Aviation and Climate Change John E. Putnam Kaplan Kirsch & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

aviation and climate change
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Aviation and Climate Change John E. Putnam Kaplan Kirsch & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Aviation and Climate Change John E. Putnam Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell, LLP October 12, 2009 Overview How does aviation affect climate? What is being done now? What can be done? International efforts Clean Air Act


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Aviation and Climate Change

John E. Putnam Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell, LLP October 12, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Overview

  • How does aviation affect climate?
  • What is being done now?
  • What can be done?
  • International efforts
  • Clean Air Act
  • Legislation
  • National Environmental Policy Act
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • Approx. 3%
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Control of GHG Emissions

  • Engine emissions/airframe efficiency
  • Conventional technology
  • Demand/price
  • Operations/airspace
  • NextGen Airspace
  • Biofuels
  • Airport/ground operations
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

International Efforts

  • UN Framework Convention on Climate Change/

Kyoto Protocol

  • Domestic versus international flights
  • ICAO
  • Has recommended open emissions trading
  • Developing guidance on voluntary trading
  • European Union proposed legislation
  • Controversy regarding application to non-EU flights
  • Airlines accountable, not airports
slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Clean Air Act: Massachusetts v. EPA

  • Challenge to EPA’s denial of rulemaking

petition for cars and trucks

  • Court found EPA’s denial was improper
  • Determined that GHGs can constitute air

pollutants under Clean Air Act

  • EPA failed to justify denial of petition to

regulate under § 202

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Clean Air Act Provisions Regarding Cars and Aircraft

Section 202 (Cars): E.P.A.

Administrator “shall by regulation prescribe … standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.” 42 U.S.C § 7521(a)(1).

Section 231 (Aircraft): E.P.A.

Administrator “shall … issue proposed emission standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of aircraft engines which in his judgment causes, or contributes to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health

  • r welfare.”

42 U.S.C. § 7571(a)(2)(A).

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

EPA’s “Endangerment” Finding

  • 6 GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6)

constitute “air pollution”

  • These GHGs affect public health and welfare
  • Emissions from Section 202 sources cause
  • r contribute to GHG levels affecting public

health

  • Threshold will be important for other

sources

  • Now set at 25,000 tpy
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Aviation Petitions

  • Separate process from Car/Truck process
  • But, substantial overlap in findings
  • Petitioners sought wide range of measures
  • Engine and airframe design
  • Airspace efficiency
  • Airport measures (ground power and PCA)
  • Will have separate rulemaking process
  • EPA must make finding on whether aviation

“causes and contributes”

  • May be superseded by legislation
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES)

  • Passed by the House this summer
  • Focus on CO2 as pollutant under the

Clean Air Act

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES)

  • Require efficiency standards for new aircraft

and new aircraft engines (Sec. 221)

  • Rule by end of 2012
  • No mention of ICAO process
  • Require rule on mandatory reporting of GHGs

(Sec. 713)

  • EPA promulgated mandatory rule in September
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

ACES Elements (continued)

  • Cap-and-trade program (Sec. 722)
  • Declining cap through 2050
  • Covers fuel providers, not aircraft users
  • Covers large stationary sources, including some

airports and aviation production facilities

Specific provisions for phase-out of HFCs (Sec. 332)

  • Potential for exemption of critical aviation uses
  • Adaptation (Sec. 461, et seq.)
  • Federal information resources
  • Agency adaptation plans
  • Funding for state, local projects
slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Kerry-Boxer Bill

  • Senate Kerry-Boxer Bill
  • Removed mandate for EPA rule
  • Similar cap-and-trade provisions
  • Can any Bill get 60 votes in Senate this

year?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Meanwhile, at the Airports….

  • National Environmental Policy Act
  • Center for Biological Diversity v. NHTSA
  • State and local action
  • Mini-NEPAs
  • Proprietor activities v. compliance

requirements