beast results on superkekb beam background focus on the
play

BEAST results on SuperKEKB beam background: focus on the PLUME - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

BEAST results on SuperKEKB beam background: focus on the PLUME pixelated system Jerome Baudot on behalf of the BEAST/Belle II collaboration Beam induced background at SuperKEKB & Belle II: BEAST The double-sided PLUME device


  1. BEAST results on SuperKEKB beam background: focus on the PLUME pixelated system Jerome Baudot on behalf of the BEAST/Belle II collaboration ➙ Beam induced background at SuperKEKB & Belle II: BEAST ➙ The double-sided PLUME device ➙ Single Beam background estimates ➙ Outputs with 2-sided measurements

  2. Belle II physics goals  The intensity frontier SuperKEKB • Built up on B factories success e+e- coll. at  (4s) - integrated luminosity x 50 - early phase 3 • Flavour studies New source of CP violations - Phase 2 Lepton non-universality - Charged lepton flavour violation - Left-Right symmetry contribution - Dark sector - Complementary / LHCb •  Vertex Detector (VXD) Requirements • Track impact parameters • Innermost layer - Goal s( high p ) ~ 15 m m - Hit rate >0.4 hits/ m m 2 /s • B, D, decay vertices - TID: 20 kGy/year - Goal s ~ 60 m m • 30 kHz trigger rate See F. Luetticke’s talk from Monday 10 th 2 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  3. SuperKEKB collider HER: e - 7GeV Large currents e + 4GeV :LER HER I beam = 3.6 A Higher e+ energy LER I beam = 2.6 A to mitigate Touschek bkg New final focusing magnets Nominal L peak = 8x10 35 cm -2 .s -1 Add / modify RF systems for higher beam current New LER pipe Nanobeam scheme e + Vertical beam size 60 nm Crossing (Piwinski) angle  =83 mrad to mitigate beamstrahlung e - Positron source Damping ring = 𝐽 ±  ±𝑧 for low emittance e+ 𝑀 ∝ 𝑂 − 𝑂 + 𝑔 revol low emittance e- gun ∗ 𝜏 𝑦 𝜏 𝑦 𝜒𝜏 𝑨 𝛾 𝑧 3 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  4. The Belle II detector An upgrade of Belle 4 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  5. Beam induced backgrounds  Single beam effects s y << s z • Touschek  intra-beam scattering 2 2 𝐽 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 - rate ∝ = 3 3 𝜏 𝑦 𝜏 𝑧 𝐹 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 𝜏 𝑦 𝜏 𝑧 𝐹 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ • Beam gas  vacuum residues - rate ∝ 𝐽bunch × 𝑂bunch × 𝑄 𝐽 Dynamic pressure 𝑄 𝐽 = 𝑞 0 + 𝑞 1 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 -  • Synchrotron radiation  magnet bending - rate ∝ 𝐽 beam  Beam-beam effects (QED)  e + e + • rate ∝ Luminosity e - e - Radiative Bhabha 2-photon interaction scattering 5 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  6. Beam induced backgrounds  Single beam effects  Expectations • Touschek  intra-beam scattering • Dominates beam lifetime • Higher relative impact 2 2 𝐽 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 - rate ∝ = at large radii (CDC, TOP) 3 3 𝜏 𝑦 𝜏 𝑧 𝐹 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 𝜏 𝑦 𝜏 𝑧 𝐹 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ • Beam gas  vacuum residues • Sub-dominant - rate ∝ 𝐽 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ × 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ × 𝑄 𝐽 Dynamic pressure 𝑄 𝐽 = 𝑞 0 + 𝑞 1 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 - • Synchrotron radiation  magnet bending • Issue for innermost PXD - rate ∝ 𝐽beam (mostly horizontal plane )  Beam-beam effects (QED) • Dominant at L nominal • rate ∝ Luminosity • Saturate VXD occupancy 6 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  7. Belle II in Phase 2  BEAST goals • Safe background conditions for VXD insertion / phase 3 Real-time background monitoring • during SuperKEKB tuning • Understand individual background components BEAST setup No final VXD During Phase 1 (no collisions): Initial measurements with another BEAST setup 7 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  8. The BEAST setup: complementarity Sensor Measurement DEPFET B-II PXD 2 ladders In-situ occupancy tracking & vertexing DSSD B-I SVD 4 ladders Diamond Ionizing dose in VXD 8 sensors Hybrid pix Charged particle & X-ray FANGS (ATLAS) synchroton rates 3 ladders Scint.tile SiPM Rates with ns precision / CLAWS (ILC) injection 2 ladders 2sided MAPS Final VXD BEAST PLUME Rates & two-sided track. (ILC) 2 ladders ~3.5 % X 0 ~4.0 % X 0 MicroTPC Fast neutron rate 8 units He3 tube Thermal neutron rate 4 units Material budget Rad.Film Radiation level Many PinDiode 80 units Radiation at focus.magnet 8 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  9. PLUME double-sided layer  Concept • Double-sided layer of pixel sensors • Designed driven by ILC-VXD • Air cooled • Collab: Bristol, DESY, IPHC  PLUME-2 • 2x6 MIMOSA-26 sensors - Pitch 18.4 m m - Binary output - Thinned to 50 m m • 8 Mpixels • integration time 115 m s • 2 mm thick Si-carbide foam Material budget 0.4% X0 • • 4 ladders produced Side view 9 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  10. PLUME geometry in BEAST  2 complementary angles 135 0 & 225 o • • Opposite to VXD sector (0 o )  Radius covered • SVD range 10 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  11. Phase 2 data taking  SuperKEKB • Started March  Ended July 2018 • Collimator adjustment and tuning ∗ decreased from 8 to 3 mm ( s * y ~ 400 nm) • 𝛾 𝑧 • Beam current up to ~800 mA Best peak lumi: 5.4x10 33 cm -2 .s -1  BEAST • Permanent online monitoring during tuning • dedicated study with varied: collimator, current, beam size, injection PLUME CLAWS BEAM size 11 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  12. Radiation levels  From radiochromic films • Decrease with radius in inner volume: ~1 kGy  few 100’s Gy • Clear contribution from low penetrating radiations  PLUME specific • 99% up time during all Phase 2 period • No significant sign of TID  crosschecked by radio.films (~200 Gy) 12 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  13. Single-Beam background estimates  Separate contributions through their dependence to current and beam-size 2 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 2 𝑆𝑏𝑢𝑓 𝐽, 𝜏 𝑧 = 𝑈 𝜏 𝑧 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ + B 𝑞 1 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 +𝑞 0 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 • 2 absolute contributions to rate: T (Touschek), B (Beam-gas) T, B specific to each detector -  PLUME fit examples Rate (particle/cm 2 /s) LER I beam (mA) 13 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  14. Single-Beam background estimates  Unknown additional contribution for HER For large beam size, rate rise again! • • Data favour a Touschek-like contribution 2 2 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 +𝑞 0 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 + X 2 𝑆𝑏𝑢𝑓 𝐽, 𝜏 𝑧 = 𝑈 𝜏 𝑧 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ + B 𝑞 1 𝐽 𝑐𝑓𝑏𝑛 3 𝑂 𝑐𝑣𝑜𝑑ℎ 𝜏 𝑧 • Unclear origin Rate (particle/cm 2 /s) - Large beam tails PLUME to account for it HER I beam (mA) 14 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  15. Single-Beam background findings • PLUME data shown so far, but of course similar plots for all BEAST/Belle II  Rates in inner volume during Phase 2 • Of course O (10 2 ) smaller than expectation for phase 3 • Dominated by LER wrt HER  Additional collimators for phase-3 • Beam Gas  Touschek for PXD radii • Beam Gas < Touschek for SVD radii  Synchrotron radiation 1 st observation (PXD, SVD, FANGS) • X-rays in 8-15 keV range - • Not well reproduced in simulation • Not seen in PLUME 15 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  16. Sinlge-Beam background findings PLUME preliminary  Comparison to simulation Touschek DATA/MC • Dedicated beam simulation (SAD) + GEANT 4 • Relative rates (r, f ) OK • LER rates reproduced within a factor 5-20 • HER rates not reproduced reasonably  Under investigation Beam Gas DATA/MC 16 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  17. Luminosity background ?  Luminosity background Mostly e  from interaction point (IP) at low momentum (< 50 MeV) • • p T > 15 MeV to reach PLUME (5 cm radius)  “Tracking” with PLUME double -sided feature • Associate nearest hits on both sides pointing to IP • Bending & low p => dR< few mm & f ~ p /2 associated rejected dR Projected view 2 mm dR Outer side f PLUME Beam axis Inner side 17 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

  18. Luminosity background in MC dR f 200 ms of Two Photon simulation Projected view f (Rad)  Combinatorial • Ultra-dominant in real data  Selections • Sensors nearest IP along beam axis • -2.0 < f < 1.4 Rad • dR < 2 mm  Efficiency on total # particles from luminosity background = (5  1) 10 -3 18 BEAST results on beam Background at SuperKEKB: PLUME focus - J. Baudot - PIXEL 2018

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend