Lecture 14 AST4320 - Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy The Too Big to Fail Problem The Nature of Dark Matter
1AST4320 - Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy Lecture 14 The Too - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
AST4320 - Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy Lecture 14 The Too - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
AST4320 - Cosmology and extragalactic astronomy Lecture 14 The Too Big to Fail Problem The Nature of Dark Matter 1 Previously on AST4320: Missing Satellite Problem (see review by Weinberg et al. 2013, arXiv:1306.0913) Left: simulated dark
Previously on AST4320: Missing Satellite Problem
(see review by Weinberg et al. 2013, arXiv:1306.0913) 2 Left: simulated dark matter distribution in dark matter halo with M=1012 Msun. Circles denote 9 most massive substructures or `satellites’. Right: Spatial distribution of observed Milky Way `satellites’.Observational Constraints on Dark Matter Halo Profiles (see review by W. De Blok, arXiv:0910.3538)
(Oh et al. 2011; THINGS* survey. Colored points are the dwarfs.) (* The HI Nearby Galaxy Survey)The Nature of the Dark Matter
4The Nature of the Dark Matter
5 What is the dark matter, and why is it `cold’? Cosmic microwave background and observed large-scale structure in the Universe (i.e. clustering of galaxies) provide constraints on content of Universe: Ordinary matter (baryons, leptons, photons) make up ~ 4% of Universal energy density. `Dark energy’ accounts for ~73%. Dark matter accounts for the remaining ~23%. `Just as the chocolate frosting glues the sprinkles together on the cupcake, dark matter binds baryons together to form galaxies, galaxy groups, and galaxy clusters.’- A. Peter, 2013, arXiv:1201.3942
- baryonic: evidence from cosmic microwave background, large scale structure, and also
The Nature of the Dark Matter
- baryonic: evidence from cosmic microwave background, large scale structure, and also
- composed of `light’ (mX < keV) particles. BB.
The Nature of the Dark Matter
- baryonic: evidence from cosmic microwave background, large scale structure, and also
- composed of `light’, mX < keV, particles. These particles would be `relativistic’ when T
- f the Universe was ~ 1 keV. This would suppress growth of structure on `small’
The Nature of the Dark Matter
Constraints on (Warm) Dark Matter
9 Observational constraints mass power spectrum `primordial’ P(k) `Meszaros’ suppression rH matter-radiation equality T~ eV `rH‘ relativisitic WDM m ~ keV Lyman alpha forest indicates that mDM > keVConstraints on other Properties of Dark Matter
10 Constraints on electro-magnetic charge Constraints on self-interaction. `Self-interaction’ refers to interactions among (different species of) dark matter particles, mediated by e.g. `dark gauge bosons’.Constraints on other Properties of Dark Matter
11 “Bullet Cluster”: two merging clusters. Pink: hot X-ray emitting gas. Blue: dark matter in the cluster, determined from measuring the lensing signal (lecture~20) from the visible-light images of the galaxies.Constraints on other Properties of Dark Matter
12 Constraints on electro-magnetic charge. Constrained by small-scale fluctuations in Cosmic-Microwave Background (see Sigurdson et al. 2004) Constraints on self-interaction. `Self-interaction’ refers to interactions among (different species of) dark matter particles, mediated by e.g. `dark gauge bosons’. Could alter predicted structure of dark matter halos.Constraints on other Properties of Dark Matter
13 Constraints on self-interaction. `Self-interaction’ refers to interactions among (different species of) dark matter particles, mediated by e.g. `dark gauge bosons’. Could alter predicted structure of dark matter halos. Example: Recent example of self-interacting dark matter as a solution to the `cusp-core’ problem (with velocity dependent collision cross-section).Constraints on other Properties of Dark Matter
14 Density profiles in cosmological simulations that have self-interacting Dark Matter (SIDM). Example of self-interacting dark matter as a solution to the `cusp-core’ problem (with velocity dependent collision cross-section). Slope of density profile flattens from Cusp to Core. Vogelsberger et al. 2012Constraints on other Properties of Dark Matter
15 Density profiles in cosmological simulations that have self-interacting Dark Matter (SIDM). SIDM reduces tension between kinematics in observed and simulated satellites. Vogelsberger et al. 2012Summary Empirical Constraints Dark Matter
16 Cosmic-Microwave Background limits the charge of the dark matter particle (see Sigurdson et al. 2004) Mass of dark matter particle > keV from Lyman alpha forest observations. Dark matter is at least colder than warm. Collisionless nature of dark matter particle constrained by cluster lensing + X-ray data. Cross-section for `hard-sphere’ elastic scattering though recently some models of self-interacting DM have been put forward that bypass cluster constraints while addressing core-cusp + too big to fail problems in dwarf galaxiesSome Dark Matter Candidates I: WIMPs
17 WIMP: Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. Popular because:Some Dark Matter Candidates I: WIMPs
18 WIMP: Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. Popular because: `Electro-weak’ energy scale at ~200 GeV, above which weak and electromagnetic interaction merges into the `electroweak’ interaction. It is thought that new particles* should exist around this mass-scale. This new particle annihilates into quarks + antiquarks in the early Universe, until density and temperature drops sufficiently that annihilation becomes increasingly rare. The comoving number density nX `freezes’ out. The`predicted’ mass density in this relic density of particles - for the standard assumptions for the mass and annihilation coupling strength - comes out at The fact that particle physics considerations alone, can give the correct order of magnitude for WIMP mass density is referred to as WIMP Miracle. * what these particles are depends on the new physics that is introduced at the electroweak scale. Examples of WIMPS are supersymmetric neutralino, Kaluza-Klein photon,...Some Dark Matter Candidates I: WIMPs
19 WIMP: Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. Popular because:Some Dark Matter Candidates I: WIMPs
20 WIMP: Weakly Interacting Massive Particles. Popular because:Some Dark Matter Candidates II: Other New Particles
21 Other candidates include:- Axions: hypothetical particle introduced to resolve the strong CP problem in QCD.
Some Dark Matter Candidates II: Other New Particles
22 Other candidates include:- Axions: hypothetical particle introduced to resolve the strong CP problem in QCD.
- Gravitinos: supersymmetric partner of graviton. Not as popular as WIMPs because
Some Dark Matter Candidates II: Other New Particles
23 Other candidates include:- Axions: hypothetical particle introduced to resolve the strong CP problem in QCD.
- Gravitinos: supersymmetric partner of graviton. Not as popular as WIMPs because
- Sterile Neutrinos: neutrinos that do not act electroweakly. Introduced to generate
Some Dark Matter Candidates II: Other New Particles
24 Other candidates include:- Axions: hypothetical particle introduced to resolve the strong CP problem in QCD.
- Gravitinos: supersymmetric partner of graviton. Not as popular as WIMPs because
- Sterile Neutrinos: neutrinos that do not act electroweakly. Introduced to generate
- Hidden sector dark-matter: dark sector may be as rich as ordinary standard model,
Dark Matter Searches.
25 Searches for dark matter can be done in- Colliders: given that dark matter is neutral and weakly interacting, they behave like
- WIMPs. So far, no evidence for physics beyond standard model.
- ver cosmological times (let go longer than a ns).
HARD
Dark Matter Searches.
26 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Direct detection: looking for the collision of a WIMP with an atomic nucleus in the
- LAB. Experiments include DAMA/LIBRA, CRESST, CoGeNT, XENON100, CDMS-II,
Intermezzo: Nuclear Recoil
27 WIMP-Nucleus Interaction: WIMPs have finite cross-section for interacting with standard model particles. Momentum conservation during scattering of WIMPs by atomic nuclei gives rise to `recoil’ of nucleus with E ~few to tens of keV. Nuclear recoil can be manifest through scintillation, collisional ionization Why e.g. Xenon?:- 1. transparent to own scintillation flux (no subsequent absorption).
- 2. liquid xenon is so dense, neutrons cannot enter target (important, as neutron induced
Intermezzo: Nuclear Recoil
28 Nuclear recoil can be manifest through scintillation, collisional ionizationIntermezzo: Nuclear Recoil
29 WIMP-Nucleus Interaction: WIMPs have finite cross-section for interacting with standard model particles. Momentum conservation during scattering of WIMPs by atomic nuclei gives rise to `recoil’ of nucleus with E ~few to tens of keV. Nuclear recoil can be manifest through scintillation, collisional ionization Why e.g. Xenon?:- 1. transparent to own scintillation flux (no subsequent absorption).
- 2. liquid xenon is so dense, neutrons cannot enter target (important, as neutron induced
Dark Matter Searches.
30 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Direct detection: looking for the collision of a WIMP with an atomic nucleus in the
- LAB. Experiments include DAMA/LIBRA, CRESST, CoGeNT, XENON100, CDMS-II,
Dark Matter Searches.
31 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Direct detection: looking for the collision of a WIMP with an atomic nucleus in the
- LAB. Experiments include DAMA/LIBRA, CRESST, CoGeNT, XENON100, CDMS-II,
Dark Matter Searches.
32 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Direct detection: looking for the collision of a WIMP with an atomic nucleus in the
- LAB. Experiments include DAMA/LIBRA, CRESST, CoGeNT, XENON100, CDMS-II,
Dark Matter Searches.
33 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Direct detection: looking for the collision of a WIMP with an atomic nucleus in the
- LAB. Experiments include DAMA/LIBRA, CRESST, CoGeNT, XENON100, CDMS-II,
Dark Matter Searches.
34 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Direct detection: looking for the collision of a WIMP with an atomic nucleus in the
- LAB. Experiments include DAMA/LIBRA, CRESST, CoGeNT, XENON100, CDMS-II,
Dark Matter Searches.
35 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Looking for Dark Matter Annhilation: WIMP annihilation in dark matter dense
- bjects, since annihilation rate increase as (density)2. Good places include:
- WIMPs annihilate into variety of standard model particles incl. neutrinos, and gamma-
Dark Matter Searches.
36 Searches for dark matter can be done via- Looking for Dark Matter Annhilation: H.E.S.S result from last year
Dark Matter Detections?
37 Unidentified line at E=3.5 keV, associated with decaying dark matter? If so, we should see it in the Milky Way (?) Which we do not. Very hot topic. Recent (Feb 2014) X-ray observations of nearby galaxy clusters.Dark Matter Detections?
38 Unidentified line at E=3.5 keV, associated with decaying dark matter? If so, we should see it in the Milky Way (?) Which we do not. Very hot topic. Recent (Feb 2014) X-ray observations of nearby galaxy clusters.Dark Matter Detections?
39 Recent (Feb 2014) X-ray observations of nearby galaxy clusters.Dark Matter Detections?
40 Recent (Feb 2014) X-ray observations of nearby galaxy clusters.Dark Matter Detections?
41 Recent (Feb 2014) X-ray observations of nearby galaxy clusters.Dark Matter Detections?
Fermi Gamma Ray observations of the full sky. A diffuse gamma-ray glow - centered on Milky Way center - has been observed. This so-called `Fermi-haze’ has been speculated to be a dark matter signal.`Macro Dark Matter’
43 Massive `non-particle’ dark matter particles (see arxiv:1410.2236). Motivation: reaction rate between baryons and dark matter particles is ~ Moreover,}
Dark matter is `dark’ because it barely interacts with ordinary matter, i.e. GammaXb is low Traditionally, a low is associated with a low Alternatively, a low is associated with a high MX High can be macroscopically high 1e-12-1e34 gr! `Macro dark matter’`Macro Dark Matter’ (journal club, yesterday)
44 Weird non-particle dark matter particles (see arxiv:1410.2236):- nuclearites
- strangelets
- strange baryon Q-balls
- baryonic colour superconductors
- compact composite objects
- compact ultradense objects
- primordial black holes
- cheese
- ...
Summary Knowledge on Dark Matter
45 Mass of dark matter particle > keV from Lyman alpha forest observations. Dark matter is at least colder than warm. Collisionless nature of dark matter particle constrained by cluster lensing + X-ray data. Cross-section for `hard-sphere’ elastic scattering though recently some models of self-interacting DM have been put forward that bypass cluster constraints while addressing core-cusp + too big to fail problems in dwarf galaxies Theoretically, the leading popular candidate is the WIMP . Universal mass density in WIMPs ~ dark matter density (`WIMP’ miracle). Observational constraints on WIMPs, are improving. However, stage is wide-open. Many other candidates including axions, hidden sector dark matter, macro dark matter,...Outlook
46 Next lecture: turn to the `bright’ side of extragalactic astrophysics. Focus on Lyman alpha forest:- provide constraints on mass power spectrum on smallest scales (and hence dark
- provides insights into distribution & properties of gas in range of densities from linear
`Too Big To Fail’ Problem.
Boylan-Kolchin et al. 2011/2012 Satellite Luminosity function- bserved
Constraints on (Warm) Dark Matter
Observational constraints mass power spectrum `primordial’ P(k) `Meszaros’ suppression rH matter-radiation equality T~ eV `rH‘ relativisitic WDM m ~ keV Lyman alpha forest indicates that mDM > keVConstraints on other Properties of Dark Matter
“Bullet Cluster”: two merging clusters. Pink: hot X-ray emitting gas. Blue: dark matter in the cluster, determined from measuring the lensing signal (lecture~20) from the visible-light images of the galaxies.