An Examination of the Vulnerability of Groundwater to Climate Change - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an examination of the vulnerability of groundwater to
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An Examination of the Vulnerability of Groundwater to Climate Change - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Examination of the Vulnerability of Groundwater to Climate Change in Olympic Valley Jean E. Moran (California State University East Bay) Michael J. Singleton, Darren Hillegonds, Ate Visser, Brad Esser (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An Examination of the Vulnerability of Groundwater to Climate Change in Olympic Valley

Jean E. Moran (California State University East Bay) Michael J. Singleton, Darren Hillegonds, Ate Visser, Brad Esser (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presentation Outline

  • Predicted effects of climate change on runoff

and groundwater

  • Effects particular to alpine/subalpine (snowmelt

dominated) groundwater basins

  • Dissolved gas and isotopic tools applied
  • Results from Olympic Valley groundwater basin
  • Implications for recharge under warmer climate

conditions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

High Certainty for Earlier Peak Streamflow

From: Dettinger et al., 2004

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Challenges in predicting effects of climate change on groundwater

  • Recharge is strongly influenced by changes in

precipitation amount, which is not as well- predicted as temperatures

– Small changes in precipitation may result in large changes in recharge in semi-arid, arid climates

  • Downscaling is major issue for predicting GW

response

  • Wide range in subsurface residence times of

complicates response of surface water- groundwater interaction

  • Non-climatic drivers exert large influence on

recharge and groundwater levels

slide-5
SLIDE 5

[after Domenico & Schwartz, 1990]

?

Connections between snowmelt and groundwater recharge are poorly understood

Noble Gases Recharge Temperature Excess Air

When and where does recharge take place? What is the residence time of groundwater?

Groundwater Age

3H-3He, 4Herad

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Climate change effects that are particular to alpine/sub-alpine GW basins

  • Occur at elevations where change in form of

precipitation will be important

  • Rain on snow events generate flooding events
  • Down-scaling of GCMs important to capture

basin physiography

  • Disparate recharge mechanisms possible

(mountain block/fractured rock, influent streams, diffuse snowmelt)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tritium decays to 3He

p n n p n p

Tritium (3H) is an unstable nucleus and ejects an energetic electron to become an atom of helium-3 (3He )

3H 3He

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The 3He from 3H decay starts to accumulate once the water has become groundwater

Age (years) = 18 x ln( 1 + 3He / 3H )

0 years 12 years 24 years

slide-9
SLIDE 9

0.0E+00 5.0E-05 1.0E-04 1.5E-04 2.0E-04 10 20 30

Temperature (C) Solubility

(mole/mole, 1 atm)

Xenon Krypton Helium Neon Argon

A reasonable range in pressure (altitude) is assumed and temperatures are calculated from equilibrium solubility component

Analytical uncertainty is approximately +/- 1°C

Temperature of recharge is determined from noble gas concentrations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Excess air concentrations reflect air entrainment and hydrostatic pressure during recharge

Artificial recharge and recharge through fractures adds a lot of excess air to groundwater due to large fluctuations in the water table Little or no vadose zone interaction results in very low excess air

Recharge via fractures in hard rock terrain would trap a lot of excess air

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The Olympic Valley Basin

Olympic Valley

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Wells Sampled

Olympic Valley

  • 6 production wells
  • 22 monitoring wells
slide-13
SLIDE 13

3 Stream Flow Gauges 2 Horizontal Wells

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Groundwater Ages - Cross Section

  • 1. Shallow alluvial

aquifer

  • Recent recharge

4He-rad

2: Mixed bedrock and alluvial flow

  • Pre-modern

component

  • Radiogenic 4He
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Comparing excess air concentrations

1Manning and Caine, 2007; 2Cey et al., 2008

Singleton and Moran, WRR 2009

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • RTs consistent

with or slightly higher than MAATs

  • Mean RT (7.8C)

matches monthly mean air temperature for May (7.7C)

  • Under current

conditions, most recharge likely

  • ccurs during

May-June

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Data from an

instrumented soil zone at Gin Flat, Yosemite

  • Rapid increase in

soil temps and SWC once snowpack melts

  • Nightly freeze

allows soil to drain into weathered granite

Flint et al., 2008 Vadose Zone J.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Findings: Recharge location and residence time

  • Recharge occurs on lower slopes of catchment

– Recharge temperatures close to mean annual air temperature and higher than expected for direct infiltration of snowmelt – Low excess air – minimal recharge through fractured rock – d13C of DIC indicates exchange with soil gas CO2

  • Groundwater (even deep groundwater) in

upstream portion of the basin is young

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Effects of Climate Change

Climate Change Scenarios

  • More precip as rain, extended

period of runoff

  • Earlier runoff
  • More rain on snow events
  • More nights above freezing

temp.

  • Less total precip

Effect on Recharge and Discharge

  • More recharge, if precip rate is

lower than current snowpack melt rate

  • Early decreased baseflow (fast

drainage)

  • Increased overland flow, less

recharge to alluvium

  • More saturation-induced overland

flow, less recharge

  • Less recharge, near immediate

effect on GW availability and streamflow

Effects will be immediate and drastic at Olympic Valley

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Acknowledgements

  • Squaw Valley Public Services District

– Derrik Williams

(Hydrometrics LLC)

  • Friends of Squaw Creek
  • The Resort at Squaw Creek
  • Squaw Valley Mutual Water Company
  • Matt Reeves , Desert Research Institute
  • Tony Ferenzi, Placer County Water Agency
  • Students:

– C. Cox, C. Tulley, C. Barton, G. Rhett, D. Meyer, H. Bigman , Elizabeth Derubeis

  • LLNL Labs:

– Noble Gas Lab (D. Hillegonds, M. Sharp) – EMRL (R. Bibby, E. Guthrie) – Stable Isotope Lab (S. Roberts)

  • Funding: LLNL Climate Initiative and SWRCB

GAMA program

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Comparing three high elevation basins

Drainage Area Max depth to bedrock Valley floor elevation Max elevation in drainage Max discharge during study Average annual discharge Average Annual Precip GW Basin Area Olympic Valley 22 km2 55m 1898m – 1853m 2750m 5.2 m3/s 2x107 m3/yr 1016- 1650 mm 2.6 km2 Yosemite Valley 465 km2 600m (mean 300m) 1224m – 1100m (540m) 3997m 235 m3/s 64 x107 m3/yr 1277 mm 31 km2 Martis Valley 433 km2 320 m 1737m- 1798m 2624m 28 m3/s 50x107 m3/yr 584-1910 mm 142 km2

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Squaw Creek

Gauging Stations

  • Fed by two major

tributaries

  • Very low flow in the fall
  • Gaining along the

valley reach

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Carbon isotopes are consistent with the incorporation of soil CO2 during recharge

slide-25
SLIDE 25

What is excess air ?

Air bubbles can be trapped during recharge and subsequently dissolve because of the increased pressure

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Components of dissolved noble gases

  • Equilibrium solubility

(dependent upon p, T)

  • Excess Air
  • Mantle Helium
  • Terrigenic Helium
  • Tritiogenic helium (for

3H-3He age)

50% 150% 250% 3He 4He Ne Ar Kr Xe

Percent equilibrium saturation Tritiogenic 3He Terrigenic He Excess Air

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Martis Valley sample locations

  • 17 wells and 4

surface water locations sampled in Dec/Jan

  • Most field work

will take place this summer

Martis Valley

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Fraction pre-modern

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Older groundwater is captured by wells during late summer

  • 5

5 10 15 20 25 30

Apparent Age (yrs) Sampling Date

SVPSD Well 1 SVPSD Well 2 SVPSD Well 3 SVPSD Well 5 MWC Well 1 MWC Well 2