An acknowledgement We would like to show our respects and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an acknowledgement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An acknowledgement We would like to show our respects and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An acknowledgement We would like to show our respects and Acknowledge the Bedegal people who are the Traditional Custodians of the Land, of Elders past and present on which this Alumni Network takes place. The FULT Alumni Network aims to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An acknowledgement

We would like to show our respects and Acknowledge the Bedegal people who are the Traditional Custodians

  • f the Land, of Elders past and present on which this

Alumni Network takes place.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The FULT Alumni Network aims to provide alumni with an opportunity to:

  • Participate in an active network,
  • Explore the latest issues is higher education learning and teaching;
  • Hear dynamic speakers on educational excellence;
  • Be updated on innovations and future directions;
  • Support alumni leadership potential as champions of learning and

teaching.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Today’s Alumni Network features

1. A welcome by the PVCE 2. Keynote presentation by a FULT Alumna 3. Presentations by the 2018 recipients of the FULT Alumni Scholarship 4. Lunch 5. Focus group discussion around the impact of the FULT Program

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Welcome to the FULT Alumni Network

Professor Alex Steel Acting PVC(Education)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Keynote

Applying learnings from FULT to the classroom

Dr Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes

BE, MEng, PhD, MIEEE, FHEA Lecturer, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications Laboratory and Casual Staff Coordinator

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Dr Inmaculada Tomeo-Reyes School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications

Applying FULT learnings into my teaching practice

FULT Alumni Network meeting

slide-7
SLIDE 7

How did FULT help me?

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Background

ELEC1111 is an introduction to electrical engineering for both electrical and telecommunications engineering students and other engineering disciplines. It is a first year course

  • Pre-requisite for many courses both in electrical and other engineering schools
  • More than 1000 students annually (~450 students in T1 and ~650 students in T3)

Before FULT…

  • Delivery

– Lectures: 3 hrs/week (450-650 students per room) – Tutorials: 1 hr/week face-to-face (120 students per room) + weekly online tutorials – Labs: 2 hrs/week (60 students per room)

  • Assessment

– Mid-term exam (individual) – Laboratory Assessment (pairs) and exam (individual) – Online quizzes (individual) – Final exam (individual)

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Student learning - 3P model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

About Me

Background

  • Lecturer (Education focused), UNSW, Australia (2018 – ).
  • Associate Lecturer, QUT, Australia (2015 – 2018).
  • PhD in Electrical Engineering, QUT, Australia (2015).
  • R&D engineer, UC3M, Spain (2008 – 2011).
  • Bachelor (2006) and Master (2008) of

Telecommunications Engineering, and Master in Multimedia and Communications (2010), UC3M, Spain.

Main Research Interests

  • Signal and Image Processing.
  • Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning.
  • Engineering Education.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

About You

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Teaching for learning – Good teaching

  • Share their love of the subject.
  • Encourage communication between learners and teachers and learn

from each other.

  • Encourage interaction and collaboration among learners.
  • Provide opportunities for active learning.
  • Allow for student independence.
  • Provide timely and appropriate feedback.
  • Emphasise time on task.
  • Motivate learning by communicating expectations and setting clear

goals.

  • Respect and accommodate student diversity, talents, and ways of

learning.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Engagement with academic staff

“Students who find academic staff available and helpful are more engaged with their studies than those who do not. […] About 30 per cent of students do not seek advice from academic staff. Importantly, this group of students was most likely to report low achievement levels in the first semester of their studies. This could have implications for student retention.”

(The First Year Experience in Australian Universities: Findings from Two Decades, 1994 – 2014; Baik, Naylor & Arkoudis)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Approachability

  • Encourage face-to-face consultation
  • Set up a course discussion board (e.g. Moodle forum)

Suggest students to use it for questions about course requirements or assignments, rather than sending emails.

Encourage students to answer questions, but check regularly.

  • Be consistent when answering questions in forums/emails

Set expectations for response time.

Dedicate specific hours to responding to forums/email.

If possible, use appropriate tools to reduce time spent on emails and/or prevent emails coming back and forth.

  • Create effective message content

Encourage communication.

Acknowledge the student’s issues.

Respond in a professional tone.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Approachability

Make students feel that you care about them as learners and also as persons.

  • Frequently encourage your students to contact you if they

have any doubt or problem

Include “Course convenors” and “Course contacts” blocks in the Moodle page

Make it easy for them to contact you by providing different options

  • Monitor student progress and follow up

Address student’s issues with compassion and empathy

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Challenge/Opportunity

However, in ELEC1111 tutorials:

  • Focus was on the content, not the doing
  • Learning occurred in isolation
  • There was a lack of authentic problems
  • Tutor was a formal authority, and while

most of the students learned the content, several had important gaps in their knowledge

According to the literature, learning is a process that:

  • Is active
  • Occurs in a complex social environment
  • Is situated in an authentic context
  • Requires learners’ motivation and

cognitive engagement

slide-20
SLIDE 20

ELEC1111 tutorials were redesigned in such a way that: (a) Students had opportunities to direct the learning process and engage with it (b) Students had opportunities to collaboratively solve real wold problems which simulate what is asked of and done by professionals. (c) Tutors became facilitators rather than formal authorities

Solution

Tutorials in T1’2019:

  • Face-to-face collaborative tutorials (2 hrs/week)

These new tutorials offer students authentic learning experiences by using real world problems which have to be solved in groups. Students in each group should work together, supported by tutors, to come up with and verify solutions.

  • Online tutorials (released weekly, to complete at

students’ own pace)

  • Tutorial problems for practice (released weekly,

to complete at students’ own pace)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Student-centred and collaborative component

  • Creating appropriate environments where students can learn from their peers

allows them to take an active role in their learning and has a positive impact.

  • Active and collaborative learning approaches are necessary to develop essential

skills of engineers, who normally work in teams to tackle real world challenges.

Before:

  • 120 students in a lecture-like room
  • Tutor solves the problems (no

interaction between students)

After:

  • 60 students in a collaborative

learning space

  • Students solve the problem in

groups with the support of the tutor

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Authentic context

  • Authentic activities contribute to students' work-readiness capabilities and

employability, so the new tutorials are based on real wold problems and simulate what is asked of and done by professionals.

Before: After:

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Open-ended problems also play an important role in offering students authentic

learning experiences. Some (simplified) design problems were used in the new tutorials. Before After

Authentic context

Bloom’s Taxonomy

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tutors as facilitators and peer mentors

  • The secret of great facilitation is to help creating a group process that flows

and an environment in which it can flourish, so that groups reach a successful solution.

  • Peer mentors can be really useful in this scenario

– Peer mentoring does not usually involve significant differences in age, experience or rank, which facilitates increased levels of mutual expertise, equality and empathy.

Before:

  • 1 tutor for 120 students
  • Tutor solves the problems
  • Tutor is formal authority

After:

  • 1 tutor and 1 mentor for 60 students
  • Students solve the problem in groups

with the support of the tutor

  • Tutor and mentor are facilitators
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • After around 3 weeks, students got used to the learning style and their teams

and started enjoying the method over traditional tutorials. This resulted in an increased in-class engagement. – From ~25% attendance in Sem2’18 to ~50% in T1’2019

  • Students performed better in contextualised questions in exams:

– Increase of the average mark of contextualised questions on the same topic with similar difficulty:

Capacitors (mid-term): from 6.7/15 in Sem2’2018 to 9.1/15 in T1’2019

OpAmps (final): from 11.1/15 in Sem2’2018 to 13.4/15 in T1’2019

▪ Phasors (final): from 10.7/15 in Sem2’2018 to 11.3/15 in T1’2019

Results

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Feedback from myExperience indicates that students found problems interesting

and helpful in reinforcing the understanding of the course. They also appreciate the collaborative component.

Results

“ The new style of face–to–face tutorials were well done, especially with the focus on practical, scenario based questions which would otherwise not be covered in the lectures or textbook” “The Tutorials I found were rather helpful, and interesting as they were more grounded in reality, and required more problem solving skills” “I love the interactive tutorials. Being in a group and talking with each other face to face was a great way to relive my nerves, especially as a first year. I find it very enjoyable to come to the tutorials. The content in the tutorials was very useful, I like the practical questions” “The tutorials were hands down the best addition to the course. They solidified

  • ur understanding of the topics in a

whole new way, that would help us actually apply these topics in our engg1000 and other pursuits”

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Feedback from myExperience also indicates that (as always) there is room for

improvement.

Results

“The face–to–face tutorials were a little inconsistent in length and difficulty. This never caused me any concern, but it may be worth rectifying. Additionally, I found that, if I required help during these tutorials, it was sometimes necessary to wait for rather a long time owing to the number of students in the room. If possible, smaller tutorial sizes would be

  • f great benefit.”

“And maybe include more engaging group activities in the tutorials instead of just 'discussing' with members” “I would like tutorial worked solutions to be posted since the tuts are large classes and my tut was at Friday 9am and I'm definitely not a morning person so sometimes I go through the tut confused and don't ask questions because I'm not in a mental state to process information” “These tutorial questions could be improved by beginning with purely theoretical exercises […] and then move on to scenario based questions. This would have allowed for me to get the basic technique down before moving to more difficult questions”

slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Feedback

Apart from the feedback provided in laboratories and tutorials, what could work well in a class with 600+ students?

  • Generic feedback

Summary of class strengths and weaknesses after grading

Use of polling tools (e.g. Zeetings, Mentimeter, Lecture Recordings+, …) in lectures

Posts to class discussion forum

  • Automated feedback

Automated feedback through

  • nline quiz tools
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Feedback

What about individual feedback such as comments on assignments?

  • Exam digitisation

Add marks

Embed comments throughout the assignment by writing directly into comment boxes

Reuse commonly used comments from a comments library

Provide general comments and audio comments

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Reflection- Brookfield’s four lenses

Lens 1: The autobiographical lens

‒ Record teaching and learning experiences ‒ Create a teaching portfolio to record your teaching philosophy, goals, aids, recordings, reflections, feedback, and evaluations

Lens 2: The lens of our students' eyes

‒ Undertake a group discussion during a tutorial session about the teaching/course ‒ Provide students with an evaluation questionnaire

Lens 3: The lens of our colleagues' experiences

‒ Have a critical conversation with an experienced lecturer who works in the same faculty to help you check, reframe, and broaden your teaching practice ‒ Undertake peer observation

Lens 4: The theoretical lens (based on educational literature)

‒ Engage with articles from the literature of teaching and learning. ‒ Document your engagement with and reflection on the literature of higher education.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Evaluation - Brookfield’s four lenses

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Thank you!

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2018 FULT scholarship winners

Dr Lisa Anne Williams Faculty of Science Awe in Science Learning Dr Christine Mathies UNSW Business School The Power of Student Feedback Commendation Award Dr Jessica Macer-Wright Rural Clinical School Keeping the Rural in Rural Medicine

https://www.business.unsw.edu.au/our-people/christinemathies https://research.unsw.edu.au/people/dr-lisa-anne-williams

slide-36
SLIDE 36

FULT Alumni Network

Next network meeting Term 1 2020

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Lunch and networking

This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-ND

slide-38
SLIDE 38

The Impact of FULT?

Dr Anna Rowe Kristin Turnball Sonal Bhalla