Matt Schrader BSC 3052 February 5, 2004 Newman, D., and D. A. Tallmon. 2001. Experimental evidence for beneficial fitness effects of gene flow in recently isolated populations. Conservation Biology. 15(4): 1054- 1063. In small populations, extinction risk may be increased by genetic factors such as drift and inbreeding depression. Simple genetic models predict that a few migrants per generation can counteract inbreeding depression and maintain genetic variation in small populations, but there have been few empirical tests of their predictions. Newman and Tallmon (2001) experimentally manipulated migration into small plant populations in order to test (1) whether migration decreases the effects of inbreeding depression in small populations, (2) whether the amount of migration matters, and (3) how migration affects the distribution of phenotypic variation, within and among populations. The experiment consisted of three migration treatments (0-migrants per generation, 1-migrant per generation, and 2.5 migrants per generation) applied to 10 replicate lab-populations of the annual plant Brassica campestris (rapa) for 5 generations. Each of the thirty populations was founded from 5 seeds collected from a wild population, and the pool of migrants came from the same wild population. Inbreeding coefficients were calculated for each individual using pedigrees, and expected inbreeding coefficients for each treatment were calculated using Wright’s equations. Fitness traits were measure in the lab on seeds that produced the 2nd, 4th, and 6th generation (germination rate, # of seeds per capsule, and seed weight), and in the field on 6th generation plants (cotyledon width, flowering date, stem diameter,
Comments to assignment
- 1. Goals of the study
- 2. Method(s)
- 3. Results or conclusions
- 4. Strengths and Weaknesses
- 5. Overall evaluation (do strengths outweigh weaknesses,
contribution to field)
- 6. If you use work of others, include a Reference section
- 7. Questions that paper raises or future work needed
- 8. Questions for summary/discussion
- 1. avoid direct quotations
- 2. support arguments with DATA or LOGIC.
“The paper was convincing." “Their sampling seemed biased."
- 3. Be specific.
“The authors looked at papers over many years."
- 4. Your personal opinion is not informative without saying why.
"I found this paper interesting"
- 5. Focus on CONTENT not style.
“This paper was well written”
Biodiversity
“Biodiversity is the structural and functional variety of life forms at genetic, population, community, and ecosystem levels”.
[Sandlund, Hindar, and Brown, 1992]
Species
Domain: Eucarya Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Amphibia Order: Anura Family: Ranidae Genus: Rana Species: cretensis