An Impact Perspective Labels, Standards & Certifications Lynne - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an impact perspective
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An Impact Perspective Labels, Standards & Certifications Lynne - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Impact Perspective Labels, Standards & Certifications Lynne Olson, Ph.D. The Problem Which is more sustainable? Made from a renewable made of polyethylene, a most commonly made petroleum-based resource resource (trees) from


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An Impact Perspective

Labels, Standards & Certifications

Lynne Olson, Ph.D.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

 most commonly made

from cotton (fossil-fuel- intensive)

 cotton growers use

more than 10 percent

  • f the world's

pesticides and nearly 25 percent of the world's insecticides

 most are woven outside

the U.S. where labor is less costly

 Increased fossil fuels in

transportation

 %#*&!, forgot it again…  made of polyethylene, a

petroleum-based resource

 consumes 40% less energy to

produce than paper.

 generates 80% less solid

waste than paper bags

 can take 1,000 years to

decompose

 fewer than 5% of plastic bags

are recycled

 60 to 80 percent of ocean

debris is plastic - poisoning or strangling marine life

 Made from a renewable

resource (trees)

 hold twice the contents of

most plastic bags

 takes about a month to

decompose

 21% of paper bags are

currently recycled

Credit: Tim Smith, Ph.D. UMN (NorthStar

Initiative for Sustainable Enterprise)

The Problem

Which is more sustainable?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Solution

Purchasing Framework Guide purchasing decisions that:

  • Have an positive impact on the facility
  • Are measureable & comparable
  • Accessible and “simple”
  • Strategic (address the important stuff)
  • Avoid undesirable tradeoffs
  • e.g. paper vs. cotton

3

Proposed Objectives for Deciding What is Sustainable

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Current State

Product Level

Regulatory Requirement

Product Level

Business Requirement

Facility Level

Options

Internal Operations / Manufacturing External Building / Destination

EU Detergent Regulation Food Grade Packaging

NSF/ANSI 60 Drinking Water Standard

Labels, Standards & Certifications in Purchasing

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Benefits

 Sustainability is Complex

  • Shifts responsibility for evaluating complex human health and

environmental requirements to external organization

  • Creates documentation for external validation – e.g. LEED,

Bids

 Communication of Sustainability Requirements

  • Often not Defined by Procurement

 Eco-Certifications are easily specified in bids

  • Check the box

Only Tool Available, Accessible & Easy

5

Labels, Standards & Certifications in Purchasing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Limitations

 Only part of the impacts are considered

  • Operational safety
  • Water use
  • Energy use
  • Waste/Assets/Air Impacts

 Limited product categories.

  • Yet, broad range of products required to run a facility

 Unclear Connection between the standard and impacts

  • GHG, water, waste …..????
  • Can the impacts be measured and compared?
  • Are there tradeoffs? (Paper bags ----- Cotton bags….)

6

Ecolab Total Impact View

Labels, Standards & Certifications in Purchasing

Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End of Life

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Next Step - Evolution

 Suppliers  Feedstock's &

byproducts

 Corporate

footprint

7

Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End

  • f

Life

 User health &

safety

 User Resources  System

Performance

 Environmental

Impacts Is there a way to broaden our perspective?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Standards

 Suppliers  Feedstock's &

byproducts

 Corporate

footprint

8

Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End

  • f

Life

 User health &

safety

 User Resources  System

Performance

 Environmental

Impacts Gaps in Life Cycle Impact View

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Use Phase is Important!

9

Examples

Facility Water Waste Energy Asset Air Yuengling Brewery (CIP) 950,000 Gal/yr Baymont Inn & Suites, Bryon Center MI (Laundry) 242,000 Gal/yr 74% less plastic 610 therms/yr (3.1 metric tones CO2 Protein Plant (water process treatment) Improved Water Quality $155,938 in surcharges Redu ced Odor

Use Phase

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Life Cycle Analysis

 Suppliers  Feedstock's &

byproducts

 Corporate

footprint

11

Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End

  • f

Life

 User health &

safety

 User Resources  System

Performance

 Environmental

Impacts Not Clear, Accessible or Easy

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Gaps

Standards

12

Life Cycle Impacts Comparison LCA (cradle to gate) Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)?

Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End of Life Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End of Life Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End of Life

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Vision

13

Develop an Effective yet Simple Lifecycle Impacts EPD

Procurement Level Roll up GHG Water Waste

Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End of Life

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary

 Problem

  • data – data driven, sustainable, procurement decisions

 Today, standards and LCA’s have a limited view  Future vision – consider impacts across product life cycle

  • Define and prioritize impacts
  • Measurable and comparable
  • Roll up to facility level

14

Impact Perspective Environmental Product Declaration (EPD)?

Sourcing, Mfr. Distribution Use Phase End of Life

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Bringing unlimited resourcefulness to the challenge of limited resources. For more information, visit www.Ecolab.com/csr

15