SLIDE 1
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title LAW 6001 Taxation Law - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title LAW 6001 Taxation Law - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title LAW 6001 Taxation Law Assessment Assessment 2: Presentation Individual/Group Group Length A powerpoint and/or multimedia presentation of between 15 and 20 mins duration. A electronic copy of the
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
LAW6001 Assessment 2 Group Presentation Page 3 of 6
MARKING RUBRIC
Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Grade Description (Grading Scheme) Evidence of unsatisfactory achievement of one or more of the learning objectives of the course, insufficient understanding of the course content and/or unsatisfactory level of skill development. Evidence of satisfactory achievement of course learning
- bjectives, the
development of relevant skills to a competent level, and adequate interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a good level of understanding, knowledge and skill development in relation to the content of the course
- r work of a superior
quality on the majority of the learning objectives of the course. Demonstration of a high level of interpretation and critical analysis skills. Evidence of a high level of achievement of the learning
- bjectives of the
course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, use of methodology and communication skills. Evidence of an exceptional level of achievement of learning objectives across the entire content of the course demonstrated in such areas as interpretation and critical analysis, logical argument, creativity, originality, use of methodology and communication skills. Knowledge and understanding Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall
- r summary of key
ideas. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal
- pinion with
Thorough knowledge
- r understanding of
the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion
- f personal opinion
and information substantiated by
SLIDE 4
LAW6001 Assessment 2 Group Presentation Page 4 of 6 40% 0 - 19 information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. 20 -25.9 Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. 26-29.9 from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.
30 - 34.4
robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.
34.5- 40
Critical reasoning Formation of recommendations based on the identification of the issues and the application of case law principles and relevant legislation identified in the research process. Difficulty in formulating own opinion and a lack of recognition of the various issues. A lack of application
- f the relevant case law and/or
relevant legislation Difficulty in justifying
- wn opinion. Some
recognition and discussion of the various issues. Some application of the relevant case law and/or relevant legislation Own opinion is partly justified with reference to case law and/or relevant legislation. Recognition and discussion of the various issues identified in the question Application
- f the relevant case
law and/or relevant legislation to these issues Own opinion is justified with reference to case law and/or relevant legislation. Recognition and discussion of the various issues identified in the question plus
- thers identified
by the student Application of the relevant case law and/or relevant legislation to these issues Sophisticated arguments supporting own
- pinion is justified
with reference to case law and/or relevant legislation. Recognition and discussion of the various issues identified in the question plus others identified by the student and problems identified Application of the relevant case law and/or relevant
SLIDE 5
LAW6001 Assessment 2 Group Presentation Page 5 of 6 30% 0-14.9 15-19.4 19.5-22.4 22.5- 25.4 legislation to these issues 25.5-30 Presentation skills 15% Generally poor presentation skills with little to no audience engagement, no attempt to practice
- r develop a coherent presentation
Clearly underprepared with no coherent grasp of their part. 0 - 7.4 Some evidence of preparation and involvement in the group work. Some knowledge of their particular part. No clear, cohesive presentation 7.5- 9.4 A good presentation showing signs of practice both on their
- wn and within the
group context. Some attempt to develop a cohesive whole in the presentation Able to answer basic questions on their particular part 9.5 – 9.9 A very good presentation, clear evidence of practice both on their own and within the group
- context. A clear
attempt to develop a cohesive whole in the presentation Able to answer advanced questions on their particular part and consider possible improvements 11-12.9 An excellent presentation showing signs of extensive practice both on their
- wn and within the
group context. The presentation is a well developed cohesive whole. Able to answer advanced questions
- n their particular
part and consider possible improvements and suggest policy changes, or other practical suggestions for implementing change. 13-15
SLIDE 6
LAW6001 Assessment 2 Group Presentation Page 6 of 6 Effective communication Ability to effectively communicate conclusions, ideas and the key aspects of the student’s personal analysis of the issue
15%
Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow
- f ideas, argument lacks supporting
evidence. No effort is made to keep audience engaged, audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Little use of presentation aids, or the presentation aids and material used are irrelevant.
0- 7.4
Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Attempts are made to keep the audience engaged, but not always successful. Line of reasoning is
- ften difficult to
follow. Presentation aids are used more for effect than relevance. 7.5- 9.4 Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. The audience is mostly engaged, line
- f reasoning is easy