Automorphisms of C 2 with multiply connected attracting cycles of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

automorphisms of c 2 with multiply connected attracting
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Automorphisms of C 2 with multiply connected attracting cycles of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Automorphisms of C 2 with multiply connected attracting cycles of Fatou components Josias Reppekus (Universit` a degli Studi di Roma " Tor Vergata " ) Topics in Complex Dynamics 2019 - From combinatorics to transcendental dynamics,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Automorphisms of C2 with multiply connected attracting cycles of Fatou components

Josias Reppekus (Universit` a degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata")

Topics in Complex Dynamics 2019 - From combinatorics to transcendental dynamics, Barcelona, March 25-29, 2019

  • 26. March 2019

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

1 / 13

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fatou components

Definition

Let F : C2 → C2 be a holomorphic map. The Fatou set of F is the open set F := {z ∈ Cd | {F n}n∈N is normal in a neighbourhood of z}. A Fatou component of F is a connected component U of F and it is invariant if F (U) = U, attracting if (F|U)n → p ∈ U (in particular F (p) = p), non-recurrent if no orbit starting in U accumulates in U (in the attracting case, i.e. p ∈ ∂U).

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

2 / 13

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Main result

Theorem (Bracci-Raissy-Stensønes)

There exists F ∈ Aut(Cd) with an invariant, attracting, non-recurrent Fatou component biholomorphic to C × (C∗)d−1 attracted to the origin O.

Theorem (R)

Let k, p ∈ N∗. There exists F ∈ Aut(Cd) with k disjoint, p-periodic cycles

  • f attracting, non-recurrent Fatou components biholomorphic to

C × (C∗)d−1 attracted to the origin O.

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

3 / 13

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Other results

Theorem (R)

Let k, p ∈ N∗. There exists F ∈ Aut(Cd) with k disjoint, p-periodic cycles

  • f attracting, non-recurrent Fatou components biholomorphic to

C × (C∗)d−1 attracted to the origin O.

Other results

Let U ⊆ C2 be an invariant attracting Fatou component of F ∈ Aut(C2).

1 If U is recurrent or F is polynomial, then U ∼ C2

(Rosay-Rudin/Peters-Vivas-Wold, Ueda/Peters-Lyubich).

2 U is Runge in C2 (Ueda).

In particular, H2(U) = 0 (Serre).

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

4 / 13

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A one-resonant morphism

Take F : C2 → C2 of the form F (z, w) = λz λw 1 − zw 2

  • + O((z, w)l),

where |λ| = 1 is not a root of unity and λ is Brjuno (in particular λλ = 1). This is a so-called one-resonant map (Bracci-Zaitsev). F acts on the

  • ne-dimensional coordinate u = zw as

u → u(1 − u + 1/4u2) + O((z, w)l).

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

5 / 13

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Local Dynamics

(z, w) (arg z, arg w) ×

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 z 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 w

(z, w) < |u|β u = zw u → u(1 − u + 1/4u2) + O((z, w)l) =: S

Theorem (Bracci-Zaitsev 2013)

Let β ∈ (0, 1/2) such that β (l + 1) ≥ 2. Then

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

6 / 13

slide-7
SLIDE 7

A Fatou component

Let Ω :=

n∈N F −n(B). Then Ω is completely F-invariant, open and

attracted to O.

Claim

Ω is a (union of) Fatou component(s).

Proof.

Ingredients:

1 For (z, w) ∈ Ω, we have |zn| ∼ |wn|. 2 If λ is Brjuno, then there exist local coordinates tangent to (z, w)

such that (D, 0) and (0, D) are Siegel discs, that is, analytic discs on which F acts as an irrational rotation (P¨

  • schel).

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

7 / 13

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Globalisation

Theorem (Forstneriˇ c)

There exists an automorphism F ∈ Aut(C2) of the form F (z, w) = λz λw 1 − zw 2

  • + O((z, w)l).

Claim

For F as above, Ω ∼ = C × C∗.

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

8 / 13

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Local Fatou coordinates on B

(arg z, arg w) ×

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 z 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 w

(z, w) < |u|β u = zw w U = 1/u

U→U+1+HOT

w Fatou coordinates: ˜ U → ˜ U + 1 ˜ w → λe− 1

2 ˜ U Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

9 / 13

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Extending Fatou coordinates

˜ U extends via ˜ U → ˜ U + 1 to C : ˜ w extends via ˜ w → λe− 1

2 ˜ U to C∗

  • ver H = ˜

U(B) : ˜ w(n)(p) = ˜ w(F n(p)) is defined

  • ver Hn = H − n.

C∗-bundle structure over C: Transition functions: ˜ w(n+1) = λe

1 2( ˜ U+n) ˜

w(n). Such a bundle is trivial Ω ∼ = C × C∗

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

10 / 13

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Higher orders and periodic components

As in the one-dimensional case, we can find multiple such components, invariant or periodic, if we replace F by F (z, w) = λz ζpλw 1 − (zw)k 2k

  • + O((z, w)l),

where ζp is a p-th root of unity.

  • Josias Reppekus (TCD2019)

Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

11 / 13

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Open questions

Classification of Fatou components

Let Ω be a non-recurrent, attracting Fatou component for F ∈ Aut(Cd).

1 Is Ω biholomorphic to Cd, Cd−1 × C∗, . . . or C × (C∗)d−1? 2 Does the Kobayashi metric vanish: kΩ ≡ 0? 3 Is there a Fatou coordinate ψ : Ω → C that is also a fibre bundle.

For d = 2, 2 and 3 would imply 1.

Extension of Siegel discs

In our example, there are Siegel discs for F tangent to the axes.

1 Can these be extended to entire Siegel curves? 2 Can they be globally simultaneously linearised? I.e. can we find global

  • schel coordinates for F?

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

12 / 13

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Thank you!

Josias Reppekus (TCD2019) Attracting C × C∗ Fatou cycles

  • 26. March 2019

13 / 13