Atmospheric Chemical Composition, Climate, and Societal Implications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

atmospheric chemical composition climate and societal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Atmospheric Chemical Composition, Climate, and Societal Implications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Atmospheric Chemical Composition, Climate, and Societal Implications Steven C. Wofsy Harvard University HIPPO images by Bruce C. Daube Presented to 40 th Annual Meeting of the Global Monitoring Division, ESRL, National Oceanic & Atmospheric


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Atmospheric Chemical Composition, Climate, and Societal Implications Steven C. Wofsy Harvard University

5/23/2012 1

Presented to 40th Annual Meeting of the Global Monitoring Division, ESRL, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Admin. 15 May 2012

HIPPO images by Bruce C. Daube

slide-2
SLIDE 2

5/23/2012 2

Abstract Global atmospheric concentrations of CO2 , CH4 and N2 O are largely under human control, affecting climate and global atmospheric chemical processes. This talk discusses measurements of these gases in two major aircraft campaigns: HIAPER Pole‐to‐Pole Observations program (“HIPPO”, sponsored by NSF and NOAA) and CalNEX (sponsored by NOAA and CARB), and their synergy with measurements at NOAA surface, tower, and aircraft profile stations. New information on the drivers of long‐term changes in the global atmosphere are explored, emphasizing interpretation of data for CO2 and other GHGs from the NOAA network, and new information on CH4 emissions in the Arctic region.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GV launch in the rain, Anchorage, January, 2009 (HIPPO-1)

HIPPO: NCAR Gulfstream V "HIAPER"

slide-4
SLIDE 4

HIPPO_2 Nov 2009 HIPPO_3 Mar-Apr 2010 HIPPO_1 Jan 2009 preHIPPO Apr-Jun 2008

HIPPO itinerary

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

5/23/2012 6

Part 1. CO2 at the global scale: The Network, CarbonTracker, and atmospheric “global fine structure”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

5/23/2012 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

5/23/2012 8

CO2 CarbonTracker along the HIPPO flight track

Courtesy Colm Sweeney/Anna Karion

slide-9
SLIDE 9

5/23/2012 9

CO2 CarbonTracker compared to HIPPO cross section

Mar 2009 Aug 2009 Aug 2011 Mar 2009

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5/23/2012 10

January 2009 March 2010 August 2011

Seasonal transport of CO2 through the middle and high latitude troposphere has strong isentropic character, and in winter, a jet stream component. (B. Stephens, H1 science team meeting).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

5/23/2012 11

Network design study using Carbon Tracker

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Part 2. CH4 (and other stuff) in the Arctic

5/23/2012 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

GLOBAL METHANE SOURCES, Tg a-1 [IPCC, 2007] ANIMALS 80-90 LANDFILLS 40-70 GAS 50-70 COAL 30-50 RICE 30-110 TERMITES 20-30 WETLANDS 100-230 BIOMASS BURNING 10-90 Sink: oxidation by OH (lifetime of 10 years)

5/23/2012 13

500 1000 1500 ‐4000 ‐2000 0 Age (yrs BP) CH4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

HIPPO Profiles over the Arctic Ocean and North Slope ( n = 96 )

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Photos: S. Wofsy

August, 2011

5/23/2012 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

UT NN GGLAT GGLON ALT m To C 74520 1467 75.04469 ‐161.5916 653.708 ‐4.736278 UT NN GGLAT GGLON ALT m To C 74580 1469 75.11114 ‐161.5076 403.508 ‐3.894623 UT NN GGLAT GGLON ALT m To C 74640 1473 75.17651 ‐161.4241 257.740 ‐3.14 UT NN GGLAT GGLON ALT m To C 77280 1481 78.70973 ‐156.4544 3854.904 ‐25.08

Photos from 19 Aug 2011

5/23/2012 16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

5/23/2012 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Photos: S. Wofsy

5/23/2012 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

73.6 N, Aug 2011 HIPPO‐5 Wind dir 0 150 300

CH4

CO

Θe RH

Wind Dir (deg)

5/23/2012 19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

5/23/2012 20

pollution: 0.3 ppb CH4 /ppb CO could account for at most ~0.6 ppb ΔCH4

CO2 CH4 CO 82N 15 April 2010 ΔCH4 = 0.15 x ΔCO2 r2=.83

slide-21
SLIDE 21

5/23/2012 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

5/23/2012 22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

82N 15 April 2010

5/23/2012 23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

5/23/2012 24

385 386 387 CO2 CH4 1880 1890 1900

ΔCH4 = 0.12 x ΔCO2

30 34 38 O3

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Slide from: E. A. Kort Relationships between tracers with distinct sources: A tool for understanding large scale sources and sinks of GHGs.

Arctic pollution Arctic

  • cean

5/23/2012 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

5/23/2012 26

Non‐pollution sources of CH4 fill the whole Arctic… Is this excess due to marine emissions? Do ocean sources respond to changes in ice cover?

CH4 Mar 2010 CH4 Aug 2011 CO Mar 2010 CO Aug 2011

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CH4

HIPPO

5/23/2012 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Arctic Pollution 6‐8 km, all year round…

5/23/2012 28

Black C (NOAA SP2) CO (Harv/Aerodyne/NCAR )

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Summary: The Arctic

The HIPPO data show:

  • Dense pollution

at both very high and low altitudes in the Arctic. Unexpected distributions of Black Carbon (NOAA SP-2; radiative forcing?). (Not shown here).

  • Sources of CH4

in the Arctic from from the ocean surface, significant compared to fossil fuel extraction and land surface. … and a lot more

5/23/2012 29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Photos: by; B. C. Daube & J. V. Pittman

slide-31
SLIDE 31

5/23/2012 31

Stepping back: If you set the goal to monitor the atmosphere, globally or regionally, for science and policy, what are the considerations for science strategy and design of networks?

slide-32
SLIDE 32

N2 O in the atmosphere: where does it really come from?

5/23/2012 32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Concentrations of atmospheric N2 O have been increasing since the end of the 18th Century

5/23/2012 33

NOAA HATS/Elkins

slide-34
SLIDE 34

PRESENT-DAY GLOBAL BUDGET OF ATMOSPHERIC N2 O (1535 TgN )

SOURCES (Tg N yr-1) 16 (13 - 19) Natural 10 (5 – 16) Ocean 3 (1 - 5) Tropical soils 4 (3 – 6) Temperate soils 2 (1 – 4) Anthropogenic 8 (2 – 21) Agricultural soils 4 (1 – 15) Livestock 2 (1 – 3) Industrial 1 (1 – 2) SINK (Tg N yr-1) Photolysis and oxidation in stratosphere (τ = 127 yr) 12 (10 - 14) ACCUMULATION (Tg N yr-1) 4 (3 – 5)

A budget can be constructed, but uncertainties in sources are large !

5/23/2012 34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

HIPPO-5 Aug 2011 HIPPO-4 Jun 2011 HIPPO-1 Jan 2009

5/23/2012 35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

5/23/2012 36

CalNEX NOAA P‐3 at Ontario, CA June 2010

slide-37
SLIDE 37

5/23/2012 37

Examples of CalNEX flights and N2 O data (NOAA P3, 2010)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

5/23/2012 38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

5/23/2012 39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

5/23/2012 40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

5/23/2012 41

nmol m‐2 s‐

1

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Flux Model Results (Optimized using CalNEX aircraft data) Total (est) = 0.12 TgN/yr Edgar 4.0 Flux Model Total = 0.026 TgN/yr

5/23/2012 42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

5/23/2012 43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

5/23/2012 44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

5/23/2012 45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

5/23/2012 46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

5/23/2012 47

Do you want greenhouse gases with that, sir?

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Summary: N2 O

Analysis of data from HIPPO and CalNEX flights, and NOAA surface stations and tall towers, shows:

  • Global sources are stronger (2x) in the tropics than

given in inventories, and the influence is invisible to surface stations (see next slide for CO2 ).

  • Agricultural sources in the US are 2x to 4x bigger

than in current inventories.

5/23/2012 48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

An optimal Earth observing system includes a diversity of data types and very tight control of data quality.

5/23/2012 49 Courtesy: Arlyn E. Andrews

slide-50
SLIDE 50

5/23/2012 50

CO2

78N 02 Nov. 2009

385 386 387 ppm 1880 1890 1900

CH4

CH4 :CO2 = .0085