Binary evolution and supernova kicks Mathieu Renzo The most common - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

binary evolution and supernova kicks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Binary evolution and supernova kicks Mathieu Renzo The most common - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Binary evolution and supernova kicks Mathieu Renzo The most common binary evolution path 2 see outreach movie at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmfJNI0PXbo The most common binary evolution path 2 see outreach movie at


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Binary evolution and supernova kicks

Mathieu Renzo

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The most common binary evolution path

2

see outreach movie at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmfJNI0PXbo

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The most common binary evolution path

2

see outreach movie at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmfJNI0PXbo

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The most common binary evolution path

2

see outreach movie at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmfJNI0PXbo

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The most common binary evolution path

2

see outreach movie at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmfJNI0PXbo

slide-6
SLIDE 6

How common is “common”?

3

Renzo et al. 19b

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What exactly disrupts the binary?

4

Ejecta impact

(Tauris & Takens 98, Liu et al. 15)

Loss of SN ejecta

(Blaauw ’61)

86+11

−22% of massive binaries are disrupted

Renzo et al. 19b, Kochanek et al. 19, Eldridge et al. 11, De Donder et al. 97

slide-8
SLIDE 8

What exactly disrupts the binary?

4

SN Natal kick

(Shklovskii 70, Katz 75, Janka 13, 17)

Ejecta impact

(Tauris & Takens 98, Liu et al. 15)

Loss of SN ejecta

(Blaauw ’61)

86+11

−22% of massive binaries are disrupted

Renzo et al. 19b, Kochanek et al. 19, Eldridge et al. 11, De Donder et al. 97

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Kicks do not change companion velocity

5

SN Natal kick

(Shklovskii 70, Katz 75, Janka 13, 17)

vdis ≃ vorb

2

before the SN

86+11

−22% of massive binaries are disrupted

Renzo et al. 19b, Kochanek et al. 19, Eldridge et al. 11, De Donder et al. 97

slide-10
SLIDE 10

BH kicks from the mass of runaways

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A way to constrain BH kicks with Gaia

6

0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Probability×105 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Mdis [M⊙] 0.0 1.0

Mass # stars

Massive runaways mass function (v ≥ 30 km s−1, M ≥ 7.5 M⊙)

Renzo et al. 19b Numerical results publicly available at:: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

slide-12
SLIDE 12

A way to constrain BH kicks with Gaia

6

0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Probability×105 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Mdis [M⊙] 0.0 1.0

BH momentum kick (σkick = 265 km s−1, fiducial)

Mass # stars

Massive runaways mass function (v ≥ 30 km s−1, M ≥ 7.5 M⊙)

Renzo et al. 19b Numerical results publicly available at:: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A way to constrain BH kicks with Gaia

6

0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Probability×105

BH: σkick = 100 km s−1 NS: σkick = 265 km s−1 (no fallback for BH)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Mdis [M⊙] 0.0 1.0

BH momentum kick (σkick = 265 km s−1, fiducial)

Mass # stars

Massive runaways mass function (v ≥ 30 km s−1, M ≥ 7.5 M⊙)

Renzo et al. 19b Numerical results publicly available at:: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A way to constrain BH kicks with Gaia

6

0.0 1.0

BH kick=NS kick (σkick = 265 km s−1) (no fallback)

0.0 1.0 Probability×105

BH: σkick = 100 km s−1 NS: σkick = 265 km s−1 (no fallback for BH)

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Mdis [M⊙] 0.0 1.0

BH momentum kick (σkick = 265 km s−1, fiducial)

Mass # stars

Massive runaways mass function (v ≥ 30 km s−1, M ≥ 7.5 M⊙)

Renzo et al. 19b Numerical results publicly available at:: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mass-velocity varying the natal kick

7

Fiducial σkick = 265 km s−1

20 40 60 80 100 120 vdis [km s−1] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Mdis [M⊙] BH momentum kick (σkick = 265 km s−1, fiducial) −10 −9 −8 −7 −6 log10(Pdis)

Intermediate BH kick σkick = 100 km s−1

20 40 60 80 100 120 vdis [km s−1] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Mdis [M⊙] BH: σkick = 100 km s−1 NS: σkick = 265 km s−1 (no fallback for BH) −10 −9 −8 −7 −6 log10(Pdis)

Large BH kicks (no fallback)

20 40 60 80 100 120 vdis [km s−1] 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Mdis [M⊙] BH kick=NS kick (σkick = 265 km s−1, no fallback) −10 −9 −8 −7 −6 log10(Pdis)

Numerical results publicly available at: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66 Renzo et al. 19b, (see also Dray et al. 2006 for WR runaways)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Kicks constraints from XRBs astrometry

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Post-SN velocity of surviving binaries

8

BH kick = NS kick Renzo et al. 19b

# systems

NS + Main sequence BH + Main sequence

Velocity respect to the pre-explosion binary center of mass

Numerical results publicly available at: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Preliminary: The case of 4U1700-37

342.75 343.50 344.25 345.00 345.75 346.50 347.25 348.00

l (degrees)

1 2 3

b (degrees) current positions members NGC 6231 current position 4U 1700-37

9

M ≃ 2.5 M⊙ , M∗ ≃ 60 ± 10 M⊙ , P ≃ 3.4 days , e ≃ 0.22 , v ≃ 60 km s−1

van der Meij, D.-F . Guo, et al. (incl. MR), in prep.

Galactic latitude Galactic longitude

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Preliminary: The case of 4U1700-37

342.75 343.50 344.25 345.00 345.75 346.50 347.25 348.00

l (degrees)

1 2 3

b (degrees) path NGC 6231 position members NGC 6231 2.2 Myr ago current positions members NGC 6231 current position 4U 1700-37

9

M ≃ 2.5 M⊙ , M∗ ≃ 60 ± 10 M⊙ , P ≃ 3.4 days , e ≃ 0.22 , v ≃ 60 km s−1

van der Meij, D.-F . Guo, et al. (incl. MR), in prep.

Galactic latitude Galactic longitude

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Preliminary: The case of 4U1700-37

9

M ≃ 2.5 M⊙ , M∗ ≃ 60 ± 10 M⊙ , P ≃ 3.4 days , e ≃ 0.22 , v ≃ 60 km s−1

van der Meij, D.-F . Guo, et al. (incl. MR), in prep.

Galactic latitude Galactic longitude

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Take home points

10

Natal kicks cause the disruption of 86+11

−22% of massive binaries

For disrupted binaries the kick acts only on compact object ⇒ walkaways outnumber the runaways; If binary remains bound the kick changes the kinematics of the whole system; Runaway mass distribution ⇒ constraints on BH kicks without seeing the collapse nor the BH.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Backup slides

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Methods: Population Synthesis

Fast ⇒ Allows statistical tests of the inputs & assumptions

SN kicks Stellar Winds Initial Distributions

Evolution

Synthetic Population

(available online)

RLOF & Common Envelope Tidal Interactions Mass Transfer

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Initial Distributions 25 50 75 100 M1 [M⊙] Probability

slope=-2.3 (or -1.9) Kroupa ’01 (or Schneider et al., ’18)

0.0 0.5 1.0 q = M2/M1

flat

1 2 3 4 log10(P/[days])

slope=-0.55 if M1 ≥ 15M⊙ else flat Sana et al., ’12 200 400 600 800 1000 NS kick [km s−1] Probability

Maxwellian σvkick = 265 km s−1 + Fallback rescaling

(from Fryer et al. ’12) Hobbs et al. ’05

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Velocity distribution: Runaways

Renzo et al. 19b

Velocity respect to the pre-explosion binary center of mass

Numerical results publicly available at: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Velocity distribution: Walkaways

Renzo et al. 19b

Velocity respect to the pre-explosion binary center of mass

Numerical results publicly available at: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Velocity distribution: Walkaways

Renzo et al. 19b

Velocity respect to the pre-explosion binary center of mass

Numerical results publicly available at: http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/624/A66

Under-production of runaways because mass transfer widens the binaries and makes the secondary more massive

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Star forming region velocity dispersion

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 vdis [km s−1] 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 Normalized Probability R15 =26.8 RSFH

15

=14.1 ≥ 15 M⊙ Convolved −40−20 0 20 40

vSFH [km s−1]

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

Renzo et al. 19b

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Velocity distribution log-scale

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 log10(vdis/[km s−1]) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Probability×103 Runaways ⇒ 10−1 100 Cumulative ⇐ Walkaways 2.00 2.25 0.000 0.001 0.002

Renzo et al. 19b

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Velocity post-main sequence stars

20 40 60 80 100 120 vdis [km s−1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 Probability×105 He stars WDs non-degenerate post-MS 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Cumulative

Renzo et al. 19b

slide-32
SLIDE 32

pre-CC mass distribution

10 20 30 40 50 Mpre−CC [M⊙] 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 Probability×104 MCC Mdis 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Cumulative

Renzo et al. 19b

slide-33
SLIDE 33

pre-CC separation distribution

Mpre−CC

2

≥ 15 M⊙ Mpre−CC

2

≥ 7.5 M⊙ all Mpre−CC

2

1 2 3 4 5 log10(apre−CC/R⊙) 0.0 1.0 2.0 Probability×104 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Cumulative

Renzo et al. 19b

slide-34
SLIDE 34

How far do they get?

“Distance traveled”

(No potential well)

Renzo et al. 19b