asean 3
play

ASEAN+3: Achievements in the Past Decade and Challenges for Further - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Government Bond Markets in ASEAN+3: Achievements in the Past Decade and Challenges for Further Development 14 November 2011 Singapore Noritaka Akamatsu Asian Development Bank Before and shortly after 97 Asian Currency Crisis Before the


  1. Government Bond Markets in ASEAN+3: Achievements in the Past Decade and Challenges for Further Development 14 November 2011 Singapore Noritaka Akamatsu Asian Development Bank

  2. Before and shortly after ‘97 Asian Currency Crisis Before the 1997 crisis, the conservative fiscal stance and high  economic growth did not call for govt borrowing. E.g., – In 1996, ASEAN+2 market, $530 billion, 2.1% of the world market. – Korea, China, and Thailand only had a small domestic govt bond market, while the Indonesia had none (because the govt was legally banned from borrowing from the domestic market). – Thailand has tried to develop corporate bond market since late 1980’s but with limited temporary success. In response to the crisis, Indonesia, Korea and Thailand issued a  large volume to recapitalize banks and finance companies and made a concerted effort to build the market. – The effort by Thailand and Indonesia guided by an inter-agency committee on bond market led by MOF. 2

  3. Characteristics 2001 Disparity in level of development among ASEAN+2 markets.  – Markets in mid income countries were in an early stage of development, while lower income ASEAN practically had no market. – 1997 Crisis triggered / accelerated the market development in mid income countries directly hit by the crisis. Govt debt dominated total fixed income markets (crisis  response). Significant share of external debt although domestic (LCY) debt  exceeded external debt in 6 countries. Non-marketable securities were sizeable in PRC and Singapore  (and Indonesia if bonds issued to Bank Indonesia were counted). Fixed rate bonds dominated in most markets,  – Fixed income useful for building benchmarks / yield curve. – The lack of short-term benchmarks (money market) to price floaters.

  4. Institutional framework 2001 Debt management responsibility generally resided with  Ministries of Finance, separated from monetary policy. – Indonesia, Korea, Philippines, Thailand – Most countries formalized debt management objectives in the legal framework. All ASEAN5+2 had a legal framework for borrowing authority  and limits. Central Bank was a significant issuer in PRC, Indonesia, Korea,  and Malaysia, requiring coordination with govt securities issuance. ASEAN 4 ( – Indonesia)+2 shaped the primary market with  auction and primary dealer system. Market supervision is generally delegated to specialized  authorities or mixed systems.

  5. Investor base 2001 Holders of domestic marketable GS outstanding 100% 80% Other 60% Resident investors* Securities 40% Commercial banks 20% Central Bank 0% *Malaysia: includes pension, insurance & Employee Provident Fund **Commercial banks and Special Financial Institutions combined

  6. Secondary market liquidity 2001 Government securities turnover Indonesia* Malaysia* Thailand* Philippines** China Korea*' Singapore 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Outright Repos (x) Note: Turnover is calculated as Annual trading volume/Year end marketable securities outstanding. *Annualized data Jan-June 2002, Thailand Jan- Sep2002 ** No breakdown given *’includes National Housing bonds.

  7. Achievements since 2001  The share of emerging East Asia increased to 8.0% from 2.1%, driven largely by govt bonds (treasuries, central bank bills, and SOE / SOB bonds). – More recently, the bond market able to respond to grow when the global liquidity contracted at the wake of the global financial crisis.  The maturities lengthened and diversified, providing more diverse investment opportunities for institutional investors.  Liquidity in most markets has improved, as foreign holdings rose particularly recently, resulting in narrower spread and more reliable yield curve.  The overall market growth slowed in the past year due to a sharp reduction in sterilization issuance by central banks.  The issuance of treasuries and SOE / SOB bonds continued and is attracting investor interest, reducing the net capital outflows of the recent weeks. asianbondsonline.adb.org

  8. Bonds Outstanding 2010 2010 1996 % of % of LCY Bonds World LCY Bonds World (USD trillion) Outstanding Total Outstanding Total United States 25.35 38.8% 10.93 42.9% Japan 11.72 17.9% 4.46 17.5% France 3.17 4.8% 1.26 4.9% Germany 2.62 4.0% 1.89 7.4% United Kingdom 1.65 2.5% 0.68 2.7% Emerging East Asia 5.21 8.0% 0.53 2.1% of which: PRC 3.05 4.7% 0.06 0.2% Emerging East Asia excl. PRC 2.16 3.3% 0.47 1.8% of which: Rep. of Korea 1.15 1.8% 0.28 1.1% Brazil 1.34 2.0% 0.30 1.2% India 0.71 1.1% 0.08 0.3% asianbondsonline.adb.org Source: Bank for International Settlements and AsianBondsOnline.

  9. Maturities lengthened In 2001, most were mid term maturities though with disparity  among countries. – 15.4% (<1yr), 33% (1yr<<5yr), 51.6% (>5yrs) Today, maturities have been extended to:  – China – 50 years – Indonesia – 30 years – Malaysia – 20 years – Philippines – 25 years – Thailand – 50 years – Viet Nam – 15 years 9

  10. Maturity Profile - Government (Individual Maturities as % of Total) % 60 1-3 years 50 3-5 years 5-10 years 40 >10 years 30 20 10 0 People's Rep. Hong Kong, Indonesia Korea, Rep. of Malaysia Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam China China, of Note: Data as of 2Q11. Source: Asia Bond Monitor.

  11. Growth of Emerging East Asia Bond Market USD billion 6,000 Corporate Government 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 asianbondsonline.adb.org Source: AsianBondsOnline.

  12. Government bonds breakdown (USD billion) Treasury Central Bank Others Total China, People's Rep. of 1,074 431 935 2,440 Hong Kong, China 4 84 88 Indonesia 81 22 102 Korea, Rep. of 362 155 28 546 Malaysia 125 36 0.2 161 Philippines 63 3 65 Singapore 113 113 Thailand 83 79 16 178 Viet Nam 6 9 15 Total Emerging East Asia 1,910 807 990 3,708 asianbondsonline.adb.org Source: AsianBondsOnline.

  13. Foreign Holdings in LCY Govt Bonds % 40 Japan 35 Indonesia Malaysia 31.31 30 Thailand Republic of Korea 25 24.64 20 15 10.89 10 8.91 5.70 5 0 Nov-02 Jun-03 Jan-04 Jul-04 Feb-05 Aug-05 Mar-06 Oct-06 Apr-07 Nov-07 Jun-08 Dec-08 Jul-09 Jan-10 Aug-10 Mar-11 Sep-11 Note: Data for Japan, the Republic of Korea, Malaysia , and Thailand as of June 2011; Indonesia as of asianbondsonline.adb.org September 2011. Source: AsianBondsOnline.

  14. Government Bond Yields China, People’s Rep. of Indonesia Korea, Rep. of Thailand

  15. Institutional developments – Case of Thailand – Primary market:  – Multiple price auctions (1998), non-competitive bidding (2002), nine primary dealers (2002), electronic bidding (2003) Secondary market:  – Bond Electronic Exchange (BEX, 2003) and OTC (Fixed Income & Related Securities Trading system, or FIRST). – Clearance & settlement: Bhatnet II for RTGS/DVP (2001) – Thai Bond Market Association (ThaiBMA) as SRO and bond price information center (2005) by transforming Thai BDC. Investor base broadening  Benchmark building by reopening and prefunding for refinancing.  – Public Debt Management Act amended (2007) to permit prefunding, – Bond Market Development Fund (2010). Transparent and efficient issuance based on a continuous and  systematic dialog with the market. 15  Earlier process guided by the Domestic Bond Market Committee.

  16. Institutional developments – Case of Indonesia – BIBL  Center for Govt Bond Mgmt (PMON) established in 2001.  Govt Securities Law (2002), State Finances Law (2003), State  Treasury Law (2004), etc. – Govt bond issuance for budget financing (2002); auction (since 2003); Regular monthly issuance (2004); reprofiling by debt switching. – T-bills (2007) Liquidation of recap bonds and broadening of the investor base  – Reprofiling (2002) – Banks’ share declined, while foreign investors’ increased. – Retail bonds (2006), retail Sukuk (2009) BI-RTGS, BI-SSSS (2002)  IDMA  16

  17. Institutional developments – Republic of Korea – Primary dealer (PD) system launched in 1999, improved in 2010.  A preliminary PD system was introduced in 2011. A 3-year KTB futures market was created in 1999, 5-year KTB  futures in 2003, 10-year KTB futures market in 2008. KTB auction method changed to differential pricing auction from  Dutch auction in 2009 . Launched 20-year KTBs inflation-linked KTBs in 2007.  Over-the-counter (OTC) quotation disclosure system —KOFIA’s  Bond Quotation System (BQS) — introduced in 2007. Exempted taxes on interest income and capital gains from  foreign investors’ holdings of Korean government bonds in 2009; these withholding taxes were revived in 2011. 17

  18. Institutional developments – Case of Malaysia – Primary market:  – Principal Dealers System (1989) – Fully Automated System for Issuing/Tendering - FAST (1996) – Government Auction Calendar (2000), Islamic Treasury Bills (2004), 20-year MGS (2005), Sukuk Ijarah (2006) Secondary market:  – PDS is made scripless through SPEEDS (1996) and replaced by RENTAS (1999) – Bonds Information and Dissemination System (BIDS) was introduced (2001); replaced by Electronic Trading Platform (ETP) (2008)  Securities Commission was set-up (1993); became sole regulator of all fund raising activities (2000)  Capital Market Masterplan was launched (2001); Capital Market Masterplan 2 (2011)  To enhance liquidity, debt switch was introduced (2007); callable MGS (2006) 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend