atlas cms upgrades
play

ATLAS/CMS Upgrades Yasuyuki Horii Nagoya University on Behalf of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ATLAS/CMS Upgrades Yasuyuki Horii Nagoya University on Behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations Outline 2 /26 LHC/HL-LHC plan ATLAS/CMS upgrades Physics prospects LHC/HL-LHC Plan Overview 4 /26 SM precision studies and BSM searches


  1. ATLAS/CMS Upgrades Yasuyuki Horii Nagoya University on Behalf of the ATLAS and CMS Collaborations

  2. Outline 2 /26 LHC/HL-LHC plan ATLAS/CMS upgrades Physics prospects

  3. LHC/HL-LHC Plan

  4. Overview 4 /26 SM precision studies and BSM searches with 13-14 TeV and 3000 fb -1 . Peak instantaneous luminosity: 5-7x10 34 cm -2 s -1 — a lot of challenges. Two upgrade phases: Phase 1 (2019-2020) and Phase 2 (2024-2026). http://hilumilhc.web.cern.ch/about/hl-lhc-project

  5. Luminosity levelling 5 /26 The average luminosity is almost the same. HL-LHC is designed to operate with levelling. Lower pileup in the experimental detectors Lower energy deposition by the collisions in the interaction region magnets CERN-ACC-2015-0140

  6. ATLAS/CMS Upgrades

  7. Challenges 7 /26 Increased luminosity provides a significant challenge for the experiments. Upgrades are essential to exploit the full potential of LHC and HL-LHC. Higher radiation dose Replacement of some of the detectors Higher pileup Replacement of the electronics → Higher particle rate Overall modifications 
 Higher event rate on the trigger and readout scheme

  8. Inner tracker 8 /26 ATLAS CMS Inner trackers will be in an extreme environment at HL-LHC. 1 MeV neutron equivalent fluence up to 2 x 10 16 /cm 2 . Ionisation dose up to 10 MGy. Particle rates up to 2 GHz/cm 2 — high occupancy, high bandwidth. Pileup 140 expected at L = 5 x 10 34 cm -2 s -1 CMS CERN-LHCC-2015-010; LHCC-P-008

  9. Inner tracker 9 /26 ATLAS Phase 2 Entire tracker replacement (all-silicon tracker) at the Phase 2 upgrade. Radiation tolerance, increased granularity, reduced material, extension to forward, … Ratio of reconstructed to generated tracks No pileup dependence with ≧ 11 hits Channel occupancy [%] for 200 pileups Pixel thickness possibly 150 µm, pixel size possibly 50 x 50 µm 2 CERN-LHCC-2012-022; LHCC-I-023. CERN-LHCC-2015-020; LHCC-G-166.

  10. Inner tracker 10 /26 CMS Phase 1/2 Pixel detector replacement in the end of 2016 (as a Phase 1 project). Entire tracker replacement at the Phase 2 upgrade. Strip Pixel +Strip Pixel Pixel size considered: 25x100 µm 2 and 50x50 µm 2 Radiation tolerance, increased granularity, 
 reduced material, extension to forward, … CERN-LHCC-2015-010; LHCC-P-008

  11. Calorimeter 11 /26 CMS Phase 2 Endcap calorimeter will be replaced — longevity and performance issues. Hadron fluence 2 x 10 14 /cm 2 at | η | = 2.6. A high-granularity sampling calorimeter Defects in lead tungstate scintillating crystal with a tungsten/silicon electromagnetic 
 of the electromagnetic calorimeter. part (EE) followed by brass/silicon (FH) and brass/scintillator (BH) hadronic parts. Fraction of the response Light transmission loss Response degradation also expected 
 High performance at high pileup for the hadron calorimeter. CERN-LHCC-2015-010; LHCC-P-008

  12. Muon spectrometer 12 /26 ATLAS Phase 1 New Small Wheel will be installed to cope with a relatively high hit rate 
 (~15 kHz/cm 2 at L = 7 x 10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) and also to improve muon trigger. Micro-mesh gaseous detector (MM) Both MM and sTGC for precision tracking and trigger. Position resolution per layer: ~100 µm. Segment angle resolution at first-level trigger: ~1 mrad. Coverage: 1.3 < | η | < 2.7. CERN-LHCC-2013-006; ATLAS-TDR-020

  13. Trigger 13 /26 ATLAS CMS More luminosity — more interesting events but also more background. Without changes, trigger rates exceed the limits of trigger/readout system. Choice of ATLAS and CMS at Phase 2 upgrades Increase trigger rates. First level: ~100 kHz → 750-1000 kHz Storage level: ~1 kHz → 5-10 kHz Increase latency — improve algorithm. First level: ~3 µs → 6-12.5 µs Simply increasing the threshold Electronics replacements for all sub-systems. would kill the signal. CERN-LHCC-2012-022; LHCC-I-023. CERN-LHCC-2015-019; LHCC-G-165. CERN-LHCC-2015-020; LHCC-G-166.

  14. Trigger 14 /26 CMS Phase 2 Track trigger implementation in the first-level trigger. Benefits: improved p T determination, better identification of charged leptons, … Technologies: studies ongoing for Associative Memories, FPGA, … Electron trigger Muon trigger CERN-LHCC-2015-010; LHCC-P-008.

  15. Trigger 15 /26 ATLAS Calorimeter trigger upgrade Muon trigger upgrade Higher granularity information Extend muon trigger acceptance 
 provided at first-level trigger. in the barrel by additional chambers. Less sensitive to pileup. Phase 2 Current Additional RPCs Phase 1 Muon A x ε in barrel could be improved 
 from ~70% to ~95%. Trigger rate reduction for e, γ , … CERN-LHCC-2013-017; ATLAS-TDR-022-2013. O. Kortner, VCI 2016.

  16. Physics Prospects — Examples

  17. ttH 17 /26 Direct probe of Higgs-top coupling. Events / ( 2 GeV ) ATLAS Simulation Preliminary 300 ∫ -1 L dt = 3000 fb , s =14 TeV Simulation 200 Background Fit 100 0 100 120 140 160 200 Background subtracted events Signal Fit 0 gg → H and H →γγ indirect (loops). 100 120 140 160 m [GeV] γ γ Observation expected for ttH, H →γγ . ATLAS expected: 8.2 σ (3000 fb -1 ). ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-012

  18. H → bb 18 /26 Access to Higgs-bottom coupling. Events / 20 GeV Events / 20 GeV 90000 ZH x 10 ATLAS Simulation VH(bb)x10 ATLAS Simulation Diboson VZ Preliminary 80000 Preliminary 2500 WW t t -1 s = 14 TeV, 3000 fb , < > = 140 Multijet µ Z+bb -1 70000 s = 14 TeV ∫ L dt = 3000 fb < > = 140 t t µ Z+bl Z 2 lep, 2 jets, 2 tags, p > 200 GeV t, s+t-chan T Z+cc 2000 V 1 lep., 2 jets, p > 200 GeV Wt 60000 Z+cl T W+bb Z+l W+bl 50000 Unc. W+cc 1500 W+cl W+l 40000 Z+bb Unc. 1000 30000 20000 500 10000 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 50 100 150 200 250 m [GeV] m [GeV] bb bb Observation expected for VH, H → bb (V = Z or W). ATLAS expected significance at 3000 (300) fb -1 : 8.8 σ (3.9 σ ). ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-011

  19. H → µµ 19 /26 Access to Higgs-muon coupling. 5000 (Data - Background) / 0.5 GeV Events / 0.5 GeV 10 10 ATLAS Simulation Preliminary ATLAS Simulation Preliminary 4000 = 14 TeV s s = 14 TeV 9 10 3000 H , m =125 GeV -1 → µ µ L dt = 3000 fb -1 ∫ ∫ L dt = 3000 fb H 8 Z → µ µ 10 2000 t t 7 1000 10 WW → µ ν µ ν 0 6 10 -1000 5 10 -2000 S+B toy Monte Carlo 4 10 -3000 S+B model 3 10 -4000 B-only model 2 -5000 10 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 m [GeV] m [GeV] µ µ µ µ Reduction of the material and better 
 Observation expected for H → µµ. spacial resolution for tracking at Phase 2. Mass resolution expected: 
 ATLAS expected: 7.0 σ (3000 fb -1 ). 40% better with respect to ‘Phase 1 aged’ 
 (radiation damage for 1000 fb -1 assumed). CERN-LHCC-2015-010; LHCC-P-008. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2013-014.

  20. Higgs couplings 20 /26 ATLAS Simulation Preliminary Fit with a fully generic parametrisation -1 -1 ∫ ∫ s = 14 TeV: Ldt=300 fb ; Ldt=3000 fb No assumption on the total width κ gZ κ gZ (= κ g κ Z / κ H ) overall scale parameter 
 λ WZ common to all signal channels λ tg No assumption on new particle contribution 
 λ through loops bZ λ Z τ Hashed areas: current theory systematic uncertainties λ Z µ λ gZ For various coupling scale factor ratios, 
 λ γ Z the precision of % level expected at 3000 fb -1 . λ (Z γ )Z Similar precision expected for ATLAS and CMS. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 κ X = ( ) ∆ λ ∆ κ XY Y ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-016. arXiv:1307.1347 [hep-ph].

  21. Higgs couplings 21 /26 -1 3000 fb (14 TeV) 1/2 CMS or (g/2v) t Projection 1 WZ 68% CL -1 10 λ b τ -2 10 µ -3 10 -4 10 0.1 1 10 100 mass (GeV) Significant improvement expected with 14 TeV, 3000 fb -1 . Precision test of Yukawa terms for various ‘flavors’: t, b, τ , and µ. CERN-LHCC-2015-019; LHCC-G-165

  22. B s,d → µµ 22 /26 B s,d → µµ decays are only proceed 
 CMS and LHCb, Nature 522, 68 (2015) through FCNC processes 
 B (B s → µµ) = (2.8 +0.7-0.6 ) x 10 -9 and are highly suppressed in SM. B (B d → µµ) = (3.9 +1.6-1.4 ) x 10 -10 C. Bobeth, et al., PRL 112, 101801 (2014) ATLAS, arXiv:1604.04263 [hep-ex] B (B s → µµ) = (3.65 ± 0.23) x 10 -9 B (B s → µµ) = (0.9 +1.1-0.8 ) x 10 -9 B (B d → µµ) = (1.06 ± 0.09) x 10 -10 B (B d → µµ) < 4.2 x 10 -10 (95% CL) D. M. Straub, arXiv:1012.3893 Some of new physics scenarios 
 may boost the B s,d → µµ decay rates. B s /B d ratio provides a stringent test 
 of various models beyond SM.

  23. B s,d → µµ 23 /26 300 fb -1 3000 fb -1 S/(S+B) Weighted Events / ( 0.02 GeV) S/(S+B) Weighted Events / ( 0.01 GeV) 500 CMS Simulation CMS Simulation 120 -1 -1 Scaled to L = 3000 fb Scaled to L = 300 fb data data | ( )|<1.4 | ( )|<1.4 η µ η µ full PDF full PDF 400 100 - + B - → µ µ + B → µ µ s s - + B → µ µ - + B → µ µ d d combinatorial bkg combinatorial bkg 80 300 semileptonic bkg semileptonic bkg peaking bkg peaking bkg 60 200 40 100 20 0 0 4.9 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 4.9 5 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 m (GeV) m (GeV) µ µ µ µ B (B s → µµ) precision: 13% B (B s → µµ) precision: 11% B (B d → µµ) precision: 48% (2.2 σ ) B (B d → µµ) precision: 18% (6.8 σ ) σ x B predicted by SM assumed. CERN-LHCC-2015-010; LHCC-P-008. K. F. Chen, EPS-HEP 2015.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend