beamtime at cosy data analysis results
play

Beamtime at COSY: Data analysis results Viktor Rodin Myroslav - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kvi - center for advanced kvi - center for advanced radiation technology radiation technology | 1 | 1 Beamtime at COSY: Data analysis results Viktor Rodin Myroslav Kavatsyuk Peter Schakel | 2 SODANET protocol Data is read out as a


  1. kvi - center for advanced kvi - center for advanced radiation technology radiation technology | 1 | 1 Beamtime at COSY: Data analysis results Viktor Rodin Myroslav Kavatsyuk Peter Schakel

  2. | 2 SODANET protocol Data is read out as a one SuperBurst event (16 bursts) equal 38.6 μs.

  3. | 3 Burst Building Network 1562500 SuperBursts per minute ≈ 26040 SuperBursts per second

  4. | 4 SODANET protocol How can we check a stability of synchronization? Data is read out as a one SuperBurst event (16 bursts) equal 38.6 μs.

  5. | 5 Final Setup at COSY (22.02.19) o n s V p r o t ~ 2 . 5 G e

  6. | 6 Final Setup at COSY (22.02.19) o n s V p r o t ~ 2 . 5 G e

  7. | 7 Final Setup at COSY (22.02.19) o n s V p r o t ~ 2 . 5 G e

  8. | 8 Measurement Strategy EMC To check the synchronization quality of SODANET and the readout Q A D d n a E T N A D S O stability of DAQ system in general, a strategy of growing complexity was proposed: ● Only EMC Readout with 1 DC TOF ● Only EMC Readout with 2 DC FT ● EMC+TOF Readout ● EMC+TOF+FT Readout

  9. | 9 Only EMC with 1 DC EMC prototype – 9 crystals ● Light Pulser as a reference ● 1 DC ● SODA source on the same TRB ● Digitizer 8/16 bursts for BBN 32 photo-sensors ● Partial pile-up ● CN filtering recovery ● CN I SFP 2Gbs DC Digitizer PC CN III 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● recovery SODA CN II SFP 2Gbs TRB

  10. | 10 Only EMC with 2 DC EMC prototype – 9 crystals ● Light Pulser as a reference ● 2 DC (1 per ADC board) ● Digitizer SODA source on the same TRB ● 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● 8/16 bursts for BBN ● recovery CN filtering ● SFP 2Gbs DC CN I TRB Digitizer PC CN III DC 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● recovery SODA CN II SFP 2Gbs source

  11. | 11 EMC+TOF Digitizer EMC prototype + TOF bars ● 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● Light Pulser as a reference ● recovery 2 DC (1 per ADC board) ● SODA source on the different TRB DC SFP 2Gbs ● 16 bursts for BBN, IIR, MWD filters ● TRB Digitizer DC 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● recovery CN I SODA HUB SFP 2Gbs PC CN III TRB TOF CN II TRB SODA source

  12. | 12 EMC+TOF+FT Digitizer 32 photo-sensors EMC+TOF+FT ● Partial pile-up ● DC recovery Light Pulser as a reference ● TRB 2 DC (1 per ADC board) ● SFP 2Gbs SODA source on the different TRB ● DC 16 bursts for BBN, IIR, MWD filters ● Digitizer SODA 32 photo-sensors HUB Partial pile-up ● recovery CN I TOF SFP 2Gbs TRB PC CN III TRB FT CN II TRB SODA source

  13. | 13 Some facts Proton beam ~2.5 GeV Estimated deposited energy ~ 200 MeV. Nuclear counter events are expected!

  14. | 14 Only EMC (1 DC) Results EMC_ADC_channel_11 ADC 1 ADC 2 Single crystal Single LAAPD Each ADC board is represented as Energy spectra obtained from a single 64 channels corresponding High gain/ crystal (1 LAAPD). Light Pulser peak is Low gain component of the from the right side. photodetectors.

  15. | 15 Only EMC (1 DC) Results Deposited Energy Single crystal Both LAAPD Deposited energy distribution for a single crystal (both LAAPDs).

  16. | 16 Only EMC (1 DC) Results EMC_crystal_5 Energy-dT correlation Time difference between 2 LAAPDs of 1 crystal dT-Energy dependence for that crystal. in case if only they are present in event.

  17. | 17 Only EMC (1 DC) Results Time difference between Synchronization is stable. LAAPDs does not change What about precision? over minutes.

  18. | 18 Only EMC (1 DC) Results Area of interest Red lines show Energy cut around proton beam peak.

  19. | 19 Only EMC (1 DC) Results Time difference distribution after Energy Evolution of time difference between 2 cut. Values in red square show Gaus fit ADC channels belonging to 1 crystal. parameters.

  20. | 20 Only EMC with 2 DC EMC prototype – 9 crystals ● Light Pulser as a reference ● 2 DC (1 per ADC board) ● Digitizer SODA source on the same TRB ● 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● 8/16 bursts for BBN ● recovery CN filtering ● SFP 2Gbs DC CN I TRB Digitizer PC CN III DC 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● recovery SODA CN II SFP 2Gbs source

  21. | 21 Only EMC (2 DC) Results Single crystal Both LAAPD Energy deposition distribution for a single crystal caused by proton beam

  22. | 22 Only EMC (2 DC) Results Time difference of 2 ADC channels Evolution of time difference between 2 belonging to 1 crystal. Energy cut is ADC channels belonging to 1 crystal. applied.

  23. | 23 EMC+TOF Digitizer EMC prototype + TOF bars ● 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● Light Pulser as a reference ● recovery 2 DC (1 per ADC board) ● SODA source on the different TRB DC SFP 2Gbs ● 16 bursts for BBN, IIR, MWD filters ● TRB Digitizer DC 32 photo-sensors Partial pile-up ● recovery CN I SODA HUB SFP 2Gbs PC CN III TRB TOF CN II TRB SODA source

  24. | 24 EMC+TOF Results Time difference between TOF and ADC channels (log scale).

  25. | 25 EMC+TOF Results Cluster energy distribution (time gated). Time difference between TOF and ADC channels.

  26. | 26 EMC+TOF Results EMC-TOF time difference in case of Evolution with time. energy gate for cluster. Values in red square show Gaus fit parameters.

  27. | 27 EMC+TOF+FT Digitizer 32 photo-sensors EMC+TOF+FT ● Partial pile-up ● DC recovery Light Pulser as a reference ● TRB 2 DC (1 per ADC board) ● SFP 2Gbs SODA source on the different TRB ● DC 16 bursts for BBN, IIR, MWD filters ● Digitizer SODA 32 photo-sensors HUB Partial pile-up ● recovery CN I TOF SFP 2Gbs TRB PC CN III TRB FT CN II TRB SODA source

  28. | 28 EMC+TOF+FT Results Time difference between TOF and FT channels (log scale).

  29. | 29 EMC+TOF+FT Results Time difference between TOF and FT channels.

  30. | 30 EMC+TOF+FT Results Time difference between FT and EMC channels (log scale).

  31. | 31 EMC+TOF+FT Results Time difference between FT and EMC Cluster energy distribution (time gated). channels

  32. | 32 EMC+TOF+FT Results EMC-FT time difference in case of Evolution with time. energy gate for cluster. Values in red square show Gaus fit parameters.

  33. | 33 Summary ● Current prototype of the DAQ for PANDA showed possibility to handle data from the multi- component detector system ● Synchronization of the readout was stable at all chain configurations ● Data taking during beamtime helped to reveal shortcomings and bottlenecks of this system

  34. | 34 Additional Slides

  35. | 35 Cluster Energy Cluster Energy is defined by sum of the energy deposited during a short time in each crystal . Time window is taken from the left picture.

  36. | 36

  37. | 37 EMC+TOF+FT Results Time scale in seconds Time gap

  38. | 38 EMC+TOF+FT Results Time scale in seconds Light Pulser Time-Energy distribution for Channel #10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend