Barclays Metals and Materials Cross Asset Forum
March 2014
Barclays Metals and Materials Cross Asset Forum March 2014 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Barclays Metals and Materials Cross Asset Forum March 2014 Cautionary statements All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING
March 2014
All monetary amounts in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated Total cash costs shown net of by-product sales unless otherwise stated CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, which address events or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward-looking statements in this presentation include, among others, statements with respect to: guidance for production, cash costs and all-in sustaining costs; mine life; the expected throughput and recovery rates at New Afton; the expected timeline, outcomes, cost and payback period of planned modifications to the New Afton mill; expected future production and mining activities including the expected future annual production and grades at existing operations based on current mine plans; estimates of future net cash generated from operations; the estimation of mineral reserves and resources and the realization of such estimates; the results of the Rainy River and Blackwater feasibility studies, including the expected production, costs, mine life, infrastructure, NPV and IRR (and related sensitivities associated with each project); the annual production and cash costs, and the potential for a block cave and its grade, at the El Morro project; the potential for the C-zone to increase the mine life and cash flow at New Afton; future exploration targets; the timing of permitting activities, environmental assessment processes and other development and construction milestones and activities at Rainy River, including targeted timing for commissioning and full production; and the timing of achieving production at Blackwater and El Morro. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding our forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, New Gold’s MD&A, its Annual Information Form and its Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no significant disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold operates, or may in the future operate, being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (3) the accuracy of New Gold’s current mineral reserve and resource estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar, Mexican Peso and U.S. dollar being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) labour and material costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) permitting and arrangements with First Nations and other Aboriginal groups in respect of Rainy River and Blackwater being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all environmental approvals (including the environmental assessment process for the Blackwater and Rainy River projects), required permits, licenses and authorizations being obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines; and (9) the results of the feasibility studies for the Rainy River and Blackwater projects being realized. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated reserves and resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States, Australia, Mexico and Chile or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political
validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, including, but not limited to: in Canada, obtaining the necessary permits for the Blackwater and Rainy River projects; in Mexico, where Cerro San Pedro has a history of ongoing legal challenges related to our environmental authorization (EIS); and in Chile, where the courts have temporarily suspended the approval of the environmental permit for El Morro; the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves and resources; competition; loss of key employees; additional funding requirements; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies including the feasibility studies for Rainy River and Blackwater; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of First Nations and other Aboriginal groups; uncertainties with respect to obtaining all necessary surface and other land use rights or tenure for Rainy River; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with obtaining and maintaining necessary licenses, permits and authorizations and complying with permitting requirements, including those associated with the environmental assessment processes for Blackwater and Rainy River. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future events could materially differ from those anticipated in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The footnotes and endnotes to this presentation contain important information. The endnotes are found at the end of the presentation.
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history
creation
3
18.5 Moz gold reserves(1) ~$90 million investment by Board & Management Targeting ~$825/oz all-in sustaining costs(2) ~900 Koz annual production potential from growth projects(3) +250% increase in share price since March 2009
Percent per Share and Provides 2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
Blackwater New Afton Rainy River Mesquite Cerro San Pedro El Morro Peak Mines Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 10 years Mine Life: 14 years Mine Life: 8+ years Mine Life: 2+ years Mine Life: 17 years Mine Life: 6+ years
#2
CANADA
#6
UNITED STATES
#5
MEXICO
#3
CHILE
#1
AUSTRALIA
OPERATING DEVELOPMENT
4
Mining investment – country rankings(1)
2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
Mineral Reserves(2)
5
BOARD OF DIRECTORS David Emerson Former Canadian Cabinet Minister James Estey Former Chairman, UBS Securities Canada Robert Gallagher President & Chief Executive Officer Vahan Kololian Founder, Terra Nova Partners Martyn Konig Former Executive Chairman, European Goldfields Pierre Lassonde Chairman, Franco-Nevada Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Raymond Threlkeld Mining Consultant EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT TEAM Randall Oliphant Executive Chairman Robert Gallagher President & Chief Executive Officer Brian Penny Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer Ernie Mast Vice President Operations
6
GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
margin New Afton offset by lower production at Cerro San Pedro
Afton and Peak Mines higher
production and depreciation of Canadian and Australian dollars
by lower total cash costs(1) and lower sustaining capital
decrease by over $70 per ounce versus 2013
Canadian and Australian dollars
average of peer-companies(3) that have provided 2014 guidance
New Gold 2014 Reported Average(4)
~$825
7
Lower costs driving higher margins(1)
~$825
2014E GUIDANCE – ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS ($/OZ)(2)
potential equivalent to over 2x today’s production
acquisitions increased shares
potential ~175% increase in production
significantly from Canadian dollar depreciation
exchange rate equivalent to $141 million/2.8% change in pre-tax NAV/IRR
exchange rate equivalent to $270 million/1.9% change in pre-tax NAV/IRR
Organic projects +900 Koz(1) per year Rainy River
2014E Gold Production Future Organic Growth Potential
El Morro
8
Four current
Blackwater New Afton Expansion
C-Zone M&I Resource(2)
9
87 102-112
Gold (Koz)
72 78-84
Copper (Mlbs)
2013 2014E 2013 2014E
NEW AFTON Future Upside Near-Term Upside Jurisdiction Current Production
British Columbia, Canada
Country Ranking(1)
Reserves by 127 Percent per Share and Provides 2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
2015 to benefit further from mill expansion
Mill Expansion - $45mm
Throughput: Recoveries: Return(3): Payback: 12,500 14,000 85-86% 88-89% +50% <2 years GOLD 0.83 g/t 0.7Moz COPPER 0.91% 0.5Blbs
26 Million Tonnes
10
C-zone Main A&B Zone Isometric view looking NE
YEAR-END 2013 C-ZONE RESOURCES(1)
Tonnes (000’s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Measured 618 0.75 0.91 15 12 Indicated 25,223 0.84 0.91 678 504 Total M&I 25,842 0.83 0.91 693 516 Inferred 11,288 0.63 0.64 227 159
Gold Reserves by 127 Percent per Share and Provides 2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
92 86 95 87 107 108 2013 2014E 2015E
11
COPPER PRODUCTION (MILLION POUNDS) GOLD PRODUCTION (THOUSAND OUNCES)
70 65 72 72 81 82 2013 2014E 2015E
Actual/Guidance(2) 2009 Technical Report(1) Actual/Guidance(2) 2009 Technical Report(1)
New Afton production start
tonnes(3)
C-ZONE RESOURCE B-ZONE C-ZONE Tonnes (Mt) 68 26 Gold grade (g/t) 0.65 0.83 Copper grade (%) 0.91 0.91 MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES(3)
Reserves by 127 Percent per Share and Provides 2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
12
New Gold has a track record of successful mine development
Once mines are in production – multiple options to further enhance value
Cerro San Pedro (April 2007) – ~35,000 tonne per day open pit/heap leach Mesquite (January 2008) – ~40,000 tonne per day open pit/heap leach New Afton (June 2012) – 11,000 tonne per day block cave/process facility Mine life extension (Mesquite(1), Peak Mines(2), New Afton C-zone) Increased production rate (Cerro San Pedro(3), New Afton)
13
Gold Resource/Upside Situated for Mine Development
Ontario, Canada
Jurisdiction
Country Ranking(1)
Land Package
Multiple regional targets
RAINY RIVER
Reserves by 127 Percent per Share and Provides 2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
Flat terrain Close to infrastructure 17km tie-in to power
Reserves(5)
M&I Resources(5)
2014 Feasibility Study
First nine years:
Total Cash Costs(3)
All-in Sustaining Costs(4)
Annual Production
Development Capital(2)
14
2014 2015 Q1’14 Q2’14 Q3’14 Q4’14 H1’15 H2’15 Complete Feasibility Study Submit Environmental Assessment Report Order Long Lead Equipment Award EPCM Contract Commence Detailed Engineering Provincial Environmental Assessment Approval Federal Environmental Assessment Approval Construction/Other Permits Arrival of Mobile Equipment Begin Construction - Water Management Facility Pour First Concrete for Mill Building Commence Pre-Strip Arrival of Mill Equipment Complete Enclosure of Mill Building
Targeted milestones
Targeting commissioning in late 2016 with first year of full production in 2017
15
purchase orders for:
engaged
Project Development Capital Costs Description Cost ($ million) Direct Costs Process Equipment $127 Process Facilities – Construction $170 Site Development $111 Open Pit Mine Equipment $81 Overburden and Waste Stripping $80 Tailings and Water Management $48 Power Line and Roads $21 Total Direct Capital Costs $638 Owner's and Indirect Costs Owner's Costs $76 EPCM $48 Other Indirects $53 Total Owner's & Indirect Capital Costs $177 Subtotal $815 Contingency $70 Total Project (at US$/C$ - 0.95) $885 21% of pricing being locked in 98% of pricing being locked in EPCM in process
16
UPSIDE GOLD RESOURCE
British Columbia, Canada
BLACKWATER Regional Upside Significant Gold Resource Jurisdiction
Country Ranking(1)
Reserves(5)
M&I Resources(5)
Land Package
Initial resource at Capoose Multiple newly identified targets
Reserves by 127 Percent per Share and Provides 2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
Mine Life
2013 Feasibility Study
First nine years:
Total Cash Costs(3)
All-in Sustaining Costs(4)
Annual Production
Development Capital(2)
17 Chile
Higher Grade Block Cave Potential EL MORRO Unique Joint Venture Structure Gold/Copper Reserve (30%) + Upside Jurisdiction 2011 Feasibility Study (30%)
Country Ranking(1)
Annual Copper Production
Total Cash Costs(2)
Annual Gold Production
Goldcorp 70% partner Funds 100% of capital New Gold retains portion of cash flow from mine start-up
Gold Reserve(3)
Copper Reserve(3) Life of mine:
2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
18
Existing low cost production base to be further enhanced by our lower cost development projects(1)
2014(2) 2017(3) Future Potential(4) GOLD PRODUCTION
reserve grade, which is partially offset by Cerro San Pedro ceasing active mining and moving into residual leaching, and includes the first year of full production from Rainy River. Assumes on-time completion of Rainy River.
Mesquite and the Peak Mines according to their respective mine plans. Assumes the timely development of Blackwater and El Morro.
19
$79 $182 $230 $236 $249 $282 ~$400 ~$400 ~$600 $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E
flow assumes: successful mill expansion to 14,000 tonnes per day at New Afton in mid-2015, Mesquite moving into mining of higher grade areas of the open pit in 2015 in accordance with the current mine plan, Peak’s copper production increasing from 2014 levels in accordance with the current mine plan, and Cerro San Pedro mining higher grade material in its final year of active mining in accordance with the current mine plan. 2016 estimated cash flow assumes: New Afton processing for a full year at 14,000 tonnes per day, Mesquite remaining in higher grade areas in accordance with the current mine plan, Peak further increasing its copper production in accordance with the current mine plan, and Cerro San Pedro moving into its first year of residual leaching in accordance with the current mine plan. 2017 estimated cash flow assumes: Rainy River commercial production is achieved on schedule and Rainy River has its first full year of production in 2017 with a production level consistent with the project’s feasibility study, New Afton processing 14,000 tonnes per day, Mesquite remaining in higher grade areas in accordance with the current mine plan, Peak further increasing its copper production in accordance with the current mine plan, and Cerro San Pedro continuing its residual leaching in accordance with the current mine plan. Assumes no non-recurring cash flows in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
(3)
NET CASH FROM OPERATIONS ($ MILLIONS)
Enterprise Value $3.6 billion Consensus Blackwater and El Morro Value(1) $0.9 billion Enterprise Value (excluding Blackwater and El Morro) $2.7 billion
Trading at ~4.5x 2017E cash flow at 2014 guidance prices
(4) (4) (4) (2)
20
2014 costs declining versus 2013 New Afton production and cash flow continues to increase New Afton C-zone exploration Rainy River regional exploration Blackwater regional exploration Rainy River and Blackwater permitting New Afton mill expansion Cash flow growth
Performance since March 2009 New Gold/Western Goldfields merger announcement
21
S&P/TSX Global Gold Index(1) Gold Price New Gold (NYSE)
255% 50% (7%)
Portfolio
in top-rated jurisdictions Invested and experienced team Among lowest-cost producers with established track record Peer-leading growth pipeline A history
creation
22
18.5 Moz gold reserves(1) ~$90 million investment by Board & Management Targeting ~$825/oz all-in sustaining costs(2) ~900 Koz annual production potential from growth projects(3) +250% increase in share price since March 2009
Percent per Share and Provides 2014 Guidance with Even Lower Costs“. Refer to Endnotes under the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”.
23
Appendices Page 1. Financial information 24 2. Consolidated operating performance 29 3. New Afton 37 4. Mesquite, Peak Mines, Cerro San Pedro 44 5. Rainy River 47 6. Blackwater 49 7. El Morro 50 8. Exploration 53 9. Reserves and Resources notes 57
66
Cash and Equivalents(1) Undrawn Credit Facility(2)
24
long-term debt(3)
7.00% notes due in 2020
6.25% notes due in 2022
loan, payable out of El Morro project cash flow
Appendix 1
25
Undrawn Credit Facility Senior Unsecured Notes (April 2012) Senior Unsecured Notes (November 2012) El Morro Funding Loan Face Value $150 million(1) $300 million $500 million $78 million Maturity 1 year with annual extensions permitted April 15, 2020 November 15, 2022 n/a Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ 7.00% 6.25% 4.58% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Upon start of production Conversion price n/a n/a n/a n/a Current trading value n/a ~104 ~101 n/a Key features
covenants Interest Rate
LIBOR based on ratios
1.06%
2016 at 103.5% down to 100% of face after 2018
leverage ratio below 2:1
November 15, 2017 at par plus half coupon, declining ratably to par
leverage ratio below 2:1 New Gold to repay Goldcorp out of 80% of its 30% share of cash flow
starts production
Appendix 1
26
New Afton
Sustaining Capital: ~$145 million Growth Capital: ~$195 million
Mesquite Peak Mines Cerro San Pedro Rainy River New Afton Cerro San Pedro Blackwater
Total Capital
Appendix 1
27
Growth capital
categories – sustaining capital and growth capital (future production growth and mine life extension)
New Afton - $115 million Rainy River - $105 million Mesquite - $40 million
Sustaining capital
48% 52% 100% 100%
surface ventilation upgrade
permitting
Appendix 1
28
Peak Mines - $40 million Cerro San Pedro - $28 million
100% 71%
Growth capital Sustaining capital
New Gold’s 30% share of estimated 2014 El Morro capital costs of $6 million fully carried by Goldcorp Inc.
Blackwater - $15 million
100%
29%
Appendix 1
29
GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
Mines met guidance
Appendix 2
30
2013 FOURTH QUARTER
Gold production (Koz) Total cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
New Afton 25 ($1,428) $12 Mesquite 35 $841 $988 Peak Mines 24 $778 $1,106 Cerro San Pedro 22 $911 $1,076 107 $316 $883 New Afton co-product cash costs(1) Gold ($/oz) $391 Copper ($/lb) $1.08 2013 FOURTH QUARTER
perform well
quarter of 2013 as planned with higher grades
costs(2) decreased by over $200 per ounce from third quarter of 2013
higher recoveries in each consecutive month during the quarter
Appendix 2
31
2013 FULL YEAR
Gold production (Koz) Total cash costs(1) ($/oz) All-in sustaining costs(2) ($/oz)
New Afton 87 ($1,196) ($133) Mesquite 107 $907 $1,108 Peak Mines 101 $850 $1,331 Cerro San Pedro 103 $676 $766 398 $377 $899 New Afton co-product cash costs(1) Gold ($/oz) $486 Copper ($/lb) $1.19 New Gold co-product cash costs(1) Gold ($/oz) $712 Copper ($/lb) $1.86 Silver ($/oz) $10.24 2013 FULL YEAR
in each consecutive quarter during the year
production at Peak Mines versus previous year
company’s history
Appendix 2
$465 $418 $446 $421 $377 $478 $557 $643 $738 $782
32
Industry New Gold
Incremental Benefit to NGD Shareholder
(2)
New Gold versus Industry Average Total Cash Costs(1)
Appendix 2
33
OPERATING MARGIN(1) REVENUE ADJUSTED NET CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS(3) ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS PER SHARE(2)
$202 $184 $196 $198 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13
$ millions $ millions $ millions $ per share
FY 2013 $780 $96 $78 $94 $77 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 FY 2013 $344 $59 $43 $54 $93 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 FY 2013 $249 $0.04 $0.01 $0.04 $0.04 Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 FY 2013 $0.13
Appendix 2
34
Appendix 2
2013A 2013A 2013A 2013A Tonnes processed
(000 tonnes)
14,297 13,000
13,463 13,400
814 830
4,087 4,500
Tonnes mined
(000 tonnes)
48,206 56,000
31,018 33,000
1,100 1,300
4,226 4,600
Strip ratio 2.37 3.31
1.30 1.46
(g/t)
0.37 0.40
0.47 0.35
4.14 3.9
0.78 0.81
Silver grade
(g/t)
15.0
(%)
0.86%
0.93% 0.93%
Gold recovery
(%)
63.0% 51.0% 92.9% 91.0%
85.1% 85.0%
Silver recovery
(%)
(%)
91.0%
85.9% 86.0%
Production Gold production
(Koz)
107.0 113.0
102.8 70.0
100.7 95.0
87.2 102.0
Silver production
(Koz)
1,100.0
(Mlbs)
14.0
72.0 78.0
Reserve grade Gold grade
(g/t)
Silver grade
(g/t)
Copper grade
(%)
3.52 7.1 1.22% 0.56 2.2 0.84% 0.60
18.1
2014E 2014E New Afton Cerro San Pedro 2014E Peak Mines 2014E ~50% ~15% ~65%
35
Appendix 2
Category Copper Price Silver Price AUD/USD CDN/USD MXN/USD Diesel Base Assumption $3.25 $20.00 $1.14 $1.11 $13.00 $3.25 Sensitivity +/- $0.25 +/- $1.00 +/- $0.05 +/- $0.05 +/- $1.00 +/- $0.25 Total Cash Costs(1) - Impact New Afton +/-$200
Peak Mines +/-$40
+/-$60 +/-$5 +/-$15 +/-$15 +/-$10 +/-$5 Total Cash Costs(1) - Sensitivities
36
Total cash costs(1) ~$330/oz General and administrative(2) ~$90/oz Exploration expense ~$35/oz Sustaining capital(3) ~$370/oz
Appendix 2
37
GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
TOTAL CASH COSTS(1)
Co-Product Gold ($/oz) Co-Product Copper ($/lb)
(2013A - $3.23 per pound)
$1.11
equals ~$200 per ounce change in New Afton total cash costs
~$15 per ounce change in New Afton total cash costs
increase due to:
throughput rate
copper production, depreciating Canadian dollar and decrease in sustaining capital costs
OVERVIEW KEY ASSUMPTIONS AND SENSITIVITIES
Appendix 3
38
New Facilities
Surface Stockpile
Appendix 3
39
engineering
H1’15
H2’14 H1’14
Appendix 3
40
Engineering, Construction and Equipment $26 million Building and Site Works $12 million Owner’s Costs $2 million Contingency $5 million
ESTIMATED EXPANSION CAPITAL
Target: 14,000 tonnes per day at higher metal recoveries
Appendix 3
41
IRR of +50% and payback period of less than two years
2014 TARGETED AVERAGES RUN RATE TARGETED AVERAGES WITH MILL EXPANSION
Appendix 3
42
limited deep holes drilled from surface
commenced in second half of 2012
totaling 26,800 metres
Measured and Indicated resource resulting in 10-fold increase in contained gold and copper
resource
Tonnes (000’s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Measured 618 0.75 0.91 15 12 Indicated 25,223 0.84 0.91 678 504 Total M&I 25,842 0.83 0.91 693 516 Inferred 11,288 0.63 0.64 227 159
YEAR-END 2012 C-ZONE(1) YEAR-END 2013 C-ZONE(2)
Tonnes (000’s) Gold (g/t) Copper (%) Gold (Koz) Copper (Mlbs) Measured 400 0.60 0.73 8 6 Indicated 2,900 0.63 0.68 58 43 Total M&I 3,300 0.62 0.68 66 49 Inferred 13,600 0.70 0.76 307 228
“Technical Information”.
Appendix 3
43
Appendix 3
44
total costs
Brent oil price
price has ~$15 per ounce impact on total cash costs
mining of higher grades versus 2013
increase in total tonnes mined
Mesquite
GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) OVERVIEW KEY ASSUMPTIONS AND SENSITIVITIES ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
Appendix 4
45
(2013A - $3.29 per pound)
exchange – $1.14
equals ~$40 per ounce change in Peak Mines total cash costs
~$10 per ounce change in Peak Mines total cash costs
increased copper grade and recovery
increased copper by-product revenue, depreciating Australian dollar and increased productivity through lower turnover
GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) COPPER PRODUCTION (Mlbs) OVERVIEW KEY ASSUMPTIONS AND SENSITIVITIES ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
Appendix 4
46
(2013A – $23.61 per ounce)
$13.00
~$15 per ounce change in Cerro San Pedro total cash costs
~$50 per ounce change in Cerro San Pedro total cash costs
increased strip ratio for Phase 5 pushback and mining of lower grade ore
lower gold production, lower silver by- product revenue and increased volume
GOLD PRODUCTION (Koz) SILVER PRODUCTION (Moz) OVERVIEW KEY ASSUMPTIONS AND SENSITIVITIES ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS(2) ($/oz) TOTAL CASH COSTS(1) ($/oz)
Appendix 4
47
conventional crushing, grinding, leaching and carbon-in-pulp technology
year of full production in 2017
years and processing of a combination of stockpile and underground ore thereafter
inclusive of $70 million contingency (at $1.05 CDN/USD)
91% and 64%
elevated cut-off grade strategy during first nine years
Appendix 5
Pre-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,350 1,450 1,600 US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.90 0.97 1.00 5% NPV ($mm) 138 438 691 738 1,009 IRR (%) 7.8 13.1 17.7 17.6 21.1 Payback (years) 6.8 5.4 4.2 4.3 3.6 After-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,350 1,450 1,600 US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.90 0.97 1.00 5% NPV ($mm) 100 314 495 520 706 IRR (%) 7.1 11.3 15.2 14.9 17.8 Payback (years) 6.8 5.5 4.4 4.4 3.8
48
Final construction during commissioning Ongoing consultation
Project Schedule Feasibility Study First Nations & Public Consultation Engineering/Procurement Environmental Assessment Permitting Construction Production 2014 2015 2016 2017
Appendix 5
49
with 60,000 tonne per day processing plant
inclusive of $190 million contingency (at $1.05 CDN/USD)
87% and 49%
Storage Facility
grid, via 140-kilometre transmission line
within 15 kilometres
for closure
Appendix 6
Pre-tax Economics Gold Price ($/oz) 1,150 1,300 1,350 1,450 1,600 US$/C$ exchange 0.93 0.95 0.90 0.97 1.00 5% NPV ($mm) 402 991 1,467 1,582 2,120 IRR (%) 7.8 11.3 14.4 14.4 16.8 Payback (years) 7.5 6.2 5.1 5.1 4.5
50
Funded by $1.2 billion interest at 4.58% ~ $2.7 billion 70% 20% 80%
30% 70% 30%
Total Capital 100% ~ $3.9 billion(1) 100% Average annual cash flow
Carried funding repayment
Appendix 7
51
2012 open pit Proven and Probable reserves and Measured and Indicated resources Underground Inferred resource with block cave potential
500 metres
Appendix 7
Reserve Grade Gold: 0.46 g/t Copper: 0.49% Inferred Grade Gold: 0.97 g/t Copper: 0.78%
52
EL MORRO WITHIN GOLDCORP PORTFOLIO
Asset Gold Reserves (Moz) Asset Gold Equivalent(2) (Moz) Penasquito 11.6 Penasquito 30.6 Los Filos 8.0 El Morro 18.0 El Morro 6.7 Los Filos 8.9 Pueblo Viejo 6.5 Pueblo Viejo 7.5 Cerro Negro 5.7 Cerro Negro 6.6
Appendix 7
53
New Gold’s estimated exploration budget for 2014 is $50 million
New Afton 30,000-35,000 metres Peak Mines 45,000 metres Blackwater 10,000-15,000 metres
Rainy River 35,000-40,000 metres
Appendix 8
54
2013 ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 PROGRAM
Targeting resource expansion in near-mine environment
from Intrepid Zone
Intrepid Zone
Appendix 8
55
2013 Achievement
and gold mineralization intercepted on three
2014 Program
Appendix 8
56
2013 ACHIEVEMENTS 2014 PROGRAM
Focus on reserves replacement in near-mine environment
Appendix 8
57
Appendix 9
Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Proven and Probable Reserves 18,538 90,080 2,953 7,752 31,256 3,282 Measured and Indicated Resources (inclusive of Reserves) 27,505 124,499 4,353 21,403 131,847 4,061 Inferred Resources 4,161 30,360 1,821 4,383 84,620 1,114 M&I Resources (inclusive of Reserves) New Afton 2,297 7,786 1,988 1,979 6,830 1,818 Mesquite 4,904
810 1,380 158 880 1,350 146 Cerro San Pedro 397 15,948
57,980
6,236 14,635
n/a n/a Blackwater 9,500 70,130
56,190
320 14,620
9,497
3,041
2,891
Total M&I 27,505 124,499 4,353 21,403 131,847 4,061 Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary As at December 31, 2013 As at December 31, 2012(1)
58
Appendix 9
Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs New Afton Proven
48,821 0.56 2.2 0.84 879 3,500 904 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 Total New Afton P&P 48,821 0.56 2.2 0.84 879 3,500 904 52,500 0.65 2.3 0.93 1,100 3,880 1,080 Mesquite Proven 3,809 0.70
0.68
112,094 0.60
0.56
115,903 0.60
0.57
Proven 1,820 4.35 6.7 1.16 255 390 47 2,109 5.89 7.5 1.08 399 510 50 Probable 1,820 2.69 7.4 1.27 157 430 51 2,118 3.82 6.8 1.18 260 466 55 Total Peak Mines P&P 3,640 3.52 7.1 1.22 412 820 98 4,227 4.85 7.2 1.13 659 976 105 Cerro San Pedro Proven 12,982 0.47 17.5
7,311
0.52 17.1
11,600
13,714 0.44 18.7
8,239
0.48 17.4
14,800
26,696 0.46 18.1
15,550
0.50 17.3
26,400
Contained metal Metal grade Metal grade Contained metal Mineral Reserves statement as at December 31, 2012
59
Appendix 9
Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Rainy River Direct processing material Open Pit Proven 15,839 1.47 2.0
1,038
46,866 1.26 3.1
4,594
62,705 1.31 2.8
5,632
Proven
4,187 4.96 10.3
1,388
4,187 4.96 10.3
1,388
Open Pit Proven 6,843 0.38 1.5
332
30,541 0.39 2.1
2,058
37,384 0.38 2.0
2,390
Proven 22,681 1.14 1.9
1,370
81,594 1.12 3.1
8,040
104,275 1.13 2.8
9,410
Direct processing material Proven 124,500 0.95 5.5
22,100
169,700 0.68 4.1
22,300
294,300 0.79 4.7
44,400
Proven 20,100 0.50 3.6
2,300
30,100 0.34 14.6
14,100
50,200 0.40 10.2
16,400
344,400 0.74 5.5
60,800
30% Basis
Proven 321,814 0.56
1,746
307,949 0.57
1,705
Probable 277,240 0.35
929
335,152 0.37
1,186
Total El Morro P&P 599,054 0.46
2,675
643,101 0.47
2,891
Total P&P 18,538 90,080 2,953 7,752 31,256 3,282
100% Basis 30% Basis 100% Basis
Mineral Reserves statement as at December 31, 2013 Contained metal Metal grade Metal grade Contained metal Mineral Reserves statement as at December 31, 2012
60
Appendix 9
Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs New Afton A&B Zones Measured 41,059 0.79 2.7 1.09 1,041 3,624 984 33,500 0.86 2.9 1.18 929 3,160 873 Indicated 26,966 0.44 2.1 0.65 384 1,777 384 45,900 0.67 2.4 0.89 984 3,530 896 A&B Zone M&I 68,025 0.65 2.5 0.91 1,425 5,401 1,368 79,400 0.75 2.6 1.01 1,913 6,690 1,769 C-Zone Measured 618 0.75 1.5 0.91 15 30 12 400 0.60 1.3 0.73 8 20 6 Indicated 25,223 0.84 2.0 0.91 678 1,589 504 2,900 0.63 1.3 0.68 58 120 43 C-Zone M&I 25,842 0.83 2.0 0.91 693 1,620 516 3,300 0.62 1.3 0.68 66 140 49 HW Lens Measured
11,035 0.50 2.2 0.43 179 763 104
11,035 0.50 2.2 0.43 179 763 104
104,901 0.68 2.3 0.86 2,297 7,786 1,988 82,700 0.74 2.6 1.00 1,979 6,830 1,818 Mesquite Measured 9,070 0.66
0.61
304,081 0.48
0.45
313,151 0.49
0.45
Measured 3,000 4.69 6.7 1.06 450 650 70 2,700 5.74 7.5 1.05 494 647 62 Indicated 3,400 3.29 6.7 1.18 360 730 88 3,200 3.75 6.8 1.19 386 703 84 Peak Mines M&I 6,400 3.95 6.7 1.12 810 1,380 158 5,900 4.66 7.1 1.13 880 1,350 146 Cerro San Pedro Measured 13,387 0.46 17.3
7,459
0.40 14.4
18,900
14,311 0.43 18.4
8,489
0.34 11.5
39,080
27,698 0.45 17.9
15,948
0.35 11.9
57,980
Metal grade Contained metal
M easured and Indicated mineral R eso urce statement (inclusive o f R eserves) as at D ecember 31, 2013
Contained metal Metal grade
61
Appendix 9
Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Rainy River Direct processing material Open Pit Measured 20,282 1.45 1.9
1,261
80,411 1.35 2.6
6,584
100,693 1.37 2.4
7,846
Measured 89 4.95 2.8
8
5,469 4.53 11.3
1,994
5,558 4.53 11.2
2,002
Open Pit Measured 6,294 0.37 1.3
262
64,816 0.44 2.2
4,526
71,110 0.43 2.1
4,788
Measured 26,665 1.21 1.8
1,531
150,696 1.07 2.7
13,104
177,361 1.09 2.6
14,635
Direct processing material Measured 116,955 1.04 5.6
21,060
189,044 0.78 6.0
36,470
305,999 0.88 5.8
57,520
Measured 26,521 0.30 4.1
3,500
64,382 0.30 4.4
9,110
90,904 0.30 4.3
12,600
396,903 0.74 5.5
70,130
0.85 5.9
56,190
Indicated 20,280 0.50 22.4
14,620
0.43 20.8
9,497
Measured 341,604 0.56
1,848
307,949 0.57
1,705
Indicated 349,803 0.35
1,193
335,152 0.37
1,186
Total El Morro M&I 691,407 0.46
3,041
643,101 0.47
2,891
Total M&I 27,505 124,499 4,353 21,403 131,847 4,061
M easured and Indicated mineral R eso urce statement (inclusive o f R eserves) as at D ecember 31, 2012
Metal grade Contained metal
100% Basis 30% Basis
M easured and Indicated mineral R eso urce statement (inclusive o f R eserves) as at D ecember 31, 2013
Contained metal
100% Basis 30% Basis
Metal grade
62
Appendix 9
Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs Tonnes 000's Gold g/t Silver g/t Copper % Gold Koz Silver Koz Copper Mlbs New Afton A&B-Zone 5,607 0.32 1.5 0.38 59 272 46 14,900 0.45 2.0 0.65 216 940 212 C-Zone 11,288 0.63 1.7 0.64 227 602 159 13,600 0.70 1.5 0.76 307 670 228 HW Lens 818 0.56 1.3 0.42 15 33 7
17,713 0.53 1.6 0.54 301 907 212 28,400 0.57 1.8 0.70 523 1,610 440 Mesquite 17,550 0.42
0.40
2,000 2.34 4.7 1.17 150 300 51 1,700 2.64 4.8 1.13 144 261 42 CSP 1,174 0.34 11.6
436
0.25 8.8
29,200
Direct processing Open Pit 9,388 0.97 2.3
687
2,641 4.46 8.3
707
12,029 1.74 3.6
1,394
Open Pit 8,626 0.37 1.2
323
20,655 1.16 2.6
1,717
Direct processing 13,815 0.76 4.1
1,820
3,785 0.31 3.6
440
17,600 0.66 4.0
2,260
0.58 10.8
5,760
29,263 0.39 26.3
24,740
0.29 23.2
47,789
564,217 0.16
871
137,555 0.99
1,310
El Morro - Underground 113,840 0.97
1,065
Total Inferred 4,161 30,360 1,821 4,383 84,620 1,114
100% Basis 30% Basis 30% Basis 100% Basis
Inferred Resource statement as at December 31, 2013 Contained metal Metal grade Inferred Resource statement as at December 31, 2012 Metal grade Contained metal
63
New Gold reports its Measured and Indicated mineral resources inclusive of its mineral reserves. Measured and Indicated mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence and economic and legal feasibility, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are exclusive of mineral reserves. Mineral reserves have been estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) definition standards and National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). 1) Mineral Reserves for the company’s mineral properties have been estimated based on the following metal prices and lower cut-off criteria: Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off New Afton $1,300 $22.00 $3.00 US$21.00/t NSR Mesquite $1,300
0.41 g/t Au – Non-oxide reserves Peak Mines $1,300 $22.00 $3.00 A$88 – 134/t NSR Cerro San Pedro $1,300 $22.00
Rainy River $800 $1,300 $25.00 $22.00
Underground: 3.5 g/t Au Blackwater $1,300 $22.00
Stockpile: 0.32 g/t AuEq El Morro $1,300
0.20% Cu
Appendix 9
64
2) Mineral Resources for the company’s mineral properties have been estimated based on the following metal prices and lower cut-off criteria: 3) Mineral resources are classified as Measured, Indicated and Inferred resources and are reported based on technical and economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable for their potential commercial exploitation. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a mineral resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ have been applied to indicate envisioned mining method. Likewise the designators ‘oxide’, ‘non-oxide’ and ‘sulphide’ have been applied to indicate the type of mineralization as it relates to appropriate mineral processing method and expected payable metal recoveries. Additional details regarding mineral resource estimation, classification, reporting parameters, key assumptions and associated risks for each of New Gold’s mineral properties, other than Rainy River, are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports which are available at www.sedar.com. Refer to the supplementary information below regarding the mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates for Rainy River. Mineral Property Gold (US$/oz) Silver (US$/oz) Copper (US$/lb) Lower Cut-off New Afton $1,400 $24.00 $3.25 0.40% CuEq Mesquite $1,400
0.22 g/t Au – Non-oxide resources Peak Mines $1,400 $24.00 $3.25 A$92 - 125/t NSR Cerro San Pedro $1,400 $24.00
0.30 g/t AuEq – Open pit sulphide resources Rainy River $1,400 $24.00
Underground: 2.5 g/t Au Blackwater $1,400 $24.00
Stockpile: 0.30 – 0.40 g/t AuEq Capoose $1,400 $24.00
El Morro $1,300
0.20% Cu
Appendix 9
65
Rainy River Mineral Reserves:
US$1.00, gold recovery of 89.9% (non-CAP Zone) and 74.3% (CAP Zone) and a silver recovery of 67.1% (non-CAP Zone) and 69.5% (CAP Zone). The cut-off grade is based on a gold price of $1,200. Underground reserves have been estimated from mining shapes generated using a cut-off grade of 3.5 g/t gold-equivalent. Development material from stope access drives above a cut-off grade of 1.5 g/t gold-equivalent is also assumed to be sent to the mill for processing. Underground breakeven cut-off grade is calculated at 2.75 g/t gold-equivalent based on metal prices of $1,300 per ounce gold and $22 per ounce silver, a foreign exchange rate of CAD $1.05 to USD $1.00, gold recovery of 95% and a silver recovery of 75%.
both rock and backfill dilution. Open pit and underground reserves have been estimated using a mining recovery of 95% and 96.5%, respectively.
stockpiling and future processing.
September 2013 models for the main ODM zone and Intrepid Zone, respectively. Models were prepared by Dorota El-Rassi, P.Eng. (APEO #100012348) and Glen Cole, P.Geo. (APGO #1416), of SRK, both independent “Qualified Persons" as that term is defined in National Instrument 43-101. Rainy River’s exploration program in Richardson Township is being supervised by Mark A. Petersen, (AIPG Certified Professional Geologist #10563), Vice President, Exploration for New Gold and a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101. New Gold continues to implement a rigorous QA/QC program to ensure best practices in drill core sampling, analysis and data management.
mineral reserve statement was prepared by Colm Keogh, P.Eng. (APEGBC #37433) of AMC Mining Consultants (Canada) Ltd., both independent “Qualified Persons" as that term is defined in National Instrument 43-101.
Rainy River Mineral Resources:
per ounce, a silver price of $24.00 per ounce, a foreign exchange rate of C$1.10 to US$1.00, gold recovery of 88% for open pit resources and 90% for underground resources with silver recovery at 75%.
future processing based on average metallurgical recoveries of 88% gold and 75% silver.
Persons" as that term is defined in National Instrument 43-101.
4) Qualified Person: The preparation of New Gold's mineral reserve and mineral resource statements has been done by Qualified Persons as defined under National Instrument 43-101 under the supervision of Mark A. Petersen, a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 and an officer of New Gold.
Appendix 9
66
Guidance assumptions Spot:
2014 Gold price ($/oz) 1,300 Silver price ($/oz) 20.00 Copper price ($/oz) 3.25 AUD/USD 1.14 CDN/USD 1.11 MXN/USD 13.00 Spot Gold price ($/oz) 1,370 Silver price ($/oz) 21.20 Copper price ($/oz) 2.92 AUD/USD 1.11 CDN/USD 1.11 MXN/USD 13.27
Appendix 10
67
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this Report are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on November 27, 2010 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”). While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, certain information contained in this Report concerning descriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of Inferred Mineral Resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the Reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the Measured or Indicated Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves will ever be converted into Mineral Reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The scientific and technical information in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold. Mr. Petersen is an AIPG Certified Professional Geologist and a “qualified person” under National Instrument 43-101. For additional information with respect to our Mineral Resource and Reserve estimates and the Feasibility Studies discussed herein, refer to our news release dated February 6, 2014, the Rainy River Technical Report, the Blackwater Technical Report and our other technical reports available at www.sedar.com.
NON-GAAP MEASURES (1) TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce figures are non-GAAP measures which are calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers of gold and gold products that ceased operations in 2002. Adoption of the standard is voluntary and the cost measures presented may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. The company believes that certain investors use this information to evaluate the company’s ability to generate liquidity through operating cash flow and that this measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of the company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration costs, royalties, production taxes, and realized gains and losses on fuel contracts, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs and net of by-product sales. Total cash costs are then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as a by-product of gold production and apportion the cash costs to each metal produced on a percentage of revenue basis, and subsequently divides the amount by the total ounces of gold or silver or pounds of copper sold, as the case may be, to arrive at per ounce or per pound figures. Unless otherwise indicated, all total cash cost information in this presentation is net of by-product sales. These measures, along with sales, are considered to be a key indicator of a company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under GAAP or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding total cash costs and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measures are provided in our MD&A’s accompanying our financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (2) ADJUSTED NET CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS “Adjusted net cash generated from operations” and “Adjusted net cash generated from operations per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net cash generated from operations has been adjusted for
the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and provides an additional manner to compare performance between periods without the impact of non-recurring items. Adjusted net cash generated from operations and adjusted net cash generated from operations per share are intended to provide additional information and are non-GAAP financial measures. They do not have any standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. (3) ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS “Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net earnings have been adjusted and tax affected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are impacted for tax in the unadjusted net earnings from continuing
performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. They do not have any standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. (4) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the company in assessing the company’s operating performance, its ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under GAAP or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding all-in sustaining costs and a reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measures are provided in our MD&A’s accompanying our financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (5) OPERATING MARGIN “Operating margin” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under GAAP, which management uses to further evaluate the company’s results of operations in each reporting period. Operating margin is calculated as revenue less operating expenses and therefore does not include depreciation and depletion. Operating margin is intended to provide additional information and is a non- GAAP financial measure. It does not have any standardized meaning under GAAP and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP and is not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP.
68
69
Investor Relations Hannes Portmann Vice President, Corporate Development 416-324-6014 hannes.portmann@newgold.com