atriumfibrilleren en coronairlijden Jur ten Berg, MD, MSc, PhD, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

atriumfibrilleren en coronairlijden
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

atriumfibrilleren en coronairlijden Jur ten Berg, MD, MSc, PhD, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Casuistiek antitrombotische therapie bij atriumfibrilleren en coronairlijden Jur ten Berg, MD, MSc, PhD, FESC, FACC May 2017 St Antonius ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands Disclosures Advisory/consulting/speakers fees : AstraZeneca,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Casuỉstiek antitrombotische therapie bij atriumfibrilleren en coronairlijden

Jur ten Berg, MD, MSc, PhD, FESC, FACC

St Antonius ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands May 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • Advisory/consulting/speakers fees: AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Daiichi

Sankyo, The Medicines Company, Accumetrics, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Pfizer, Bayer, Ferrer

  • Research grants: ZonMw, AstraZeneca
  • RE-DUAL study: executive scientific committee
slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why change duration of DAPT after ACS and PCI?

Shorter:

  • One year DAPT after ACS based on

CURE and CURE-PCI with predominantly conservative treatment and when stented mostly BMS or 1st generation DES

  • 2nd generation DES safer (less ST)
  • Stronger more effective P2Y12

inhibitors while ischemic risk diminishes

  • ver time
  • More patients at high risk for bleedings

(elderly, OAC)

5

Longer:

  • Event rate after standard 1 year DAPT

remains high

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Shorter: 2nd generation DES safer

SCAAR S.James

1 2 3 8 5 1 2 5 3 4 Crude rates (unadjusted) with different duration of FU

All stents implanted 2007 – August 24 2016

Xience exp. N=13,266 ST 0.86% Resolute I. N=6,687 ST 0.85% Orsiro N=7,644 ST 0.59% Promus P N=24,831 ST 0.51% Ultimaster N=2,266 ST 0.49% Onyx N=18,709 ST 0.39% Synergy N=14,979 ST 0.26%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Longer: HELICON study 1-year event-free MI survivors (n=76,687)

CV, cardiovascular; MI, myocardial infarction. Jernberg, T. et al. Eur Heart J 2015: doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu505

20 %

Cumulative 3 year incidence of CV death, MI or stroke (%)

~1 in 5 patients,

Event-free for 1 year post-MI, will suffer an MI, stroke or CV death within 3 years

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Casus I

8

  • Man 50 jaar, hypercholesterolemie, rookte tot electieve

PCI van mid-LAD met 2e generatie DES (3.0x15) 11-1- 2018

a)P2Y12 remmer 6 maanden b)P2Y12 remmer 12 maanden c) P2Y12 remmer > 12 maanden

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Shorter DAPT (≤ 6 M) Most stable CAD, most 2nd generation DES, all non-inferiority design

Trial ISAR-SAFE ITALIC SECURITY OPTIMIZE PRODIGY RESET EXCELLENT N 4,000 1,822 1,399 3,119 1,970 2,117 1,433 Design 6 vs 12 6 vs 12 6 vs 12 3 vs 12 6 vs 24 3 vs 12 6 vs 12 Primary Endpoint Composite of death, MI, stroke, ST, or TIMI major bleeding at 15 months after PCI Composite of death, MI, repeat TVR, stroke or TIMI major bleeding at 12 months after PCI Composite of cardiac death, MI, stroke, ST, or BARC 3 or 5 bleeding at 12 months after PCI Composite of death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding at 12 months after PCI Composite of death, MI, or cerebrovascular accidents at 24 months after PCI Composite of cardiac death, MI, ST, ischemia-driven TVR, or bleeding at 12 months after PCI Composite of cardiac death, MI, or TVR at 12 months after PCI Mean 67 62 65 61 68 62 63 age ACS 40 24 38 32 75 55 51 % 2nd gen 72 100 100 100 50 85 75 DES BARC, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium; EXCELLENT, Efficacy of Xience/Promos versus Cypher to reduce late loss after stenting; ISAR-SAFE, Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs 12 months clopidogrel therapy after implantation of a drug-eluting stent; ITALIC, Is there a life for DES after discontinuation of clopidogrel; OPTIMIZE, Optimized duration of clopidogrel therapy following treatment with the Endeavor Zotarolimus-eluting stent in the real world clinical practice; PRODIGY, Prolonging DAPT in patients with coronary artery disease after graded stent-induces intimal hyperplasia; RESET, A new strategy regarding discontinuation of dual antiplatelet/ real safety and efficacy of a 3-month DAPT following zotarolimus-eluting stents implantation; SECURITY, Second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation followed by 6- vs 12 month DAPT, MI myocardial infarction; NI, non-inferior; ST, stent thrombosis; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; TVR, target vessel revascularization; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention. Montalescot et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:832-47 Study NI NI NI NI NI NI NI Outcome DAPT, mth

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Myocardial infarction: 3-6 months vs 12 months Meta-analysis for the 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update

Trial EXCELLENT (6 vs 12 mo) RESET (3 vs 12 mo) OPTIMIZE (6 vs 12 mo) SECURITY (6 vs 12 mo) ISAR-SAFE (6 vs 12 mo) Bayesian hierarchical meta analysis Fixed effect model Random effect model Events 7 / 4 / 42 / 15 / 14 / 82 / 721 1058 1556 717 2003 6055 Events 13 / 2 / 49 / 16 / 13 / 93 / 722 1059 1563 682 1997 6023 OR 0.53 2.01 0.86 0.89 1.07 0.90 0.87 0.87 95% CI (0.21-1.35) (0.37-11.0) (0.56-1.30) (0.44-1.81) (0.50-2.29) (0.60-1.30) (0.65-1.18) (0.65-1.18) 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 Prolonged Short Short better Prolonged better

  • Circulation. 2016;134:e156–e178.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Major hemorrhage: 3-6 months vs 12 months Meta-analysis for the 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update

Trial EXCELLENT (6 vs 12 mo) RESET (3 vs 12 mo) OPTIMIZE (6 vs 12 mo) SECURITY (6 vs 12 mo) ISAR-SAFE (6 vs 12 mo) Bayesian hierarchical meta analysis Fixed effect model Random effect model Events 4 / 6 / 14 / 8 / 5 / 37 / 721 1058 1556 717 2003 6055 Events 2 / 2 / 10 / 4 / 4 / 22 / 722 1059 1563 682 1997 6023 OR 2.01 3.01 1.41 1.91 1.25 1.67 1.67 1.65 95% CI (0.37-11.0) (0.61-15.0) (0.62-3.18) (0.57-6.38) (0.33-4.65) (0.89-2.90) (0.99-2.84) (0.97-2.82) 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 Prolonged Short Short better Prolonged better

  • Circulation. 2016;134:e156–e178.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Casus II

13

  • Man 55 jaar, DM II, hypertensie met GFR = 48 ml/min, rookt nog
  • 2017-1 pPCI RCA voor OWI start asa+ticagrelor (2x90 mg)
  • 2017-1 PCI DES proximale LAD, PCI Cx en diffuus RCA
  • 2018-1 geen AP, geen bloeding

a) P2Y12 remmer (ticagrelor) had al gestopt moeten zijn b) Nog jaren continueren

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

DAPT trial, Not-Stent Thrombosis Myocardial Infarction

Maanden na randomisatie 12 15 18 21 30 33 % 10 8 6 24 27 4

HR 0,59 95% CI 0,45 – 0,78 P value <0,001 n 9.961 12 months 30 months

1,8 2,9 55% of the MI benefit is NOT related to stent thrombosis

Mauri L, et al. Am Heart J 2010;160:1035-1041.e1

slide-15
SLIDE 15

N= 21.000

age of 65 years or older, diabetes mellitus requiring medication, a second prior spontaneous myocardial infarction, multivessel coronary artery disease, or chronic renal dysfunction GFR< 60 ml/min

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Bleeding

Bonaca MP et al. Am Heart J 2014; 167:437-44

1 2 3 4 TIMI Major 5 TIMI Minor Fatal bleeding ICH Fatal bleeding

  • r ICH

2.6 2.3 1.1 1.3 1.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.3 <0.001 <0.001 NS NS NS

Ticagrelor, 90 mg Ticagrelor, 60 mg Placebo

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Prolonged DAPT post AMI

Udell, prolonged DAPT post AMI. Meta analysis EHJ 2016

2006 CHARISMA MI cohort 2012 PRODIGY 2014 ARCTIC interruption 2014 DAPT 2015 DES-LATE 2015 PEGASUS-TIMI 54 125 63 3 59 56 980 1903 732 156 1805 1512 14095 162 69 4 108 66 578 1943 733 167 1771 1551 7067 21.4% 13.3% 1.0% 14.6% 12.9% 36.8% 0.77 0.91 0.79 0.52 0.85 0.84 (0.61-0.98) (0.65-1.28) (0.18-3.51) (0.38-0.72) (0.60-1.21) (0.76-0.94) Major adverse cardiovascular events Cardiovascular death Myocardial infarction Stroke Stent thrombosis (definite, probable) Major bleeding Non-cardiovascular death All-cause death 0.78 0.65 0.70 0.81 0.50 1.73 1.03 0.92 (0.67-0.90) (0.74-0.98) (0.55-0.88) (0.68-0.97) (0.28-0.89) (1.19-2.50) (0.86-1.23) (0.83-1.03) 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 0.5 1 2.5 Extended DAPT Events/Total ASA only Events/Total Rel. weight HR 95% CI

Absolute 0.3%

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Casus II

19

  • Man 55 jaar, DM II, hypertensie met GFR = 48 ml/min, rookt nog
  • 2017-1 pPCI RCA voor OWI start asa+ticagrelor (2x90 mg)
  • 2017-1 PCI DES proximale LAD, PCI Cx en diffuus RCA
  • 2018-1 geen AP, geen bloeding

a) P2Y12 remmer (ticagrelor) had al gestopt moeten zijn b) Nog jaren continueren

PEGASUS: age of 65 years or older, diabetes mellitus requiring medication, a second prior spontaneous myocardial infarction, multivessel coronary artery disease, or chronic renal dysfunction GFR < 60 ml per minute. DAPT: no event first year, score 3 (DM, prior MI or PCI, smoking)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Hart Beter

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Personal information Sex Male Age 85 years Blood pressure 161/89 mmHg Pulse 69 bpm Oxygen saturation 97%

Patient: Jan

Patient history Medical history

  • Hypertension (2002)
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus (2003)
  • Peripheral artery disease
  • Renal impairment (GFR = 45 mL/min)
  • TIA (2011)
  • Paroxysmal NVAF (diagnosed 2011; CHA2DS2-VASc: 7)

Medications

  • Beta blocker
  • Statin
  • ACE inhibitor
  • Antidiabetics
  • NOAC since 2013 (because of labile INR/low TTR)

Presentation

  • Heavy chest pain (40 min, previous night)
  • Pain-free at presentation
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Q

What is the optimal antithrombotic regimen after stenting? 1. Dual 2. Triple therapy

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Study Design: Multicenter, randomized,

  • pen-label trial following a PROBE design

R

Randomization ≤120 hours post-PCI* 6-month minimum treatment duration with visits every 3 months for the first year, then visits and telephone contact alternating every 3 months and a 1-month post-treatment visit

Patients with AF undergoing succesful PCI with stenting no recent < 1 m ICH, stroke, surgery, bleeding CrCl <30mL/min Dabigatran 150 mg BID + P2Y12 inhibitor Dabigatran 110 mg BID + P2Y12 inhibitor Warfarin (INR 2.0–3.0) + P2Y12 inhibitor + ASA

Dabigatran (110 or 150 mg) Warfarin 1 month of ASA (BMS) 3 months of ASA (DES)

N=2725 Mean duration of follow-up: ~14 months

P2Y12 inhibitor P2Y12 inhibitor

slide-27
SLIDE 27

» Full analysis set presented. HRs and Wald CIs from Cox proportional-hazard model. For the dabigatran 110 mg vs warfarin comparison, the model is stratified by age, non-elderly vs elderly (<70 or ≥70 in Japan and <80 or ≥80 years old elsewhere). For the dabigatran 150 mg vs warfarin comparison, an unstratified model is used, elderly patients outside the USA are excluded. Non- inferiority P value is one sided (alpha=0.025). Wald two-sided P value from (stratified) Cox proportional-hazard model (alpha=0.05)

Time to first major bleeding event or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event

Probability of event (%)

90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 Time to first event (days) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5

Warfarin triple therapy Dabigatran 110 mg dual therapy

HR: 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42–0.63) Non-inferiority P<0.0001 P<0.0001

90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 Time to first event (days) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5

Dabigatran 150 mg dual therapy Warfarin triple therapy

HR: 0.72 (95% CI: 0.58–0.88) Non-inferiority P<0.0001 P=0.002

slide-28
SLIDE 28

» Non-inferiority P value is one sided (alpha=0.025). Results presented are Step 3 of hierarchical testing procedure, testing non-inferiority of dabigatran dual therapy (combined doses) to warfarin triple therapy in death or thromboembolic event and unplanned revascularization

Time to death or thromboembolic event, or unplanned revascularization

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 Probability of event (%) 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 Time to first event (days) Dabigatran (combined doses) dual therapy Warfarin triple therapy