apport ionment q uot a m et hods
play

Apport ionment Q uot a M et hods T erminology: Seat s It ems t o - PDF document

Apport ionment Q uot a M et hods T erminology: Seat s It ems t o be apport ioned House Size Number of Seat s St at es Part ies t o whom seat s are apport ioned Populat ion M easurement of st at es size T ot al Populat ion


  1. Apport ionment Q uot a M et hods T erminology: Seat s – It ems t o be apport ioned House Size – Number of Seat s St at es – Part ies t o whom seat s are apport ioned Populat ion – M easurement of st at e’s size T ot al Populat ion – Sum of populat ions of all st at es Nat ural D ivisor = T ot al Populat ion House Size St at e’s Nat ural Q uot a = St at e’s Populat ion Nat ural D ivisor

  2. Alt ernat ive: St at e’s Nat ural Q uot a = St at e’s Populat ion T ot al Populat ion · ( House Size) O bvious Solut ion: Simple Rounding – Round each st at e’s nat ural quot a t o nearest int eger. Problem: House Size may not come out cor- rect ly.

  3. Hamilt on’s M et hod – M et hod of L argest Fract ional Part s • Calculat e t he nat ural quot a for each st at e. • Round each st at e’s nat ural quot a down t o t he nearest int eger t hat does not exceed t he quot a. • Assign ext ra seat s t o t he st at es whose quo- t as have t he largest fract ional part s.

  4. L owndes’ M et hod – M et hod of L argest Relat ive Fract ions • Calculat e t he nat ural quot a for each st at e. • Round each st at e’s nat ural quot a down t o t he nearest int eger t hat does not exce ed t he quot a. • Assign ext ra seat s t o t he st at es whose quo- t as have t he largest relat ive fract ional part s. T he relat ive fract ional part is t he fract ional part of t he nat ural quot a divided by it s int e- gral part . Definition 1 (Quota Property). An appor- t ionment is said t o sat isfy t he Q uot a Property if each st at e’s allocat ion diff ers from it s nat ural quot a by less t han one.

  5. Early D ivisor M et hods Definition 2 (Jefferson’s Method). Find a divisor such t hat t he correct number of seat s is allot t ed when all t he result ing modifi ed quot as are rounded down t o t he nearest whole num- ber. T o fi nd a divisor t hat would make a st at e’s modifi ed quot a a cert ain value, divide it s pop- ulat ion by it s desired quot a. In ot her words, t hreshold divisor for n seat s = populat ion . n Possible Problem: Violat ion of t he Q uot a Prop- erty. All divisor met hods violat e t he Q uot a Property. Smaller divisors result in larger modifi ed quot as and larger divisors result in smaller modifi ed quot as.

  6. Jeff erson’s M et hod has a bias in favor of t he larger st at es. Definition 3 (Webster’s Method). Find a di- visor such t hat t he correct number of seat s is allocat ed when t he result ing modifi ed quot as are rounded in t he nat ural way. t hreshold divisor for n seat s = populat ion . n − 0 . 5

  7. � � Apport ionment in T oday’s House of Represent at ives Definition 4 (Hill-Huntington Method). Find a divisor such t hat t he correct number of seat s is allocat ed when t he result ing modifi ed quot as are rounded using t he geomet ric mean ( n − 1) n for rounding between n − 1 and n . t hreshold divisor for n seat s = populat ion ( n − 1) n Alt ernat ives • Adam’s M et hod – Q uot a’s are rounded up from t he modifi ed quot a. B ias in favor of smaller st at es. • D ean’s M et hod – Cut off for rounding is ( n − 1) n n − 0 . 5 .

  8. n − 0 . 5 = ( n − 1) n n Not e: n − 1 < ( n − 1) · n − 0 . 5 = n · n − 1 n − 0 . 5 < n . • Condorcet ’s M et hod – Q uot as are rounded up at 0 . 4.

  9. Search for an Ideal Apport ion- ment M et hod Definition 5 (Quota Property). An appor- t ionment is said t o sat isfy t he Q uot a Property if each st at e’s allocat ion diff ers from it s nat ural quot a by less t han one. Theorem 1. No divisor met hod sat isfi es t he Q uot a Property. Definition 6 (House Size Property). No st at e ever loses a seat when t he size of t he house in- creases. Theorem 2. Every divisor met hod sat isfi es t he House Size Property. Definition 7 (Population Property – Popu- lation Monotonicity). For a fi xed house size, no st at e whose populat ion increases ever loses a seat t o anot her st at e whose populat ion de- creases. Theorem 3. An apport ionment met hod sat is- fi es t he Populat ion Property if and only if it is a “ generalized” divisor met hod, where t he rounding met hod may depend on t he number of st at es and t he house size. Consequent ly, no apport ionment met hod sat isfi es bot h t he Q uot a Property and t he Populat ion Property.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend