SLIDE 1 Radiative capture study by combining EFT with ab initio calculations:
Xilin Zhang (Ohio University)
( ) ( ) B
γ p, Be and Li γ n, Li
8 7 8 7
Nuclear Theory Group Seminar, LANL, Jan 15, 2014
- X. Z, K. M. Nollett and D. R. Phillips, arXiv:1311.6822; 1401.xxxx
SLIDE 2 Outline
- Motivations
- A toy model: spinless nucleon and core
- Li7 capture: spins, core excitation, leading order
(LO) results
- Be7 capture: nonperturbative Coulomb, LO
results
- Outlook: Next-to-LO
- My other works: neutrino-nucleus, jet quenching
in heavy ion collision, cold nuclear matter
SLIDE 3
Motivations
Astrophysics
SLIDE 4
- W. C. Haxton et.al., arXiv:1208.5723
Solar neutrino generation
Not experimentally accessible
SLIDE 5
Li7 capture is used to constrain models of Be7 capture.
SLIDE 6
A toy model
n c c n − γ
SLIDE 7 Gross features: p-wave
1/17/2014 7
Shallow p-wave bound state 5 . ~ MeV 8 . 57 2 ~ MeV 100 ~ 2 ~
8 71 7 43
Λ = Λ γ γ
Li Li
B M B M
SLIDE 8 Gross features: s-wave
1/17/2014 8
MeV 100 ≈ Λ
Large s-wave scattering length
- L. Koester, K. Knopf, and W. Waschkowski, Z. Phys. A 312, 81 (1983)
SLIDE 9 S-wave in EFT
Effective range expansion (ERE): Natural
Λ Λ 1 ~ and 1 ~ r a
SLIDE 10 S-wave in EFT
Effective range expansion (ERE): Natural Unnatural
Λ 1 ~ but 1 ~ r a γ Λ Λ 1 ~ and 1 ~ r a
SLIDE 11
S-wave in EFT
+
=
... +
One parameter: g (or a0)
SLIDE 12 P-wave in EFT
Shallow p-wave bound state:
Λ Λ ~ and 1 ~
1 2 1
r a γ
Natural Unnatural
2 1 1
4 2 1 1
= + + γ γ r a
SLIDE 13
P-wave in EFT
SLIDE 14
P-wave in EFT
=
+
SLIDE 15
P-wave in EFT
=
+
SLIDE 16
P-wave in EFT
=
+
Two parameters: Delta and h (or a1 and r1)
SLIDE 17 P-wave in EFT
Asymptotic normalization coefficient (ANC)
SLIDE 18 P-wave in EFT
2 1 1 3 2
3 2 1 1 1 2 2
= + + + − = γ γ γ γ r a r C
) and (or and
1 1
∆ h r a
- K. M. Nollett et.al., PRC 83, 041001 (2011)
Asymptotic normalization coefficient (ANC)
SLIDE 19 Radiative capture: LO
Halo-EFT parameters S wave scattering length
SLIDE 20 Radiative capture: LO
Halo-EFT parameters S wave scattering length C
~ 1 ~ , 1 ~ 1 ~ Λ ⇒ Λ ⇒ γ γ X a X a
SLIDE 21 ( )
Li γ n, Li
8 7
- G. Rupak and R. Higa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 222501 (2011)
SLIDE 22 1/17/2014 22
Scales, spins, core excitations
*
E
SLIDE 23 1/17/2014 23
Scales, spins, core excitations
*
E
, : n Li7 IS , , : n Li7 IS
1 * 3 * 1 * 2 5 1 3
S S D S S + +
SLIDE 24 1/17/2014 24
Scales, spins, core excitations
*
E
2 * 3 * 2 5 2 3
: n Li7 ) FS(2 , : n Li7 ) FS(2 P P P + +
+ +
, : n Li7 IS , , : n Li7 IS
1 * 3 * 1 * 2 5 1 3
S S D S S + +
SLIDE 25 1/17/2014 25
Scales, spins, core excitations
*
E
1 * 3 1 * 1 * 1 5 1 3
, : n Li7 ) FS(1 , : n Li7 ) FS(1 P P P P + +
+ + 2 * 3 * 2 5 2 3
: n Li7 ) FS(2 , : n Li7 ) FS(2 P P P + +
+ +
, : n Li7 IS , , : n Li7 IS
1 * 3 * 1 * 2 5 1 3
S S D S S + +
SLIDE 26 Scales, spins, core excitations
1/17/2014 26
MeV 300 100 − ≈ Λ
- L. Koester, K. Knopf, and W. Waschkowski, Z. Phys. A 312, 81 (1983)
SLIDE 27
EFT
SLIDE 28
EFT
SLIDE 29
EFT
SLIDE 30 EFT
>>
2 =
i
S 1 =
i
S 1 =
i
S
One fine tuning in S wave
SLIDE 31 + + 1
, 2
+ + 1
, 2
=
+ +
+ + 1
, 2
EFT
>> ~
2 =
i
S 1 =
i
S 1 =
i
S
One fine tuning in S wave One fine tuning in P wave
SLIDE 32 P-wave
=
+ +
+
2
- L. Trache,et.al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 062801(R) (2003)
SLIDE 33 P-wave
=
+ +
+
2
- L. Trache,et.al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 062801(R) (2003)
4 parameters: 3 h + 1 Delta,
SLIDE 34 P-wave
=
+ +
+
2
- L. Trache,et.al., Phys. Rev. C 67, 062801(R) (2003)
4 parameters: 3 h + 1 Delta,
5 parameters
SLIDE 35
Radiative captures: LO
SLIDE 36
Radiative captures: LO
>>
SLIDE 37 Radiative captures: LO
>>
~ 1 ~ , 1 ~ 1 ~ Λ ⇒ Λ ⇒ γ γ X a X a
Initial total spin Si=2
SLIDE 40 LO results on Li7(n,gamma)Li8(Li8*)
1/17/2014 40
- N. K. Timofeyuk et.al., PRL 91, 232501 (2003); D. Howell et.al., PRC 88, 025804 (2013);
- D. Gul’ko et.al., SJNP 6, 477 (1968); E. Lynn et.al., PRC 44, 764 (1991);
- Y. Nagai et. al., PRC 71, 055803 (2005); J. C. Blackmon et. al., PRC 54, 383 (1996); J. E. Lynn et. al., PRC
44, 764 (1991); M. Heil et.al., Astro. J. 507, 997 (1998); W. L. Imhof et.al., PR 114, 1037 (1959).
SLIDE 41 1/17/2014 41
0.86] [>
- A. D. Gul’ko, S. S. Trostin, and A. Hudoklin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 6, 477 (1968);
- J. E. Lynn, E. T. Jurney, and S. Raman, Phys. Rev. C 44, 764 (1991);
- Y. Nagai et. al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 055803 (2005).
LO results on Li7(n,gamma)Li8(Li8*)
SLIDE 42 1/17/2014 42
0.86] [>
- A. D. Gul’ko, S. S. Trostin, and A. Hudoklin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 6, 477 (1968);
- J. E. Lynn, E. T. Jurney, and S. Raman, Phys. Rev. C 44, 764 (1991);
- Y. Nagai et. al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 055803 (2005).
LO results on Li7(n,gamma)Li8(Li8*)
SLIDE 43 1/17/2014 43
0.86] [>
0.89(1)] [
- A. D. Gul’ko, S. S. Trostin, and A. Hudoklin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 6, 477 (1968);
- J. E. Lynn, E. T. Jurney, and S. Raman, Phys. Rev. C 44, 764 (1991);
- Y. Nagai et. al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 055803 (2005).
LO results on Li7(n,gamma)Li8(Li8*)
SLIDE 44 ( ) B
γ p, Be
8 7
- It is considered as isospin mirror of Li7
capture on the nucleon level
- From EFT/core+proton picture, they are
quite different due to strong Coulomb effect
SLIDE 45
Nonperturbative Coulomb effect
1 ~ k kC ≡ η
SLIDE 46
Nonperturbative Coulomb effect
1 ~ k kC ≡ η
SLIDE 47 Nonperturbative Coulomb effect
1 ~ k kC ≡ η
Kummer function Coulomb barrier, and phase
SLIDE 48
ERE in EFT
SLIDE 49
ERE in EFT
SLIDE 50
ERE in EFT
One parameter: g (or a0) Two parameters: Delta and h (or a1 and r1)
SLIDE 51 1/17/2014 51
2 .
*
E
Shallow bound state
1 ~ k kC = η
Scales, spins, core excitations
SLIDE 52 1/17/2014 52
*
E
2 * 3 * 2 5 2 3
: p Be7 ) FS(2 , : p Be7 ) FS(2 P P P + +
+ +
, : p Be7 IS , , : p Be7 IS
1 * 3 * 1 * 2 5 1 3
S S D S S + +
Repeat
SLIDE 53
=
+ +
P-wave
SLIDE 54
=
+ +
P-wave
4 parameters: 3 h + 1 Delta, or 3 C + gamma
SLIDE 55
Radiative captures: LO
SLIDE 56
Radiative captures: LO
Initial total spin Si=1
SLIDE 57
Radiative captures: LO
Initial total spin Si=1
SLIDE 58
Radiative captures: LO
Initial total spin Si=1
h W n G j F → → →
SLIDE 59 Radiative captures: LO
×
SLIDE 60 1/17/2014 60
LO results on Be7(p,gamma)B8
- P. Navratil, R. Roth and S. Quaglioni, Phys. Lett. B 704, 379 (2011);
- C. Angulo et. al., Nucl. Phys. A 716, 211 (2003);
- G. Tabacaru, et. al., Phys. Rev. C 73, 025808 (2006)
SLIDE 61 1/17/2014 61
LO results on Be7(p,gamma)B8
One standard deviation in S-wave scattering lengths
- P. Navratil, R. Roth and S. Quaglioni, Phys. Lett. B 704, 379 (2011)
SLIDE 62 1/17/2014 62
LO results on Be7(p,gamma)B8
One standard deviation in S-wave scattering lengths Need better measurement of S-wave scattering lengths and/or effective ranges to extrapolate data to zero energy
- P. Navratil, R. Roth and S. Quaglioni, Phys. Lett. B 704, 379 (2011)
SLIDE 63 LO results on Be7(p,gamma)B8
- L. T. Baby, et. al., [ISOLDE Collaboration], Phys. Rev.Lett. 90, 022501 (2003);
- F. Hammache, et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3985 (2001);
- F. Strieder, et. al., Nucl. Phys. A 696, 219 (2001);
- B. W. Filippone, et. al., Phys. Rev. C 28, 2222 (1983);
- A. R. Junghans, et. al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 065803 (2003);
- A. R. Junghans, et. al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 012801 (2010).
Fit to 0<E<50 keV
- E. G. Adelberger, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 195 (2011)
SLIDE 64 Summary
- EFT (power counting)+ab initio works as
expected at LO
- LO need s-wave scattering length, p-wave
ANCs, and binding momentum
- The p-wave is a coupled-channel problem
- For Be7 capture, improving s-wave
measurement is important for extrapolating data to stellar energies.
SLIDE 65
Outlook: NLO
SLIDE 66 Outlook: NLO
couplings, i.e., need more “observables”.
calculations?
conditions?
fields?
SLIDE 67 Outlook: NLO
couplings, i.e., need more “observables”.
calculations?
conditions?
fields?
- Another approach by using
data?
SLIDE 68 Other works
- Neutrino-nucleus interactions (GeV): neutral-
current induced photon (motivated by MiniBooNE low energy excess), pion productions, nuclear effects [with Brian Serot]
- Jet quenching in heavy ion collisions: initial state
fluctuation, different phenomenological jet energy loss models, possible near-Tc enhancement [with Jinfeng Liao]
- Two-loop contributions: nuclear matter, neutron
matter, finite temperature [With Madappa Prakash]
https://sites.google.com/site/xilinzhangphysics/
SLIDE 70 New hadronic interactions?
γ ρ ω, Z
70
J.A. Harvey, C.T. Hill, R.J. Hill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 261601 (2007), Phys. Rev. D 77, 085017(2008). R.J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 81, 013008 (2010), 84 017501(2011).
SLIDE 74 NC photon production off the nucleon
74
SLIDE 75 75
γ
ρ ω, Z
M 1 ~ state te intermedia N
These terms are small
- R. J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 81, 013008 (2010)
- W. Peters l, H. Lenske, U. Mosel,
- Nucl. Phy. A640,89 (1998)
8 . 5 . 1
1 1
= = e c
γ
ρ ω, π
SLIDE 76 MiniBooNE NC photon events
76
Xection needs to be doubled at least.
SLIDE 77 77
- Incoherent one is small at Enu~ 1 GeV
- Coherent one is zero
SLIDE 78 backup
- Capture cross section
- 20 keV ~ fb
- 1MeV ~mb
SLIDE 79