An Intensive Medical Home for Patients with Chronic Disease
Presented to the National Academy of Medicine’s Value Incentives and Systems Innovation Collaborative meeting December 18th, 2017 Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF, FACG
An Intensive Medical Home for Patients with Chronic Disease - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
An Intensive Medical Home for Patients with Chronic Disease Presented to the National Academy of Medicines Value Incentives and Systems Innovation Collaborative meeting December 18 th , 2017 Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF, FACG Why
Presented to the National Academy of Medicine’s Value Incentives and Systems Innovation Collaborative meeting December 18th, 2017 Lawrence R. Kosinski, MD, MBA, AGAF, FACG
the 30 days prior to inpatient admission
Physicians
Assessments Patients
Tools
Manager Data Data
Jan 2012
Began meeting with BCBSIL to obtain cost data on Crohn’s
May 2012
Received large database from BCBSIL with cost data on 21,000 patients
July 2012
Began developing CDS tools and patient engagement tools
Jan 2013
Deployed Project Sonar on 50 LK patients
Mar 2013
Presented concept
BCBSIL
Data Analysis Jan 2014
Early Data showing decrease in hospitalization
Oct 2013
Meeting at BCBSIL to discuss structure and data
Feb 2014
LOI signed between BCBSIL and IGG
Apr 2014
Final Agreement signed with BCBS
Mar 2014
Meeting with Takeda to discuss data
Sep 2014
Final patient attribution list provided Patient Enrollment
Dec 2014
Go live on financial shared savings period
Dec 2014
Financial Data available
AGA Crohn’s Disease Care Pathway Aug 2014
AGA Crohn’s Dis Care Pathway published
Project Sonar Testing Live June 2015
Agreement signed with Takeda and Xcenda to validate platform
June 2015
SonarMD Web APP/Platform Deployed
Practice and SonarMD receive Attribution List
Practice receives Payment
Practice receives PMPM Payment
SonarMD receives monthly claims data and provides Data Analytics to Practices
The payer attributes the patient with the chronic disease The practice engages the patient
Care Manager
visit if indicated
patient quarterly
The patient undergoes an enrollment visit which includes:
Enrollment in SonarMD Platform
Patient receives text message with secure hyperlink Patient completes disease specific questionnaire Sonar Score is calculated by platform Immediate feedback is provided to the patient Sonar Score is sent to NCM NCM interprets score based upon algorithm NCM communicates with provider if necessary
Payer provides quarterly claims data to SonarMD SonarMD provides performance reports to practice
provider and NCM
provider and NCM
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Inf Burden Risk ESR Comorbidity Risk Perianal Abcess Inf Burden Risk Localized Tenderness Dis Burden Risk Perianal Disease Dis Burden Risk Ulcers Inf Burden Risk Cutaneous Signs Inf Burden Risk Fever Inf Burden GI Bleeding Comorbidity Risk Abcess Inf Burden Risk Anemia Dis Burden Risk Stricturing Comorbidity Risk Prior Surgery Comorbidity Risk Advanced Medical Therapy
Risk Factors
Cost Factor
Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) CDAI = Sum(2S+5P+7G+20ΣC+30D)* Algorithm for automated responses drives behavior
What patients tell you (subjective) is different from what really happens (objective) reporting Portal response rate 27% and application response rate 80%
*S = number of liquid or soft stools each day for 7 days; P = abdominal pain (graded from 0–3 on severity) each day for 7 days; G = general well being, subjectively assessed from 0 (well) to 4 (terrible) each day for 7 days; C = presence of complications, 1 point each for each set of complications; D = taking Lomotil or opiates for diarrhea.
Proprietary
Develop the Algorithm Develop Predictive Analytics Assess the Risks Manage the Care Analyze the Payer Data
Engage the Patient
8.97%
Percentage Change From Baseline
Total Inpatient Emergency Department Infusable Biologics Injectable Biologics
“To date, we see medical savings trending at $6,000 for each “pinger”—patients using the technology—compared with other patients. This rate has resulted in almost $500,000 in savings for the 81 pingers in the initial program.” HFMA Journal February 2017: Care Not Just for Primary Care Practices See more at: http://www.hfma.org/Leadership/Share_Your_Story_Blog/2017/February/Value-B ased Care Not Just for Primary Care Practices
All Services Total Control Study Pingers Nonpingers Savings against Control Savings % Patients 1049 864 185 111 74 Inpatient Cost 1,476,937.77 $ 1,261,079.67 $ 215,858.10 $ 77,949.06 $ 137,909.04 $ Inpatient Cost/PT 1,407.95 $ 1,459.58 $ 1,166.80 $ 702.24 $ 1,863.64 $ (757.34) $
Total Outpatient Cost 6,096,846.84 $ 5,073,329.16 $ 881,270.68 $ 517,382.29 $ 500,344.39 $ OPT Cost per patient 5,812.06 $ 5,871.91 $ 4,763.63 $ 4,661.10 $ 6,761.41 $ (1,210.81) $
Total Savings 7,331.49 $ (1,968.15) $
Study Matched Control Savings
Metrics
2016 2016
Patients Count 185 864 % of Male 47.6% 45.0% Patient Age 46 46 Concurrent Risk Score, First Quarter 2016 2.868 2.703 Concurrent Risk Score, Whole Year 2016 2.635 2.925 Crohn's Related Services Inpatient Cost $94,122 $887,381 Inpatient Cost/PT $509 $1,027 ($518.29) Total Outpatient Cost $358,813 $2,209,751 Outpatient Cost/PT $1,940 $2,558 ($618.05)
43 year old female with Crohn’s Ileocolitis 2011: Stable on medical therapy but desired pregnancy
2013: Placed on Pilot of Project Sonar August 2014: Disease Flare – Detected by Rising Sonar Scores
Diagnosed
Improvement
April 2015:Rising Sonar Score/Persistent symptoms
June 2015: Poor response to Humira
Sept 2015 Persistently high Sonar Scores
Stabilized Sonar Scores
Announcement: The Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) has completed its two-day public meeting to deliberate and vote on three proposals for physician-focused payment models. The full Committee voted to make the following recommendations to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS):
for limited-scale testing
Disease and Critical Care Consultants Medical Group Inc. (PMA): do not recommend
for limited scale testing The next step is for PTAC to draft its report to the Secretary transmitting its recommendations and rationales for those recommendations. The Secretary will post his response to PTAC’s recommendations
Provider
Improved Symptoms Less loss work/school Fewer complications Improved overall wellbeing Enters the Value Space Generates more revenue Improves Patient Care Becomes part of the solution Controls Cost/Risk Partners with Providers Bonds with Patients Differentiates from the competition