ASB The Changing Landscape CIH Midlands Region March 2013 Gail - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

asb the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ASB The Changing Landscape CIH Midlands Region March 2013 Gail - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ASB The Changing Landscape CIH Midlands Region March 2013 Gail Sykes, Partner Tel: 01733 888794 Email: gail.sykes@buckles-law.co.uk www.buckles-law.co.uk Possession Proceedings and Proportionality Summary possession proceedings


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ASB – The Changing Landscape

CIH Midlands Region March 2013

Gail Sykes, Partner

Tel: 01733 888794 Email: gail.sykes@buckles-law.co.uk www.buckles-law.co.uk

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Possession Proceedings and Proportionality

  • Summary possession proceedings still open

to challenge

  • The court should follow the guidance in

Manchester City Council v Pinnock and Hounslow v Powell

  • Recent case law includes
  • Corby Borough Council v Scott [2012]
  • West Kent HA v Haycraft [2012]
  • Riverside Group Ltd v Thomas [2012]
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Possession Proceedings and Proportionality

To avoid a successful challenge:

  • Follow policy and procedure
  • Investigate allegations of ASB
  • Manage the tenant’s expectations
  • Keep a complete file!
  • Ensure that independent reviews are

available

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Draft Anti-Social Behaviour Bill

  • Published 13 December 2012
  • Has been considered by the Home Affairs

Select Committee – which reported on 15 February 2013

  • Further amendments likely before

consideration by Parliament 2013/2014

  • Commencement 2015?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

The Draft Anti-Social Behaviour Bill - mandatory possession

  • NOSP 28 days notice to be served within a

year if conviction/breach

  • Five conditions for possession
  • Review procedure will be required –

(proportionality challenges likely)

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 1. Conviction of serious offence
  • 2. Breach of injunction
  • 3. Breach of criminal behaviour order
  • 4. Closure order
  • 5. Breach of noise abatement notice

The Draft Anti-Social Behaviour Bill - mandatory possession

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Inter-agency communication – convictions
  • Injunctions – breach must have been proved

to the court

  • More incentive to defend committal

proceedings for breach of injunction or to deny serious offences

  • Judges likely to scrutinise injunction terms

very carefully

  • Undertakings less attractive to housing

providers but more attractive to Judges The Draft Anti-Social Behaviour Bill - mandatory possession

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The Draft Anti-Social Behaviour Bill - new discretionary ground for possession

  • The tenant, or a person residing in the

dwellinghouse (in England) has been convicted of an offence which took place in a riot in the UK

  • A discretionary ground so that the judicial

approach to possession will be interesting

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Injunctions to Prevent Nuisance and Annoyance (IPNA’s)

The test:

  • Conduct capable of causing a nuisance and

annoyance; and

  • It is just and equitable to grant the injunction
  • Without notice injunctions, powers of arrest

and exclusion orders still available

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Injunctions to Prevent Nuisance and Annoyance (IPNA’s)

  • Available against those over 10 (Youth Court

jurisdiction)

  • Available to a wider number of agencies

(Police, Environmental Health)

  • Scope may be limited with a proportionality

test or the need to show that conduct was intentional or reckless

  • An attempt to define housing management

functions

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recent ASB Case Law

Southend Borough Council v Armour [2012]

  • Termination of introductory tenancy
  • No further ASB between service of notice and

trial

  • Should the period of good behaviour be taken

into account?

  • Delays (at least in part caused by the

defendant’s legal team)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Recent ASB Case Law

Birmingham City Council v Ashton [2012]

  • The judicial approach when considering

whether the tenant is likely to cause further ASB is a suspended order is made

  • The court should consider whether cogent

evidence has been produced

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recent ASB Case Law

Stafford v Camden LBC [2012]

  • Considered whether LA must serve a fresh

section 128 notice when previous notice relied upon to issue proceedings

  • Review panel suggested alternative to

possession

  • CA held landlord must give unequivocal

confirmation of original decision

  • Be aware of danger of giving "second

chance"

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Recent ASB Case Law

Wandsworth LBC v Maggott [2013]

  • ASB not found to be “in the locality” of Mr

Maggott’s home

  • The landlord could not rely upon tenants’

ASB covenants which were too wide

  • If the Judge was wrong – it was not

reasonable to make an order anyway!

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Any questions?

?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ASB – The Changing Landscape

March 2013

Buckles Solicitors LLP | Grant House | 101 Bourges Boulevard | Peterborough | PE1 1NG | Telephone: 01733 888888 Buckles Solicitors LLP | 3 St Mary's Hill | Stamford | Lincs | PE9 2DW | Telephone: 01780 484570 www.buckles-law.co.uk enquiries@buckles-law.co.uk

Buckles Solicitors LLP is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Registered in England No OC311739.