Asymptotic behaviour of large random stack-triangulations Marie - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

asymptotic behaviour of large random stack triangulations
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Asymptotic behaviour of large random stack-triangulations Marie - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives Asymptotic behaviour of large random stack-triangulations Marie Albenque et Jean-Franois Marckert LIAFA LABRI


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Asymptotic behaviour of large random stack-triangulations

Marie Albenque et Jean-François Marckert

LIAFA – LABRI

McGill University – February, 26th 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Outline

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Definition of planar maps

  • Planar map = planar connected graph embedded properly in the

sphere up to a direct homomorphism of the sphere

  • Rooted planar map = an oriented edge (e0, e1) is marked, e0 = root

vertex.

= = =

Map = Metric space with graph distance.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Definition of planar maps

  • Planar map = planar connected graph embedded properly in the

sphere up to a direct homomorphism of the sphere

  • Rooted planar map = an oriented edge (e0, e1) is marked, e0 = root

vertex.

= = =

Map = Metric space with graph distance.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Maps and faces

Faces = connected components of the sphere without the edges or the map. Triangulation = map whose faces are all of degree 3. Quadrangulation = map whose faces are all of degree 4.

Figure: Two quadrangulations and two triangulations

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Random Apollonian networks – Stack-triangulations

Stack-triangulations = triangulations obtained recursively:

△2k = (finite) set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Random Apollonian networks – Stack-triangulations

Stack-triangulations = triangulations obtained recursively:

△2k = (finite) set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Random Apollonian networks – Stack-triangulations

Stack-triangulations = triangulations obtained recursively:

△2k = (finite) set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Random Apollonian networks – Stack-triangulations

Stack-triangulations = triangulations obtained recursively:

△2k = (finite) set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Random Apollonian networks – Stack-triangulations

Stack-triangulations = triangulations obtained recursively:

△2k = (finite) set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Random Apollonian networks – Stack-triangulations

Stack-triangulations = triangulations obtained recursively:

△2k = (finite) set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Stack-triangulations vs Triangulations

{Stack-triangulations} {Triangulations}

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of large random planar maps

  • Large ? Number of vertices grows to infinity.
  • Random ? Which law ?
  • Convergence ? Which notion of convergence ?

[Angel et Schramm, 03], [Chassaing et Schaeffer, 04], [Bouttier, Di Francesco, Guitter, 04], [Chassaing et Durhuss, 06], [Marckert et Mokkadem, 06], [Miermont, 06], [Marckert et Miermont, 07], [Le Gall, 07], [Le Gall et Paulin, 08], [Miermont et Weill, 08], [Chapuy, 08], [Bouttier et Guitter, 08], [Le Gall, 08]

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of large random planar maps

  • Large ? Number of vertices grows to infinity.
  • Random ? Which law ?
  • Convergence ? Which notion of convergence ?

[Angel et Schramm, 03], [Chassaing et Schaeffer, 04], [Bouttier, Di Francesco, Guitter, 04], [Chassaing et Durhuss, 06], [Marckert et Mokkadem, 06], [Miermont, 06], [Marckert et Miermont, 07], [Le Gall, 07], [Le Gall et Paulin, 08], [Miermont et Weill, 08], [Chapuy, 08], [Bouttier et Guitter, 08], [Le Gall, 08]

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of large random planar maps

  • Large ? Number of vertices grows to infinity.
  • Random ? Which law ?
  • Convergence ? Which notion of convergence ?

[Angel et Schramm, 03], [Chassaing et Schaeffer, 04], [Bouttier, Di Francesco, Guitter, 04], [Chassaing et Durhuss, 06], [Marckert et Mokkadem, 06], [Miermont, 06], [Marckert et Miermont, 07], [Le Gall, 07], [Le Gall et Paulin, 08], [Miermont et Weill, 08], [Chapuy, 08], [Bouttier et Guitter, 08], [Le Gall, 08]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of large random planar maps

  • Large ? Number of vertices grows to infinity.
  • Random ? Which law ?
  • Convergence ? Which notion of convergence ?

[Angel et Schramm, 03], [Chassaing et Schaeffer, 04], [Bouttier, Di Francesco, Guitter, 04], [Chassaing et Durhuss, 06], [Marckert et Mokkadem, 06], [Miermont, 06], [Marckert et Miermont, 07], [Le Gall, 07], [Le Gall et Paulin, 08], [Miermont et Weill, 08], [Chapuy, 08], [Bouttier et Guitter, 08], [Le Gall, 08]

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two probability distributions

△2k = set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces. Two natural probability distributions on △2k:

  • the uniform law, denoted U△

2k, ◮ ◮ ◮

  • the “historical” law, denoted Q△

2k : the probability of each map is

proportional to its number of histories.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two probability distributions

△2k = set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces. Two natural probability distributions on △2k:

  • the uniform law, denoted U△

2k, ◮ ◮ ◮

  • the “historical” law, denoted Q△

2k : the probability of each map is

proportional to its number of histories.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two probability distributions

△2k = set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces. Two natural probability distributions on △2k:

  • the uniform law, denoted U△

2k, ◮ ◮ ◮

  • the “historical” law, denoted Q△

2k : the probability of each map is

proportional to its number of histories.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two probability distributions

△2k = set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces. Two natural probability distributions on △2k:

  • the uniform law, denoted U△

2k, ◮ ◮ ◮

  • the “historical” law, denoted Q△

2k : the probability of each map is

proportional to its number of histories.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two probability distributions

△2k = set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces. Two natural probability distributions on △2k:

  • the uniform law, denoted U△

2k, ◮ ◮ ◮

  • the “historical” law, denoted Q△

2k : the probability of each map is

proportional to its number of histories.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two probability distributions

△2k = set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces. Two natural probability distributions on △2k:

  • the uniform law, denoted U△

2k, ◮ ◮ ◮

  • the “historical” law, denoted Q△

2k : the probability of each map is

proportional to its number of histories.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two probability distributions

△2k = set of stack-triangulations with 2k faces. Two natural probability distributions on △2k:

  • the uniform law, denoted U△

2k,

3 1

  • the “historical” law, denoted Q△

2k : the probability of each map is

proportional to its number of histories.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Results on random stack-triangulations

According to Q△

2k,

  • Degree of a vertex and expected value of the distance between two

vertices [Zhou et al., 05], [Zhang et al., 06], [Zhang et al., 08] According to U△

2k,

  • Degree of a vertex [Darasse et Soria, 07]
  • Expected value of the distance between two vertices

[Bodini, Darasse, Soria, 08]

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Results on random stack-triangulations

According to Q△

2k,

  • Degree of a vertex and expected value of the distance between two

vertices [Zhou et al., 05], [Zhang et al., 06], [Zhang et al., 08] According to U△

2k,

  • Degree of a vertex [Darasse et Soria, 07]
  • Expected value of the distance between two vertices

[Bodini, Darasse, Soria, 08]

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Uniform law Quadrangulations uniform law Stack Triangulations Historical law Which definition

  • f convergence ?
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two notions of convergence : local convergence

Bm(r) = ball of radius r centered at the root of m.

Definition

Let m and m′ be two planar maps, the local distance between them is: dL(m, m′) = inf

  • 1

1 + r where Bm(r) ∼ Bm′(r)

  • ,

Local convergence = Convergence of the balls centered at the root.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Angel and Schramm, 03 Chassaing and Durhuss, 06 uniform law Stack-triangulations historical law Quadrangulations uniform law Local convergence

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two notions of convergence : overall convergence

Number of vertices grows to infinity ⇒ distance between to vertices grows to infinity. To study the overall behavior of the map, we have to normalize it : Length of an edge = dependent on the number of vertices.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Two notions of convergence : overall convergence

Number of vertices grows to infinity ⇒ distance between to vertices grows to infinity. To study the overall behavior of the map, we have to normalize it : Length of an edge = dependent on the number of vertices.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

uniform law Stack-triangulations Historical law convergence Local Scaled

Marckert-Mokkadem, 06 Le Gall, 07 Le Gall-Paulin, 08

convergence

Chassaing-Schaeffer, 04

Quadrangulations uniform law

Angel-Schramm, 03 Chassaing-Durhuss, 06

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

uniform law Stack-triangulations Historical law convergence Local Scaled

Marckert-Mokkadem, 06 Le Gall, 07 Le Gall-Paulin, 08

convergence

Chassaing-Schaeffer, 04

Quadrangulations uniform law

?

Angel-Schramm, 03 Chassaing-Durhuss, 06

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

The Theorem

Theorem (A.,Marckert ’08)

Under the uniform law on △2n,

  • mn,

Dmn (2/11)

  • 3n/2
  • (d)

− − →

n

(T2e, d2e), for the Gromov-Hausdorff topology on the set of compact metric spaces.

  • Gromov-Hausdorff ?
  • (T2e, d2e) = Aldous’ Continuum Random Tree (CRT)
  • 2/11 ?
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

The Theorem

Theorem (A.,Marckert ’08)

Under the uniform law on △2n,

  • mn,

Dmn (2/11)

  • 3n/2
  • (d)

− − →

n

(T2e, d2e), for the Gromov-Hausdorff topology on the set of compact metric spaces.

  • Gromov-Hausdorff ?
  • (T2e, d2e) = Aldous’ Continuum Random Tree (CRT)
  • 2/11 ?
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

The Theorem

Theorem (A.,Marckert ’08)

Under the uniform law on △2n,

  • mn,

Dmn (2/11)

  • 3n/2
  • (d)

− − →

n

(T2e, d2e), for the Gromov-Hausdorff topology on the set of compact metric spaces.

  • Gromov-Hausdorff ?
  • (T2e, d2e) = Aldous’ Continuum Random Tree (CRT)
  • 2/11 ?
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

The Theorem

Theorem (A.,Marckert ’08)

Under the uniform law on △2n,

  • mn,

Dmn (2/11)

  • 3n/2
  • (d)

− − →

n

(T2e, d2e), for the Gromov-Hausdorff topology on the set of compact metric spaces.

  • Gromov-Hausdorff ?
  • (T2e, d2e) = Aldous’ Continuum Random Tree (CRT)
  • 2/11 ?
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Gromov-Hausdorff distance

Hausdorff distance between X and Y two compact sets of (E, d) : dH(X, Y ) = max{sup

x∈X

inf

y∈Y d(x, y), sup y∈Y

inf

x∈X d(x, y)}

Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two compact metric spaces E and F: dGH(E, F) = inf dH(φ(E), ψ(F)) Infimum taken on :

  • all the metric spaces M
  • all the isometric embeddings φ : E → M et ψ : F → M.

{isometric classes of compact metric spaces} = complete and separable (= “polish” ) space.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Gromov-Hausdorff distance

Hausdorff distance between X and Y two compact sets of (E, d) : dH(X, Y ) = max{sup

x∈X

inf

y∈Y d(x, y), sup y∈Y

inf

x∈X d(x, y)}

Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two compact metric spaces E and F: dGH(E, F) = inf dH(φ(E), ψ(F)) Infimum taken on :

  • all the metric spaces M
  • all the isometric embeddings φ : E → M et ψ : F → M.

{isometric classes of compact metric spaces} = complete and separable (= “polish” ) space.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Gromov-Hausdorff distance

Hausdorff distance between X and Y two compact sets of (E, d) : dH(X, Y ) = max{sup

x∈X

inf

y∈Y d(x, y), sup y∈Y

inf

x∈X d(x, y)}

Gromov-Hausdorff distance between two compact metric spaces E and F: dGH(E, F) = inf dH(φ(E), ψ(F)) Infimum taken on :

  • all the metric spaces M
  • all the isometric embeddings φ : E → M et ψ : F → M.

{isometric classes of compact metric spaces} = complete and separable (= “polish” ) space.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Triangulations and ternary trees

A B C

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Triangulations and ternary trees

A B C B C A A C B

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Triangulations and ternary trees

A B C

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Harris walk of a tree

C(t) 1 t 3 2

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Continuum Tree

f = function from [0, 1] onto R+ such that f (0) = f (1) = 0.

f (t) mf (s, t) s s′ t 1 f (s)

  • s ∼ s′ if and only if f (s) = f (s′) = mf (s, s′)
  • continuum tree = [0, 1]/ ∼
  • distance : df (s, t) = f (s) + f (t) − 2mf (s, t)
slide-45
SLIDE 45

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Continuum Tree

f = function from [0, 1] onto R+ such that f (0) = f (1) = 0.

f (t) mf (s, t) s s′ t 1 f (s)

  • s ∼ s′ if and only if f (s) = f (s′) = mf (s, s′)
  • continuum tree = [0, 1]/ ∼
  • distance : df (s, t) = f (s) + f (t) − 2mf (s, t)
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Continuum Tree

f = function from [0, 1] onto R+ such that f (0) = f (1) = 0.

f (t) mf (s, t) s s′ t 1 f (s)

  • s ∼ s′ if and only if f (s) = f (s′) = mf (s, s′)
  • continuum tree = [0, 1]/ ∼
  • distance : df (s, t) = f (s) + f (t) − 2mf (s, t)
slide-47
SLIDE 47

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Continuum Tree

f = function from [0, 1] onto R+ such that f (0) = f (1) = 0.

f (t) mf (s, t) s s′ t 1 f (s)

  • s ∼ s′ if and only if f (s) = f (s′) = mf (s, s′)
  • continuum tree = [0, 1]/ ∼
  • distance : df (s, t) = f (s) + f (t) − 2mf (s, t)
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Continuum Random Tree – CRT

A normalized brownian excursion e = (et)t∈[0,1] is a brownian motion conditioned to satisfy B0 = 0, B1 = 0 and B(t) > 0 for every t ∈]0, 1[.

1

CRT = Tree obtained from a normalized brownian excursion. It is denoted (T2e, d2e).

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence towards the CRT

Uniform law on stack-triangulations with 2n faces ⇒ uniform law Uter

3n−2 on the set of ternary trees with 3n − 2 nodes.

Proposition (Aldous)

Under Uter

3n+1, for the Gromov-Hausdorff topologogy :

  • T,

dT

  • 3n/2
  • (d)

− − →

n

(T2e, d2e).

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Triangulations and ternary trees

A B C

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Triangulations and ternary trees

A B C B C A A C B

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Triangulations and ternary trees

A B C A C B B C A B C A A C B C B A A B C

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Bijection between trees and maps

Proposition

For any K ≥ 1, there exists a bijection Ψ△

K :

△2K − → T ter

3K−2

m − → t := Ψ△

K (m)

such that: (i) (a) Every internal node u of m corresponds bijectively to an internal node v of t. u′ denotes the image of u. (b) Each leaf of t corresponds bijectively to a finite face of m. (ii) For any internal node u of m, |Γ(u′) − dm(root, u)| ≤ 1. (ii′) For any pair on internal nodes u and v of m |dm(u, v) − Γ(u′, v ′)| ≤ 3. Who is Γ ?

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Bijection between trees and maps

Proposition

For any K ≥ 1, there exists a bijection Ψ△

K :

△2K − → T ter

3K−2

m − → t := Ψ△

K (m)

such that: (i) (a) Every internal node u of m corresponds bijectively to an internal node v of t. u′ denotes the image of u. (b) Each leaf of t corresponds bijectively to a finite face of m. (ii) For any internal node u of m, |Γ(u′) − dm(root, u)| ≤ 1. (ii′) For any pair on internal nodes u and v of m |dm(u, v) − Γ(u′, v ′)| ≤ 3. Who is Γ ?

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Neveu formalism

  • A ternary tree = set of words on the alphabet {1, 2, 3}.
  • Vertex of the tree = a word

∅ 1 11 12 2 21 211 212 3 31 32 33 331 332

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Type of faces and nodes

ρ k i j u u3 u2

If type(u) = (i, j, k),    type(u1) = ( 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k, j, k ), type(u2) = ( i, 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k, k ), type(u3) = ( i, j, 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k )

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Type of faces and nodes

u u3 u u u2 ρ k i

If type(u) = (i, j, k),    type(u1) = ( 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k, j, k ), type(u2) = ( i, 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k, k ), type(u3) = ( i, j, 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k )

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Type of faces and nodes

u u3 u u u2 ρ k i 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k

If type(u) = (i, j, k),    type(u1) = ( 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k, j, k ), type(u2) = ( i, 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k, k ), type(u3) = ( i, j, 1 + i ∧ j ∧ k )

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

A langage for distances

L1,2,3 = { words of {1, 2, 3}⋆ with at least one occurence of 1, 2 and 3} Let u ∈ {1, 2, 3}⋆, Γ(u) = max{k such that u = u1 . . . uk, ui ∈ L1,2,3 for i ∈ {1, 2, 3}} u = 122132132212232 ⇒ Γ(u) = 3. Let u = w · u1 . . . uk et v = w · v1 . . . vl with u1 = v1, we denote : Γ(u, v) = Γ(u1 . . . uk) + Γ(v1 . . . vl)

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

A langage for distances

L1,2,3 = { words of {1, 2, 3}⋆ with at least one occurence of 1, 2 and 3} Let u ∈ {1, 2, 3}⋆, Γ(u) = max{k such that u = u1 . . . uk, ui ∈ L1,2,3 for i ∈ {1, 2, 3}} u = 122132132212232 ⇒ Γ(u) = 3. Let u = w · u1 . . . uk et v = w · v1 . . . vl with u1 = v1, we denote : Γ(u, v) = Γ(u1 . . . uk) + Γ(v1 . . . vl)

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

A langage for distances

L1,2,3 = { words of {1, 2, 3}⋆ with at least one occurence of 1, 2 and 3} Let u ∈ {1, 2, 3}⋆, Γ(u) = max{k such that u = u1 . . . uk, ui ∈ L1,2,3 for i ∈ {1, 2, 3}} u = 12213 · 213 · 2212232 ⇒ Γ(u) = 3. Let u = w · u1 . . . uk et v = w · v1 . . . vl with u1 = v1, we denote : Γ(u, v) = Γ(u1 . . . uk) + Γ(v1 . . . vl)

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

A langage for distances

L1,2,3 = { words of {1, 2, 3}⋆ with at least one occurence of 1, 2 and 3} Let u ∈ {1, 2, 3}⋆, Γ(u) = max{k such that u = u1 . . . uk, ui ∈ L1,2,3 for i ∈ {1, 2, 3}} u = 12213 · 213 · 2212232 ⇒ Γ(u) = 3.Γ(u) = 3. Let u = w · u1 . . . uk et v = w · v1 . . . vl with u1 = v1, we denote : Γ(u, v) = Γ(u1 . . . uk) + Γ(v1 . . . vl)

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

A langage for distances

L1,2,3 = { words of {1, 2, 3}⋆ with at least one occurence of 1, 2 and 3} Let u ∈ {1, 2, 3}⋆, Γ(u) = max{k such that u = u1 . . . uk, ui ∈ L1,2,3 for i ∈ {1, 2, 3}} u = 12213 · 213 · 2212232 ⇒ Γ(u) = 3. Let u = w · u1 . . . uk et v = w · v1 . . . vl with u1 = v1, we denote : Γ(u, v) = Γ(u1 . . . uk) + Γ(v1 . . . vl)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of stack-triangulations

Lemma

Let (Xi)i≥1 be a sequence of independant random variables uniformly distributed on {1, 2, 3}. Let Wn be the word X1 . . . Xn then Γ(Wn) n

(a.s.)

− − − →

n

Γ△, where Γ△ = 2/11 Distance in the map and in the tree: |dmn(u, v) − Γ(u′, v ′)| ≤ 3 We show : P

  • sup
  • dmn(u, v) − 2

11dTn(u′, v ′)

  • ≥ n1/3

− →

n→∞ 0

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of stack-triangulations

Lemma

Let (Xi)i≥1 be a sequence of independant random variables uniformly distributed on {1, 2, 3}. Let Wn be the word X1 . . . Xn then Γ(Wn) n

(a.s.)

− − − →

n

Γ△, where Γ△ = 2/11 Distance in the map and in the tree: |dmn(u, v) − Γ(u′, v ′)| ≤ 3 We show : P

  • sup
  • dmn(u, v) − 2

11dTn(u′, v ′)

  • ≥ n1/3

− →

n→∞ 0

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of scaled stack-triangulations

Theorem

Under the uniform law on △2n,

  • mn,

Dmn Γ△

  • 3n/2
  • (d)

− − →

n

(T2e, d2e), for Gromov-Hausdorff topology on the set of compact metric spaces.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

uniform law Stack-triangulations historical law convergence Local Scaled

Marckert-Mokkadem, 06 Le Gall, 07 Le Gall-Paulin, 08

convergence

Chassaing-Schaeffer, 04

Quadrangulations uniform law

topology cvg in law for Gromov-Hausdorff towards CRT normalization = √n Angel-Schramm. 03 Chassaing-Durhuss, 06

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of stack-triangulations according to Q△

Theorem (A.,Marckert ’08)

Let Mn a stack-triangulation according to Q△

  • 2n. Let k ∈ N et v1, . . . , vk,

k nodes Mn chosen independently and uniformly amongst the internal nodes of Mn, then: DMn(vi, vj) 3Γ△ log n

  • (i,j)∈{1,...,k}2

proba.

− − − − →

n

(1i=j)(i,j)∈{1,...,k}2 . Study of the trees under the historical law = study of increasing trees . . . [Broutin, Devroye, McLeish, de la Salle 08]

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Convergence of stack-triangulations according to Q△

Theorem (A.,Marckert ’08)

Let Mn a stack-triangulation according to Q△

  • 2n. Let k ∈ N et v1, . . . , vk,

k nodes Mn chosen independently and uniformly amongst the internal nodes of Mn, then: DMn(vi, vj) 3Γ△ log n

  • (i,j)∈{1,...,k}2

proba.

− − − − →

n

(1i=j)(i,j)∈{1,...,k}2 . Study of the trees under the historical law = study of increasing trees . . . [Broutin, Devroye, McLeish, de la Salle 08]

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

uniform law Stack-triangulations historical law convergence Local Scaled

Marckert-Mokkadem, 06 Le Gall, 07 Le Gall-Paulin, 08

convergence

Chassaing-Schaeffer, 04

Quadrangulations uniform law

topology cvg in law for Gromov-Hausdorff towards CRT normalization = √n cvg of fin-dim laws normalization = log n Angel-Schramm. 03 Chassaing-Durhuss, 06

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Local convergence of stack-triangulations : Uniform law

Under U△

2n :

Theorem (A.,Marckert ’08)

The sequence (U△

2n) weakly converges towards P△ ∞, for the topology of

local convergence, where the support of P△

∞ is a set of infinite stack-triangulations.

Ingredients :

  • Local convergence of Galton-Watson trees towards a tree with a

unique infinite spine.

  • Definition of an infinite planar map similar to the UIPT of Angel and

Schramm.

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Local convergence of stack-triangulations : Historical law

Degree of the root = number of white balls in an urn

  • Initially : 2 white balls and 1 black ball
  • matrix replacement :
  • 2

1 3

  • [Flajolet, Dumas, Puyhaubert, 06]

⇒ The degree of the root grows to infinity. ⇒ No local convergence.

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Local convergence of stack-triangulations : Historical law

Degree of the root = number of white balls in an urn

  • Initially : 2 white balls and 1 black ball
  • matrix replacement :
  • 2

1 3

  • [Flajolet, Dumas, Puyhaubert, 06]

⇒ The degree of the root grows to infinity. ⇒ No local convergence.

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

uniform law Stack-triangulations historical law convergence Local Scaled

Marckert-Mokkadem, 06 Le Gall, 07 Le Gall-Paulin, 08

convergence

Chassaing-Schaeffer, 04 cvg in law to a law supported by infinite triangulations No convergence

Quadrangulations uniform law

topology cvg in law for Gromov-Hausdorff towards CRT normalization = √n cvg of fin-dim laws normalization = log n Angel-Schramm. 03 Chassaing-Durhuss, 06

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Stack-quadrangulations

We managed to deal with a special case of stack-quadrangulations

B C A D 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 5 5 5 6 6 7 7 6 8 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2

but more general models resist. . .

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Brownian Map

Convergence of scaled quadrangulations under the uniform law ? [Chassaing et Schaeffer, 04], [Marckert et Mokkadem, 06], [Marckert et Miermont, 07], [Le Gall, 07], [Le Gall et Paulin, 08]

  • Universality principle ? Convergence of all the “reasonable” models

to the same limit ?

  • Which limit ? Brownian map...
slide-77
SLIDE 77

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Brownian Map

Convergence of scaled quadrangulations under the uniform law ? [Chassaing et Schaeffer, 04], [Marckert et Mokkadem, 06], [Marckert et Miermont, 07], [Le Gall, 07], [Le Gall et Paulin, 08]

  • Universality principle ? Convergence of all the “reasonable” models

to the same limit ?

  • Which limit ? Brownian map...
slide-78
SLIDE 78

Stack-triangulations Convergence of planar maps Uniform law and normalized convergence Other types of convergence Perpectives

Thank you !