splits Sample Locally LTS Tests IA Sample www.dot.state.pa.us 15

  16. Gmm Verification Testing • Federal Aid Projects & Projects on the NHS • Local Testing www.dot.state.pa.us 16

  17. Staffing LA Testing • Districts will need to allocate certified plant inspectors to perform testing • Shortage in qualified staff • Use Consultants? • May need to coordinate testing for out of District sources www.dot.state.pa.us 17

  18. Contractor’s Lab Assessment • Local acceptance lab will need AMRL on-site proficiency assessment • Every two years • Assessment on the equipment to be used for acceptance www.dot.state.pa.us 18

  19. Independent Assurance • Required by 23 CFR 637 • First lot and randomly once for every ten thereafter • Performed at the LTS on split samples • Ensures sampling and testing is performed correctly • Ensures testing equipment used is properly calibrated and operating correctly www.dot.state.pa.us 19

  20. Local Acceptance QC Plan • Separate LA QC Plan required to detail specifics • 3 weeks before paving • Must identify lab and equipment for testing www.dot.state.pa.us 20

  21. Local Acceptance Equipment Requirements • Dedicated equipment for Department use • Representative reviews equipment • Can remove equip. not meeting requirements from service • Department Acceptance • Accessibility to local lab www.dot.state.pa.us 21

  22. Sample Transportation and Security • Tamper proof coolers with clasps and unique, unopened padlock • Must be capable of relocking for storage www.dot.state.pa.us 22

  23. Sample Transportation and Security • Alternative: Coolers with uniquely numbered security tags • Only one lot per container www.dot.state.pa.us 23

  24. Sample Security • Sealed containers first inspected for security. Upon opening, samples and paperwork to be examined. • If evidence of compromised security, Dept. may reject for testing, suspend paving operations and require additional samples to be taken www.dot.state.pa.us 24

  25. Sample Paperwork • Paperwork (TR-447) is the same • Worksheets keep records of test results • Paperwork to be retained for 3 years www.dot.state.pa.us 25

  26. Lot Testing • Testing to begin once lot is complete • LA testing takes priority over other testing • Contractor’s technician may be present to witness, but not required • Contractor may saw cut density cores for testing www.dot.state.pa.us 26

  27. 2016 Construction Season • Projects advertised after October 13, 2015 (considered) • PWT-HOLA available as of January 15, 2016 • PWT-LTS Incentive/ Disincentive Spreadsheet www.dot.state.pa.us 27

  28. Challenges • Budget • Test Turnaround Time (PWT-LTS) • Oven Correction Factor (PWT-LTS) • Manpower/ Equipment (PWT-HOLA) • AMRL (PWT-HOLA) • Standard Deviation www.dot.state.pa.us

  29. Taking on the Challenge • Expedited Sample Delivery (PWT-LTS) • Dispute Resolution • Training (PWT-HOLA) • AMRL (PWT-HOLA) • Standard Deviation www.dot.state.pa.us

  30. www.dot.state.pa.us 30

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend