Beam dynamics study for the Muon Campus at Fermilab Diktys - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

beam dynamics study for the muon campus at fermilab
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Beam dynamics study for the Muon Campus at Fermilab Diktys - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Beam dynamics study for the Muon Campus at Fermilab Diktys Stratakis Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Physics with muons beyond g-2 and Mu2e, Fermilab, Batavia, IL May 03, 2016 1 Outline Overview of the Fermilab Muon Campus


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Beam dynamics study for the Muon Campus at Fermilab

Diktys Stratakis

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory

Physics with muons beyond g-2 and Mu2e, Fermilab, Batavia, IL May 03, 2016

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Overview of the Fermilab Muon Campus
  • Simulation model & results

– Target and M2-M3 beamlines – Delivery ring – M4-M5 beamlines

  • Delivery ring for neutrino research
  • Conclusion & Future work

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Muon Campus overview

3

8.89 GeV p beam impacts the target

3.1 GeV secondaries (π, μ, p) travel along M2 & M3 μ+ are extracted from the ring and transferred into the storage ring via M4, M5 After a few turns all π+ convert to μ+

μ+ enter the g-2 storage ring

Protons separate and are removed

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Challenges

  • Beam requirements at the g-2 ring entrance:

– At least 7x10-7 muons per POT within ±2% ∆𝑞/𝑞 – Maintain an average polarization 90% or better

  • At the same time, the beamlines have bends, elevation

changes, complex injection and extraction schemes:

– Can cause severe particle loss – Trigger spin correlations that could increase systematic error

  • At the same time most beamlines need to be compatible

with the Mu2e experiment

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Approach

  • The aim of this work is to deliver an end-to-end simulation

for g-2 so that the above issues can be addressed

  • To achieve this we have developed simulation models for

different parts of the lines

– Targetry: MARS & GEANT4 – Beamline optics: MADX – Beam and spin tracking: BMAD, GEANT4, G4Beamline

  • Validated our results against:

– Theoretical models – Independent simulation codes

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Beam production target

6

Pulsed magnet Collimator Target Li-lens

Parameter Value Intensity per pulse 1012 Proton energy 8.0 GeV Secondary energy 3.1 GeV Selected particle π+ Beam size at target 0.15 mm Distance between Li-lens and target 31.0 cm Focusing field gradient of Li-lens 232 T/m Grange et al., Muon Technical Design Report (2015)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Secondary beam transport lines

7

  • M2 & M3 lines will carry the secondary beam from the

target (T) to the delivery ring (DR)

  • Loop four times until μ+ yield peaks and all p are removed

M2 M3

DR

T

G4BL model

Switch

M2 M3

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Optics in M2 & M3 beamlines

8

Match to DR 720 cells 900 cells 1200 cells

Beta, β (m) Dispersion, D (m)

Johnstone, GM2-doc-700-v13 (2014)

M2-M3 switch 180 bend

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tracking in M2 & M3 beamlines

9

Entrance to DR

1.37x10-4 POT 1.87x10-5 POT 2.62x10-6 POT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Injection: Conceptual design & model

10

  • Conceptual design
  • Simulation model
  • Vertical injection with a combination of a C-magnet, 303

quadrupole, magnetic septum and kicker magnets

Morgan, GM2-doc-3312 (2015) & Morgan, GM2-doc-2244 (2014)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Performance

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Performance along the DR

12

  • After 4 turns near 90% of muons are transmitted towards

the extraction line

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Delivery ring & M4/M5 lines

13

  • Near magic momentum μ+ are extracted

into the M4 line and bent into M5 for transport to the g-2 storage ring

M4 M5 DR g-2 storage ring

G4BL model

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Optics of M4 & M5 beamlines

14

Final focus

Johnstone, GM2-doc-1568-v16 (2015)

27.10 h bend M5 FODO Ring extraction M4-M5 switch

Dispersion, D (m)

Beta, β (m)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tracking in M4 & M5 beamlines

15

Storage ring injection

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Beam at the storage ring entrance

16

012 . / GeV/c 091 . 3     p p p

Particles Value Total number of muons 8.7x10-7 POT Muons in Τ ∆𝑞 𝑞 = ±1% 4.4x10-7 POT Muons in Τ ∆𝑞 𝑞 = ±0.5% 2.4x10-7 POT

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Benchmarking results

  • Our G4Beamline results were cross-checked against

independent simulation codes

17

Work done by: M. Korostelev (Cockcroft, Lancaster) & D. Stratakis (FNAL)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Spin Tracking

<

𝑞𝑄

𝑦 = −0.71𝑄

𝑞𝑄

𝑨 = −0.65𝑄

𝒒𝑸 = 𝟏. 𝟘𝟕𝑄 𝑞𝑄

𝑦 = −0.56𝑄

𝑞𝑄

𝑨 = −0.78𝑄

𝒒𝑸 = 𝟏. 𝟘𝟕𝑄 𝑞𝑄

𝑦 = −0.38𝑄

𝑞𝑄

𝑨 = −0.88𝑄

𝒒𝑸 = 𝟏. 𝟘𝟕𝑄 𝑞𝑄

𝑦 = −0.01𝑄

𝑞𝑄

𝑨 = −0.96𝑄

𝒒𝑸 = 𝟏. 𝟘𝟕𝑄 DR entrance (CMAG) Turn 2 Turn 3 Turn 4

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

New projects

  • Potential of using Muon Campus for neutrino research

19

Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND) will be one of three liquid argon neutrino detectors sitting in the Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) at Fermilab as part

  • f the Short-Baseline Neutrino Program.

It is a long the neutrino path of sector 10

  • f the Muon campus delivery ring

Collaboration with: J. Grange (ANL), J. Zennamo (UChicago) and Z. Pavlovic (FNAL)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Neutrino Detector

  • Three virtual detectors are placed at the end of straight

sections 10, 30, and 50. Results for turn 1 only.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Straight 30

  • At straight 30 the number of

– ν𝜈 is 6x10-7 per POT – ν𝑓 is 10-9 per POT

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Straight 10

22

  • At end of straight 10 the number of:

– ν𝜈 is 1.3x10-7 per POT – ν𝑓 is 10-9 per POT

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Straight 50

23

  • At end of straight 10 the number of:

– ν𝜈 is 5.8x10-8 per POT – ν𝑓 is 10-9 per POT

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Conclusion

  • Developed a simulation model for the g-2 beam lines
  • At the SR entrance parameters match the desired criteria:

– The beam is >95% polarized – Τ ∆𝑞 𝑞 = ±1.2% and centered near magic momentum – 8.4X10-7 muons per POT

  • Our results agree well with independent simulation codes
  • The number of neutrinos in the DR is estimated
  • As a next step

– Estimate the number of neutrinos in the SBND detector – Produce DR beam fluxes for a range of proton energies

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Acknowledgment

  • Thanks to Ao Liu (Fermilab) for allowing me to use his

plotting program

  • Thanks to Tom Roberts for helping me with G4Beamline
  • Special thanks to: Bill Morse, Jason Crmkovic, Jean-

Francois Ostiguy, Jim Morgan, Mary Convery, Maxim Korostelev, Mike Syphers, Nathan Froemming, Volodya Tishchenko for many discussions…

25