- Dr. Mark Livschitz
Anti-Corruption Compliance
Swiss-Israeli Chamber of Commerce Zurich, February 25, 2010
Anti-Corruption Compliance Swiss-Israeli Chamber of Commerce - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Anti-Corruption Compliance Swiss-Israeli Chamber of Commerce Zurich, February 25, 2010 Dr. Mark Livschitz Anticorruption why bother? Weapons manufacturer CH IL Hightech components producer $ Ministry of defence Risks for CH parent (1)
Swiss-Israeli Chamber of Commerce Zurich, February 25, 2010
CH IL
Hightech components producer Weapons manufacturer Ministry of defence
$
Tax evasion for both company; aiding & abetting by individuals (bribe is not tax-deductible) Tax fraud for individuals (deducting bribe creates false balance sheet) Possibly forgery
e.g. if balance sheet is used to
facility
CH IL
Hightech components producer Weapons manufacturer Ministry of defence
$ $ $
Revenue 20 Salaries Suppliers Dividends Machines Swiss parent‘s bank account:
D&O culpability of senior group management May extend across borders (depending on ambits of responsibilities) Intervene against ML/bribery where known/taken into account Prevent corruption/compliance (where typical business risk) through appropriate compliance measures
Individual
enterprise through D&O culpability Individual
typical business risk Lack of appropriate compliance structures conducive to individual crime Punishment: fine up to CHF 5 M Result: serious impact on goodwill, possibly debarment etc.
Switzerland
CH IL
Hightech components producer Weapons manufacturer Ministry of defence
$ $ $
might be seized and as the case may be, forfeited and shared with CH authorities
individuals (gathering of evidence)
under Israeli law (for aiding and abetting, or ML), and for aiding and abetting under Swiss law
paying a purported agent, business consultant
agreements paying a real agent excessive commissions so that beyond fees for real services, he receives enough to bribe
13
Y AG (CH) OOO Y (RUS) Regional Govt. X
A B C D
Infrastructure contract 100%
Y AG (CH) OOO Fiction (RUS) OOO Y (RUS) Regional Govt. X
A B C D BVI-Account
Infrastructure contract 100%
Producer Distributor Distribution agreement Public hospital
Producer Distributor Owner of Distr. Distribution agreement Public hospital
Bank account CH
Producer Official Ministry of defence
Producer Distributor Official Ministry of defence 100 80
100%
Oil trading co. (CH) Oil ministry JV partner (X) 100 Oil 80
e.g. fictitious expenses, excessive hospitalities
Intermediary unnecessary Intermediary does not perform Intermediary controlled by bribe recipient (and as the case may be, required by same) Payment made to third country, and not where money would be needed to pay for performance Obfuscated accounting for
XYZ Business Advisors Ltd. P.O. Box 1234 Dubai, UAE ABC AG Musterstrasse 1 CH-0000 Traumhausen
For advisory on project „Big Blue“ USD 550,000.--
1234, YZX-Bank, BVI
Fee not agreed upon (Non-defined) surplus fee agreed upon Very large sales volumes to public entities at high prices Sales to public entities without due tender process Intermediary lacks appropriate qualification, experience, infrastructure Unclear indication of
Recommended or asked for by public client Payment to account in third country
Unusual payment methods asked for: Cash, into numbered account, to third parties, advance payment No detailed narrative provided (e.g. „for system integration“) Close relations (personal, family) with
Intermediary asks for refund of unusually high
expenses Contract lacking proper protections, hardly any documents re contract negotiation
Market price for real & legitimate services Integrity clause / audit rights / training Written agreement Ownership: (relationship with) public official? Integrity check: Reports on previous cases etc.? Requests for cash payments
Qualification check: Can he do it? Licenses, referrals, etc. Necessity check: Do I need him?
What exactly does agent do? What is actual performance, what is mere documentation of same? Define exactly in contract Benchmark internally. Rule of thumb starting point 2-5%, depending on contract value, then increase or decrease depending on service level External benchmarking possible? Avoid unusual on-top components (large bonuses or contingency fees etc.)
Document performance of agent If possible, book agreed upon fees and payments made redundantly, in
manipulations to facilitate excess payments, etc.
Contract value
Service Level 1 Service Level 2 Service Level 3 Service Level 4 Up to USD 10M Up to 2% Up to 5% Up to 8% Up to 10% USD 15M Up to 1,5% Up to 4% Up to 7% Up to 8% USD 30M Up to 1,25 % Up to 3% Up to 6% Up to 7% Over USD 50 Up to 1%, capped at USD 1M Up to 2%, capped at USD 1.5M Up to 5%, capped at USD 3M Up to 6%, capped at USD 4.5M
30
Intermediaries Training Code of Conduct HR policies Adaptation Monitoring Accounting controls Compliance-Organisation
31
Legal framework: what are we fighting agsainst? Individuelle Pflichten: Dos & Don‘ts Charitable and political contributions Accounting rules Individual duties and responsibilities; Dos & Don‘ts
32
Africa CIS Eastern Asia Middle East LatAm Italy/Greece Eastern Europe Turkey
33
34
35
Example Risk Matrix (for machine building business)
Risk criterion Risk criterion detail Threshold Low Med. High Country customer EU West EU East West Africa (etc.) Sector customer Public Private Industry customer Arms Building Oil & Gas etc. Intermedary/payment Per time unit Commission Content of assignment Delivery Maintenance Repair etc. Payment method &
From customer into account From third party Cash
36
37
Assess business risk systematically through analytical tools such as risk matrixes Requirement: Know business processes exactly, interview staff to such effect Document interviews and risk assessment activities in writing Update risk assessment at reasonable intervals, encompass and address risk of bypassing controls
Supplement through automatic risk monitoring (measuring, and observing development of, compliance indicators)
Compliance indicators can be created based on accounting data available e.g. in SAP E.g.: ratio of payments against invoice without approved contract vs. payments where invoice is based on approved contract Other possible indicators one can measure and monitor automatically:
Hard-to-trace payments (e.g. checks) Potential double payments Manual payments Payments from
accounts Payments to third countries etc.
41
Legal framework: what are we fighting agsainst? Individuelle Pflichten: Dos & Don‘ts Charitable and political contributions Accounting rules Individual duties and responsibilities; Dos & Don‘ts
42
Financial accounting reflects flow of funds between business and third parties Corrupt payments are usually backed by faked vouchers Accounting is a significant tool to avoid illegal payments How exactly?
43
No booking without legitimate voucher, report suspicious vouchers No slush funds, account for all assets No off-book transactions Limit use of cash
Purchase AG Manager Producer GmbH
CH account machines 150 50
letter: „excess payment of 50, pls. return “
45
Customer X Transport Ltd. Customs Black Box Customer CH
X
Import mandate Transportation mandates CASH CASH CASH
CH
Transport AG
46
processes, and define those processes
balances
General:
transactions possible
pair of eyes without interest in turnover
Payments: 4 eyes principle
47
Restrict access to IT:
Spot checks:
48
In case of suspicion, focused scrutiny Distance between controller and controlled 100% control impossible Spot checks and focused scrutiny have preventive effect Documentation!
Corruption correlates with ML AML regulation requires banks to identify transaction risks and as the case may be, conduct in-depth investigation Not a problem if bank participates in specific transaction, e.g. finances a project But what if e.g. bank grants general credit facility?
CH IL
Hightech components producer Weapons manufacturer Ministry of defence
$ $
Business in risk areas (region, industry)? Existing compliance organization (elaborate on structure, reporting lines and recruiting criteria)? Mission statement and code of conduct on anti-bribery? Rules on gifts, hospitalities, dealing with intermediaries and accounting (to counter fake entries and limit use of cash) in code of conduct or separate policies? Internal controls incl. 4-eyes and divided functions principles? Is anti-bribery a topic in internal audits? Are random tests being done? Is there intermediary vetting, what does the process look like? Intermediary agreements with integrity clauses and audit rights? Range of usual intermediary fees? How often does staff undergo training? Is there a whistleblowing policy?