Anisotropic Long Range Spin Systems Nicol` o Defenu Scuola - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

anisotropic long range spin systems
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Anisotropic Long Range Spin Systems Nicol` o Defenu Scuola - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Anisotropic Long Range Spin Systems Nicol` o Defenu Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste (Italy). ndefenu@sissa.it July 26, 2016 Nicol` o Defenu (SISSA) Functional RG July 26, 2016 1 / 21 Overview Long Range


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Anisotropic Long Range Spin Systems

Nicol`

  • Defenu

Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, Trieste (Italy). ndefenu@sissa.it

July 26, 2016

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 1 / 21

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

1

Long Range Interactions Spin systems

2

LR Spin Systems Traditional results Controversy Effective Dimension

3

The Anisotropic case Dimensional Analysis Three regimes Effective dimension Critical exponents

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 2 / 21

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Long range interacting systems.

1 rd+σ

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 3 / 21

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Spin Systems.

Why spin systems

spin systems are the testbed of statistical mechanics. Various Monte Carlo (MC) and perturbative results available. Diverse interesting physical problems in a single formalism.

Issues:

Phase diagram for diverse interaction shapes. Description of different symmetry groups. Description of high order critical points.

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 4 / 21

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Spin Systems

Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −J 2

  • ij

1 |i − j|d+σ SiSj

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 5 / 21

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Spin Systems

Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −J 2

  • ij

1 |i − j|d+σ SiSj

Mean Field Propagator

G(q)−1 = J(q) =

  • ddx J(i − j)eiq·(i−j)

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 5 / 21

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Spin Systems

Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −J 2

  • ij

1 |i − j|d+σ SiSj

Mean Field Propagator

G(q)−1 = J(q) =

  • ddx J(i − j)eiq·(i−j)

Leading momentum term

lim

q→0 G −1(q) ∝ qσ

if σ ≤ 2 lim

q→0 G −1(q) ∝ q2

if σ > 2

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 5 / 21

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Long range interactions in d dimensions

Traditional Results

Three regimes: 0 < σ < d/2 Mean field exponents (η = 2 − σ and ν = σ−1). d/2 < σ < 2 Long range exponents (η ≡ η(σ) and ν ≡ ν(σ)). σ > 2 Short range exponents (η = ηSR and ν = νSR).a

aM.E. Fisher et al. PRL 29,14 Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 6 / 21

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Long range interactions in d dimensions

Traditional Results

Three regimes: 0 < σ < d/2 Mean field exponents (η = 2 − σ and ν = σ−1). d/2 < σ < 2 Long range exponents (η ≡ η(σ) and ν ≡ ν(σ)). σ > 2 Short range exponents (η = ηSR and ν = νSR).a

aM.E. Fisher et al. PRL 29,14

Peculiar Long Range Behavior

Using ǫ-expansion technique with ǫ = 2σ − d or 1/N expansion is possible to calculate the critical exponent η. η = 2 − σ + O(ǫ3) Exact at any order in ǫ. η = 2 − σ for all σ < 2. Discontinuity in σ = 2.

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 6 / 21

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Removal of the discontinuity

Sak’s Results

The anomalous dimension cannot be less than ηSR, η = 2 − σ σ < σ∗ η = ηSR σ > σ∗ where σ∗ = 2 − ηSR. No discontinuity is present.

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 σ 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 d

M e a n F i e l d Long Range Short Range

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 7 / 21

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Removal of the discontinuity

Sak’s Results

The anomalous dimension cannot be less than ηSR, η = 2 − σ σ < σ∗ η = ηSR σ > σ∗ where σ∗ = 2 − ηSR. No discontinuity is present.

System regimes

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 σ 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 d

M e a n F i e l d Long Range Short Range

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 7 / 21

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Monte Carlo Results: Controversy

Luijte and Blotea results (2002) seemed to confirm Sak results, but new, more complete, results (2013)b question on Sak validity

  • aE. Luijte & H.W. Blote PRL 89, 025703
  • bM. Picco, arXiv:1207.1018

Figure: MC 2002

VS

Figure: MC 2013

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 8 / 21

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Effective Dimension

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy

ΦSR =

  • ddSRx
  • −Zkψ∆ψ + µψ2 + gψ4

+ · · · ΦLR =

  • ddLRx
  • −Zkψ∆

σ 2 ψ − Z2,kψ∆ψ + µψ2 + gψ4

+ · · ·

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 9 / 21

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Effective Dimension

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy

ΦSR =

  • ddSRx
  • −Zkψ∆ψ + µψ2 + gψ4

+ · · · ΦLR =

  • ddLRx
  • −Zkψ∆

σ 2 ψ − Z2,kψ∆ψ + µψ2 + gψ4

+ · · ·

Effective dimension results

Zk = Z2,k = 1 → dSR = 2dLR σ Z2,k = 1 → dLR = (2 − ηSR)dLR σ

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 9 / 21

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Qualitative Description

I Approximation Level: No anomalous dimension

dSR = 2dLR

σ : Exact N → ∞, Correct σ ranges, σ∗ = 2

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 10 / 21

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Qualitative Description

I Approximation Level: No anomalous dimension

dSR = 2dLR

σ : Exact N → ∞, Correct σ ranges, σ∗ = 2

II Approximation Level: Pure Long range case

dSR = (2−ηSR)dLR

σ

: Exact N → ∞, Correct σ ranges, σ∗ = 2 − ηSR

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 10 / 21

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Qualitative Description

I Approximation Level: No anomalous dimension

dSR = 2dLR

σ : Exact N → ∞, Correct σ ranges, σ∗ = 2

II Approximation Level: Pure Long range case

dSR = (2−ηSR)dLR

σ

: Exact N → ∞, Correct σ ranges, σ∗ = 2 − ηSR

III Approximation Level: Mixed theory space

Competition between Short and Long range fixed points: ✟✟

✟ ❍❍ ❍

dSR

Fixed Points Solutions and Stability

1 2 d 2

σ∗ 2 −2 −1 1 θ

d 2

σ∗ 2 ηSR 1 η2 0.8σ∗ 0.9σ∗ σ∗ 0.004 0.008 0.01 |νLR(d, σ) − 2

σνSR(Deff)|

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 10 / 21

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Quantitative Results

Short Range Corrections

Short Range corrections spoil dimensional equivalence. Small every- where but at σ ≃ σ∗.

Correlation Length Exponent

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

Σ 1 ΝLR

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6

Σ 1 ΝLR

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 11 / 21

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Anisotropic O(N) models.

Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −

  • i=j

J 2 SiSj rd1+σ

,ij

δ(r ⊥,ij) −

  • i=j

J⊥ 2 SiSj rd2+τ

⊥,ij

δ(r ,ij).

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 12 / 21

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Anisotropic O(N) models.

Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −

  • i=j

J 2 SiSj rd1+σ

,ij

δ(r ⊥,ij) −

  • i=j

J⊥ 2 SiSj rd2+τ

⊥,ij

δ(r ,ij).

Mean Field Propagator

lim

q→0 G(q)−1 = lim q→0 J(q) = Zqσ + Z⊥qτ ⊥ + µ + O(q2)

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 12 / 21

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Anisotropic O(N) models.

Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −

  • i=j

J 2 SiSj rd1+σ

,ij

δ(r ⊥,ij) −

  • i=j

J⊥ 2 SiSj rd2+τ

⊥,ij

δ(r ,ij).

Mean Field Propagator

lim

q→0 G(q)−1 = lim q→0 J(q) = Zqσ + Z⊥qτ ⊥ + µ + O(q2)

Effective field theory

  • ddx
  • −Z

2 φ(x)∆σ/2φ(x) − Z 2 φ(x)∆τ/2φ(x) + ... + U(φ(x))

  • Nicol`
  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 12 / 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Physical Realizations.

Quantum Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −J 2

  • i=j

σ(z)

i

σ(z)

j

|i − j|d+σ − h

  • i

σ(x)

i

,

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 13 / 21

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Physical Realizations.

Quantum Lattice Hamiltonian

H = −J 2

  • i=j

σ(z)

i

σ(z)

j

|i − j|d+σ − h

  • i

σ(x)

i

,

Mapping between Quantum LR and Anisotropic LR

σi → Si d1 = d d2 = z σ = σ τ = 2. The Quantum LR Ising is obtained for z = 1

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 13 / 21

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Critical Behavior

Asymptotic propagators

G(q1, q1) ≈ q−σ+ησ

1

G(1, q2q−θ

1 ) ≈ q−τ+ητ 2

G(q1q

− 1

θ

2

, 1)

Correlation Lengths

ξ ≈ |T − Tc|−ν1 ξ⊥ ≈ |T − Tc|−ν2,

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 14 / 21

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Critical Behavior

Asymptotic propagators

G(q1, q1) ≈ q−σ+ησ

1

G(1, q2q−θ

1 ) ≈ q−τ+ητ 2

G(q1q

− 1

θ

2

, 1)

Correlation Lengths

ξ ≈ |T − Tc|−ν1 ξ⊥ ≈ |T − Tc|−ν2,

Anisotropy index

σ − ησ τ − ητ = ν2 ν1 = θ.

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 14 / 21

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Critical Behavior

Asymptotic propagators

G(q1, q1) ≈ q−σ+ησ

1

G(1, q2q−θ

1 ) ≈ q−τ+ητ 2

G(q1q

− 1

θ

2

, 1)

Correlation Lengths

ξ ≈ |T − Tc|−ν1 ξ⊥ ≈ |T − Tc|−ν2,

Anisotropy index

σ − ησ τ − ητ = ν2 ν1 = θ.

Mean field Results

ησ = ητ = 0, ν1 = σ−1, ν2 = τ −1.

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 14 / 21

slide-27
SLIDE 27

System regimes

Mean Field Regions

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

σ

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

τ

I IIa IIb III

1 2

τ

1 2 3

z

MF WF

Three regimes

Region I: Anisotropic pure LR system (σ < σ∗ and τ < τ∗). Region II a\b: Anisotropic S-LR system (σ < σ∗ and τ > τ∗). Region III: Isotropic SR system (σ > σ∗ and τ > τ∗).

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 15 / 21

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Effective Dimension

In region I the system is equivalent to an isotropic LR one

D = d1 + θd2, θ = σ τ .

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 16 / 21

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Effective Dimension

In region I the system is equivalent to an isotropic LR one

D = d1 + θd2, θ = σ τ .

Exact in the spherical limit

ν1 = τ τd1 + σd2 − τσ, ν2 = σ τd1 + σd2 − τσ.

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 16 / 21

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Effective Dimension

In region I the system is equivalent to an isotropic LR one

D = d1 + θd2, θ = σ τ .

Exact in the spherical limit

ν1 = τ τd1 + σd2 − τσ, ν2 = σ τd1 + σd2 − τσ.

Independent confirmation: the spherical ANNNI model

ν1 = L (d1 − 2)L + d2 , ν2 = 1 (d1 − 2)L + d2 .

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 16 / 21

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Anomalous Dimension results

Anomalous dimension in the three regimes

Region I: η1 = 2 − σ and η2 = 2 − τ (ησ = ητ = 0). Region II a\b: η1 = η(τ) and η2 = 2 − τ Region III: η1 = η2 = ηSR

Anomalous dimension of the SR term in region II

0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

τ

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25

η d1 = d2 = 1

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

τ

0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05

η d1 = 1(2) and d2 = 2(1)

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 17 / 21

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Correlation length exponent

Region I: Anisotropic pure LR system.

Deff = d1+θd2: Exact for N → ∞. σ∗ = 2−η(τ) and τ ∗ = 2−η(σ)

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 18 / 21

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Correlation length exponent

Region I: Anisotropic pure LR system.

Deff = d1+θd2: Exact for N → ∞. σ∗ = 2−η(τ) and τ ∗ = 2−η(σ)

Region II: Anisotropic mixed S-LR region.

Deff = d1 + θd2: Exact for N → ∞. τ ∗ = 2 − ηSR. θ = 2−η(τ)

τ

.

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 18 / 21

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Correlation length exponent

Region I: Anisotropic pure LR system.

Deff = d1+θd2: Exact for N → ∞. σ∗ = 2−η(τ) and τ ∗ = 2−η(σ)

Region II: Anisotropic mixed S-LR region.

Deff = d1 + θd2: Exact for N → ∞. τ ∗ = 2 − ηSR. θ = 2−η(τ)

τ

.

Region III: Isotropic SR case.

Universality class of an isotropic SR system in dimension d = d1 +d2.

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 18 / 21

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Correlation length exponent

Region I: Anisotropic pure LR system.

Deff = d1+θd2: Exact for N → ∞. σ∗ = 2−η(τ) and τ ∗ = 2−η(σ)

Region II: Anisotropic mixed S-LR region.

Deff = d1 + θd2: Exact for N → ∞. τ ∗ = 2 − ηSR. θ = 2−η(τ)

τ

.

Region III: Isotropic SR case.

Universality class of an isotropic SR system in dimension d = d1 +d2.

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

σ

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

τ

IMF I II MF II a II MF II b III

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

σ

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

τ

IMF I II MF II a II b III

1.95 1.96 1.97 1.94 1.95 1.96 1.97 Border region

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 18 / 21

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Correlation length exponent

Short Range Corrections

Short Range corrections spoil dimensional equivalence. Small every- where but close to the boundaries.

Correlation Length Exponent

1 2 1 2 ν−1

2 σ = 0.4 σ = 0.8 σ = 1.2 σ = 1.6 σ > 2.0

1 2 τ 1 2 ν−1

1

(c) N = 1

1 2 1 2 ν−1

2 σ = 0.4 σ = 0.8 σ = 1.2 σ = 1.6 σ > 2.0

1 2 τ 1 2 ν−1

1

(d) N = 2

1 2 1 2 ν−1

2 σ = 0.4 σ = 0.8 σ = 1.2 σ = 1.6 σ > 2.00

1 2 τ 1 2 ν−1

1

(e) N = 3

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 19 / 21

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Acknowledgements

Resident Advisors: Andrea Trombettoni & Stefano Ruffo External Advisor: Alessandro Codello

ndefenu@sissa.it

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 20 / 21

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Thank You

Nicol`

  • Defenu (SISSA)

Functional RG July 26, 2016 21 / 21