Team: IIT Madras 440000 new cases of Multiple Drug Resistant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Team: IIT Madras 440000 new cases of Multiple Drug Resistant - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Team: IIT Madras 440000 new cases of Multiple Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Overuse of Antibiotics Cattle/Poultry Feed Prescriptions Antibiotic resistance genes in research RIP RIP Selects for Selection against transformants non
440000 new cases of Multiple Drug Resistant Tuberculosis
Overuse of Antibiotics
- Cattle/Poultry Feed
- Prescriptions
Antibiotic resistance genes in research
RIP RIP
Selection against non‐ transformants
- Antibiotic Resistance
Genes
- Risk of Horizontal
Gene Transfer
Selects for transformants
- Metabolic Selection
Markers
Project Sunscreen
P R P R P R H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ + ATP Retinal Retinal ATP Synthase
Project Artemis
Electron Transport Chain H+ H+ H+ H+ Glycolysis Carbon Source ATP ATP Synthase
Electron Transport Chain H+ P R P R P R H+ H+ H+ H+ H+ Glycolysis + Carbon Source ATP Retinal Retinal ATP Synthase
Recombinant Protein
BBa_K572005 Proteorhodopsin Coding Gene BBa_K572005 BBa_B0034 BBa_B0015 BBa_K572006 Proteorhodopsin Generator BBa_K572005 BBa_B0034 BBa_B0015 T7 Promoter BBa_K572007 IPTG induced Proteorhodopsin Generator (pET vector) BBa_K572005 BBa_B0034 BBa_J23119 BBa_B0015 BBa_K572008 Constitutive Proteorhodopsin Generator
Range of Tm, %GC and Length
INPUTS
OUTPUTS Number and positions of Mutations Protein sequence Primer sequence Tm and GC content Common primer for mutation sites closer than 20bp
PRIMER TOOL PRIMER TOOL
BBa_K572009 Mouse Beta‐Carotene Dioxygenase Coding Gene BBa_K572009 BBa_B0034 BBa_B0015 Dioxygenase Generator BBa_K572009 BBa_B0034 BBa_J23119 BBa_B0015
CrtEBIY
Retinal Biosynthesis
β‐Diox
BBa_K274210: Endogenous synthesis of beta‐carotene BBa_K572009: Mouse Beta Carotene Dioxygenase converts beta carotene to Trans‐Retinal Retinal with PR in presence
- f light helps in development
- f proton gradient
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
IPTG+ Light‐ IPTG+ Light+
Relative number of CFUs Azide Negative Samples Azide Treated Samples
K572005 Over Expression of GPR in DH5α
.
15% SDS PAGE gel showing the IPTG induction of PR expression
Time after induction
28kDA K572005 Functional Studies ‐ AzideTest
.
P S X E
BBa_K572100
Proteorhodopsin
BBa_K572005
Backbone of pSB1C3, without Chloramphenicol Resistance Gene
*Adam M Feist et al 2007, A genome‐scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K‐12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information, Molecular Systems Biology ** Walter et al 2006, “Light empowering Escherichia coli with proteorhodpsin”, PNAS
SBML*
- Quantification of Proton flux through proteorhodopsin
- E.coli genome scale model extended to include proteorhodopsin
COBRA
- Constraint based Reconstruction and Analysis
- Objective function optimization (Flux)
Model
- Simulations to validate network using experimental data
Analysis
- Comparative analysis of increase in growth rate in proteorhodopsin transformed
cells
Hypothesis: Increase in growth rate due to Proteorhodopsin proton efflux in minimal carbon media
Simulation of published experimental data for model validation
Jessica M. Walter et al 2006, Light‐powering Escherichia coli with proteorhodopsin, PNAS) “Light‐driven pumping by PR can fully replace respiration as a cellular energy source in some environmental conditions”
20 40 60 80 100 120 5 10 15
% Increase in growth rate Glucose uptake flux (in mmol/ g‐dw hr)
Complete Inhibition of ETC in presence of azide
5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15
% Increase In growth rate Glucose uptake flux (in mmol/g‐dw hr)
70% Inhibition of ETC in presence of azide
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 5 10 15
% Increase in growth rate Glucose uptake flux ( in mmol/g‐dw hr)
Comparative analysis of increase in growth rate in proteorhodopsin transformed cells
Growth rate advantage due to PR
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 2 4 6 8 10 Cell concentration (g/l) Time (Hour)
Control Growth Profiles (DH5α)
LB 0.2 g/l 0.4 g/l 1 g/l 3 g/l 5 g/l 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 2 4 6 8 Specific growth rate (Hour ‐1) time(hour)
Comparison of rate of change of specific growth rate in LB
IPTG Induced PR+pET41a in LB PR+pET41a Control in LB y = 9.1994e‐0.711x R² = 0.9836 y = 4.2768e‐0.551x R² = 0.9881 1 2 3 2 4 6 8 Specific Growth rate (Hour‐1) Time (Hour)
Comparison of specific growth rate in M9 media
IPTG Induced5g/l M9 media 5g/l M9 media Control
BBa_K081014/mRFP1 gen BBa_K118011 (PcstA) Carbon Stress Induced Promoter
BBa_K572001 : Carbon Stress Response Indicator
Substrate Availability
Time Bba_K572001
525 nm 584 nm
Wavelength
RFP GPR
Absorption Spectrum
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 2 4 6 8 RLU/OD600 Time (Hours)
RFP Expression
0.02 0.1 0.5 LB LB+0.2
As viewed under a fluorescence microscope, RFP being expressed in DH5α with PcstA promoter
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 4 6 8 10 OD600 Time (Hours)
Growth Profile
0.02 0.1 0.5 LB LB+0.2
P S X E
BBa_K572200
Proteorhodopsin
BBa_K572005
Backbone of pSB1C3, without Chloramphenicol Resistance Gene
pSB1Pe – Expression Vector
PcstA
Kwang‐Hwan "Kevin" Jung, Ph.D., Associate Professor,
Department of Life Science and Institute of Biological Interfaces, Sogang University, Korea for sending us the plasmid (pKJ900) with proteorhodopsin gene.
Prof. Karthik Raman of IIT Madras who helped our team
in efficient modelling of our Project
Mr. Shrikumar Suryanarayan, Adjunct Professor, IITM, for
his financial assistance and encouragement
Prof. K B Ramachandran and Prof. Mukesh Doble,
Department of Biotechnology IIT Madras for their constant support and encouragement
IITM and IITMAA(IITM Alumini Association) for their
financial support