An IFU survey of redshift one galaxies Chris Lidman H Gas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an ifu survey of redshift one galaxies
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An IFU survey of redshift one galaxies Chris Lidman H Gas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An IFU survey of redshift one galaxies Chris Lidman H Gas Velocity Dispersion 72 50 0.3 50 Gas Velocity 32 50 64 0.0 24 40 40 0.3 40 56 16 0.6 8 30 30 30 48 0.9 0 40 20 20 1.2 20 8 1.5 32


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting Courtesy of D. Campbell-Wilson

An IFU survey of redshift one galaxies

Chris Lidman

With help from Julia Bryant and Scott Croom

0 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 50

−2.1 −1.8 −1.5 −1.2 −0.9 −0.6 −0.3 0.0 0.3 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50 10 20 30 40 50

Gas Velocity

−32 −24 −16 −8 8 16 24 32 0 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 50

Gas Velocity Dispersion

16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

Fibre Integral Field Units

SAMI MaNGA

32” 15”

Single fibre

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

The SAMI survey - http://sami-survey.org/

› 3,400 galaxies › Median redshift z~0.05 › Started in March 2013, ends 2018

The MaNGA survey - http://www.sdss.org/surveys/manga/

› 10,000 galaxies › Median redshift z~0.03 › Started in March 2014, ends 2020

Local galaxy IFU surveys

The HECTOR survey

› 10,000+ galaxies › Starting in 2019 › Larger IFUs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

The SAMI survey

Mass SFR

0 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 50

−1.2 −0.9 −0.6 −0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50 10 20 30 40 50

Gas Velocity

−60 −45 −30 −15 15 30 45 60 0 10 20 30 40 10 20 30 40 50

Gas Velocity Dispersion

80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240

  • 1.2 -0.8 -0.4 0.0 0.4

Log([NII]/Hα)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

Science results from SAMI and MaNGA

146 papers with SAMI or MaNGA in the title Enormous diversity in the science

  • Environmental quenching occurs outside-in (Schaefer++2017)
  • Mass quenching occurs inside-out (Ellison++2018)
  • Star formation is not enough to explain gas turbulence in disk galaxies (Zhou++2017)
  • The “Kinematic” morphology - density relation (Green et al. 2018, Brough++2017)
  • The ubiquity of low-ionisation emission line regions (Belfiore++2016)
  • The ubiquity of galactic scale outflows - 40% of edge on galaxies (Ho++2016)
  • Tight local mass density - metallicity relationship (Barrera-Ballesteros++2016)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

The Universe at z=1

  • It is 7.8 billion years younger (middle age)
  • It is 8 times denser
  • The SFR density is 10 times higher, i.e. more SNe
  • The AGN number density is ~100 times higher
  • Galaxy clusters are a factor of 3 less massive
  • Higher gas fractions

How do the processes that shape galaxies at z=1 differ in importance from the ones we see today?

For example, one might expect galaxy scale winds to be far more common

SAMI ULTIMATE M-IFS

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

ULTIMATE Multi-object IFU Galaxy Survey

A SAMI-like at three (four) redshift intervals: z~0.6, 0.9, and1.4 (2.2)

  • 3000 galaxies
  • Targets from the COSMOS and SXDF-UDS fields (HSC ultra-deep survey

and forerunner ULTIMATE imaging surveys) › What are the physical processes responsible for galaxy transformations?

  • Morphological and kinematic transformations; internal vs. external; secular vs. fast;

ram pressure stripping; harassment, strangulation; galaxy–group/cluster tides; galaxy-galaxy mergers; galaxy-galaxy interactions…

› How does mass and angular momentum build up?

  • The galaxy velocity function; stellar mass in dynamically hot and cold systems;

galaxy merger rates…

› Feeding and feedback: how does gas get into galaxies, and how does it leave?

  • Winds and outflows; feedback vs. mass; triggering and suppression of SF; gas

inflow; metallicity gradients; the role of AGN…

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

ULTIMATE IFUs

1 7 19 37 61 d=0.15” pitch or flat-to-flat 1.35” d t Area=1.5dt Area= 61 1.5 d2 / 3 = 1.18 sq. arc seconds

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

SAMI, MaNGA and ULTIMATE IFU

Characteristic SAMI @ z~0.05 MaNGA @ z~0.03 ULTIMATE @ z~1 Number of IFUs 13 17 13 FoV of positioner 3.6 Mpc (60’) diameter 3.2 Mpc (90’) diameter 7.2 Mpc (15’) diameter FoV of IFU 15 kpc (15”) 7.2-19.3 kpc (12”-32”) 11.0 kpc (1.35”) Number of fibres per IFU 61 19-127 61 Fibre pitch 1.6 kpc (1.6”) 1.2 kpc (2”) 1.2 kpc (0.15”) Minimum sep. 30kpc (30”) 160 kpc (20”) Spectral resolution 1,700-4500 2,000 3,000-5,000 Telescope 3.9m 2.5m 8.2m

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

SINFONI, KMOS and ULTIMATE IFU

Characteristic SINFONI @ z~1 KMOS @ z~1 ULTIMATE @ z~1 Number of IFUs 1 24 13 FoV of positioner

  • 3.5 Mpc (7.2’)

diameter 7.2 Mpc (15’) diameter FoV of IFU 24.4 kpc (3”) 22.7 kpc (2.8”) 11.0 kpc (1.35”) Number of fibres per IFU 1024* 196* 61 Fibre pitch 0.8 kpc (0.1”) 1.6 kpc (0.2”) 1.2 kpc (0.15”) Minimum sep.

  • 49 kpc (6”)

160 kpc (20”) Spectral resolution 2000-4000 2,000-4,200 3,000-5,000 Telescope 8.2m 8.2m 8.2m Wavelength 1.1-2.4 mic 0.8-2.5 mic 0.8-1.8 mic

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

What are we learning from surveys done with SINFONI and KMOS

IFU FoV and spatial resolution: Ideally, a 2” FoV with 0.1” resolution Spectral resolution: Ideally R=4500 / (1+z) Observations (especially at high-z) are photon starved, integrations are long, and most papers focus on the properties of the gas. Sample size: At high z, samples are ~500 (Cf. At low z, samples are ~10,000) Sample sizes at high redshift are trimmed by factors of 2-4 after selection cuts are made. Specially resolved studies of the stellar continuum at z~1 will require TMT, MNT or ELT.

  • SINS, SHiZELS, MASSIV, AMAZE/LSD (one object at a time and prior to KMOS)
  • KMOS surveys (24 objects at a time, long integrations)

Wisnioski++

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

The original concept

1 7 19 37 61 d=0.15” pitch or flat-to-flat 1.35” d t Area=1.5dt Area= 61 1.5 d2 / 3 = 1.18 sq. arc seconds

Not optimal for galaxies or points sources

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

A revised concept

d=0.15” pitch or flat-to-flat 2.1” d t Area=1.5dt Area= 169 1.5 d2 / 3 = 3.3 sq. arc seconds 0.45”

Points sources (stars, high-z galaxies)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

Technical challenges

d

The increase in the number of fibres from 61 to 169 means three times fewer IFUs with the same detector. To recover the multiplex one needs larger detector and multiple spectrographs => $$$ Two sets of IFUs means that a slit exchanger is required => $$$

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

What will the landscape look like in 10 years?

Characteristic ULTIMATE @ z~1 GMTIFS @ z~1 (see also HARMONI) Number of IFUs 4-5 (2k detectors) 1 FoV of positioner 7.2 Mpc (15’) diameter NA FoV of IFU 17.0 kpc (2.1”) 36x18 kpc (4.4”x2.3”) Number of fibres per IFU 169 1980 Fibre pitch 1.2 kpc (0.15”) 0.05-0.4 kpc (6-50 mas) Minimum sep. 160 kpc (20”) NA Spectral resolution 3,000-5,000 5,000-10,000 Telescope 8.2m 25m Wavelength 0.8-1.8 mic 0.9-2.5 mic Also GIRMOS on Gemini and IRIS/NFIRAOS on TMT

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

Issues that need more work

I. What is the optional fibre spacing on the detector? (assumed 5 pixels)

  • II. Can we install a slit exchanger?
  • III. Using fibres that transmit in the K band
  • VI. Is an ADC needed for the small IFU?
  • VII. Further development of the science cases
  • IV. Detailed feasibility calculations
slide-17
SLIDE 17

ULTIMATE-Subaru Collaboration Meeting

OzDES

Thank You