ASAS applications maturity assessment Operational concept 4 3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Airborne Separation Assistance System (ASAS) Thematic Network 2: ASAS applications maturity assessment Operational concept 4 3 Benefits & Transition issues 2 constraints 1 0 Systems, HMI & Safety Technology Procedures & human factors 2008 2007 2006 Chris Shaw, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Contents of presentation • Introduction • Objectives • ADS-B • Method – Applications Maturity assessment – Maturity metrics • Results • Conclusion

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Introduction • ASAS Thematic Network 2 – Sponsored by European Commission Directorate General Research 6 th Framework – Three year project from April 2005 – Aim: to accelerate the application of ASAS operations in European Airspace taking into account global applicability in order to increase airspace capacity and safety. – Managed by consortium: BAE Systems, ENAV, LFV, NLR, Thales Air Systems & Thales Avionics, EUROCONTROL (leader)

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Objectives • 5 ASAS workshops & final seminar – Malmo (Oct 2005), Rome (Apr 2006) – Glasgow (Sep 2006), Amsterdam (Apr 2007), – Toulouse (Sep 2007) • Web-based ASAS related documentation • Annual assessment of the maturity of global ADS-B/ASAS applications by ASAS-TN2 partners – Deliverables: Report ”ASAS application maturity assessment” V1 March 2006, update V2 March 2007 & V3 March 2008

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 ADS-B - coverage • Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) Mode S Extended Squitter in Europe: – In Jan 2008, 97% of flights Mode S equipped (95% in Oct 2006) of which 78% ADS-B Extended Squitter capability (57% in Oct 2006). ADs-B Extended Squitter (% of Mode S Airborne position indicated (% of ADS- 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 B flights) 60 60 flights) 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 janv-06 oct-06 janv-08 janv-06 oct-06 janv-08

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Method (1/3) • 19 ASAS applications: – ADS-B surveillance – Airborne traffic situational awareness – Airborne spacing – Airborne separation – Airborne self-separation • 12 ASAS specialists from: BAE systems (UK), ENAV (Italy), LFV (Sweden), NLR (The Netherlands), Thales ATM (France), Thales Air Systems (France) and EUROCONTROL

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Method (2/3) • Maturity metrics scale 0 to 4 (±0.5): – Operational concepts – Benefits and constraints – Safety assessment – Procedures and human factors – Systems, HMI and technology – Transition issues • Results reviewed by selected peers from US, Europe and Australia

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Method (3/3) Example metric: Operational concept 1 = Problem statement, identify solutions, concept generation (concept of operations) 2 = Preliminary Operational Concept Description (R&D Operational Service and Environment Description (OSED)) 3 = Draft Requirements Focus Group (RFG) OSED in development (e.g. from R&D OSEDs, trials and experiments, initial OSED) – mature and in review. 4 = Consolidated OSED - Published

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Results (1/4) - overview 2006 2007 2008 24 20 Total maturity score 16 12 8 4 0 SURF ITF ITM APT RAD NRA AIRB ITP ITP FFT ADD VSA S&M C&P LC&P VC&P S&M FFAS MAS ADS-B ATSA ASPA ASEP SSEP ASAS applications

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Results (2/4) – highest/lowest Highest maturity score Lowest maturity score ATC surveillance in non-radar Vertical crossing and passing areas (Airborne separation) Operational concept Operational concept 4 4 3 Benefits & 3 Benefits & Transition issues 2 Transition issues 2 constraints constraints 1 1 0 0 Systems, HMI & Systems, HMI & Safety Safety Technology Technology Procedures & Procedures & human factors human factors 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Results (3/4) – fastest/newest Largest increase in maturity score New application Sequencing and merging In-trail merge (Airborne spacing) (Airborne separation) Operational concept Operational concept 4 4 3 Benefits & 3 Benefits & Transition issues 2 Transition issues constraints 2 constraints 1 1 0 0 Systems, HMI & Safety Systems, HMI & Technology Safety Technology Procedures & Procedures & human factors human factors 2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Results (4/4) – maturity rates Maturity rate 2006-7 Maturity rate 2007-8 10 8 Change in maturity score per year 6 4 2 0 ITM APT RAD NRA AIRB SURF ITP ITP ITF FFT ADD VSA S&M C&P LC&P VC&P S&M FFAS MAS -2 ADS-B ATSA ASPA ASEP SSEP “ASAS-TN2 aim: to accelerate the application of ASAS operations…”

ASAS-TN2 Seminar, Paris, 14-15 April 2008 Conclusion • Of 19 applications assessed, 9 have maturity scores of at least 12 (out of 24) • Maturity has ‘accelerated’ from 10% increase in total scores (2006-7) to 13% (2007-8) • Maturity cases: • Highest: ADS-B-NRA (operational Australia) • Lowest: ASEP-VC&P (score 6/24) • Fastest: ASPA-S&M (UPS M&S operational approval) • Versions 1, 2 & 3 of report on ASAS-TN2 website (http://www.asas-tn.org/reports)