Assessment Equity for Deaf Students: The Nexus between Disability - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

assessment equity for deaf students the nexus between
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Assessment Equity for Deaf Students: The Nexus between Disability - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Assessment Equity for Deaf Students: The Nexus between Disability and English Learners Stephanie Cawthon, National Deaf Center Martha Thurlow, National Center on Education Outcomes Alan Lytle, Arkansas Department of Education Jennifer Higgins,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Assessment Equity for Deaf Students: The Nexus between Disability and English Learners

Stephanie Cawthon, National Deaf Center Martha Thurlow, National Center on Education Outcomes Alan Lytle, Arkansas Department of Education Jennifer Higgins, National Deaf Center

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Thank you, Alan!

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Symposium Goal

To examine testing equity for deaf students can be considered within the frameworks of both supports for Students with Disabilities and English Learners.

slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Road Map

▷ Understanding the population ▷ Accessible assessment ▷ ELP policy guidance ▷ Issues from the field ▷ Support for stakeholders

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1 % of students in special education

Population Demographics

50% with additional disability Sometimes arrive without a robust first language IEPs or 504s 25% from multilingual homes Experience academic delays

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What does deaf mean?

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

ASL Translation as an Access Strategy

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

ASL Translation: Core Equity Questions

▷ Item bias: Is there bias in the content of the test items? Is this question part of review or later measurement? ▷ Construct validity: Does the ASL translation change the content of the test item? ▷ Cultural relevance: Are there questions related to the cultural relevance or sensitivity of the test item? Are the ASL translations culturally embedded within the language?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ASL Translation: Evolving Best Practices

▷ Maintain linguistic structures in translation ▷ Team approach to development and documentation ▷ Certified Deaf Interpreters as key partners ▷ Feedback for item construction process

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ASL Translation: Lingering Issues

▷ ASL acquisition trajectory ▷ Content areas and constructs ▷ Regional variations in signs ▷ Alignment with instruction ▷ Consistency and quality

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Deaf Students as English Learners

▷ Recall: Approximately 25% of deaf students come from multilingual homes ▷ When might deaf students be eligible English Learner services?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

▷ Home Language Survey questions focus on language in the home environment ○ If home language is not English, referral to ELP screener ○ If ELP screener scores indicate not yet fluent in English, referral to EL services that provide support ○ Annual ELP test to determine if still eligible for EL services and supports

Eligibility for EL Services

slide-16
SLIDE 16

▷ ASL as a home language does not refer for ELP screener. ▷ English language proficiency levels, without home language referral, does not refer for EL services. Stays within special education process. ▷ Special education supports and EL supports regulated by different sets of policies and guidance.

Issues and Challenges

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Learning from the Field

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Case One

A deaf fifth grade student is taking a mathematics assessment delivered in an online platform. Her English literacy proficiency is at about a first grade level. The student began learning sign language when she arrived in school and uses an interpreter in some of her classes, but is not on grade level in ASL in her receptive or expressive signing skills. The ASL translations for the online assessment are difficult for her to understand, even with multiple viewings.

What should the IEP team consider for accommodations in this case?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Case Two

An English Learner student who is on the autism spectrum is also deaf. Spanish is the language at home. The student is required to take an English Language Proficiency (ELP) screener exam with the four domains: Reading, Writing, Speaking, and Listening. What might the assessment team consider in the administration, scoring, and use of the ELP score?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Case Three

A hearing student without a disability and from a Deaf family has American Sign Language as a home language. The student comes to school with what appears to be delayed English proficiency and might benefit from English learner services and supports.

How does the school or district best support this student?

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Case Four

A district provides a remote interpreter for a student. The remote interpreter is located in another state. The student and the interpreter use close-circuit TV to communicate, and the interpreter has auditory access to the teacher via a mic-enabled headset. What should be considered when the district sets up the student’s state assessments?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Supporting the Field

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

National Deaf Center Mission

NDC provides evidence-based strategies to deaf individuals, family members, and professionals at the local, state, and national levels with the goal

  • f closing education and

employment gaps for deaf individuals.

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Funding Context

▷ Allocation is under IDEA ▷ OSERS → OSEP + RSA ▷ Technical Assistance & Dissemination

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Systems Change

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Task Force

The purpose of an NDC task force is to convene thought leaders to discuss and identify issues related to data and best practices in a focused content area related to postsecondary outcomes for deaf individuals. Focus: Assessment Equity and Access

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Resource Development

WHY STANDARDS CHECKLISTS/GUIDES

slide-28
SLIDE 28

nationaldeafcenter.org/learn

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Success... together.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Or Email:

nationaldeafcenter.org

For More Information visit:

help@nationaldeafcenter.org

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

The National Deaf Center is funded by the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs and the Rehabilitation Services Agency, and the US Department of Education via Cooperative Agreement #H326D160001

Thank you!