astronomy The role of Research Infrastructures in quality and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

astronomy the role of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

astronomy The role of Research Infrastructures in quality and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Data sharing in astronomy The role of Research Infrastructures in quality and trust Franoise Genova, CDS, Strasbourg astronomical Observatory Prsent par Research Infrastructures in astronomy ELT SKA CT A Gaia Planck + DATA


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Data sharing in astronomy – The role of Research Infrastructures in quality and trust

Françoise Genova, CDS, Strasbourg astronomical Observatory

Présenté par

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Research Infrastructures in astronomy

Gaia ELT SKA CT A Planck Herschel

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

2

+ DATA

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Data as a Research Infrastructure

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

3

  • Astronomers routinely use data they retrieve on line in

their daily research work

  • The astronomical data RI has many components

– Observatory archives – Very Large surveys – Value‐added databases, e.g. CDS (Strasbourg astronomical Data Center) – Journals – Modeling data

  • Astronomers trust the data providers, which have an

established role in the community context

  • Trust is not only linked to data quality, but also to the

« quality » of the different elements of the data sharing system, including the fact that the system is relevant to users’ needs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Data sharing in astronomy: accessibility AND reusability

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

4

  • Early pioneers – IUE 1978‐1996, CDS 1972
  • International collaboration on standards

– Format (FITS) 1979 – Bibliographic id 1989 – Interoperability of data and tools

  • Standards defined by the IVOA (since 2002)
  • Open and inclusive framework – anyone can « publish » a data

resource in the VO, anyone can develop a VO‐enabled tool to access data

  • More than 100 « authorities » provide a resource in the VO,

including all the large data providers

  • Astronomy data is FAIR thanks to the data providers

and the VO developers

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RI data policy in astronomy Observatories

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

5

  • Observation time is obtained through often

tough competitive process

  • Observatories make their data available after

a proprietary period (in general 1 year)

  • Proprietary period an important factor

– To make the open data policy acceptable by the community – To continue to have the best possible observation proposals – ie to build trust in the archive content!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RI data management and quality Observatories

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

6

  • Data management is included in the mission and

budget of the RIs or of the agencies which manage them

  • They provide data to observers and make them

public in their archives

  • Data is Reusable and for most observatories

available in the VO (FAI)

  • Significant effect on RI impact –

« good »/useful/ « trusted » data is reused

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Publications using HST data

Both Archive Guest Observers

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Data management and quality Value‐added data service ‐ CDS

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

8

  • CDS is a RI in the French National RI Roadmap
  • Fully trusted by the community

– ~1 000 000 queries/day on the services – Services used by observatories, research agencies & journals for their

  • wn needs
  • Data curation & services to access data
  • CDS DSA & WDS certified (now applying to CTS)

– Already trusted by its community but important wrt. CDS evaluation by the rest of the world including the funders

  • Data from published papers, large surveys and selected data from
  • bservatories
  • Quality ensured by an integrated team of astronomers, specialized

librarians and IT engineers

  • Expertise built on 46 years: quality of the content, also quality of

the services (functionalities, operations) wrt. user needs and expectations

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Conclusions

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

9

  • Data sharing does change the way science is done and

boosts the RI impact when well done (ie in a trustable and trusted way)

  • Lots of work behind the scene on data management &

stewardship, standards and tools

  • Quality/relevance rely on expertise built on the long

term including disciplinary knowledge and a deep knowledge of their instruments for the observatories

  • All disciplines are different but lessons learnt can be

shared

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Implications

  • Very long term endeavour – sustainable support a must
  • Data Sharing frameworks should be built taking community

requirements and feedback into account, including from RIs

  • Enable collaboration at the European & international levels

– Cluster projects are a good vehicle when well targeted – Create/find an appropriate international forum for disciplinary discussions (specific, generic such as RDA)

  • Trust is not only linked to data quality, but also to the

« quality » of the different elements of the data sharing system, including the fact that the system is relevant to users’ needs

  • Quality/relevance driven by science needs, neither

technology nor policy demand nor data conservation – although the three play a role

13 Septembre 2018

  • F. Genova, ICRI Session 5B

10