Ay 102 Physics of the Interstellar Medium supplemental material - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ay 102 physics of the interstellar medium
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ay 102 Physics of the Interstellar Medium supplemental material - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ay 102 Physics of the Interstellar Medium supplemental material Hillenbrand Winter Term 2019-2020 Radiative Transfer The interaction of photons and matter! whfreeman.com Important variables: energy of the photons (


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ay 102 Physics of the Interstellar Medium

supplemental material Hillenbrand – Winter Term 2019-2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Radiative Transfer

  • The interaction of photons and matter!
  • Important variables:
  • energy of the photons (è frequency)
  • temperature and density of the gas (è cross section)
  • presence and size of dust (è cross section)

whfreeman.com

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • D. Fischer

n1, σ1 n2, σ2 n, σ

Can also have an emission component, which contributes photons instead of removing them è d Iν = jν ρds

recall that n σ = k ρ

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Equation of Radiative Transfer

In analyzing spectra need to consider both continuum and line processes. Optical depth τν (with dτν = κν ρ ds) accounts for interaction between matter and the radiation field.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Illustration (courtesy of K. Dullemond)

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν < Iν

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν < Iν

  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν < Iν

  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν < Iν

  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν > Iν

  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν > Iν

  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν > Iν

  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Sν > Iν

  • Rad. trans. through a cloud of fixed T
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • D. Fischer

Many Ways to Remove Photons = Opacity

(continuum opacity) (line opacity) (continuum opacity)

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • D. Fischer

Many Ways to Remove Photons = Opacity

(continuum opacity) (continuum opacity)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Opacity is mostly from dust at UV through infrared and millimeter Opacity is entirely from gas below the lyman limit

Resulting Total Absorption Cross Section

Showing wavelength dependence of the continuum only. There can also be superposed line opacity.

10 µm 1 µm 0.1 µm

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • T. Montmerle
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Far

  • UV

Extreme-UV Soft x-ray Hard x-ray Ercolano & Pascucci

It Doesn’t Take Much Column to Get Rid of UV

12.4 nm à Av = 1 mag This is a hot emission region seen through increasing amounts

  • f cooler gas.

(showing continuum and lines)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Radiative Transfer and Spectral Lines

  • Concerning line opacity, we are going to spend some

time understanding energy levels and the “transitions” between them for:

  • Atoms / Ions (Grotrian diagrams for electronic levels)
  • Molecules (Jablonski diagrams for rotational and vibrational)
  • The balance of the upward and downward transitions --

combined with the 1/ 4π directional probability for photon emission −− is a source of opacity.

  • Then the solutions to the Radiative Transfer Equation

determine what we actually observe.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Line Profiles and Strengths

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Emission vs. absorption lines

Hot foreground layer Flux l Cool foreground layer Flux l

  • K. Dullemond
slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • J. Williams

how strong is the line?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Thermal Line Width

Profile strength Fν ν σ νline

  • K. Dullemond
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Illustration (courtesy of K. Dullemond)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Emission vs. absorption lines

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Emission vs. absorption lines

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Emission vs. absorption lines

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

line is “saturated”

Emission vs. absorption lines

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Emission vs. absorption lines

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Emission vs. absorption lines

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

Emission vs. absorption lines

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Iν,bg Iν,out T

cloud

τcloud

Tbg=6000 K

line is “saturated”

Emission vs. absorption lines

slide-33
SLIDE 33

IGM example

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Lyman Series Absorption è NHI

Flux Velocity

line is “saturated” higher level lines from same species are weaker

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37