ASAS applications maturity assessment Operational concept 4 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

asas applications maturity assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ASAS applications maturity assessment Operational concept 4 3 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Airborne Separation Assistance System (ASAS) Thematic Network 2: ASAS applications maturity assessment Operational concept 4 3 Benefits & Transition issues 2 constraints 1 0 Systems, HMI


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

1 2 3 4 Operational concept Benefits & constraints Safety Procedures & human factors Systems, HMI & Technology Transition issues 2008 2007 2006

Airborne Separation Assistance System (ASAS) Thematic Network 2:

ASAS applications maturity assessment

Chris Shaw, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Contents of presentation

  • Introduction
  • Objectives
  • ADS-B
  • Method

– Applications – Maturity metrics

  • Results
  • Conclusion

Maturity assessment

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Introduction

  • ASAS Thematic Network 2

– Sponsored by European Commission Directorate General Research 6th Framework – Three year project from April 2005 – Aim: to accelerate the application of ASAS

  • perations in European Airspace taking into

account global applicability in order to increase airspace capacity and safety. – Managed by consortium: BAE Systems, ENAV, LFV, NLR, Thales Air Systems & Thales Avionics, EUROCONTROL (leader)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Objectives

  • 5 ASAS workshops & final seminar

– Malmo (Oct 2005), Rome (Apr 2006) – Glasgow (Sep 2006), Amsterdam (Apr 2007), – Toulouse (Sep 2007)

  • Web-based ASAS related documentation
  • Annual assessment of the maturity of

global ADS-B/ASAS applications by ASAS-TN2 partners

– Deliverables: Report ”ASAS application maturity assessment” V1 March 2006, update V2 March 2007 & V3 March 2008

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

ADS-B - coverage

  • Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) Mode S

Extended Squitter in Europe: – In Jan 2008, 97% of flights Mode S equipped (95% in Oct 2006) of which 78% ADS-B Extended Squitter capability (57% in Oct 2006).

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ADs-B Extended Squitter (% of Mode S flights) janv-06

  • ct-06

janv-08 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Airborne position indicated (% of ADS- B flights) janv-06

  • ct-06

janv-08

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Method (1/3)

  • 19 ASAS applications:

– ADS-B surveillance – Airborne traffic situational awareness – Airborne spacing – Airborne separation – Airborne self-separation

  • 12 ASAS specialists from:

BAE systems (UK), ENAV (Italy), LFV (Sweden), NLR (The Netherlands), Thales ATM (France), Thales Air Systems (France) and EUROCONTROL

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Method (2/3)

  • Maturity metrics scale 0 to 4 (±0.5):

– Operational concepts – Benefits and constraints – Safety assessment – Procedures and human factors – Systems, HMI and technology – Transition issues

  • Results reviewed by selected peers from US,

Europe and Australia

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Method (3/3) Example metric: Operational concept

1 = Problem statement, identify solutions, concept generation (concept of operations) 2 = Preliminary Operational Concept Description (R&D Operational Service and Environment Description (OSED)) 3 = Draft Requirements Focus Group (RFG) OSED in development (e.g. from R&D OSEDs, trials and experiments, initial OSED) – mature and in review. 4 = Consolidated OSED - Published

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Results (1/4) - overview

4 8 12 16 20 24

APT RAD NRA ADD AIRB SURF ITP VSA S&M C&P LC&P VC&P ITP ITF S&M ITM FFAS MAS FFT Total maturity score

2006 2007 2008

ADS-B ATSA ASPA ASEP SSEP

ASAS applications

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

1 2 3 4 Operational concept Benefits & constraints Safety Procedures & human factors Systems, HMI & Technology Transition issues 2008 2007 2006

1 2 3 4 Operational concept Benefits & constraints Safety Procedures & human factors Systems, HMI & Technology Transition issues 2008 2007 2006

Results (2/4) – highest/lowest

Highest maturity score ATC surveillance in non-radar areas Lowest maturity score Vertical crossing and passing (Airborne separation)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

1 2 3 4 Operational concept Benefits & constraints Safety Procedures & human factors Systems, HMI & Technology Transition issues 2008 2007 2006

1 2 3 4 Operational concept Benefits & constraints Safety Procedures & human factors Systems, HMI & Technology Transition issues 2008 2007 2006

Results (3/4) – fastest/newest

Largest increase in maturity score Sequencing and merging (Airborne spacing) New application In-trail merge (Airborne separation)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Results (4/4) – maturity rates

“ASAS-TN2 aim: to accelerate the application of ASAS

  • perations…”
  • 2

2 4 6 8 10 APT RAD NRA ADD AIRB SURF ITP VSA S&M C&P LC&P VC&P ITP ITF S&M ITM FFAS MAS FFT

Change in maturity score per year

Maturity rate 2006-7 Maturity rate 2007-8

ADS-B ATSA ASPA ASEP SSEP

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008

Conclusion

  • Of 19 applications assessed, 9 have maturity

scores of at least 12 (out of 24)

  • Maturity has ‘accelerated’ from 10% increase

in total scores (2006-7) to 13% (2007-8)

  • Maturity cases:
  • Highest: ADS-B-NRA (operational Australia)
  • Lowest: ASEP-VC&P (score 6/24)
  • Fastest: ASPA-S&M (UPS M&S operational

approval)

  • Versions 1, 2 & 3 of report on ASAS-TN2

website (http://www.asas-tn.org/reports)