ASTIGMATISM AFTER PREVIOUS CORNEAL SURGERIES Dimitrii Dementiev, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ASTIGMATISM AFTER PREVIOUS CORNEAL SURGERIES Dimitrii Dementiev, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
LENS EXCHANGE WITH IMPLANTATION OF A BITORIC INTRAOCULAR LENS IN EYES WITH SIGNIFICANT ASTIGMATISM AFTER PREVIOUS CORNEAL SURGERIES Dimitrii Dementiev, MD, Anna Shipunova, MD, PhD Irina Ivanchikova, MD, Vera Veshchikova Blue Eye Centro
To evaluate refractive outcomes, rotational stability and safety after lens exchange for customized AT TORBI 709M (Carl Zeiss) IOL in eyes previously underwent PKP, RK and PRK Purpose
AT TORBI 709M (Carl Zeiss Meditec)
- Bitoric, plate haptics, Hydrophilic Acrylic,
- ne piece IOL
- Aspheric (Aberration-neutral)
- MICS: Implantable trough 1.5 mm incision
- 6.0 mm optical/ 11.0 mm total diameter
- 118.3 A-Const
- In bag implantation
- Individual calculation & manufacturing (customized)
- High rotational stability after surgery
- Easy rotation during surgery
DIOPTER RANGE: Sphere: -10.0 to +32.0 D, 0.5 D increments Cylinder: +1.0 to +12.0 D, 0.5 D increments
PKP 19 eyes
Post-RK ectasia 4 eyes
Keratoconus 15 eyes
RK 7 eyes PRK 8 eyes
Myopia 15 eyes
Materials & Methods
34 eyes of 33 patients Preexisting induced corneal astigmatism of -3.0 to -12.0 D
- Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)
- Best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA)
- Autorefractokeratometry (Tomey)
- Slit-lamp examination with photo registration (Takagi, Japan),
- Software (Adobe Photoshop)
- Optical biometry, keratometry AC measuraments, WW size (Carl Zeiss IOL Master V.5.4.1,
Carl Zeiss Meditec)
- Pachymetry, AC depth & angle size (Visante OCT 3.0.1.8 Carl Zeiss Meditec)
- Corneal topography (ATLAS Revision 3.0.0.39 Carl Zeiss Meditec)
Materials & Methods
Materials & Methods
Questionnaire: spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and satisfaction with vision (1 = completely unsatisfied; 10 = completely satisfied) The toric IOL was customized, calculated and ordered from manufacturers in all cases (Carl Zeiss) Postop Refractive Target: sph - 1.0
Toric IOL *ID *Age Name 20123 IOL Type Date: r [mm] P [D] *Axis [°] r [mm] P [D] *Axis [°] *K1 52,54 162 *K2 37,69 72 Visus sc 24,20 Visus sc Visus cc Visus cc Sphere [D] Cylinder [D] Axis [°] Sphere [D] Cylinder [D] Axis [°] / Date: 30.04.2013 ASAS Nr.- Sph. Equ.
- Sph. Equ.
- 5,68
- 5,71
- 0,30
- 5,73
51 (18.04.62) Right Eye - OD 709M(P) ° implantation axis Left Eye - OS 709M(P) 162 ° implantation axis AT TORBI™ Guidance for STACY Alignment - IOL Implantation Axis AT TORBI™
IOL-Berechnung-V23-KW-17--30 04 2013_ASAS.xlsMARKING 0° & 180° axis
- Topic Anestesia (Lidocaine 2%)
- Under Slit lamp in sit position
- Just before the surgery to keep the
marks visible
Patient Preparation
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
- Topic anestesia 2% Lidocain 20 min prior surgery
- Midriasis (Fenelefrin,Tropicamid1%, Deltamidrin)
- Clear Cornea self sealing incision of 2.4 mm MICS
- f 1.5 Viscoelastic in AC
- Capsulorexis 5.0-6.0 mm
- Facoimulsification
- I/A cortex removal
- Viscoelastic injection in capsular bag
- IOL implantation
- IOL positioning
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE IOL positioning according to steep corneal axis
Mean (SD) Median (Range) Preoperative data p-value PKP group PRK group RK group LogMAR UDVA
1.05 (0.32) 1.00 (0.40 to 1.52) 0.93 (0.52) 1.30 (0.20 to 1.30) 1.20 (0.30) 1.00 (1.00 to 1.80) 0.776
Manifest sphere (D)
- 2.64 (2.57)
- 2.50 (-8.25 to 1.50)
0.53 (2.03) 1.25 (-4.00 to 2.25)
- 1.18 (3.65)
- 1.50 (-7.00 to 3.00)
0.029
Manifest cylinder (D)
- 9.08 (1.92)
- 9.00 (-12.00 to -6.00)
- 4.67 (1.36)
- 5.00 (-6.00 to -2.50)
- 6.04 (1.21)
- 6.50 (-7.00 to -3.75)
<0.001
Manifest SE (D)
- 7.18 (2.86)
- 8.00 (-12.50 to -1.50)
- 1.80 (2.37)
- 0.75 (-7.00 to 0.075)
- 4.20 (3.89)
- 5.00 (-10.25 to 0.25)
<0.003
LogMAR CDVA
0.42 (0.21) 0.50 (0.00 to 0.80) 0.35 (0.21) 0.50 (0.10 to 0.50) 0.49 (0.04) 0.50 (0.40 to 0.50) 0.587
Mean (SD) Median (Range) Postoperative data p-value PKP group PRK group RK group LogMAR UDVA
0.29 (0.21) 0.30 (0.05 to 1.00) 0.12 (0.03) 0.10 (0.10 to 0.17) 0.20 (0.07) 0.17 (0.10 to 0.30) 0.018
Manifest sphere (D)
- 1.41 (1.70)
- 0.50 (-5.00 to 0.50)
- 0.09 (0.42)
0.00 (-1.00 to 0.50)
- 0.39 (0.20)
- 0.50 (-0.50 to 0.00)
0.132
Manifest cylinder (D)
- 3.00 (1.60)
- 3.00 (-6.00 to 0.00)
- 0.94 (0.73)
- 0.88 (-2.00 to -0.25)
- 0.79 (0.17)
- 0.75 (-1.00 to -0.50)
0.003
Manifest SE (D)
- 2.91 (2.05)
- 2.75 (-7.50 to 0.00)
- 0.56 (0.60)
- 0.44 (-2.00 to -0.13)
- 0.79 (0.20)
- 0.88 (-1.00 to -0.50)
0.004
LogMAR CDVA
0.07 (0.04) 0.10 (0.00 to 0.10) 0.01 (0.00) 0.01 (0.01 to 0.01) 0.08 (0.03) 0.10 (0.05 to 0.10) 0.088
34 eyes of 33 patients Mean age: 41.5 ± 6,4 years (31-51) Mean postoperative follow-up – 31.3± 8.1 months (22-55) The mean interval from previous surgery to toric IOL implantation 9.9 ±6.1 years (3-22)
0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
pre op 1 month 6 months 12 months 24 months 30 months
PRK PKP RK
Mean UCVA (LogMAR)
Efficacy
EFFICACY
SAFETY
PREDICTABILITY
Post RK Post PRK
Scatter plot of polar astigmatic vectors
Pre-operative corneal astigmatism Post-operative refractive cylindrical error
Post PKP
Scatter plot of polar astigmatic vectors
Pre-operative corneal astigmatism Post-operative refractive cylindrical error
Stability
- 2
- 1,5
- 1
- 0,5
0,5 1 1,5 2
pre op 1 month 6 months 12 months 24 months 30 months
RK PKP PRK
Mean Manifest spherical equivalent (D)
ROTATIONAL STABILITY
≤2° - 86% ≤5° - 100%
PATIENT SATISFACTION
- 1. Spectacle independence – 63, 7%
- 2. Visual disturbance (halo and glare) – 21,4%,
- 3. Satisfaction with vision: - 92,3%
Customized Refractive Lens Exchange for AT TORBI Toric IOL (Carl Zeiss)
- Effective
- Safe
- Predictable
- Stable