Beaver County System of Care Steering Committee: Member Survey HPW - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Beaver County System of Care Steering Committee: Member Survey HPW - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Beaver County System of Care Steering Committee: Member Survey HPW Associates, LLC April 23, 2013 Committee Member Affiliation Primary Identification/Affiliation (N=43) Consumer/ Family Members, 4.8% (2) Project Recovery Adminstrators
Committee Member Affiliation
Consumer/ Family Members, 4.8% (2) Project Recovery Adminstrators & Consultants, 16.7% (8) Regional Managed Care Provider, 4.8% (2) Beaver County Providers, 73.8% (31)
Primary Identification/Affiliation (N=43)
Survey Results
Submitted by (N=29): Response Rate: 71% or 29 members of the Steering Committee responded to
the survey.*
45% (13) 24% (7) 3% (1) 28% (8)
Program Manager Agency Administrator Consumer/Family Member Other Specialized Positions
* Survey administrators were excluded from this calculation and did not participate in the survey.
Purpose of the Survey
Obtain information related to participation on the
Steering Committee
Provide recommendations for improvement
Primary Reasons for Participating
Other Includes: Worthwhile project, reporting on other initiatives, or improve the System of Care.
59% (17) 45% (13) 38% (11) 28% (8) 17% (5) 17% (5) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Networking with
- ther Providers
Agency Designee Gathering Information Networking with Change Agents Change Agent Other Duplicated Responses (N=29)
Expectations
76% (22) 76% (22) 48% (14) 45% (13) 34% (10) 28% (8) 10% (3) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Relationships with Providers Advocate for Changes in the System of Care Receive Input from Minkoff & Cline Relationships with Consumers/Family Members Information on the CCISC Principles Advocate for Peers Other Duplicated Responses (N=29)
Other: Information on unified System of Care and ensure peers are treated with respect and included.
What have you gained?
Word Cloud of Responses*
*The larger the word, the more often it was mentioned by a respondent.
What have you gained? (cont’d)
Partner and collaborate with other providers in Beaver
County
Growth in relationships Improved understanding County-wide (and more) initiatives Improved knowledge of the System of Care A more welcoming environment for consumers Ability to effect change in the System of Care Networking
Number of Meetings Attended
10% (3) 31% (9) 28% (8) 21% (6) 7% (2) 3% (1) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% None One Two Three All No Answer N=29
Reasons for NOT Attending
45% (13) 17% (5) 14% (4) 10% (3) 10% (3) 10% (3) 3% (1) 10% (3) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Agency constraints Scheduling conflict Other agency staff attended Did not know about the meetings Meeting time Insufficient notice
- f the meetings
Not cost effective Other* Duplicated Results (N=29)
*Other Includes: Meetings are too long, emergency situation took priority, and member does not believe in the value of the committee.
Non-issues:
- Location
- Meeting day
- Transportation
- Not interested
Could Not Attend…
Send a representative? Participate via conference call?
20 3 5 10 15 20 25 Yes No N=23 9 8 2 4 6 8 10 Yes No N=17
Suggestions to Improve
Meeting
Post the minutes of the meeting on the System of Care website Schedule meetings for the year and publicize in advance Alternate meeting times to enable more members to attend
Topics
Delineate “clear steps” in achieving “better coordination of care” Improve management of dual diagnosis clients Use of data to monitor progress being made Involve and sustain more peer involvement in the System of Care
Planning
Use the committee to plan more initiatives in Beaver County