and Reducing Overuse Task Force on Low-Value Care April 27, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

and reducing overuse
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

and Reducing Overuse Task Force on Low-Value Care April 27, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Defining, Measuring, and Reducing Overuse Task Force on Low-Value Care April 27, 2017 Outline Defining waste (and its several varieties) (1) Significance of waste and overuse (2) Examples of overuse (3) Reducing overuse: what works? (4)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Defining, Measuring, and Reducing Overuse

Task Force on Low-Value Care April 27, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

Defining waste (and its several varieties) Significance of waste and overuse Examples of overuse Reducing overuse: what works?

2

(1) (2) (3) (4)

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • OECD:
  • Services and processes that are either harmful or do not

deliver benefits

  • Costs that could be avoided by substituting less

expensive alternatives with identical or better benefits

  • OECD. Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.

3

On Waste

DEFINING WASTE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Administrative Waste

  • Complexity
  • Transactions-related
  • Benefit management
  • Sales/marketing
  • Compliance
  • Fraud
  • Pricing failures

4

Bentley TGK, Effros RM, Palar K, Keeler EB. Waste in the U.S. Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework. Milbank Q. 2008;86(4):629-659.

  • OECD. Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.

A Taxonomy of Waste

DEFINING WASTE

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Administrative Waste Operational Waste

  • Complexity
  • Transactions-related
  • Benefit management
  • Sales/marketing
  • Compliance
  • Fraud
  • Pricing failures
  • Inefficiencies in care

delivery

  • Unduly expensive inputs
  • Errors
  • Duplicative services

5

Bentley TGK, Effros RM, Palar K, Keeler EB. Waste in the U.S. Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework. Milbank Q. 2008;86(4):629-659.

  • OECD. Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.

A Taxonomy of Waste

DEFINING WASTE

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Administrative Waste Operational Waste

  • Complexity
  • Transactions-

related

  • Benefit

management

  • Sales/marketing
  • Compliance
  • Fraud
  • Pricing failures
  • Inefficiencies in care

delivery

  • Unduly expensive

inputs

  • Errors
  • Duplicative services

Clinical Waste

  • Care that does not

deliver net benefit (overtreatment)

  • Care that offers no

benefit over less costly alternatives

  • Care that delivers

benefit, but does not meet standards of cost-effectiveness

6

Bentley TGK, Effros RM, Palar K, Keeler EB. Waste in the U.S. Health Care System: A Conceptual Framework. Milbank Q. 2008;86(4):629-659.

  • OECD. Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.

A Taxonomy of Waste

DEFINING WASTE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Waste Clinical Waste Overuse

Clinical Waste

  • Care that does not

deliver net benefit (overtreatment)

  • Care that offers no

benefit over less costly alternatives

  • Care that delivers

benefit, but does not meet standards of cost-effectiveness

Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating Waste in US Health Care. JAMA. 2012;307(14):1513-1516.

7

A Taxonomy of Waste

DEFINING WASTE

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Waste Clinical Waste

(a) Overuse

  • f testing

(b) Overuse of treatment (c) Treatment of over- diagnosed disease

Morgan DJ, Dhruva SS, Wright SM, Korenstein D. 2016 update on medical overuse: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(11):1687-1692.

8

A Taxonomy of Waste

DEFINING WASTE

Overuse

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Societal-level estimates can be drawn by

extrapolating from:

  • Comparisons with peer countries
  • Variation in patterns of practice across regions
  • Domain-specific expert opinion
  • Person-level claims/encounter data
  • Person-level medical record review

Approaches to Estimating Waste

SIGNIFICANCE

9

The Healthcare Imperative: Lowering Costs and Improving Outcomes: Workshop Series Summary. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2010.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating Waste in US Health Care. JAMA. 2012;307(14):1513-1516.

10

Cost of Waste

SIGNIFICANCE

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating Waste in US Health Care. JAMA. 2012;307(14):1513-1516.

11

Cost of Waste

SIGNIFICANCE

slide-12
SLIDE 12

PSA Testing in Men 75+

EXAMPLES OF OVERUSE

12

US Preventive Services Task Force. Final Recommendation Statement: Prostate Cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/prostate-cancer-screening.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Percent of Male Medicare FFS Beneficiaries Age 75+ With Screening PSA Test (2014) National Average: 18.2%

PSA Testing in Men 75+

EXAMPLES OF OVERUSE

13

Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Screening PSA Tests. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/data/topic/topic.aspx?cat=72. US Preventive Services Task Force. Final Recommendation Statement: Prostate Cancer: Screening. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/prostate-cancer-screening.

% % %

slide-14
SLIDE 14

20% 28% 34% 36% 41% 42% 46% 48% 49% 51% 56% 62% 64% 66% 67% 73% 74% 75% 78% 83% 84% 85% 87% 91% 97% 80% 72% 66% 64% 59% 58% 54% 52% 51% 49% 44% 38% 36% 34% 34% 27% 26% 25% 22% 17% 16% 15% 13% 9% 3%

25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

VA System

Adherence to Colonoscopy Interval Guidelines in 25 VA Systems

Share of Patients with Guideline-Concordant Care Share of Patients with Care Not Guideline-Concordant

Screened Too Soon (95%)

Colonoscopy

EXAMPLES OF OVERUSE

14

Johnson MR, Grubber J, Grambow SC, Maciejewski ML, Dunn-Thomas T, Provenzale D, Fisher DA. Physician non-adherence to colonoscopy interval guidelines in the veterans affairs healthcare system. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(4):938-951.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Distribution Of Cesarean Rates in US Hospitals Among Lower-Risk Pregnancies (2009)

Cesarean Sections

EXAMPLES OF OVERUSE

15

Kozhimannil KB, Law MR, Virnig BA. Cesarean Delivery Rates Vary Tenfold Among US Hospitals; Reducing Variation May Address Quality and Cost Issues. Health Aff. 2013;32(3):527-535.

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Launched in 2012
  • 75 partnering specialty

societies

  • 490 service-specific

recommendations

Low-Value Lists

MEASURING OVERUSE

16

American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation, Consumer Reports. Choosing Wisely Infographic. http://www.choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Choosing-Wisely-Infographic-Update0317.pdf. Published April 2017.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Milliman and VBID Health. MedInsight Health Waste Calculator. http://vbidhealth.com/docs/Health-Waste%20Calculator-VBID.pdf

18

Health Waste Calculator

MEASURING OVERUSE

slide-19
SLIDE 19

9.6% 23.0% 14% 38%

Commercial Peds (2014) Commercial Adults (2013) Medicare FFS (2013)

Share of Population Receiving 1+ Choosing Wisely (or Similar) Service, Per Year

More Specific More Sensitive 11.4%

Receipt of Select Overused Services

MEASURING OVERUSE

19

Charlesworth CJ, Meath THA, Schwartz AL, McConnell KJ. Comparison of Low-Value Care in Medicaid vs Commercially Insured Populations. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(7):998-1004. Chua K-P, Schwartz AL, Volerman A, Conti RM, Huang ES. Use of Low-Value Pediatric Services Among the Commercially Insured. Pediatrics. November 2016:e20161809. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program: A Data Book.; 2016. http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/data-book/ june-2016-data-book-health-care-spending-and-the-medicare-program.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Accessed April 11, 2017.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

$2.6 $7.1

Medicare FFS (2013)

Population-Level Cost of Choosing Wisely (or Similar) Services, Per Year (Billions)

More Specific More Sensitive 20

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program: A Data Book.; 2016. http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/data-book/ june-2016-data-book-health-care-spending-and-the-medicare-program.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Accessed April 11, 2017.

Cost of Select Overused Services

MEASURING OVERUSE

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Schwartz AL, Zaslavsky AM, Landon BE, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM. Low-Value Service Use in Provider Organizations. Health Serv Res. November 2016.

100 200 300 400 500

21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 102 105

Number of Provider Organizations Low-Value Services per 100 Medicare Beneficiaries

Distribution of Provider Organizations by Count of Low-Value Services Delivered per Medicare Beneficiary Per Year

20 40 50 60 80 100 90 70 30

Variation in Tendency to Overuse

MEASURING OVERUSE

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Errors and Sub-optimal Decision- Making Poor Organization and Coordination Poor Incentives for Providers and Consumers Intentional Deception

Unintentional Deliberate 23

  • OECD. Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.

Root Causes of Waste

ADDRESSING OVERUSE

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Provider-Facing Interventions (Supply) Incentives P4P Prior authorization Risk sharing (ACOs, bundles, etc.) Information Clinical decision support Clinician education Clinician feedback Patient-Facing Interventions (Demand) Incentives Cost-sharing Value-based Insurance Design (V-BID) Information Patient education Provider report cards

Interventions

ADDRESSING OVERUSE

24

Colla CH. Swimming against the Current — What Might Work to Reduce Low-Value Care? New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;371(14):1280-1283.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Intervention Choosing Wisely Campaign Population 29 million commercially insured Americans Measures Use of x-ray, MR, and CT imaging associated with visits for low-back pain Key Findings

  • Significant 1 percentage point reduction in low-value imaging (4%

decrease)

  • No significant impact of enrollment in HDHP on receipt of imaging

Notes

  • Rate of high-value imaging unchanged

Choosing Wisely Campaign

ADDRESSING OVERUSE

25

Hong AS, Ross-Degnan D, Zhang F, Wharam JF. Small Decline In Low-Value Back Imaging Associated With The “Choosing Wisely” Campaign, 2012–14. Health Aff. 2017;36(4):671-679.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Choosing Wisely Campaign

ADDRESSING OVERUSE

26

Hong AS, Ross-Degnan D, Zhang F, Wharam JF. Small Decline In Low-Value Back Imaging Associated With The “Choosing Wisely” Campaign, 2012–14. Health Aff. 2017;36(4):671-679.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

$10,301 $9,842

$- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000

Baseline (2009-2011) Pioneer Y1 (2012) Differential Change in Spending on Low-Value Services Per 100 Beneficiaries

Intervention Pioneer ACO participation Population Medicare FFS beneficiaries Measures 31 claims-based measures of CW-type services Key Findings Significant differential reductions of:

  • 1.9% in number of low-value services
  • 4.5% in spending on low-value

services Notes

  • Larger reductions among ACOs with

historically high rates of low-value care

Pioneer ACO Program

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: SUPPLY

27

Schwartz AL, Chernew ME, Landon BE, McWilliams JM. Changes in Low-Value Services in Year 1 of the Medicare Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Program. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(11):1815-1825.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Decision Support in EHR

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: SUPPLY

28

Weingarten S. Evidence Based Medicine. Published March 17, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMo0YEYVo4w. Weingarten S. Reducing Unnecessary Tests and Treatments via E-Alerts at Cedars-Sinai. https://www.hfma.org/leadership/choosingwisely/. Published January 27, 2015.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Intervention Alerts in EHR for 180 Choosing Wisely services Population Patients of Cedars Sinai Measures Ordering of CW services Key Findings

  • ~300 alerts displayed/day
  • Acceptance of alerts ranges

from 8%-27%

  • $3M+ year in averted costs

Notes

  • Alignment with ACO efforts
  • 13%
  • 14%
  • 17%
  • 18%
  • 32%
  • 35%
  • 30%
  • 25%
  • 20%
  • 15%
  • 10%
  • 5%

0%

Opioid/Butalbital in Migraine Vitamin D Screening RBC Units in Transusions Antispychotics in Dementia Benzodiazepines for Pts 65+

Changes in Ordering Associated with Implementation of Decision Support

Opioid/Butalbital in Migraine Vitamin D Screening RBC Units in Transfusions Antipsychotics in Dementia Benzodiazepines for Patients 65+

Decision Support in EHR

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: SUPPLY

29

Weingarten S. Evidence Based Medicine. Published March 17, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMo0YEYVo4w. Weingarten S. Reducing Unnecessary Tests and Treatments via E-Alerts at Cedars-Sinai. https://www.hfma.org/leadership/choosingwisely/. Published January 27, 2015.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

17 20 55 42 35 26 34 73 61 59

20 40 60 80

Total Calcium Ionized Calcium Chloride Magnesium Phosphorus

Tests Ordered/1,000 Patient Days Pre Post

Intervention

  • Education on appropriate use of five

frequently overused laboratory tests

  • Financial incentive ($400) for

residents tied to appropriate use Setting Large academic medical center Measures Laboratory tests ordered Key Findings

  • 47% reduction in ordering for

targeted tests

  • 47% reduction in billable charges

Notes

  • No comparison group

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: SUPPLY

Incentives for Residents

30

Han SJ, Saigal R, Rolston JD, Cheng JS, Lau CY, Mistry RI, McDermott MW, Berger MS. Targeted Reduction in Neuro-surgical Laboratory Utilization: Resident-Led Effort at a Single Academic Institution. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(1):173-177.

Tests Ordered/1,000 Patient Days

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • V-BID works

for high-value services

  • Little literature

assessing V-BID for low-value services

Clinically Nuanced Cost-Sharing

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: DEMAND

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Intervention

  • Increase from $0 copay to $25 copay

for specialty care office visits

  • $0 cost-share for primary care

unchanged Population Employees of Mayo Clinic Measures Use of specialty visits, imaging, and

  • utpatient procedures

Key Findings

  • Double-digit decreases in utilization

sustained after four years Notes

  • No increase in primary care visits
  • 27%
  • 16%
  • 22%
  • 30%
  • 25%
  • 20%
  • 15%
  • 10%
  • 5%

0%

Specialty OVs Imaging Procedures

Observed Changes in Utilization Relative to Expected Changes

(Somewhat) Nuanced Cost-Sharing

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: DEMAND

32

Shah ND, Naessens JM, Wood DL, Stroebel RJ, Litchy W, Wagie A, Fan J, Nesse R. Mayo Clinic Employees Responded To New Requirements For Cost Sharing By Reducing Possibly Unneeded Health Services Use. Health Affairs. 2011;30(11):2134-2141.

Specialty Office Visits Imaging Procedures

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Intervention Contact with coaches offering shared decision making Population Patients with any of 6 preference- sensitive conditions Measures Claims Key Findings Significant reductions in:

  • Total spend (5.3%)
  • Inpatient spend (12.5%)
  • Preference-sensitive surgeries (9.9%)

Notes

  • Randomized trial

$5,233 $4,953

$- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000

Usual Care Enhanced Support

Annual Medical Costs

Shared Decision Making

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: DEMAND

33

Veroff D, Marr A, Wennberg DE. Enhanced Support For Shared Decision Making Reduced Costs Of Care For Patients With Preference-Sensitive Conditions. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):285-293.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Intervention Exposure to messaging on low-value care Population Survey panel Measures Preferences for hypothetical clinician Key Findings Only one message – emphasizing threat of harm from overuse – led to statistically significant changes in preferences Notes

  • Most effective messages emphasize

benefits to individual, not benefit to society

  • Related question found no significant

changes in mock clinician choice

35% 39% 46% 41%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%

Type of Messaging Presented

Prefer Clinician Who Avoids Low-Value Care (Percent)

Informing Clinician Choice

ADDRESSING OVERUSE: DEMAND

34

Schlesinger M, Grob R. Treating, Fast and Slow: Americans’ Understanding of and Responses to Low-Value Care. The Milbank Quarterly. 2017;95(1):70-116. .

slide-35
SLIDE 35

ADDRESSING OVERUSE

35

MacColl Center for Health Care Innovation Taking Action on Overuse Framework https://takingactiononoveruse.org National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions Choosing Wisely Employer Toolkit http://www.nationalalliancehealth .org/choosing-wisely-employer- toolkit American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation/Consumer Reports Choosing Wisely Resource Directory http://www.choosingwisely.org/re sources Washington Health Alliance Statewide Choosing Wisely Task Force http://wahealthalliance.org/allianc e-reports-websites/choosing- wisely/washington-state-choosing- wisely-task-force/

A Few Resources