assessing and reporting heterogeneity of treatment effect
play

Assessing and Reporting Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ANNUAL OCT. 31-NOV. 2, 2017 MEETING ARLINGTON, VA Assessing and Reporting Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Clinical Trials David M. Kent, MD, MS Director, Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center Tufts Medical


  1. ANNUAL OCT. 31-NOV. 2, 2017 MEETING ARLINGTON, VA Assessing and Reporting Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Clinical Trials David M. Kent, MD, MS Director, Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center Tufts Medical Center @Tufts_PACE November 1, 2017 #PCORI2017

  2. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Background • Person-level heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE) is ubiquitous. • Group-level HTE is rarely reliably identifiable in clinical trials. 2

  3. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Problems with conventional subgroup analysis • Patients have too many attributes • Low power 3

  4. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Why privilege risk-based HTE analysis? • Risk is a known mathematical determinant of treatment effect. 4

  5. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Common measures of treatment effect Risk Reduction Definition (RR) Absolute RR EER-CER Relative RR 1 - EER CER Odds Ratio EER/(1-EER) CER/(1-CER) CER=control event rate EER=experimental event rate 5

  6. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Why privilege risk-based HTE analysis? • Risk is a known mathematical determinant of treatment effect. • When baseline risk heterogeneity is present (and the treatment effect is non-zero), there is always HTE. • Risk provides a summary measure that takes into account multiple variables that are relevant and provides “patient-centered” evidence. 6

  7. Kent DM, et al. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17:887-94. 7

  8. Kent DM, et al. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17:887-94. 8

  9. 16.3% 1.0% Kent DM, et al. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17:887-94.

  10. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 DANAMI-2 High Risk Low Risk 10 Thune JJ, et al. Circulation 2005,112:2017-2021.

  11. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Predicted risk distributions in RCTs 11 Kent DM et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Jul 3. pii: dyw118.

  12. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Relative risk reduction across risk quartiles • Treatment effect heterogeneity on the proportional scale across patients at different baseline risk was rare. 12

  13. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Absolute risk reduction across risk quartiles Substantial differences in • absolute treatment effects were common. Displaying results across • subgroups defined by risk is feasible and can lead to clinically important findings. 13

  14. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Randomized Controlled Trial • Participants : 3060 non-diabetic persons with evidence of impaired glucose metabolism • Intervention: Intervention groups received metformin or a lifestyle-modification program • Main outcome measure : Development of diabetes The DPP study was conducted by the DPP Investigators and supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). 14

  15. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 DPP Risk Stratified Results: Hazard Ratios p-value = not statistically significant p-value = 0.0008 15 15

  16. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 DPP Risk Stratified Results: Absolute Risk 16

  17. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Improving Diabetes Prevention with Benefit- Based Tailored Treatment • Making the risk model available at the point of care - Stakeholder partners: - AMGA (formerly American Medical Group Association) - Project teams: - Mercy (St. Louis) – 3,000 providers - Premier Medical Associates (Pittsburgh) – 100 provider s • Incorporating EHR-compatible model - Epic (Mercy) - Allscripts (Premier) 17

  18. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Redevelopment of DPP risk model in EHR • Model developed and geographically validated in OptumLabs • Risk factors: age, gender, race, ethnicity, height, BMI, smoking status, hypertension, A1c, FPG, triglycerides, HDL, SBP validation development n = 1,075,833 n = 1,076,983 c-statistic = c-statistic = 0.735 0.763 E = 1.48% E = 0.92% E90 = 1.73% E90 = 2.25% 18

  19. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 19

  20. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Questions? 20

  21. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Thank You! David M Kent, MD, MS Director, Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Center Tufts Medical Center @Tufts_PACE November 1, 2017 21

  22. ANNUAL MEETING | #PCORI2017 Learn More • www.pcori.org • info@pcori.org • #PCORI2017 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend